• Login
  • Register
The Daily Sceptic
No Result
View All Result
  • Articles
  • About
  • Archive
    • ARCHIVE
    • NEWS ROUND-UPS
  • Podcasts
  • Newsletter
  • Premium
  • Donate
  • Log In
The Daily Sceptic
No Result
View All Result

The Face Mask Cult

by Hector Drummond
13 April 2022 2:00 PM

There follows a guest post by Hector Drummond, a former academic who worked in risk, who says when he came to research his new book The Face Mask Cult on the effectiveness of masks against COVID-19 the evidence was threadbare.

In 2021 I decided to write an FAQ on all aspects of Covid, lockdowns and non-pharmaceutical interventions (NPIs). I started with face masks, as they seemed to be the easiest issue to deal with, thinking that the whole mask situation could be summed up in five to six pages. After a few days work I had twenty pages of text, and another twenty pages of reminder notes on further aspects of face masks that I needed to consider and research. Those notes ballooned out in the next few weeks, and I realised that the use of face masks to prevent the spread of COVID-19 was a far bigger topic than I had appreciated, and would require substantial amounts of writing, and months of research and literature-reading.

It took until the next year before I decided I’d written enough on the topic. I had read an enormous number of scientific papers and other articles on masks, and gone through some of them with a fine-tooth comb (see Part 3 of the book, for instance). I had spent considerable time analysing, synthesising and rewriting, and my short FAQ article had become a comprehensive 400-page book that tackled all aspects of the issue, as well as a unique resource with its extensive scientific literature review section.

In all my researches I failed to come across very much in the way of convincing evidence that masks work. The papers that were supposed to show that they did all turned out to be poor pieces of science. None were randomly-controlled peer-reviewed trials. Some were observational studies, with inadequate controls for dealing with the possibility of faulty or biased recollection. Some were ‘modelling’ studies, in which a computer program was used to ‘model’ the effect of face masks on disease spread. Modelling studies are generally hopeless at providing any confirming evidence for the effectiveness of face masks as they require the modellers to make assumptions about how effective the masks are when writing their programs. Some were mannequin studies, in which a dummy in a lab with artificial breathing functions, rather than a real person in the real world, was used. Some were simply tests of the porosity of various materials in regard to salt aerosols.

Most studies ignored the issue of face mask gaps, despite it being well-known in the field that gaps around the sides of masks will let such large amounts of virions in and out that any effect that the masks do have will be completely negated. (This is why medical institutions require ‘fit tests’ for masks – not that fit tests are very reliable, as I explain in the book.)

Even these dubious studies that claimed to show an effect for masks didn’t show much of an effect. The less wild ones would typically claim that the cloth masks would stop 5% to 15% of virions, but they never presented any reason to believe the further claim that was often made that this would cause a 5% to 15% reduction in cases, or a 5% to 15% reduction in deaths. The closest such studies got to doing so was when an author would occasionally speculate, in an airy fashion, that if the disease in question’s R0 rate happened to be close to 1.0, then maybe widespread mask use (assuming masks had some small effect) would be enough to push the R0 rate below 1.0, in which case the disease would die out, although of course even if all their assumptions were true and masks did push the disease’s R0 rate below 1.0 it doesn’t follow that the disease would die out anytime soon. It could well be that the disease’s R0 rate would quickly come back over 1.0 again as soon as we stop masking, and so in order to stop the disease spreading again we would have to wear masks for years on end, or even indefinitely.

But what about all those government reports written by distinguished scientists assuring us that there were now truckloads of research proving that masks work? This is perhaps the most shocking part of the whole face mask con. The 2020 DELVE report and its updates, the 2020 Royal Society report, and the 2022 Department for Education’s Evidence Summary were disgraceful pieces of misinformation, as I show in detail in the book. Even more shocking, perhaps, is the fact that there have been so many acts of wrongdoing in the last two years that the scientific butchery committed in these reports is completely unknown to the general public. The fact, for instance, that the Royal Society’s report relied heavily upon a low-grade Chinese study, written in Chinese only, and published in an obscure Chinese journal, which reported fantastically unrealistic results, is never even going to briefly flit through the mind of the average person, because the average person will never come across any reference to this shameful affair in the mainstream media.

