Premium

Was the Charity Commission Ever Going to Do a Proper Review of City of Sanctuary UK?

The Charity Commission lets City of Sanctuary off the hook, then slaps down accurate reporting as "misinformation". It's ducking the real issue on kids being pushed towards asylum seekers, says Charlotte Gill.

3 min read

This week, Helen Earner, Director of Regulatory Services at the Charity Commission, accused journalists like me of spreading “online misinformation” by accurately reporting on the activities of the charity City of Sanctuary UK.

To recap, in late 2025 I covered the fact that the charity had been encouraging children to make Valentine’s cards for asylum seekers. After it received multiple complaints from MPs and others worried about the scheme, the Charity Commission launched a compliance case into City of Sanctuary’s activities – ultimately concluding that there was nothing to see here.

As a statement by the regulator put it, these Valentine’s Day cards were merely “heart-shaped general messages of welcome to refugees” (as if that’s any better) to be displayed in schools and at a “separate charity supporting refugees for display in its premises”. In reality, City of Sanctuary’s literature shows the charity suggesting that “cards” could be passed on to “people seeking sanctuary” (the trendy new term for asylum seeker/ immigrant), thus proving that mine and others’ claim that children were being encouraged to send Valentine’s cards to asylum seekers was entirely correct.

Not only did the Charity Commission fail to address people’s concerns about the charity – acting as if the only claim to address was whether children were writing “cards to individual adult asylum seekers or refugees” – but it tried to make journalists’ reporting look sinister and dangerous. In Helen Earner’s statement about the compliance case, she said “concerns about the charity’s work were fuelled by online misinformation,

Keep reading –
Donate £5 monthly
or £50 annually

Subscribe today to get unlimited online access, as well as our Premium newsletters and podcasts.

  • Read paywalled articles
  • Comment below the line and connect with other users
  • Watch and listen to the longer Premium version of our weekly podcast
  • Listen to every article
  • Receive Premium version of our daily newsletter
DONATE NOW

Comments

This week across the site:

Email me alerts for this discussion
Notify of

To join in with the discussion please make a donation to the Daily Sceptic.

Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.

17 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Lulugirl
Lulugirl
5 months ago

Earner is a classic public sector example of failing upwards and in the process becoming a ‘nice little Earner’ herself. Scrap the whole thing and reinstate a body who will examine charitable status forensically.

GroundhogDayAgain
GroundhogDayAgain
5 months ago

Not one penny of our taxes should go to charity.

Lockdown Sceptic
Lockdown Sceptic
5 months ago

City of Sanctuary Means Mass Immigration

EppingBlogger
EppingBlogger
5 months ago

I wonder what her salary, bonus, pension and benefits package looks like. Eye watering I expect.

soundofreason
soundofreason
5 months ago
Reply to  EppingBlogger

Ah. A nice little earner.

shred
shred
5 months ago
Reply to  soundofreason

£105,000 according to website

Freddy Boy
Freddy Boy
5 months ago

Sanctuary for Who ? Not The indigenous ! On & on it goes – relentless bullsh1t rhetoric !

Jeff Chambers
Jeff Chambers
5 months ago

Helen Earner … the Head of Asylum Performance and Improvement in 2009

The job title is an interesting way of framing her job. It looks like that, essentially, she was a government agent charged with furthering the invasion of our country, and the destruction of our people.

Also, isn’t having our children send “Valentines cards” to the invaders a method of hinting to said invaders that our children are sexually available to them?

Heretic
Heretic
5 months ago
Reply to  Jeff Chambers

Absolutely. It’s horrific.
Well done to Charlotte Gill for exposing this!

Tyrbiter
Tyrbiter
5 months ago

The Charity Commission, yet another organisation that should be defunded and disbanded. If that happened I doubt that most people would notice.

Charities should not be the recipients of government (taxpayer) largesse, they should have to raise their own income.

transmissionofflame
transmissionofflame
5 months ago

Abolish charitable status. Another thing that the left have screwed up.

Gezza England
Gezza England
5 months ago

I used to run a charity. It was the local amateur dramatic society. The status of ‘charity’ has been damaged by some of the biggest charities moving away from providing something – we provided drama productions – to just campaigning which requires a lot less effort. They also started paying bigger and bigger salaries. Charities should not be political and the problem with refugees – or more correctly migrants – is that this is a highly political issue.

transmissionofflame
transmissionofflame
5 months ago
Reply to  Gezza England

Almost every major charity I can think of has become political. We give to our local Air Ambulance (or more specifically we do their lottery) – they seem fairly sound.

Smudger
Smudger
5 months ago

They haven’t screwed anything up – they knew exactly what they were doing – politicise the sector to further their agenda.

transmissionofflame
transmissionofflame
5 months ago
Reply to  Smudger

Indeed – I guess I meant that there are genuine charities that actually help people which are not political, but who may ultimately pay the price for the sector being taken over by people with an agenda

ComradeSvelte
ComradeSvelte
5 months ago

Charity commission? More like yet another act of vandalism….

Smudger
Smudger
5 months ago
Reply to  ComradeSvelte

We need to know now how Reform UK intends to defund and depoliticise the charitable industrial sector.

Thank you for reading. Please help us keep the Daily Sceptic going by becoming a donor.