On August 27th, Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg issued a statement confirming what the Twitter Files, Murthy vs Missouri, and many others had long claimed – that the Biden administration aggressively pushed to censor First Amendment-protected speech on social media, in particular relating to COVID-19 and the Hunter Biden laptop.
In the case of Covid, Zuckerberg writes that the Biden White House “repeatedly pressured our teams for months to censor certain COVID-19 content, including “humour and satire”.
Zuckerberg also notes that the “FBI warned us about a potential Russian disinformation operation about the Biden family and Burisma”, a Ukrainian energy company that Hunter Biden sat on the board of. The laptop was not “disinformation”, it was real and Twitter and Facebook wrongly suppressed the New York Post story that exposed it.
But Zuckerberg’s statement missed a key detail – at least three Facebook staff members participated in the Aspen Institute’s Hunter Biden table-top exercise that game-planned how to suppress the story two months in advance of the New York Post story.
The Aspen Institute “table-top” brought together a host of media and Big Tech including Facebook, the New York Times, Twitter, the Washington Post and “anti-disinformation” NGO First Draft, to create their very own disinformation operation, literally planning day-by-day how they would respond to the leak.
Zuckerberg, however, writes, “That fall, when we saw a New York Post story reporting on corruption allegations involving then-Democratic Presidential nominee Joe Biden’s family, we sent that story to fact-checkers for review and temporarily demoted it while waiting for a reply.”
You can almost see the fall maple leaves feathering their way innocently to the forest floor.
“It’s since been made clear that the reporting was not Russian disinformation, and in retrospect, we should not have demoted the story.”
But there was no surprise, as Facebook had participated in the Aspen exercise two months before the story broke.
Even for Aspen’s Garret Graff, who coordinated the exercise, things went even better than planned:
Regarding COVID-19, Zuckerberg says the Government “repeatedly pressured” Facebook to “censor”. Regarding the Hunter Biden laptop, he only mentions they were “warned” “about a potential Russian disinformation operation”. There is no mention of pressure to censor. Did the Federal Government push Facebook to attend the Aspen Institute exercise? It seems they attended of their own volition.
Attending the Aspen suppression planning for Facebook was Nathaniel Gleicher, “Head of Security Policy at Meta”, who continues in his position to this day. The Twitter Files show Gleicher also met regularly with the Department of Defense (DoD) and FBI, and participated in a Harvard-led pre-election tabletop with the DoD whilst the Hunter Biden story was being suppressed on Facebook.
Surely someone as senior as Gleicher, tasked as he was with such sensitive and high-level contacts, would have told his boss about his attendance? After all, the laptop story could have a real impact on the outcome of a Presidential election.
Twitter’s Yoel Roth also attended the Aspen exercise and played a critical role in suppressing the Hunter Biden story on that platform. Did Gleicher play the same role at Facebook? Gleicher’s participation has been known publicly since Michael Shellenberger first broke that story, 18 months and more than 100 million impressions ago.
If Zuckerberg believes suppressing the story was wrong, why has he kept Gleicher in such a senior role? If he knew of Gleicher’s participation in the Aspen exercise, why didn’t he blow the whistle at the time? Instead, he places all the blame at the foot of the Federal Government. No doubt they exerted pressure, but that does not appear to be the whole story.
Is Zuckerberg attempting to absolve himself of responsibility?
Andrew Lowenthal is a Brownstone Institute fellow, journalist and the founder and CEO of liber-net, a digital civil liberties initiative. He was co-founder and Executive Director of the Asia-Pacific digital rights non-profit EngageMedia for almost eighteen years, and a fellow at Harvard’s Berkman Klein Center for Internet and Society and MIT’s Open Documentary Lab. This article first appeared in the Brownstone Institute.
To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.
Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.
It is very easy to understand. It is the corporate game. Plausible deniability and attempting to keep all parties happy along with unaccountability and facelessness. These people are steeped in such systems. By the time they are successful it is a reflex for them. Later in life they will face the karma of untruthfulness but they consider billions of pounds adequate compensation for the time being. But when fate comes knocking the misery is applied retroactively. It is a fool’s errand but the fool can’t see it.
Per Durov. Illustrating the fickleness of The System, in turning on its own when the need suits.
If I was working for Pfizer I would be telling you that it is safe and effective. If I wasn’t telling you that then I wouldn’t be working for Pfizer. So don’t be surprised at their behaviour because the system is self-selective obviously. Same goes for mainstream politics or anything mainstream.
I think it is simply that he knows trump is likely to win and he’s trying to paint himself as a maligned good guy to take the edge off the retribution he expects.
I’m not so sure.
The Trump camp is very quiet. Something is up.
I’m hoping that his organisation is now working very hard on the ground game to counter all the shenanigans of the Democrats.
I fear that if they aren’t, his chances of winning are low.
There is a lot of ways to look at this. One of the is the Professional Managerial Class, PMCs, deciding that they know what’s best for the world at large and thag their job is to steer things in that direction.
They are the first or last social group to want to rule the world.
We know that they are the stupidest people to ever hold power and yet we cannot work out how to dislodge them. That says something about the ideology that we are embedded in.
You refer to it as a curious case but surely it is the most predictable case imaginable. Nothing curious about it. Any other behaviour would be curious. Your attitude essentially suggests cover for darker forces.
Zuk realising that the rats often turn upon and eat their own? Surprising that he has come out so publicly, as if something has happened/is happening behind the curtain.
“Is Zuckerberg attempting to absolve himself of responsibility?”
Yes. The nasty little sh!t obviously thinks The Donald may win.
Funny how he makes no mention of his role in the Covid war games. The last one was, to my knowledge, six weeks before Covid and was eerily similar. Facebook did exactly what they were told and suppressed the truth. There were not the only company of course, no doubt we all had a platform block our posts.
We live in a world of Truth: it just depends on whose Truth you are willing to swallow.
Hasn’t Trump said if elected he’ll put Zuckerberg (or anybody) interfering with the 2024 election in gaol?
So the sinner repenteth – a pre-emptive shriving to avoid the wrath of OrangeMan?