The old ladies of Switzerland have had their day in the sun – treble Factor 50s all round – but the real plaudits for the recent idiotic climate change verdict from the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) belong to the elite billionaire paymasters behind lawfare activists such as Greenpeace and Client Earth. Greenpeace bankrolled the Swiss ladies and Client Earth supplied some of the legal arguments. The case is likely to throw a spotlight on the role that a few moneyed forces are playing in using the judicial system to enforce their insane Net Zero collectivisation on populations around the world. In Europe, the billionaires, who happily fund XR vandals as well as high-earning lawyers, are seeking to redefine the meaning of democracy. In the United States, as we shall see, extensive judge grooming is being undertaken to help the judiciary come to the correct political verdicts in the growing number of climate lawfare cases.
In its way, the ECHR verdict that politicians should somehow protect citizens from alleged human-caused climate change was a punishment beating handed down after a 2021 referendum in Switzerland rowed back on Net Zero. Jessica Simor KC represented the Swiss women and frequently acts for Client Earth. After the verdict she noted: “In Switzerland it’s particularly problematic because they have referendums… the people decided they didn’t want it. This is something that comes up all the time… the conflict between this idea of democracy as entailing… rights which matter irrespective of what the majority decides.”
The stupidity of the ECHR verdict need not detail us for too long since it has been widely discussed elsewhere. But it is surely relevant that most bad weather events have shown little discernible rise in frequency over the last 100 years, while mortality from these events has dropped by 99%. Quite why the United Kingdom is a member of this cultural dead-end of a court with its ‘jurists’ defining law to open borders and save us from the weather is a mystery, but again it need not detain us at this point. Suffice to say it suits Greenpeace, Client Earth and Jessica Simor KC to have a tame, like-minded body of legal social justice warriors to agree on their elite view of what matters, irrespective of how people actually vote.
Condemnation of the ECHR verdict has been widespread, with Net Zero Watch stating that climate catastrophism now represents a clear and present threat to the rule of law and democracy. Director Andrew Montford noted an astonishingly broad interpretation of existing human rights laws that had alarming parallels with what was seen in 1930s Germany. “The judicial activism of the European Court looks very much like the judicial activism under National Socialism,” he added.
As we have seen with attempts to groom journalists and politicians to catastrophise the weather and promote Net Zero, the same wealthy names crop up again and again. So it is with the growing number of lawfare outfits. Greenpeace bankrolled the Swiss case and it collects cash from wealthy donors and foundations around the world. It seeks to remove hydrocarbons from human energy supplies and it is against nuclear energy. It is not clear how the old ladies of Switzerland will survive winter when the wind stops blowing and the sun doesn’t shine in their icy mountain redoubt.
Client Earth has been heavily supported by the Children’s Investment Fund Foundation, the activist vehicle of Sir Christopher Hohn, one time paymaster of eco-vandals and law-breakers Extinction Rebellion. Hohn is a big contributor to another funder, the European Climate Foundation. Contributions are also forthcoming from green billionaires Michael Bloomberg and Jeremy Grantham, while even the British taxpayer chips in with a contribution from the Foreign Office. Quite why the British Conservative Government is helping to fund an operation that is likely to sue it in the courts is, of course, another mystery.
But if it is bad enough in Europe, climate lawfare is rapidly escalating out of control in the United States. Numerous actions against oil and gas companies are ongoing in a judicial system that is more obviously political than its European counterparts. It might not be surprising to learn therefore that billionaires through their tax-efficient foundations are attempting to re-educate judges around the idea that the climate is collapsing due to the action of humans, and in particular the wicked actions of those that supply 80% of industrial society’s current energy needs.
Washington D.C.-based Environmental Law Institute is backed by billionaire foundation money and, according to Influence Watch, it received $500,000 from the William and Flora Hewlett Foundation to set up the Climate Judiciary Project (CJP). According to Influence Watch, by May 2023 more than 1,000 judges have participated in the CJP program, which includes 13 curriculum modules. According to the CJP website, the goal is to provide “neutral, objective information” to the judiciary about the science of climate change as it is understood by the expert scientific community and relevant to current and future litigation”.
Needless to say, neutral and objective are not words that spring immediately to mind when examining some of the detailed curriculum notes. Misinformation is particularly rife in a module that suggests individual weather events can be attributed to longer term changes in the climate. The judges are told that it is now possible to use attributions techniques to link individual human-caused weather events to climate change. It is not, it is junk science from computer models and since any ‘results’ are unfalsifiable, they fail the first test of the true scientific process. The best known ‘attribution’ service is called World Weather Attribution and is partly funded by Jeremy Grantham. Despite this, CJP claims bizarrely that the UN Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change couldn’t hold the view that human influence has warmed the planet without the many attribution analyses that are said to underpin it.
