Readers may remember Ben Pile’s article last month which mentioned Sir Keir Starmer’s 2022 visit to eco-upgraded houses owned by Kirklees Council.
Eight houses in Abbey Road, Fartown, Huddersfield were given heat pumps instead of gas boilers, plus insulation, triple-glazed windows and solar panels.
The Daily Mail reported the then-Opposition leader’s 2022 Conference speech praising the scheme, which Kirklees Council originally estimated would cost about £60,000 per house and save up to £350 on annual energy bills (so take at least 172 years to pay for itself).
Kirklees said it “would be monitoring the performance of the properties to inform future schemes we carry out”. As the Mail reported, retrofitting the nation’s 1.6 million council-owned homes in this way would cost £96 billion (tens of billions here, tens of billions there, soon you’re talking serious money…).
So would that be worth doing? The council just answered an FOI request about its Abbey Road scheme:
Cost per house? “We do not have an accurate cost per property to provide this information”
What sort of solar panels? “Four properties had photovoltaics fitted and four properties had solar thermal fitted.” So, four sets of panels to generate electricity and four to heat water (though not the house whose roof they’re on) – if the sun’s shining. And Kirklees can’t compare one type with the other because:
Fuel savings per house (i.e., comparison of current bills with previous ones)? “We do not have information to make a reliable comparison and this is our residents [sic] sensitive information.” The “monitoring” hasn’t happened.
Any help from central Government? “No this work was not grant funded by central Government.”
So no-one knows what it cost or whether it was worth doing – though we do know that cost was shouldered by Huddersfield taxpayers. Fit and forget is the way, when it’s public money.
If at this week’s Labour conference our Prime Minister refers to Huddersfield’s green triumph again, perhaps some reporter will think to ask him what he believes was really achieved? Because Kirklees Council doesn’t know.
In September 2008 our local London Borough of Camden spent an incredible £360,000 (at least) eco-refurbishing a Victorian semi, 17 St. Augustine’s Rd, and showed it off proudly on open days. Labour councillors were outraged when I pointed out in the local paper that they’d overlooked the cheapest, most obvious energy-saving measure of all – despite an ample corridor they’d failed to fit a lobby inside the front door, which lets out so much heat every time it’s opened in winter. They’d also done nothing about capturing rainwater to flush toilets – their ‘water harvesting’ was a single butt on a downpipe, to water the garden!
On a sunny autumn afternoon the roof’s solar thermal panels weren’t working at all, the hot water cylinder was cold; and interestingly, the idea of a heat pump had been discarded as “impractical” for such a house – back to gas. There were other obvious omissions.
But the worst issue was the huge cost of the makeover – fine if public money’s paying for it, but even with a 0% loan, a householder could never recover the outlay from savings on heating bills, as the council wanted us to believe.
Just as at Kirklees, we were told before-and-after energy bills would be compared and lesson learned. I never did find out how that worked out, and if Camden found the answer impressive, it kept it pretty quiet. Spending other people’s money is easy, as so many Labour councils know, and upgrading the U.K.’s publicly-owned housing will be a good way to spend a very great deal of it.
To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.
Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.
” It seems like almost any kind of coalition is possible – except the Right-wing government that Germans actually voted for, says Elisabeth Dampier in the Spectator.”
Give it a rest. Did anyone who voted CDU/CSU/FDP think they would get a “right wing” government. About 20% voted for a “right wing” government – the rest are idiots or lefties.
Yep, older people, young women and the migrants who can vote are hardly likely to have voted AfD. What a let down, despite the significant gains AfD have made this election it doesn’t make any difference going forward. It’s obviously a case of, ”Meet the new boss, same as the old boss…”
”Following his party’s victory in federal elections on Sunday, Friedrich Merz, the likely next Chancellor of Germany, rejected overtures from President Donald Trump while calling for “independence” from the United States and accusing Washington of election interference.
On Sunday, German voters firmly rejected the former leftist governing coalition of Social Democrats and Greens in favour of the supposedly conservative Christian Democrats and the populist-right Alternative for Germany (AfD).
