News Round-Up

A summary of the most interesting stories in the past 24 hours that challenge the prevailing orthodoxy about the ‘climate emergency’, public health ‘crises’ and the supposed moral defects of Western civilisation.

7 min read

If you have any tips for inclusion in the round-up, email us here.

Comments

This week across the site:

Email me alerts for this discussion
Notify of

To join in with the discussion please make a donation to the Daily Sceptic.

Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.

13 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
ellie-em
ellie-em
1 year ago

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2025/06/15/drug-migrant-stay-uk-uganda-mental-illness-deport/

I ‘struggle mentally’ too, due to the ludicrous rulings by some judges that are increasingly supportive of the nutjobs and their pathetic reasons not to be ejected from the country.

Get rid of them!

Heretic
Heretic
1 year ago

“Slain lawmaker broke down after brave vote in one of her last acts”

So the Daily Mail has invented an innocuous new term for Third World criminals illegally breaking into the West: “Undocumented Adults”, as if it’s just a matter of paperwork, instead of a deliberate criminal act.

May I just clarify a few important facts about this tragic case:

1) Both of the slain Leftist lawmakers had spent their careers forcing the Taxpayers to fund free healthcare, free college tuition, free education, free housing & free welfare benefits to the 81,000 “Undocumented Migrants” LIVING ILLEGALLY in Minnesota, predominantly Somalian Muslims, though Somalia has never had any historical connection to Minnesota at all. (81,000 is about 81 days worth of illegals entering Britain by dinghy.)

2) This not only caused huge resentment among the hardworking Minnesotan Taxpayers, but also crippled the budget, so the Leftists backtracked a bit in order to stop the state government from being shut down. In the crucial vote, the female Leftist lawmaker was “forced” to vote to stop giving free healthcare to illegal alien ADULTS ONLY, while still giving it to all of them who claimed to be “children” (you know, like the bearded 40-year-old… Read more »

ellie-em
ellie-em
1 year ago
Reply to  Heretic

It reminds me of 2tierK’s description of illegal migrants as irregular migrants.

Irrespective of the label, they should not be here, they have chosen to breach our borders illegally and should be ejected. They should not be allowed to scavenge our limited resources.

Heretic
Heretic
1 year ago
Reply to  ellie-em

Absolutely. And any British boats bringing them ashore should be confiscated and the crews arrested for human trafficking, including the RNLI.

Heretic
Heretic
1 year ago
Reply to  ellie-em

Remember when they were originally called “Illegal Immigrants” and “Illegal Aliens”? Then the Leftists renamed them “Migrants”, as if they were just a Herd of Wildebeest migrating to new waterholes, and that label stuck, because it was shorter than “Immigrants”, and destroyed the whole idea of national borders.

Then, as you said, the Leftists changed it to “Irregular” migrants, as if it were just a glitch in the computer system before handing them UK passports.

Now it’s been changed again to “Undocumented”. It should be changed to
“Undocumented Scavengers”, to use your excellent term.

EppingBlogger
EppingBlogger
1 year ago

“Rachel Reeves’s non-dom crackdown” is the sort of phrase Labour and the elites want to see. It implies that people who are “non-dom” (perhaps MPs think this refers to back street personal services) have been exploiting unintended loopholes in the biggest tax code in the world. The truth is the “crackdown” is nothing of the kind. It is a foolish costly change in tax legislation which seeks to tax people on income and assets they had never been taxed on before and for completely sensible reasons.

Why do people misuse words just because the left and elites do so.

Myra
Myra
1 year ago

We may want to keep an eye on NATO’s summit next week.
Another supranational organisation seeking to increase control over nation states, including signing up to 5% of GDP funding of defence and increasing emergency powers.

EppingBlogger
EppingBlogger
1 year ago
Reply to  Myra

We have not yet agreed to automatically follow the majority views of NATO so any increase in spending here will be a decision of Starmer and most likely it will be smoke and mirrors deception.

huxleypiggles
huxleypiggles
1 year ago
Reply to  EppingBlogger

Labour do not spend, they ‘invest’ even though 99% of their ‘investments’ produce a nil or negative return.

Lockdown Sceptic
Lockdown Sceptic
1 year ago

Climate Hoax Lies Never End – latest leaflet to print at home, deliver to neighbours, forward to your bad MP & friends online. Start a local leaflet campaign. Deliver 100 leaflets a week (5200 a year). Over 300 leaflet ideas on the link on the leaflet.

02b-Climate-Hoax-Lies-Never-End-MONOCHROME-copy
Brett_McS
Brett_McS
1 year ago

I’ve followed Nick Hudson from the beginning of the Covid days when he was among the first to see through the Covid nonsense. If I only followed one person on X it would be this guy. A recent post:

https://x.com/NickHudsonCT/status/1929922514232246593

Katy-C
Katy-C
1 year ago
Reply to  Brett_McS

Gosh he’s good.

ellie-em
ellie-em
1 year ago
Reply to  Brett_McS

Thanks for that link. He has his finger on the pulse! Spot on.

Thank you for reading. Please help us keep the Daily Sceptic going by becoming a donor.