The distinguished science writer Roger Pielke Jr. is unimpressed with weather attribution work, noting: “I can think of no other area of research where the relaxing of rigour and standards has been encouraged by researchers in order to generate claims more friendly to headlines, political advocacy and even lawsuits”.
Paymaster Larry Kramer, President of the William and Flora Hewlett Foundation, is more supportive: “With the growth in climate related litigation, judges need this kind of education to be prepared to weight scientific evidence and make better informed decisions.”
Chris Morrison is the Daily Sceptic’s Environment Editor.
To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.
Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.
Great presentation by Dr. Scot Youngblood, MD about Covid19 vaccine facts & mandates!
https://twitter.com/USMortality/status/1455671034489737223?s=20
Labelled as misleading…
Wonder why?
The future North Korea sends farmers to labour camps for low corn yields and field workers are STRIP-SEARCHED for grain as country’s food crisis continues
The thought of where they’re hiding it should really kill the black market.
Michel Palin took a train fro. Pyongyang to China some years ago. While the N. Koreans could present their capital as a Ptempkin village to some extent, nothing could hide rural peasants scrabbling in already harvested fields looking for overlooked individual grains of oats.
High Court rules that unvaccinated care home workers can be sacked By Kathy Gyngell
https://www.conservativewoman.co.uk/high-court-rules-that-unvaccinated-care-home-workers-can-be-sacked/
High Court rules that unvaccinated care home workers can be sacked despite the fact 80% of workers are already vaxxed and 95% of residents are vaxxed.
Here are some upcoming peaceful events:
Tuesday 9th November 11am – Bracknell
Meeting place: outside The Bull, (Bull Square) High Street, Bracknell 56 High St, Bracknell RG12 1DP.
***
Saturday 13th November 2pm – Reading
BERKSHIRE STAND FOR FREEDOM
Meeting place: Forbury Gardens Reading RG1 3BB
guest speaker Anna De Buisseret Senior Lawyer
****
Saturday 27th November 11am – Bracknell
Stand by the Road Yellow Board event
By the Peel Centre Skimped Hill Ln, Bracknell RG12 1EN
****
Saturday 11th December 2pm – Henley-on-Thames,
HENLEY, OXFORDSHIRE STAND FOR FREEDOM
Meet by the Town Hall, Market Place, Henley-on-Thames, Oxfordshire, RG9 2AQ by 2pm
***********************
Stand in the Park Sundays from 10am – make friends & keep sane
Wokingham – Howard Palmer Gardens Wokingham RG40 2HD
Bracknell South Hill Park, Rear Lawn, Bracknell RG12 7PA (Also Wednesdays from 2pm)
JOIN Telegram http://t.me/astandintheparkbracknell
‘The future’ and the past, N Korea descended into serfdom some decades ago together with taking a leaf out of Stalins genocide handbook.
‘”Peasants are ordered to hand over 60% of their produce leaving them with just 40%, barely enough to live on”
Depends on how much they produce, sloppy journalism.
Fun fact 1. North Koreans are, on average, 2 inches shorter than their Southern counterparts.
Fun fact 2. In the early 1960s S. Koreas GDP was on a par with Zambia. S. Koreas ruling kleptocracy stole much of the country’s incoming. foreign aid.
, Zambias took all of theirs with the results we can all see today.
I’m going to make a shocking revelation that most here aren’t going to like, so for bonus down votes, here goes.
I’m not opposed to hardly any of the covid mitigation measures (except illogical passports) that have been put in place! Some like quarantine I think are logical, some like masks are pointless, some like vaccines are just ideological, I’ve never seen any proof any vaccine for any disease meets big pharma hype.
I am however 100% against any form of coercion, force or mandatory government imposed dictate. All these measures should be voluntary but not discriminatory if you can’t discriminate against gender, sex, race or religion neither should you be able to against bodily autonomy & personal medical choice.
The only obligation an individual has in my mind towards public health is isolation if you have symptoms of infectious disease! You can have a debate on germ theory vs terrain theory, but it’s a reasonable request, that if you’re sick, stay home until your symptoms (shedding) have diminished.