However, the successor to Angela Merkel and likely incoming chancellor Friedrich Merz, whose party came first in Sunday’s vote but fell well short of a majority with just 28.5 per cent of the vote, was quick to reject a right-wing alliance with the AfD in favour of a left-wing coalition and to distance himself from Trump and America in general.
“I am communicating closely with a lot of prime ministers and heads of EU states, and for me, it is an absolute priority to strengthen Europe as quickly as possible so that we achieve independence from the U.S., step by step,” Merz said per state broadcaster DW.
“I never thought that I would ever need to say something like that, on television, but after the latest statements made by Donald Trump last week, it is clear, that the Americans — at any case these Americans, this administration — mostly don’t care about the fate of Europe one way or another,” the CDU leader added.
Merz went on to accuse the Trump administration of having committed election interference, likely hinting at key Trump ally Elon Musk, a vocal supporter of the anti-mass migration Alternative for Germany party,
He said that the “interventions from Washington were no less drastic, dramatic, and ultimately no less brazen, than the intervention that we have seen from Moscow.”
https://www.breitbart.com/europe/2025/02/24/likely-german-chancellor-rejects-trump-accuses-u-s-of-russian-style-election-interference-calls-for-independence-from-america/
One of the problems that I see with western democracies is that there is a large part of the population, typically older people who consider themselves to be moderate and “centrist”, who are failing to understand what is going on.
They don’t realise that the people who run the main parties are not the same kind of people that used to run them. These new leaders are not the sensible, reasonable, post war, early boomer generation that used to lead these parties. They are completely different. More detached from reality, more self self.serving and more mediocre.
So these snoozing oldies as one might call them, just don’t realise what is being done and less so the harm that is coming down the line. They think that if they carry on voting for the same parties they have always voted for, life will carry on as it has, not realising it’s the complete opposite.
Their once sensible parties have the most radical transformative.policies – radical socal agenda, net zero, mass immigration, mass censorship, and warmongering..
Western civilisation is being driven off a cliff because a big chunk of our population is completely asleep at the back oblivious to it all.
100%
And there is a appreciable part of the population, typically younger people, that still believe in this stuff, the stuff that has been shown to be unrealistic, causing catastrophe.
There are a lot of snoozing oldies but have you tried to engage with the young. Too many have become depoliticised or else they mouth whatever they last heard from a D-class celeb (probably with her tits hanging out at the time).
I find young people to be fairly clued in and therefore a bit cynical. But on the whole not much different to when I was young a good few decades ago now.
This.
Boris Johnson calls for 3% defence spending
Mr Johnson demonstrates, yet again, that he has no clue…….
As we stand, today, we are effectively defenceless as a country and I am not alone in saying that.
‘The last time the UK spent more than 5% of its GDP on defence was in the height of the cold war……Each defence review since 1957 has led to cuts to the defence budget in real terms. Reductions in the military budget continue because, previously, nothing presented a sufficient sub-nuclear threat to the nation deemed significant enough to reverse them. Those cuts are now so deep that the nation is on the edge of being unable to defend itself’
Kenton White, The Defence Journal
The MoD says 3.6%
‘The UK needs to spend 3.6 per cent of GDP on defence if it wants to modernise its military while protecting its nuclear deterrent and meeting Nato obligations, according to internal Ministry of Defence calculations.’
‘The 3.6 per cent figure would raise spending to about £93bn and take the UK closer to Poland, which shares a border with Ukraine and spends more than 4 per cent of its GDP on defence annually.’
‘…with any conceivable budget, even if it is a little bit more than 2.5 per cent . . . we will not be able to address [the UK military’s] lack of readiness, war stocks and so on’
https://www.ft.com/content/42912734-5688-41ea-9194-d759c321da52
But 3.6% is nowhere near enough.
‘In 2015, the British Army’s headmark output was to be a warfighting division…….The current British Army actually fields half of one heavy brigade’s worth of equipment, split between two, and one regiment of artillery.’