I felt vindicated as I put the finishing touches to the book when several prominent advocates of masks, such as Trish Greenhalgh, Jeremy Howard and many others, started to admit that cloth masks were useless. Not that they wanted to us to stop wearing masks – they now wanted us to move onto medical-grade respirator masks, like N95s and FFP2s, as Germany required. Needless to say, these mask fanatics didn’t bother to mention that Germany’s stringent mask policy has been a complete failure.

The book I finished up with is a serious corrective to the endless propaganda we have been fed about masks. It lays out the case against masks in detail, considers the harms done by mask-wearing (harms which are usually ignored by scientists and governments), closely examines many claims made about masks by both sides, and backs it all up with an enormous number of references to the scientific literature. Whenever anyone who wants you to wear a mask says, “Follow the Science”, just show them this book and say, “I already did”.

You can buy the book here in paperback and on Kindle.

Tags: EvidenceFace MasksMask MandatesThe Science

Donate

We depend on your donations to keep this site going. Please give what you can.

Donate Today

Comment on this Article

You’ll need to set up an account to comment if you don’t already have one. We ask for a minimum donation of £5 if you'd like to make a comment or post in our Forums.

Sign Up
Previous Post

Sweden Saw Second Smallest Increase in National Debt Out of All EU Countries

Next Post

Lockdown to Blame for Inflation of 7% – Highest Rate in 30 Years

Subscribe
Login
Notify of
Please log in to comment

To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.

Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.

124 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
NeilParkin
NeilParkin
2 years ago

And right there is why we shouldn’t encourage in-breeding…

242
0
nige.oldfart
nige.oldfart
2 years ago
Reply to  NeilParkin

ITS WHAT YOU GET FROM A LIMITED GENE POOL

112
0
Trev the Geek
Trev the Geek
2 years ago
Reply to  nige.oldfart

I was thinking that her name would be a good one for a product of eugenics (Eugene for a male).

If such a thing were to happen of course.

16
0
DomH75
DomH75
2 years ago
Reply to  NeilParkin

You saved me typing the same thing!! 😀

34
0
huxleypiggles
huxleypiggles
2 years ago

So now we have sub, sub branches of Windsor Inc believing they have the right to lecture us.

She doesn’t like flying – great. Don’t friggin fly as you lot keep hectoring the rest of us.

She doesn’t have plastic in the house. Really? How did she feed her august newborn then? She used terry nappies? Well obviously not her but…

Eugenie just STFU because your bloody tribe have caused enough trouble on this planet already!

218
0
Arum
Arum
2 years ago
Reply to  huxleypiggles

I’m sure she insists that the nanny/nannies only use reusable nappies

24
0
riskit
riskit
2 years ago
Reply to  huxleypiggles

We should be informed about the rest of her lifestyle. Will she retro-fitting lead pipes to get water into the house ?!

40
0
Pembroke
Pembroke
2 years ago
Reply to  riskit

Or have the house re-wired so none of the cables are sheathed in plastic.

I assume she doesn’t use a mobile phone, and wears only natural fibres.

2
0
stewart
stewart
2 years ago

The monarchy is grasping to have some sort of relevance, some sort of purpose.

At this point, I think they should just go quietly.

I’m ready for constitutional reform. A Republic with a short and clear constitution enshrining our inalienable rights as free people and a limited government.

I’m sure the Saudis will take the Windsors in, let them live the rest of their days out in luxury with all the other disgraced ex-leaders they have there.

127
-2
transmissionofflame
transmissionofflame
2 years ago
Reply to  stewart

Well, I would be delighted with some of that, but would suggest rather than a republic we have a new settlement with the monarchy whereby anyone on the payroll is expressly prohibited from getting involved in politics or campaigning of any kind. I’m with Hitchens regarding the potential horrors of trying to find a President you want to represent you.

90
-3
RW
RW
2 years ago
Reply to  transmissionofflame

The problem with the Windsors is that they (by-and-large) serve absolutely no purpose: They’re going to lead secure, luxurious lives at the taxpayer’s expense and are free to do whatever pleases them provided they don’t directly interfere with the running of the country.