Different strokes for different folks, more conservative views about masks, distancing & WFH are again about personal comfort, sometimes more conservative readers who like to see the old normal return don’t realize many people like others to keep a respectful distance in daily life are happier working from home, don’t enjoy the hassle & bustle of crowded public spaces regardless of covid-19 status. If you want your freedoms respected, you have to be willing to respect other people’s choices.
On another note, i’m not usually given to optimism, but it’s evident for most to see the climate justice movement really is just a power grab of the already offensively wealthy establishment elites.
Perhaps this is an opportunity for a Cultural Revolution, the hypocrisy of the royals, neoliberals & globalists hasn’t gone unnoticed by the unwashed masses during cop26. This could be the turning point where we abolish the monarchy, depose the neoliberal establishment & shun multinational corporations, or it could be the end of this industrial civilization.
If we get it wrong, we may become forever slaves to technocracy & machines!
May have been posted before but worthwhile reposting.
Ethics and Morals in a Pandemic Part 1 Dr. Julie Ponesse
Ethics and Morals in a Pandemic Part 2; https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qzFqt0wBCMo
Sounds interesting, saved for when I have a spare hour.
On the subject of Canada, Alex Belfied had a report on YouTube yesterday about a Canadian Supreme Court ruling supporting a comedians contention that nobody has the ‘right not to be offended’ even when, as in this case, the offense was taken over a joke about a disabled boy.
Probably was offensive, so what? It’s still not illegal, so sayeth The Judge ( from which precidence can be taken in this country).
There’s a difference between being offensive & bullying! Bullying is abhorrent & shouldn’t be tolerated (doesn’t mean it should be illegal) making a one off comment that offends, tough, get over it. Neither justifies being kept in a cage by the authorities.
Same as any ism, I can’t abide injustice, nasty racism should be treated as social leprosy, just discriminating who you socialize with is perfectly reasonable in my thinking. If it’s bigotry, so what.
The offendee was not the disabled boy who was imaginary.
The offendee was the type who trawls through the internet looking for things to get offended by and then complaining.
I could save him a lot of trouble.
Search YouTube for ‘worlds most offensive jokes’, there’s loads of it.
Alright, Alex Belfield, bloody spellchecker.
Can’t stand him, “chunky“.
Each to his own but he’s often a day or more in advance of our own Roundup
It’s his presentation more than anything.
I think they may be using “climate” policy to trigger civil war, since the plandemic proved a damp squib, with the infantilised populations.
There are different sorts of Revolution involving the transfer of wealth and power ( which is why the American revolution wasn’t one because the wealth and power remained in the same hands).
The introduction of Feudalism saw the transfer of w&p from smallholder freemen to the new feudal aristocracy. Many of the wars of the late middle ages were about transferring w&p from the landed aristocracy to absolute monarchs. Later still they were to transfer it from royalty and remnant aristos to the merchants and bankers.
The 20thC saw socialism fail to transfer w&p to the workers although The Market partly did that job for them.
Now, as you rightly observe, we appear to be witnessing a w&p grab by a tiny minority of the already ridiculously wealthy but tiny elite at the expense of the middle classes that form the majority of western populations. I would suggest that these are the newly enriched by big tech rather than The Establishment.
At this stage the monarchy and aristocracy are merely ornaments to gawp at, most of their privileges usurped by foreigners with more money than they have, from access to private education to a place in the Royal Box at Ascot.
History will probably call this process the Digital Revolution after forgetting about using Covid19 as a fig leaf, clapped along by Greta and the other useful idiots who will be cast aside to cry in the gutter.
Yes I agree with much of that, although perhaps you understate the influence of monarchy, I would certainly be happy to see Charlie living in a cardboard box under a bridge.
To be honest I don’t follow the detail of the history books, but you’re right about how the control & transfer of land “ownership” over the ages has shaped our country (world) & culture.
Personally as a libertarian minded individual I don’t believe in the concept of property (land) ownership, who had the right to sell it? “Property ownership is very much a modern “liberal” concept, as in crony capitalist! That should be separate from occupant’s rights in my mind (that’s another debate for another time).
And although I agree with you about the current power of big tech, i’m not so sure if we aren’t about to see them get reigned in by the establishment, perhaps big tech got to big & cocky & their influence have given the establishment a scare, time will tell.
I would say don’t underestimate the privilege & influence of the firm.
Under Feudalism land was generally just grabbed by the powerful with or without the consent of the King. Later it was often transferred from the old aristocracy to the merchants as a result of bankruptcy caused by ostentatious folly.