‘Today, the UK promises to provide a UK Strategic Reserve Corps. A corps is formed of a minimum of two divisions, plus corps echelon troops that collectively amount to a third division’s worth of equipment…….With one UK brigade already committed to Estonia, the actual forces available for this corps appear to consist of one under-strength brigade which is short of enablers, and a deep recce-strike brigade double-hatted as both the divisional and corps fires group.’
https://rusi.org/explore-our-research/publications/commentary/closing-saydo-gap-uk-land-power
And that is before we even think about war stocks of combat supplies and the ‘industrial resilience’ to sustain and replenish those stocks.
The Royal Ordnance Factories comprised thirteen industrial sites in 1984. BAE Land Systems now has only one such site.
This country, if it wishes to protect its own borders let alone muster a forward defence based conventional deterrent now requires to spend at least 5% of its GDP annually on defence.
It will not.
We are defenceless……..
We are a little bit more diverse though, and much more LGBTQXYZEIEIO friendly, and that’s what really matters.
We also have a massive cadre of very senior officers, so our leadership must also the best, because we’ve got (much) more of it.
Glad I binned it when I did, it was farcical 13 years ago, I dread to think what it’s like these days…
Didn’t you know, politicians only have to proclaim a vision, and it’s done!
Well, that’s been the idea, but it doesn’t appear to be working any more: Ukraine, Jabs, Scottish Independence, Heat Pumps, Cheap Electricity, an overwhelming love of EVs!
The demise of MAGA. And SHE should have won, in 2016.
There are all sorts of tricks the government can play with numbers. Cameron-Clegg added the cost of security services to defence spending to try to get to 2% but comparative numbers were not updated, of course.
The 2023/4 Tory increase in defence spending plans hod to cover military aim to Ukraine as well as a number of unfunded commitments.
For honest budgeting we need more detail and numerate MPs. We need journos interested in reporting the truth, but we all know how unlikely that is!!!
This is where you get the money from and the SDR is looking at it:
‘….greater investment in digital transformation, listing three urgent tasks for digital decision makers: replacing antiquated IT systems; improving the quality and shareability of data; and recruiting and retaining scarce, in-demand skills.
“The challenge is vast. Defra spends more than three quarters of its digital budget maintaining ageing systems. The MoD in part relies on kit dating back to the Cold War for defence inventory management,” he will say.
However, the Passport Office’s response to its post-lockdown backlog, improving its systems and operational management, show “it can be done”‘
“He will argue that issuing and collecting Council Tax via a Netflix-style digital platform would eliminate the duplication of effort and costs across local authorities, making for a more streamlined system and reducing annual spending from £1.11bn to around £8.5m.
He identifies other public services that could make savings and efficiencies – registrars could reduce annual spending from £110m to £0.85m through the introduction of identity verification platforms which would eliminate the current requirement for each of the 1.5 million births, deaths and marriages across England and Wales each year to be registered face-to-face.
Professor Thompson will also target Housing Associations, which manage nearly a fifth of the UK’s housing stock, arguing that a sector-wide payments and arrears service could reduce annual expenditure from £200m to £1.5m, and allow staff across the sector to be redeployed in front line customer facing roles.
“Public services are heading towards a cliff – staying the same isn’t an option anymore,” Professor Thompson said.
“Part of the problem is the massive duplication of corporate activity between public services, which wastes many billions each year, prevents our services from working effectively together, and directly defunds crucial front line services such as social housing, teachers, doctors and nurses, social care, and police on the street.
“But there is a way to for government to persuade public service organisations to adopt common ways of doing some things – by working with the private sector to develop standardised, digitally-enabled services’
https://news.exeter.ac.uk/research/exeter-expert-to-outline-radical-reforms-to-uk-public-services-that-could-save-millions/
The easy part is the spending as Viv Nicholson showed sixty years ago. The part that governments of any colour never do is to spend wisely and that’s assuming all the kickbacks are within “reasonable” limits. So carrying on about percentages is in fact simply bullshit.
It’s a start:
‘Among the new measures will be a new military strategic headquarters, chief of the defence staff, who will formally command the individual service chiefs for the first time and will “now be central to investment decisions between the services, along with the defence secretary and permanent secretary”, the MoD said.
The ministry has opened recruitment for a new standalone national armaments director (NAD) to help fix the “broken” defence procurement system and enable the MoD to better invest in new weapons and other technologies.