45
-1
transmissionofflame
transmissionofflame
2 years ago
Reply to  RW

Well, countries generally have a head of state to represent the country, which in parliamentary democracies is usually either a monarch or an appointed president with very limited powers. Assuming the UK continues as a parliamentary democracy, we’d probably need to find a way to appoint a president – a process that seems awkward to say the least. I don’t know how it’s done in Germany but in Italy it’s usually some ex-politician that proves just about acceptable to most of the legislature – doesn’t seem very appealing. Alternatively I suppose the PM could represent the UK as head of state, but that’s not really been done before that I am aware of. I guess we could try it. The current and future crop of Windsors I would happily ditch tomorrow if we had any kind of workable alternative, though as stated above whoever you get should have limited powers and not be allowed to shoot their mouth off about stuff.

16
0
RW
RW
2 years ago
Reply to  transmissionofflame

I’m trying to be a bit more precise (it’s unclear how good this will work out): They (the Windsor-clan) are basically royalty big brother. They exist to be gawped at and to go through the motions of their ceremonial duties but they have no real power to do anything and hence, they can do whatever they want ever bearing responsibility for the outcome (with certain limits). They’re really just members of the class of the global super-rich without closer ties to any particular country. That’s nicely exemplified by this vulnerable people who are vulnerable to volunerable climate-statement.

There are people in the UK who can’t afford heating their dwellings in winter or people in the UK who die because they couldn’t afford paying their electricity bills. Their lots will get a lot worse due to Nut Zero. But that’s of no concern to Princes Eugenie because it’s of no concern to the members of her peer group and it’s unclear even if she even knows that such people exist. It’s also a safe bet that Charles III feels closer to his plants and to environmental worries than to his supposed subjects.

Last edited 2 years ago by RW
34
0
transmissionofflame
transmissionofflame
2 years ago
Reply to  RW

Indeed it is ceremonial mainly. Just would rather they didn’t push pet causes that harm their citizens while taking our tax money.

22
0
RW
RW
2 years ago
Reply to  transmissionofflame

If you want these people to act responsibly, they need responsibilities. For as long as they’re basically doing jobs a robot could do while getting princely (literally) paid for this, they’ll act irresponsibly wrt what they’re suppsed to care about and will tend to flock towards situations where they’re more than the guy from the palace on whose head the very much honourable, traditional hat for this occasion is to be placed.

The Gormenghast-monarchy is an Unding (German, literally Not-thing, something which may seem conceivable but cannot ever really exist).

4
0
transmissionofflame
transmissionofflame
2 years ago
Reply to  RW

Maybe we should employ actors to do it, and sack them if they get out of line.

10
0
RW
RW
2 years ago
Reply to  transmissionofflame

Well, you are employing actors, except that you pay them regardless of performance and can’t sack them. That’s not a particularly sensible arrangement, at least not in my opinion. Historically, parliament was a counter-weight to the crown and vice versa. The present system lacks on of the counter-weights.

10
0
transmissionofflame
transmissionofflame
2 years ago
Reply to  RW

“That’s not a particularly sensible arrangement”

Yup, hopefully a lot of people are now realising this

5
0
varmint
varmint
2 years ago
Reply to  RW

Except they are not free to walk into a shop and buy a Mars Bar. So they are not really FREE at all are they? They are prisoners.

2
0
RW
RW
2 years ago
Reply to  varmint

Whenever they appear in public, they have to play their designed roles. That’s part of the deal. For the larger part of each day, I’m also not free to walk into a shop and buy a Mars bar because I get paid to do something else.

4
0
huxleypiggles
huxleypiggles
2 years ago
Reply to  stewart

I think that’s a very generous offer Stewart. Too generous for me but if it got rid of them that’s fine.

16
0
NeilParkin
NeilParkin
2 years ago
Reply to  stewart

The grasping for relevance seems to have overtaken all the elite and the super rich. I suppose if you have $100bn in the bank then nothing you can buy has meaning. Bugatti’s, personal jumbo jets, huge private houses. There can’t be any satisfaction to it. Its like the ordinary fellow spending a fiver. Everything is so easy to them, I can understand why they might crave complex challenges. What could be more complex and important than to solve a problem like ‘Saving the World’, made even more intractable by its stubborn non-existence. Now there’s a challenge worth applying yourself to.

43
0
Pembroke
Pembroke
2 years ago
Reply to  NeilParkin

Well maybe we should look really closely at how the monarchy is financed then?

Anything that is currently the property of “the crown” would be transferred to the public ownership and any member of the royal family who wants to perform royal duties should be paid at the same rate as an MP, with the leader (king) getting the same as the PM.