What was left was much reduced following the introduction of Inheritance (or Death) Tax which itself is now haunting the middle classes. It was never intended to apply to detached bungalows in Wimbledon or Wimborne.
A knock on the door,”i’ll fight you for it“, always seemed more civilized than banks selling mortgages to me. I just can’t get my head around someone claiming to own something that’s been there a billion years before they existed & will be there a billion years after they have gone.
Squatter rights seem fairer, if no one’s using it, it’s up for grabs (so to speak)! I’ve always wanted to build my own house without government interference like people used to. As a history buff you may appreciate this channel, https://www.youtube.com/c/TheWoodlandEscape/videos self-reliance is freedom, government/corporate dependence is slavery.
Our country has become too socialist & dependent on the state.
Thanks, just subscribed and will take a proper look later.
Squatters rights do still exist to some degree, if you occupied some of the million or so unowned acres in this country without someone saying “get orf of moi laand”, after a while you can claim it as your own. Building subject to Planning Permission.
As a moderate Royalist I have to admit to qualms at the prospect of Charlie replacing Her Maj as titular Head Of State.
My mum made we watch his inauguration as Prince Of Wales, I thought he was a twat then and still do.
‘The Queen is dead, Long live King William’ would suit me better.
You ,ay want to look at what Adam Smith, David Ricardo and Winston Churchill have said about “land monopoly” land title etc.
Under English feudalism, all land, along with the serfs who tilled it, belonged to the king. He doled out estates to the barons (thugs) as he pleased. If a thug offended him, he ‘distrained’ on that thug, told another thug he could have that estate for the taking, and let the two thugs fight it out. This gave an enormous boost to royal power. Everybody else owned nothing and was unhappy.
That was the theory, in practice powerful lords, especially the Barons on the Welsh Marches had a much freer(?) hand especially under a weak king.
Strictly speaking, French (Norman) feudalism, imposed on England by foreign invasion and conquest.
Vae victis!
Also Wales, obs, Ireland and Scotland, Robert the Bruce was Norman. The family who inhabit our local Castle and great estate have a French name that they can trace back to the conquest.
The thought of Little Goblin Greta crying in the gutter has its attractions.
Why say ignoring the patently sensible practice of isolating when diseased is just for the middle aged?
As for the rest of it, when the teenage pupils/students are attending our (6th form) College they pointedly ignore masks and all the social distancing bollocks; during the laughable ‘rule of 6’ they seemed to make a point of roaming around in packs of 8 or more.
Local Live Online managed to find one girl to tell how scared it made her feel but she was clearly Jenny-no-mates with ‘issues’ about this that and the other.
No doubt all the older teens will fall into line at the prospect of being allowed to return to Club 18-30 in Ibeza again.
Self Isolation when infected with a Notifiable Disease was already covered by the Public Health Act 1984.
It applied to infected, or suspected infected, individuals especially recalcitrant types like Typhoid Mary (go Google) but was designed to be implemented by Local Health Authorities.
It does not allow Central Government to impose sanctions upon the entire population or swathes thereof.
In the olden days when young families were having chicken pox parties (‘sleep-overs’) grandparents knew perfectly well to “keep their distance”* for a week or so.
*that was the exact phrase used throughout the 20thC.
I wasn’t talking legal obligation, just personal responsibility.
I don’t mind a bit if people lock themselves in their houses and hide under the bed quaking in terror. They can stay there till they die. I loathe the sight of maskoids, but if obliterating their face behind a damp, bacteria-ridden
rag is their choice, then they can go ahead. The snake oils are useless, but if people want to be pumped full of useless poison then let them. It may, or may not, prove to be less dangerous than smoking.
Now the corollary. I want to make my choices as well.
They make their choices, I’ll make mine. Living death for them, living life for me.
Grab a scotch and a cigar, sit back, and enjoy:
https://gab.com/TommyRobinsonOfficial/posts/107210215932510103
https://youtu.be/JfAJZvD1Q9E
Gab would not load though bravely done by Piers Corbyn on the YouTube link.
Who is Khoo?
I noticed the Gab link would not load but left it up since the YouTube link was fine, and hoped the peoblem with Gab was at my end. The Gab link shows a woman at the same event interrupting Ferguson when he says children have ‘sacrificed’ a lot in the last 18 months. Immediately you hear, ‘Why?’ She goes on to call Ferguson a ‘murderer’ and tells the audience she doesn’t know how they can sit there listening to him. She again calls him a murderer and you hear quite a big cheer from the crowd/audience. There doesn’t appear to be an awful lot of people there, so it seems that a good percentage were in agreement with the woman. Which makes sense because clearly Corbyn and others were there ready to disrupt the event.
