Part 2: The letter as mentioned above.
“As you may know care homes have been by far the hardest hit group for deaths during the pandemic. The reason the Government believes mandatory vaccinations to be morally correct is because mandatory vaccinations will save many more lives than doing nothing. The evidence shows that the vaccination programme has directly averted over 52,600 hospitalisations and analysis on the direct and indirect impact of the programme on infections and mortality suggests between 11 and 12.5 million infections and between 35,200 and 38,600 deaths. Studies have indicated that a single dose of either the Pfizer or AstraZeneca vaccine is between 55 and 70 per cent effective at stopping symptomatic disease, 75 - 85 per cent effective against hospitalisation and 75 - 80 per cent effective against death. Of course, people who are vaccinated may still catch COVID-19, as no vaccination offers 100 per cent protection, but the risks associated are significantly reduced. We know that vaccines work and are saving lives. The vaccine also helps to decrease viral load, which means if someone who is vaccinated passes on Coronavirus to another person the newly infected person will be less ill than they otherwise would have been. More information on vaccine effectiveness can be found here:
https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/998411/Vaccine_surveillance_report_-_week_26.pdf&source=gmail&ust=1627155595634000&usg=AFQjCNGMHvNxo0tKd_xdpGbkoxxPF9kgN g" data-originalfontsize="10pt" data-originalcomputedfontsize="13.333333015441895"> https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/998411/Vaccine_surveillance_report_-_week_26.pdf
Part 3
The point you bring up about taking into account natural immunity post Covid infection is certainly interesting, however this method was thought to be less effective in Public Health England's consultation. Natural immunity raises a few operational problems. Antibody tests will just tell us if they are currently naturally immune, but wouldn't give an indication as to when this natural immunity would run out. Besides this booster jabs would also be staggered between all care home workers rather than all care home workers receiving booster vaccinations within a smaller time frame, which ensures full confidence that workers would have antibodies.
Further information to any other questions you may have can be found in the link below:
https://www.gov.uk/government/consultations/making-vaccination-a-condition-of-deployment-in-older-adult-care-homes&source=gmail&ust=1627155595634000&usg=AFQjCNHpZr36jS3W799Mz3qTyo815E13L w" data-originalfontsize="10pt" data-originalcomputedfontsize="13.333333015441895"> https://www.gov.uk/government/consultations/making-vaccination-a-condition-of-deployment-in-older-adult-care-homes
@debra Just a few snippets that you may like to cut and paste into your reply.
Part 1
“As you may know care homes have been by far the hardest hit group for deaths during the pandemic..."
May I remind you that, had due diligence been used in protecting the vulnerable in care homes by not discharging infectious patients from hospital back into them, many of these deaths could have been averted.
Rather, this government has focussed on restricting and testing healthy individuals who are at very little risk from covid-19.
Whatever pandemic you refer to was back in March/April. Around 28,000 late deaths from 2019 due to elderly people living longer contributed to the peak around this time.
By June 2020, the weekly deaths were back to normal levels and remained so until mid-October. There was simply no ‘pandemic’.
"The reason the Government believes mandatory vaccinations to be morally correct is because mandatory vaccinations will save many more lives than doing nothing"
There are 1,490 deaths associated with these experimental vaccines in the UK alone. There are tens of thousands in the rest of the world. There are over a million adverse reactions, some extremely serious, in the UK alone. Overall, they cause around 100 times more deaths than any previous ‘proper’ vaccine. And that is before long-term effects begin to show.
When the infection fatality rate for the vast majority of people is in hundredths of a percent, it cannot be morally correct to force a risky clinical trial on the population as a whole.
If these so-called ‘vaccines’ are effective, then there is no reason to vaccinate one person to protect another. And if they are ineffective, there is no reason to use them anyway.
Part 2 next ...
@debra Part 2
"The evidence shows that the vaccination programme has directly averted over ... blah blah"
There is no evidence derived from predictions. And SAGE and Ferguson have been woefully off-target with their predictions so far. It is scientifically and morally bankrupt to use their analyses to impose any medical or non-medical interventions on the public. Any studies produced by pharmaceutical companies and those they sponsor cannot be relied upon.
We do not know that ‘vaccines’ are saving lives. On the contrary, the roll-out of these in care homes at the beginning of the year correlates precisely with the surge in deaths in those places. It was only after the most vulnerable of those poor folk had passed away that weekly deaths reduced. And these reductions were credited to the ‘vaccines’ that had just ripped through them!
"More information on vaccine effectiveness can be found here:"
The ‘effectiveness’ that you refer to is not borne out in the real world with these experimental ‘vaccines’. If you are interested in real world effectiveness in treatment of covid, you need look no further than ivermectin. This has been proven to be 85% effective as a prophylactic and is safe, cheap and readily available. It can stop covid entirely if caught at an early stage, saving well over half of those seriously ill.
Ivermectin is being supported by the Bird Group in Bath by, among others, Dr Tess Lawrie. There is peer-reviewed proof of its effectiveness. Because such a treatment is available, there is no medical – indeed no legal – basis for the use of experimental interventions. To deliberately ignore this evidence and coerce the public into taking unsafe ‘vaccines’ is not just wrong, it is a heinous crime.
I suggest that you stop promoting the bogus science that you have been bamboozled with and reassess the fake moral diatribe that accompanies it. If you do not detach yourself from both of these, you will be held responsible for their results.
That's it Debra! Even if you don't use any of it, I found it therapeutic to write it!
On a side note (but kind of related), Steve Baker MP recently reiterated the point that the general public should be vocal about their opposition to vaccine passports and should therefore write to their local MP and members of the cabinet, including the PM.
With that in mind, has anyone already done this and can share a template that myself and anyone else can use to contact their MP with, or are there any websites where these templates would exist?
For what it's worth
MPs voting record
@ukresponse Thank you so much for taking the effort to help me. Sorry I've been slow to respond - i've had to distance myself from the madness for a few days.
@lip09am I heard him say this in an interview - which has galvanised me to continue with my effort to compose this letter - I appreciate all the points the contributors have supplied and it will be a therapeutic endeavour.
Well, for what it is worth, this is my letter - submitted via the contact your MP Portal. [- thanks for the link]. Thank you everyone for all the notes and advice.
I have attached the letter as a document to avoid the multiple post syndrome I fell into earlier. There must be a vaccination for that? 
@debra That seems like a well-balanced reply to me. I hope it fits within the attention span of your MP - if indeed it is passed on to him/her!
By the way, 'vaccine' deaths are 1,536 as of last Friday. They have been rising at a constant rate of about 1 in 30,000 and thus largely independent of age. Last year, the risk of death due to covid-19 in healthy under 15s was about 1 in 5,000,000. We see the real risk of death greatly increased for them by this jab.
@mikeaustin Thanks for all your input- it gave me a fantastic set of bones to flesh out! The death rate is appalling and one of the, many, reasons I had a meltdown. As a family we have seen adverse reactions and I am terrified that we will lose loved ones to the booster/flu combo rollout planned to start next month.
I am extremely grateful to anyone who is fighting this whole sordid affair.
Best Wishes.
x
