Welcome to the Weekly Sceptic, episode 63!
This week:
- Sunak’s ‘Ri-shuffle’ rocks the Conservative Party as Suella Braverman is out, and, bizarrely, David Cameron is in
- Esther McVey becomes the ‘minister for common sense’
- The Armistice Day march goes much as predicted, as does the gaslighting response from the media and the Left
- Nigel Farage enters the jungle
- Greta Thunberg’s protest gets protested
- Plus the Daily Sceptic’s top stories with Will, and Peak Woke!
To advertise to our large and discerning audience (one million downloads and counting!) drop Toby a line.
Sponsored by:
- Life Guru AI (email here)
- Thor Holt (WhatsApp: 07906 321593)
- The Wild Goose Chef (07779 658164)
- Busting Anti-Vax Myths
You can listen to the podcast here and subscribe on iTunes here.
Donate to the Daily Sceptic here.
Listen to Nick’s podcast – The Current Thing – by going here.
Subscribe to Nick’s Substack here.
Help Nick keep both of his podcasts going by buying him a coffee here.
Join the Free Speech Union here.
Sign the October Declaration here.
Produced by Jason Clift
Music by Tinderella
To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.
Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.
Anyone who pays £199 pa for a subscription to Nature deserves all they misinformation they get for their money.
Fraud? Sounds more like evil to me
The simply the scientific process statement is very telling. The scientific process is obviously that – regardless of any private opinions of people who do The Science[tm] for a living – work on The Science[tm] needs funding and hence, the sciencers must deliver whatever those who are willing to fund their sciencing want. Only naive people believe sciencing would be an open-ended quest to determine true information about natural phenomena. It’s really about fabricating justifications for political goals those who fund sciencing want to achieve. Preferably with lots of math and tables in them so that laymen both end up suitably impressed and rendered incapable of asking unwelcome question like Is the emperor really clothed?
Yes, giving good slide is essential for masking the truth
The NIH doles out $billions each year in grants to private pharma companies. These same companies give back $millions to NIH scientists as royalties (kickbacks) for inventions these scientists created while at work in NIH labs. Legalised bribery.
The standout message for me is the inefficiency of peer review, whether accidental or deliberate. I have a plan. ALL papers should first appear in preprint and be available for anyone to examine. Then any and all informed analysts can dissect work before it gains the imprimatur of full publication. At present the system only allows post hoc comment, from where the taking down of a paper is far more difficult.
This is such a brilliant idea (I would say that of course) that it will never be adopted.
ISTR a retired editor of “The Lancet” saying that in his (long) experience over 90% of fully peer-reviewed papers eventually proved to be wrong – and a depressing percentage proved to be fraudulent.
In reality, “Peer Review” is no better than allowing students to mark their friends’ exam papers.
The Corruption of science for political purposes. ———We no longer have “Science”. It has morphed into “Official Science”. ——–Scientists working for governments have now become an army of data adjusters providing the excuses for government policy on everything from climate to covid. ———-“Ah yes, science. One gets such wholesale returns of conjecture from such a trifling investment of fact” –Mark Twain. —And boy do governments know that and why they seek to convince us all that since all scientists agree then so should you.
$cientists are now down there with Politicians, Lawyers and Estate Agents in the “honest and trustworthy” stakes.