‘Khoo’ is a regular at freedom marches and the smaller protests.
Thank you for that, clearly Ferguson did not vet his audience adequately. He was probably genuinely surprised at the level of vitriol.
Well it seems a dead cert now that we’re heading for the next round of lockdown: Kate Garraway’s Husband, Derek Draper is back in the top Google trends [manipulated algorithms] every day of the week as he is every time we’re in lockdown.
We seem to have a weird new breed of celebrity since the “Great Reset” began – those who’s deathly illness is used to captivate an increasingly mentally sick society. I’ll admit I’ve never gone out my way to read a single sentence about the bloke, I couldn’t give a fuck about him. But what I hear flittering around in passing conversation is that he’s ‘getting more ill’, ‘he mustn’t have long’, ‘isn’t it awful’, etc, etc. He’s apparently been on death’s door for at least a whole year, yet there’s always something more tragic to report about him.
What is peculiar (or not) is that his name vanished for the months during summer. Why was it not a surprise to see it reappear right at a time when the complicit media are running polls that celebrate the public supposedly begging to go back into lockdown?
We could do with more shit stirring gobshites like Draper within Labour, he’s done them far more harm than good but only ever thinks of himself.
When being interviewed by an undercover Observer (Sunday Guardian) journalist in an attempt to elicit bribes by lobbying the then Labour Government he said
“There are 17 people who matter in this government. To say I am intimate with every one of them is the understatement of the century”. What a knob.
A quick Google finds the same old sob story you mention in Hello! the Mirror, Star and Daily Express within the past 12 hours, hardly organs of note.
“Did Covid first emerge at the Wuhan Institute of Virology?”
An article which completely fails to mention that SARS-2 was detected in wastewater in Barcelona in March 2019 and in wastewater and blood samples in Lombardy in September 2019.
The cases in Lombardy were the result of huge numbers of Chinese being flown into north Italy to work as cheap labour in the garments industry.
In September 2019 they did not know to look for Covid but some were identified retrospectively, in France also.
Tried to explain this to my family last week (CV in Spain/Italy 2019). They just could not get it and kept saying “but it didn’t exist until March 2020”. Sadly all 2xjabbed.
ITEM: “‘Coercion is not consent’: Aussie sports star & registered nurse defends stance against ‘experimental’ Covid vaccine (Video)” – “Australian rules football star Deni Varnhagen, who is also an ICU nurse, is refusing to back down in her opposition to Covid vaccine mandates after taking part in a demonstration to rail against a ‘medical experiment’,” reports RT.
The Adelaide Crows Aussie Rules premiership-winning football champion is sticking to her guns – fighting on two fronts. One – against the ‘moderate’ ‘Liberal’ state government of Steven Marshall, which will sack her from her nursing job if she doesn’t get the shot. Two – against the gutless women’s football bosses who have ‘mandated’ the jab for all professional players (a policy copied, inevitably, from Dan Andrews).
Good on Deni – at least she is showing more principle than some other women footy players who have gone ostentatiously public to show them getting the needle to cajole others into the jab.
The report in RT quotes some anonymous ‘public health professional’ (all bow down, now) criticising Varnhagen as follows: “If you are a nurse that does not understand vaccines or the underlying science (and the science is clear on Covid vaccines safety and efficacy), then it’s clear nursing is NOT the right career choice for you“.
I think this needs amending as follows: “”If you are a nurse that does
notunderstand [the Covid non-vaccine] vaccines and the underlying science (and the science is clear on Covid vaccines’ [lack of]-safety and [waning to negative after five months] efficacy), then it’s clear nursing is EXACTLYNOTthe right career choice for you“.I sometimes wonder how dumb certain ‘public health officials’ (and politicians, and ‘journalists’, etc. etc.) can get during the Covid madness but I should stop saying so because they seem to be taking it as a challenge to rise to!
Phil
Adelaide
Good for her.
Let’s hope her lawyer explains to her that every single person involved in trying to coerce her into taking the jab is a criminal under the 1st principle of “Do no harm”.
This does not just apply to medics, it is a fundamental part of Human Rights not to mention swathes of Common Law under which she is also protected.
Bureaucrats may imagine that they have legislated these protections away but they are wrong. As wrong as Charles the 1st was about the Divine Rule Of Kings.