The NAD will be responsible for reforming defence procurement and delivering a new defence industrial strategy. They will be asked to “ensure the armed forces are properly equipped to defend Britain, to build up the British defence industry and to crack down on waste”
https://www.publictechnology.net/2024/10/30/defence-and-security/government-pledges-biggest-reform-of-mod-in-over-50-years/
“Germans won’t get the Right-wing government they voted for”
Government of the Left, by the Left, for the Left.
You can have any government you like, as long as it’s Left, Far Left, Extreme Left, Green Left, Bonkers, Schizoid or Bat-Shit Crazy.
Sorted until the next voodoo election.
Ve haf vays to make you suffer
I find it somewhat amusing.
Something like schadenfreude, I expect.
Anyone who voted for any of the Uniparty parties expecting a “right wing” government is deluded. I’m not even convinced that a lot of the people who nominally right-leaning parties are actually that “right wing” – I think of the six million who voted Tory here, lots of them are “soft left” at the least. The rich world, with maybe the exception of the US which is more polarised, has moved left.
https://www.express.co.uk/news/politics/2018802/Parliament-restoration-riverside-thames
Floating barge? Seaworthy or not, let it ‘float’ away with the
criminals / shysterpoliticians on board, as far away from our shores as possible! That’s what they did in the good old days, shipping them off to the likes of Australia…or better still, dump them down the salt mines of Siberia. They could try an honest, hard days graft for once!Sink it?
Brutally simple – I love it!
How much better to represent selling the nation down the river.
Nailed it.
I will gladly second.
Of course if said barge was to inexplicably loose its moorings and a disaster occur, well… accidents happen.
“BBC bias is not just inept, it’s becoming sinister”
The People’s Commentariat is deepest Red, Rainbow and Gaza-Green.
Someone please pull the plug pronto on this state-sponsored panderer to international terrorism.
“On Substack, Dean V. Williamson argues that while the ‘Deep State’ might sound plausible, it’s actually political appointees at the top of administrative agencies who truly shape policy.”
Of course there’s an element of the bureaucracy wanting to perpetuate itself but I don’t buy all the hand wringing from politicians- I reckon in general they are quite happy with what the agencies do. Something to hide behind and blame.
“Britain’s woeful smart meter rollout can be traced back to a decision made by Labour during Ed Miliband’s first stint as Energy Secretary, says Tom Haynes in theTelegraph.”
I can’t read the Telegraph (actually not sure I’d want to) but I presume they mean that the rollout has not proceeded fast enough – the assumption being that dumb smart meters are solving some problem or other. I’m sick of the Telegraph.
“Jonathan Reynolds apologises for describing himself as a solicitor”
Next up, Sir Two-Tier apologising for being described as a Prime Minister.
Dream on.
Now hang on – he doesn’t know he is the prime minister now, he keeps calling the leader of the opposition PM! Must be quite alarming for him to be in that ‘illustrious’ position – it’s certainly frightening for us!
Another step towards the Truth about COVID Jabs:
https://open.substack.com/pub/lionessofjudah/p/wealthy-french-businessman-died-from?utm_source=share&utm_medium=android&r=3hvv8j
Who runs administrative agencies?
How do you know when the public sector is far too large?
This is how you know:
‘The Environment Agency asked the Trent Valley Internal Drainage Board to cut weeds and de-silt parts of the River Smite in Nottinghamshire last year following complaints from residents and businesses about flooding.
But a week after the work began, the agency visited, ordered it to be halted and told the drainage board to refer itself to police for a potential breach of environment regulations.
The Environment Agency said while it was not clear if water voles were present at the time of the work – because a survey had not completed – their presence could not be ruled out.’
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cqly3549gxro.amp
I’m from the government and I’m here to help….or not really…..
“Hamas official admits he would not support October 7th attack now”
And what did he expect while he was supporting it? Israel to agree to mass suicide and abandonment of the land in return for releasing the hostages?
“Furious Zelensky ‘screamed at Trump’s envoy’ over woeful mineral deal”
He’ll be screaming even more today, after this:
Ukrainian parliament rejects resolution supporting Zelensky