0
0
RW
RW
2 years ago
Reply to  stewart

Considering that pretty much all of this crap comes from the USA, imitating the USA even harder doesn’t seem much like a solution.

20
-1
stewart
stewart
2 years ago
Reply to  RW

What would you propose?

3
0
RW
RW
2 years ago
Reply to  stewart

As I sometimes spend time thinking on this, I like to sketch a counterproposal:

The monarch should be the actual head of the government, not just its figurehead. He is to appoint a prime minister for running the day-to-day tasks he’s free to change for a different one at any time.

Then, there should be a chamber of elected representatives of the various regions of the country whose actual purpose would need to be defined. It could be anything between the law and budget making parliaments we’re familar with and a purely advisory organ which has the right to give advice on any matter it deems sufficiently important and whose advice must be seriously considered (ie, the government must publish a statement which parts of it it’s going to follow or not follow for which reasons).

In order to assure that these representatives actually represent their constituents, region-spanning political parties are to be outlawed.

4
-3
stewart
stewart
2 years ago
Reply to  RW

An absolute monarchy. Gutsy.

1
0
RW
RW
2 years ago
Reply to  stewart

An absolute monarchy is one where the monarch is not bound by law, only informally by customs and traditions. In principle, that’s not a bad form of government (or no worse than any other) but the problem is you might always end up with someone like Friedrich Wilhelm III, ie, an incompetent monarch who can’t really be arsed to care about anything except is private pleasures. Putting this into technical terms, the monarch of an absolute monarchy is a single point of failure. Single points of failure ought to be avoided by suitable system design.

3
0
Dinger64
Dinger64
2 years ago
Reply to  stewart

I believe the last time we had an absolute monarchy we went to war and chopped his head off!

1
0
Smudger
Smudger
2 years ago
Reply to  stewart

How about employing a Chinese style digitalised social credit system out on the Royals? Every time they start engaging in politics their credit score goes down and the Sovereign grant along with their Coutts ctredit cards are frozen?

9
0
Epi
Epi
2 years ago
Reply to  stewart

Do you know what I used to be a Royalist not a real deep believer but enough to go along with it. But now over the last two years I’m beginning to think perhaps it’s time for a change. Trouble is do we really want corrupt arseholes like Biden ,Clinton, Bush or Obama in charge?

7
0
For a fist full of roubles
For a fist full of roubles
2 years ago

Clearly not one of the world’s great thinkers.

93
0
DomH75
DomH75
2 years ago

Now the Queen is gone, the Royal Family has predictably gone down the plughole. Its sad in a way, because Charles III has done some good things: the Prince’s Trust and Poundbury are two things of which I approve, but nailing your loyalties to a fascist organisation like the WEF is akin to Edward VIII shaking hands with Hitler.

Roger Scruton was dead on when he wrote England: An Elegy quarter of a century ago. Blair finished off the mortally-wounded England (and the rest of UK) and what we live in now is a bloated corpse writhing with maggots. I’m a monarchist, but I’m not a fan of the Royal Family.

78
-2
stewart
stewart
2 years ago
Reply to  DomH75

I used to be a monarchist too because the empirical evidence seemed to suggest it worked. There seemed to be a correlation between a high standard of development and freedom and monarchy – with some very notable exceptions.

However, the last 3 years have demonstrated there is no causality and monarchy does nothing for personal freedom or rights.

Our supposedly advanced, free system is entirely reliant on the self restraint of those in power and sadly in what seemed like the once free west, the self restraint is gone. There are some customs and institutions and laws that have acted as safeguards, but they’re busy dismantling those, aren’t they?

And the monarchy isn’t just not doing anything to stop it, not even just standing by watching doing nothing, they’re leading the bloody charge. So they are of less than no use to me. They are a menace to my freedom.

Off to Saudi Arabia they go.

Last edited 2 years ago by stewart
54
-1
RTSC
RTSC
2 years ago
Reply to  DomH75

Poundbury is a horrid carbunkel on the lovely town of Dorchester.

8
0
JXB
JXB
2 years ago

Child abuse – call child protection.

33
0
Tyrbiter
Tyrbiter
2 years ago

Another deranged inadequately-educated royal telling us things that we know are not true.

Stick with whatever the day job is please.