The receptionist who ushers the victim to the vaccine station to be wounded at the moment of injection is as guilty by omission as the concentration guard who was only ‘following orders’ by manning his watchtower even if he didn’t kill anyone personally.
All are guilty, all the way down the line.
Popular sportsperson + ICU nurse + vax skeptic = Scotty From Marketing’s worst nightmare.
It would be a bonus if Deni triggered another video from that useless munter Sandilands!
https://technofog.substack.com/p/cdc-emails-our-definition-of-vaccine
“If you are a nurse that does not understand vaccines ” Neither does the nurse… These are not vaccinnes.
The events of the last 18 months have raised some interesting issues, far above the fairly straight-forward one of managing a novel virus. Why have we let go of basic Western freedoms so easily? Why have we not fought for a free press, freedom of speech or the right to protest, now all largely gone? Why are we allowing ourselves to be subjugated by internationalist traitors like Alexander Johnson or Anthony Blair, and their plans to destroy our currency and force us to live in a surveillance state? How can we betray our war dead like this? All of our values will of course return, and the traitors will be punished, probably brutally if history is anything to go by, but why must it always get to that? Why can we not see these threats when they are still far enough away to handle without such extreme measures?
Our world will be unrecognizable by 2025.
Why ? Communism, communism is a liberal middle-class child, it may not be the 1920s style communism, the privileged elite won’t be expected to follow the communist manifesto. Communism is effectively the majority ruled by a minority, everyone’s treated equally just as long as they keep to the rules, but not everyone is equal!
It’s achieved through brute force, lackeys, shills & camp guards enforce the elite minorities rules in turn they get a few crumbs paid for by the oppressed masses taxes. Sound familiar? Marxists of course blame capitalism, but the corporate model has far more in common with communism than principles of free, unregulated trade.
China calls itself communist, not me. China follows a regulated planned economy, it has no political opposition & the political elite call themselves the communist party. China is in effect one giant corporation. The west is following that model with the inevitable corruption, a.k.a crony capitalism & all collectivist/socialist regimes require totalitarianism to work.
The conservative party are neoliberals who share the same values as Chinese rule. Their goal is the entire planet being managed as a single corporation. Not a democracy, “Democracy; (Greek: δημοκρατία, dēmokratiā, from dēmos ‘people’ and kratos ‘rule’[1])”
Does the western political regimes we live in meet that definition of democracy? No we live in a technocratic rules based order, only the privileged get to decide the rules any opposition is punished & silenced.
Absolutely spot on about Corporate China.
While that entity might not have plans for territorial expansion (bar Taiwan) it is buying up land and access to resources all over the third world and especially in Africa yet the Left do not denounce them as Colonisers which they surely are.
In Pakistan they have built a port to which they now have sole right of use for fifty years in much the same way as Britain turned a swamp into Hongkong.
The Communists in Russia were not Communist even within their own party. As you suggest the vast majority of entry level drudges were expected to disseminate propaganda and denounce unbelievers in return for which the got the same crappy flat as everybody else but just a bit sooner.
The Country dachas, smart town houses, luxury but still crappy Zil limousines and access to western goodies were reserved for the Party elite only.
Coming our way sometime soon unless we do something about it.
See my reply to Phil Shannon above.
Bureaucrats might think they have stolen these Rights from us but they are wrong. None of it has yet been tested in Court and while it’s taking too much time the Lawyers are still on the case.
It’s going to get messy.
Those implementing their foul plans think they are being clever by playing fast and loose in many different legislatures simultaneously but the same applies to Jurisdictions which are equally numerous but each single High Court Judge can set worldwide precedence, for good or ill.
If that doesn’t work there is still, as you intimate, the Mussolini or Ceaucescu solution.
“Toby Young from the Free Speech Union says “white privilege” should not be taught in schools.”
Not only should it not be taught, but those teaching it, and those who sanctioned it should be fired without appeal or pension, and then children should be taught how evil and depraved those people are.
‘Slippery slope-Covidian Sludge’
What’s it all been about summed in two words by that article
Deferring hyperinflation.
What’s remarkable is that people honestly think lockdowns, digital IDs, the withdrawal of cash and introduction of central bank digital currencies, and the climate conferences are because politicians care about humans or the environment. Politicians care only about money, and right now the Western economy is on the verge of total collapse.
The Ponzi scheme deck of cards housing market about to come crashing down.
That has been the case for forty or fifty years, each government in turn hoping and praying it doesn’t happen on their watch but just putting it off for the next lot.
