• Login
  • Register
The Daily Sceptic
No Result
View All Result
  • Articles
  • About
  • Archive
    • ARCHIVE
    • NEWS ROUND-UPS
  • Podcasts
  • Newsletter
  • Premium
  • Donate
  • Log In
The Daily Sceptic
No Result
View All Result

The Death of Merit

by Dr James Allan
22 November 2023 7:00 PM

Tolerance and merit. These abstract concepts have been two of the great legacies of Western culture. They drive freedom, competition and wealth. But both are under incredible threat from those who prefer to see the world in terms of identity politics – this is the basic notion that the most important thing about any individual is the group to which he or she belongs. It’s not one’s ability to work hard or her moral character or his resilience or even one’s unique beauty or brains that matter.  Nope. It’s the sort of reproductive organs you bring to the table. Or your skin pigmentation. Or the religion you practise. Or that your kind arrived somewhere first. That’s the core of identity politics and it has infected politics, the universities, the corporate world, the churches, the entirety of the Human Resources sector.  Heck, the whole of the myriad DEI bureaucracies are based on identity politics.

It also lies at the heart of many claims of discrimination, of ‘unconscious bias’ (a notion, by the way, that cannot be cashed out and whose original mooters now doubt is coherent), and of the tediously frequent various days of ‘celebration’ for this supposedly downtrodden group or that – how many different flags fly atop your university alma mater do you reckon? Here’s how this identity politics thinking goes. You start by seeing the world solely in group terms. Then you look for differential outcomes (by group, never in terms of individuals where some were more talented and deserving than others). Then, by definitional fiat as it were, you attribute the differences between groups to discrimination, oppression, historical wrongdoing. Then you pick some highly desirable job or educational place or political party pre-selection spot and if there is a statistical discrepancy you allege – you take it for granted in fact – that the cause and the explanation is discrimination. (Again, it is always some desirable spot. No one says “almost all rubbish collectors are men so we need to use the power of the state to even things up”. Nor does anyone point out that over 95% of those who die at work are in jobs held by men and so “by God we need to change this sort of historical injustice so that we can get more women into these jobs where they can die at work and even things up. For too long women haven’t been dying at work”.)

In other words, this sort of thinking deals in the same sort of causal reductionism as old-fashioned Marxism (which also dealt in group thinking of course). It’s no longer all economic and control of the means of production. Now all explanations are in terms of discrimination and past injustice and oppression. But that only works today, or for Marxists, if you ignore individual merit, preferences, druthers and instead see everything through the prism of some single feature – their sex, race, religion, take your pick – and of groups not individuals.

And that takes me back to the current attacks on tolerance and merit in the West. For the first of these you might not at first glance think that tolerance is under attack because all one ever hears is the demand for tolerance. But the sort of ‘tolerance’ demanded by today’s identity politics warriors is very different to the one that drove the success of Western countries since the Enlightenment. The old-fashioned variant of tolerance – I call it ‘real tolerance’ – grew out of the religious wars in Europe between Protestants and Catholics. The numbers killed were big. It eventually dawned on people that things would be a lot better if we in this principality left you in yours to worship as you pleased. We leave you alone and you leave us alone. ‘Live and let live.’ You can run very successful societies with that underlying core foundation. But notice that old-fashioned tolerance is a means of getting along, of being polite. It in no way requires anyone to believe that others are living good lives, fulfilling lives, or worthy lives. Heck, the Protestants and Catholics stopped killing one another and indeed often lived in the same countries but both still thought the others were going to hell and were wholly misguided. They certainly did not think the others’ views were worthy of respect – full disclosure here, I come from a long-line of Scots-Canadian Calvinists (my parents being atheists, but culturally in that same mould) and no one in my extended family thought the Catholic worldview was anything other than massively wrongheaded. Put bluntly, tolerance did not include any notion of respect for the life choices of others. But today’s language of ‘tolerance’ has wholly inverted things. Groups based on whom they sleep with, or whom they worship, or what their culture happens to practise demand total ‘respect’ – if you don’t give it to them then you’re not being tolerant they say. You’re probably a bigot. That is not sustainable; it doesn’t deal in honest behaviour. ‘Live and let live’, with a healthy dose of politeness, is the sort of tolerance that works.

And as for merit, this idea is daily trashed by the wokester identity politics crowd. Once you’ve gone down the path of seeing people only in terms of the groups to which they belong and then dealt in statistical outcome differences with all group-differences always and everywhere being explained as discrimination then there really isn’t any room left for the notion of merit. Is there? But boy oh boy a society throws out the idea of merit at its peril. Merit drives competition and hard work. It delivers wealth, innovation and indeed self-respect. Jettison merit and you go back to feudal times. Or to the quota-obsessed India after independence. Everything collapses into box-ticking. Sure, the quotas won’t always be explicit but that’s what life will amount to.