82
0
psychedelia smith
psychedelia smith
2 years ago

The kid’s doing well. At just two years old he’s already got the confused vacant eyes and all the knowledge he’ll ever need to become a climate activist.

Last edited 2 years ago by psychedelia smith
61
0
RW
RW
2 years ago

we know that when the climate is vulnerable, the most vulnerable people are affected by it. And we’re going to see that more and more, you know, each time there’s a crisis happening, that people are going to be vulnerable

Getting rid of this bunch of overrated simpletons-with-sex-lives for any kind of public function would really make sense.

43
0
huxleypiggles
huxleypiggles
2 years ago

Eugenie:

“Speaking at the World Economic Forum in Davos”

In exactly what capacity has this handout merchant been speaking at the eugenecist fest?

Who paid for her to attend? Us or Charlie boy?

76
0
Nicholas Britton
Nicholas Britton
2 years ago

“Plastic causes climate change which causes slavery”. OMG, Too much inbreeding

So she wants the kid to be a climate activist. Go and glue him to the M25 then

Last edited 2 years ago by Nicholas Britton
91
0
huxleypiggles
huxleypiggles
2 years ago
Reply to  Nicholas Britton

Class.😀😀😀

27
0
Freddy Boy
Freddy Boy
2 years ago

So it’s the plastic wot dun it ! & There’s me thinking it was the WEF Globalist tinkerers !! Thank God the Royal Family are not part of it – oh hang on…… 😵‍💫

47
0
JayBee
JayBee
2 years ago

It’s not that such cultish attitudes and behaviour haven’t been analysed yet. https://off-guardian.org/2023/01/16/science-blessed-be-thy-name/
https://www.achgut.com/artikel/wissenschaft_religion_groessenwahn

7
0
JayBee
JayBee
2 years ago

Shocking.
The 97% consensus fraud exposed. https://www.2ndsmartestguyintheworld.com/p/97-consensus-what-consensus

10
0
Arum
Arum
2 years ago

There is such a thing as too much Battenberg (far too rich)

16
0
EileenD
EileenD
2 years ago

Perhaps one should look modern slavery in relation to rare mineral extraction.

24
0
Dinger64
Dinger64
2 years ago

I’ve noticed all the inbred remarks have been removed! Will this mention of a mention be removed?

7
0
Ivan the Terrible
Ivan the Terrible
2 years ago

I was prepared to give the monarchy a chance after QE2 passed but am now beginning to think the Windsors should quit while they’re still ahead.

12
0
Pembroke
Pembroke
2 years ago
Reply to  Ivan the Terrible

Or marry into another royal family so we can exchange them for a spare son on the other side.

0
0
RTSC
RTSC
2 years ago

The Windsor’s all seem to be suffering from the same conditions: a severe lack of functioning brain-cells and a belief that they have the right to lecture the rest of us about their climate delusion.

21
0
Covid-1984
Covid-1984
2 years ago

She forgot the bit about the end of the Monarchy 😀

8
0
varmint
varmint
2 years ago

“The Environment” or “Social Justice” are the default activities for those Royals, Pop Stars, Actors and other assorted self styled do gooders who mostly would not be able to explain the alleged global warming to a bunch of 3-year-olds. ———— “Saving the Planet” is now the must have fashionable accessory. They speak of their “children and grandchildren’s future”, but ofcourse none of their children will struggle to heat their house because cheap abundant energy has been removed, and replaced with expensive unreliable energy. ——–To all the Eugenie’s of this world I say—-“There are one billion people in this world with no electricity and people like you are helping to maintain that miserable state of affairs with your pathetic eco posturing”.

14
0
Smudger
Smudger
2 years ago

The sad thing is that constitutional monarchy has worked very well for us. A slimmed down non political Royal Family is essential if it is to survive.

5
0
Simon MacPhisto
Simon MacPhisto
2 years ago

If it’s all about our children and grandchildren then a better grand standing viewpoint for her would be to call
for a stop to the self inflicted injuries that are net zero. As it is the daft brat is calling for her kids to not only have no access to reliable power, but to protest for and demand it. Just another ignorant bandwagon jumper.

11
0
Alan
Alan
2 years ago

No plastic in the home – so we can assume that she has safely disposed of phones, TV and all electronic equipment and the cars must have gone as well.

13
0
JayBee
JayBee
2 years ago

Moronarchy.
Word of the year/years to come.