“White Privilege” is a lie. But privileged whites are a reality.
“White ‘male’ Privilege” is just as big a lie
As are underprivileged whites a reality especially boys in school, Toby’s observation has been commonplace for some years.
I’m white and I’m Male but I’m not privileged in terms of income or assets
To presume ‘white male privileg’ is as racist as saying ‘black cannibals’.
Here’s what communications giant AT&T have to say on the subject while training its employees
Perhaps AT&T would like to try how well they get on without their problem?
The one thing i’ve honestly never seen (as far as I recall) seeing DS/Toby Young ever mention or discuss is Assange! The Most Important Battle For Press Freedom In Our Time why is that?
Too much of a hot potato I expect.
Yes: it is increasingly obvious how TY avoids such contentious issues.
This site started Lockdownsceptics so Assange was way off target.
I think it became Daily Skeptic when we had used all the arguments we needed which still refute each and every new bit of nonsense they come out with in support of lockdown and it was all getting a bit repetitive.
Toby could have shut down shop altogether but instead chose to widen the field of skepticism.
At the end of the day it is his site and he can lead on whichever subjects he chooses.
I’ve never seen anyone being censored for going off on a tangent though.
Toby please stop saying ‘teaching white privilege’, it is indoctrination not teaching.
Any school staff found to be praising the holocaust, jihad or fairydust unicorns about to descend from the sky to save humanity from the Covid would not be described as ‘teaching’
This is a good point. Teaching implies the act of transferring knowledge. Anti-white race hatred is not knowledge but social indoctrination, identical in nature and purpose to the anti-semitic propaganda German children were given by the Nazis in the 1930s. Our children must sit in silence while adults lecture them about what awful people they are, just as the little Jewish kids had to do less than 100 years ago. How time flies.
“The masses have never thirsted after truth. Whoever can supply them with illusions is easily their master; whoever attempts to destroy their illusions is always their victim.”
— Gustave Le Bon
Tonga enters lockdown after first Covid case recorded
We can’t even see parody in the rear view mirror anymore.
Amazon tribes are vaccinated for disease they’d never heard of until Peruvian medical team arrives by boat with shots for everyone That’s them, finished then!
That’s so very sad.
Did they get Bezos?
LOLs
No. The opposite of funny. These people should have been left alone.
… and he came from zerocovidstabeverybodytwotiersocietysnaplockdown Ardernland. Who’d have thunk it?
Yep: Ardern’s new export!
Astonishing that he came from New Zealand, the Zero Covid capital of the universe!
“U.K. NIHR bombshell: fully vaccinated serve as vectors, comparable transmission to household contacts”
How is this a news bombshell? I read about this last year in a research paper. The regime has known about the injected being able to transmit the virus from the very beginning of the roll out campaign. Extraordinary.
We were told so by the developers and manufacturers before the vaccines were even rolled out, covering their arses obviously.
Just like the boxes of pale blue masks which say not for clinical/medical use on the outside.
I showed that to a shopkeeper who was flogging them, he just scratched his head.
He probably didn’t understand that it’s a ‘get out’ clause to avoid being prosecuted for selling it off as if it complied with whatever standards it would have to follow to be used by the medics, when it doesn’t. You need a magnifying glass to read notices like that – and no doubt they would have been labelled in large text as “face covers”, not “masks”, for the same reason.
Not only that, everyone who received the paperwork advertising the jabs will have been told that they do not promise that it would prevent transmission, in a somewhat awkward, negative fashion: “We do not yet know whether it will stop you from catching and passing on the virus”. Of course, it doesn’t say that it could actually INCREASE the risk to third parties!
I took jabs 1&2 for reasons I’ve outlined before. The only information I was given (though I consider myself well informed already after being on this site since last June) was a leaflet telling me how unlikely it was that I would get blood clots as a side effect.
That was on the way OUT of the wigwam erected by my GP Practice after jab #1 and in no way can be used to say I gave informed consent.
It is extraordinary that in any other moment in time, if such an organisation had produced a report of this nature then A) it would automatically collapse the jab passport policy (completely without ANY merit on the basis of these findings) and B) it would render the jabbing nothing other than a matter of pure personal choice. The fact that neither A or B will happen before hell freezes over is what is extraordinary.
“From lockdown to net zero, accountability is dead in British politics”
“Good things are easily destroyed, but not easily created.”
— Sir Roger Scruton, English philosopher (1944 – 2020)
Scruton was the architect of the word “oikophobe” which described the political classes’ hatred of the average person on the street.