At this point some of you are probably thinking, “Allan’s overstating things here”. I’m not. Last week the Vice-Chancellor of the Queensland University of Technology – be clear readers, not my University of Queensland – announced that QUT was going to remove all references to ‘merit’ from its hiring policy. The new approach would factor in gender, ethnicity and departmental balance. This is what societal decline looks like. That is politics all the way down (and as an aside, balance will not include any spots for conservatives I can assure you). If law firms and other employers had any cojones – they don’t, this is a wish – they would announce that merit does matter to them and no QUT graduates would henceforth be hired by them. Full stop. Same for governments. And alumni would simply announce that they will never give another penny to QUT until it reverses this policy.

I wonder if the Vice Chancellor of QUT believes that she earned her spot at the top on merit? I’m betting she does think that. Almost everyone who imposes these anti-merit quota-type policies on others believes that she, herself, got there on merit. If not, maybe she could just handover her VC job to a disabled, homosexual, Zarathustrian, vegan – or whoever better ticks all the ‘departmental balance’ criteria. What an embarrassment to QUT.

James Allan is the Garrick Professor of Law at Queensland University. This article first appeared in Spectator Australia.

Tags: AustraliaEDIIdentity politicsIntoleranceMeritocracyToleranceUniversityWokeWoke Gobbledegook

Donate

We depend on your donations to keep this site going. Please give what you can.

Donate Today

Comment on this Article

You’ll need to set up an account to comment if you don’t already have one. We ask for a minimum donation of £5 if you'd like to make a comment or post in our Forums.

Sign Up
Previous Post

Lockdown Was Necessary to Prevent “Extraordinarily High Loss of Life”, Chris Whitty Tells Covid Inquiry – Despite Sweden

Next Post

News Round-Up

Subscribe
Login
Notify of
Please log in to comment

To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.

Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.

21 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
GLT
GLT
4 years ago

What a fantastic essay. Many thanks.

20
0
ANDY MANSELL
ANDY MANSELL
4 years ago
Reply to  GLT

Absolutely. Sums up modern life in general for me.

3
0
Barney McGrew
Barney McGrew
4 years ago

A brilliant article. Many thanks.

11
0
Anton
Anton
4 years ago

Superb. And timely.

12
0
Mike May
Mike May
4 years ago

The latter part of that final paragraph – poetry!

As for the Thursday evening clap-for-key-workers ceremony I doubt I’m the only one eerily minded of Orwell’s two-minutes’ hate from 1984.

25
0
ANDY MANSELL
ANDY MANSELL
4 years ago
Reply to  Mike May

I’ll be honest- I take part. Originally, I thought it a nice idea, but as it dragged on and it became apparent that there were some people clearly watching to see who was and was not complying it started to feel a little creepy and not a little like an episode from ‘The Prisoner’- especially in a small village. I now take part to save my family from being declared ‘unmutual’…

3
0
Bertie Fox
Bertie Fox
4 years ago

Wonderful article! Thank you!!

8
0
rodmclaughlin
rodmclaughlin
4 years ago

Brilliant. Far-ranging analysis of modern society which goes way beyond just a critique of the lockdown.

10
0
Tom
Tom
4 years ago

The emphasis that the government – or, perhaps better, the state – places on citizens’ emotions and perceptions is a hallmark of dystopian societies: in “1984” Winston must not merely say that 2 + 2 = 5, but actually believe it; in Zamyatin’s “We” the state surgically removes the imagination from the population to reduce them to mere functionaries; and in “Brave New World” people are relentlessly conditioned to identify with the state: “everyone’s happy now”. This of course goes hand-in-hand with our new-found love of censorship – “dangerous” is the new “degenerate” – and the constant appeal to security. The principle of individual autonomy – probably the defining idea of the West – is apparently now the greatest threat. Thanks for the article.

14
0
Hieronimusb
Hieronimusb
4 years ago

A good essay which eloquently deconstructs the message but fails to name the ‘science’ behind it: Applied Behavioural Psychology (see Edward Bernays et al). Call it spin, call it what you like, governments have been ramping up their use of it for decades and it is now an insidious virus with far more potential for harm than SARS-COV-2.

15
0
Jacqueline Johnstone
Jacqueline Johnstone
4 years ago
Reply to  Hieronimusb

Susan Michie of Sage, Boris Johnson’s new BF advisor, is one of those (Applied Behavioural Psychologist). An avowed communist to boot. Lordy, Lordy.

1
0
Dene Bebbington
Dene Bebbington
4 years ago

Emotion and fear (whether because of a supposed internal or external threat) have always been two of the many tools of government.