16746540148181187001973.png
6
0
Pembroke
Pembroke
2 years ago

Saddling the poor kid with a stupid name won’t help.

0
0

NEWSLETTER

View today’s newsletter

To receive our latest news in the form of a daily email, enter your details here:

DONATE

PODCAST

The Sceptic EP.37: David Frost on Starmer’s EU Surrender, James Price on Broken Britain and David Shipley on Lucy Connolly’s Failed Appeal

by Richard Eldred
23 May 2025
7

LISTED ARTICLES

  • Most Read
  • Most Commented
  • Editor’s Picks

What Happened to Systemic Common Sense?

26 May 2025
by C.J. Strachan

White Actors in Brian Cox Play Forced to Take Anti-Oppression Course

26 May 2025
by Richard Eldred

News Round-Up

27 May 2025
by Richard Eldred

GB News’s ‘Anti-woke’ Comedy Show Faces Axe After Thousands of Complaints

27 May 2025
by Richard Eldred

How Jubilation Turned to Tragedy on Liverpool’s Darkest Day Since Hillsborough

27 May 2025
by Richard Eldred

What Happened to Systemic Common Sense?

53

How Jubilation Turned to Tragedy on Liverpool’s Darkest Day Since Hillsborough

30

GB News’s ‘Anti-woke’ Comedy Show Faces Axe After Thousands of Complaints

24

News Round-Up

24

Tommy Robinson Released From Prison

19

Alasdair MacIntyre 1929-2025

27 May 2025
by James Alexander

Lies, Damned Lies and Casualty Numbers in Ancient History

26 May 2025
by Guy de la Bédoyère

Lord Frost: “The Boriswave Was a Catastrophic Error”

26 May 2025
by Laurie Wastell

The Legal Case Against the AfD Has Collapsed

25 May 2025
by Eugyppius

Plebeians Can No Longer Rant About Bloody Murder

25 May 2025
by James Alexander

POSTS BY DATE

April 2022
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
252627282930  
« Mar   May »

SOCIAL LINKS

Free Speech Union

NEWSLETTER

View today’s newsletter

To receive our latest news in the form of a daily email, enter your details here:

POSTS BY DATE

April 2022
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
252627282930  
« Mar   May »

DONATE

LISTED ARTICLES

  • Most Read
  • Most Commented
  • Editor’s Picks

What Happened to Systemic Common Sense?

26 May 2025
by C.J. Strachan

White Actors in Brian Cox Play Forced to Take Anti-Oppression Course

26 May 2025
by Richard Eldred

News Round-Up

27 May 2025
by Richard Eldred

GB News’s ‘Anti-woke’ Comedy Show Faces Axe After Thousands of Complaints

27 May 2025
by Richard Eldred

How Jubilation Turned to Tragedy on Liverpool’s Darkest Day Since Hillsborough

27 May 2025
by Richard Eldred

What Happened to Systemic Common Sense?

53

How Jubilation Turned to Tragedy on Liverpool’s Darkest Day Since Hillsborough

30

GB News’s ‘Anti-woke’ Comedy Show Faces Axe After Thousands of Complaints

24

News Round-Up

24

Tommy Robinson Released From Prison

19

Alasdair MacIntyre 1929-2025

27 May 2025
by James Alexander

Lies, Damned Lies and Casualty Numbers in Ancient History

26 May 2025
by Guy de la Bédoyère

Lord Frost: “The Boriswave Was a Catastrophic Error”

26 May 2025
by Laurie Wastell

The Legal Case Against the AfD Has Collapsed

25 May 2025
by Eugyppius

Plebeians Can No Longer Rant About Bloody Murder

25 May 2025
by James Alexander

SOCIAL LINKS

Free Speech Union
  • Home
  • About us
  • Donate
  • Privacy Policy

Facebook

  • X

Instagram

RSS

Subscribe to our newsletter

© Skeptics Ltd.

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password? Sign Up

Create New Account!

Fill the forms below to register

All fields are required. Log In

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
No Result
View All Result
  • Articles
  • About
  • Archive
    • ARCHIVE
    • NEWS ROUND-UPS
  • Podcasts
  • Newsletter
  • Premium
  • Donate
  • Log In

© Skeptics Ltd.

wpDiscuz
You are going to send email to

Move Comment
Perfecty
Do you wish to receive notifications of new articles?
Notifications preferences