I believe that the Daily Skeptic should be reporting on these significant events:
Anna de Buisserret, Lawyer interviewed about legal proceedings and our rights against vax coercion.
https://youtu.be/ScC0sSYuDsQ
The UKMFA letter before Action
to all MPs advising of malfeasance:
https://www.ukmedfreedom.org/open-letters/ukmfa-letter-before-action-pertaining-to-misfeasance-to-mps-msps-and-mss?fbclid=IwAR1QjEe153kYmap5Joi4GRq04aZ8jIr_m1XLXTXFRUqIw1t34VOfdde6VZU
The idea we are at war (and nobody is telling us) has crossed my mind several times, nothing to do with conspiracy theorists or social media, just a thought. Why are these weird industrial accidents happening? Why haven’t western powers exploited covid against China more?
Just a thought no proof, but the next world war will be more digital & biowarfare, than conventional arms. Do they know far more than they are telling us about covid? Question everything, explore all possibilities!
This lawyer sounds like she knows her stuff & unlike many i’ve seen sounds sensible.
Some of the content of my recent replies to your comments, and others, came directly from watching that brilliant video.
It isn’t getting nearly enough traction having only gone from 3k to 21k views since the weekend.
Pleas send the link to the DS Editorial Team, I can’t do it on my Android
Your first link was posted by Burlington Bertie here last week, it is a superb piece that I have been urging DS to look at ever since.
I suggested nailing it to the Daily Sceptic header.
Perhaps someone could post the link to the editorial Team, I can’t from an Android.
At 08.45 your link is at the bottom of Roundup comments with two new articles above, few DS readers will see it here.
PLEASE REPOST later so that evening visitors might catch it.
Thank you karenovirus for promoting & sharing the link. I’ve been sharing the heck out of it! Her statement that if we do nothing, say nothing & turn a blind eye makes us complicit in the genocide really elucidated that it is up to us, the non-brainwashed, to do our bit, no matter how small that bit is.
I’ve emailed the link to the Ed team & asked them if they can do a bit more digging on our behalf. The more we can do, the better.
Thanks Bertie, I really do think it’s worth making it a ‘sticky’ on the Roundup
Homecoming Queen RT
The video of young Zachary being chosen as
histheys High School Carnival Queen is obviously staged since they is the only person in position to receive the accolade.Likewise the spontaneous outburst of cheering from the girls, reduced to also rans on the benches.
Does not say who made the decision to declare Zachary the Carnival Queen, did the students vote or was it woke school staff?
Some years ago a teacher was telling me that his (early High School) students are remarkably accepting of ‘otherness’ within their group, gayness was mentioned but Trans and gender rearrangement were not then subject to debate.
I did not trouble to doubt him but in my day boys were boys and girls were girls ( unfortunately for them in our view), a ‘bit of a Tomboy’ was acceptable up to a point and a certain age but ‘a bit of a Tinagirl’ never entered anyone’s mind, or if it did he kept quiet about it.
Is they a boy in a skirt or trans, apparently that’s defined by a rape conviction.
mother of skirt-wearing teen who raped a female classmate in girls’ bathroom says he is a troubled boy who identifies as male and just wanted sex
Looks like when trans rights leads to indefensible acts, they suddenly see what the rest of us already knew.
Debbie Hayton, in the Speccie, is very good at calling this out, & as she is a trans woman who is biologically male (her description), speaks from a position of knowledge & cannot stand the current direction of travel.
Alex Belfied had a YouTube piece about a well known American Trans (Kate Jenner?) who came out, as it were, with the same opinion, saying she just wants to be left
alone to get on with it without a lot of shouting from people who claim to represent her.
I first came across a Trans person when one of our field workers got his ‘girlfriend’ a job in the office. At first we just thought she had large hands until the truth emerged. Only one male colleague tried to give her a hard time until the rest of the staff shouted him down.
This was twenty years ago but we did not need lessons in how to treat an individual with respect.
It was bound to happen, indeed it already has in a female HMP and will continue to happen unless the Fems win their current battle with the Trans crowd.
Sadly in PC world the most PC always seem to win.
On the stupidities of trendy fascism over speech (triggered by the Old Vic issue), I find it interesting how my young grandaughter responds when she’s in the wrong and gets pulled up :
“You’ve hurt my feelings!”, she shouts.
‘Nuff said. Public discourse descending to the playpen.
… and what retrogressive damage is being done to essentially worthwhile campaigns against prejudice by all the correctness shite?