4
0
Dene Bebbington
Dene Bebbington
4 years ago

This quote from Fahrenheit 451 is pretty apt:

“But you can’t make people listen. They have to come round in their own time, wondering what happened and why the world blew up around them.” 

I think a lot of the lockdown supporters have yet to really understand the extent to which the world blew up around them: the avoidable non-Covid deaths and the massive economic damage which means we’re probably in for another 10 years of so-called “austerity”.

10
0
djc
djc
4 years ago
Reply to  Dene Bebbington

“Men, it has been well said, think in herds; it will be seen that they go mad in herds, while they only recover their senses slowly, and one by one.”
Memoirs of Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds, Charles Mackay, 1852

8
0
Rachel
Rachel
4 years ago
Reply to  Dene Bebbington

Been speculating they’ll start waking up when they visit Walmart and can’t find their favorite coffee brand on the shelves. “Oh no! Who ever thought economic devastation could disrupt my creaturely comforts while staying home forever.” Or the coffee will be there and suddenly cost $30 a canister instead of $2.50.

1
0
Julian
Julian
4 years ago

Spot on. The PM is at it again in the Mail on Sunday today, saying he understands our “frustration”. In other news, Spain has said it is planning “one last extension” of the emergency decree imposing restrictions, before “most of the country” returns to normality in June. Note how they need to explicitly extend it, in contrast to ours that is more or less open ended (ministers I believe can extend the Coronavirus Act) and how there is no mention of “new normal” (though I have to admit I don’t follow Spanish news closely so I may simply be ignorant of this). Who would have thought a country that has seen a long running fascist dictatorship in living memory would make our government look like sinister despots. I am placing my hope in two things: The strong drive of the British people to go to the pub and to want to make babies, and the strong drive of the government to look like it knows what it is doing when we are the only country in Europe living a “new normal” and the sky has not fallen in for them.

7
0
Rachel
Rachel
4 years ago

The Nanny State has Munchausen’s by Proxy.
Almost as bad across the pond.
Things will change (probably not for the better) come November.

0
0
Melanie Oxbrow
Melanie Oxbrow
4 years ago

Great! Thanks so much for this. If only it could be headline news instead of the lies and scaremongering that has become ‘normal’! Everyone needs to know this.

1
0

NEWSLETTER

View today’s newsletter

To receive our latest news in the form of a daily email, enter your details here:

DONATE

PODCAST

In Episode 35 of the Sceptic: Andrew Doyle on Labour’s Grooming Gang Shame, Andrew Orlowski on the India-UK Trade Deal and Canada’s Ignored Covid Vaccine Injuries

by Richard Eldred
9 May 2025
1

LISTED ARTICLES

  • Trending
  • Comments
  • Latest

News Round-Up

9 May 2025

Sun-Dimming Quango has £800 Million of Taxpayer Money to Blow – and a CEO on £450k

8 May 2025

BBC Quietly Edits Question Time After Wrongly ‘Correcting’ Richard Tice on Key Net Zero Claim

9 May 2025

The Sugar Tax Sums Up Our Descent into Technocratic Dystopia

8 May 2025

What Does David Lammy Mean by a State?

9 May 2025

News Round-Up

26

The Sugar Tax Sums Up Our Descent into Technocratic Dystopia

26

Electric Car Bursts into Flames on Driveway and Engulfs £550,000 Family Home

15

“I Was a Super Fit Cyclist Until I Had the Moderna Covid Vaccine. What Happened Next Left Me Wishing I Was Dead”

11

What Does David Lammy Mean by a State?

11

BBC Quietly Edits Question Time After Wrongly ‘Correcting’ Richard Tice on Key Net Zero Claim

9 May 2025

Electric Car Bursts into Flames on Driveway and Engulfs £550,000 Family Home

9 May 2025

“I Was a Super Fit Cyclist Until I Had the Moderna Covid Vaccine. What Happened Next Left Me Wishing I Was Dead”

9 May 2025

Nature Paper Claims to Pin Liability for ‘Climate Damages’ on Oil Companies

9 May 2025

What Does David Lammy Mean by a State?

9 May 2025

POSTS BY DATE

November 2023
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930  
« Oct   Dec »

SOCIAL LINKS

Free Speech Union
  • Home
  • About us
  • Donate
  • Privacy Policy

Facebook

  • X

Instagram

RSS

Subscribe to our newsletter

© Skeptics Ltd.

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password? Sign Up

Create New Account!

Fill the forms below to register

All fields are required. Log In

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
wpDiscuz
No Result
View All Result
  • Articles
  • About
  • Archive
    • ARCHIVE
    • NEWS ROUND-UPS
  • Podcasts
  • Newsletter
  • Premium
  • Donate
  • Log In

© Skeptics Ltd.

You are going to send email to

Move Comment
Perfecty
Do you wish to receive notifications of new articles?
Notifications preferences