I’m not one prone to hyperbole but MHRA’s latest response to one of my freedom of information (FOI) requests seems to me to be a straightforward admission that it missed Covid vaccine safety signals up to mid 2022 (not to mention safety signals with other vaccines).
Last year, whilst trawling through minutes of meetings of the Commission on Human Medicines (here and specifically here), I discovered that MHRA had been concerned about the large numbers of Covid vaccine Yellow Card reports swamping the database and distorting the statistical analysis it relies on to detect safety signals. MHRA was concerned enough to conduct an investigation, write a report and consult the Commission on Human Medicines about it in June 2022. So I submitted an FOI last December asking for a copy of MHRA’s report. This was all mentioned in the Perseus Report of which I was a co-author.
Nearly four months after my FOI, and after two complaints to the ICO (here and here) including the threat of legal action, MHRA eventually sent me its report. It’s quite technical but it makes very interesting reading.
First, though, a bit of background. I expect this will come as a shock, but MHRA’s safety monitoring of medicines doesn’t rely on investigating individual Yellow Card reports and assessing causality (more on that at the end). Instead, it relies on statistical analysis called ‘disproportionality analysis’. This involves mining the database of Yellow Card reports looking for statistically significant differences in the frequencies of different types of side-effect between the drug of interest and other drugs. All medicine regulators use disproportionality analysis but there are differences in the algorithms (ROR, PRR, EBGM etc.) and the signal detection thresholds they use.
As its report says, MHRA was concerned about the effect on its own disproportionality analysis due to the very large proportion of COVID-19 vaccine reports in its Yellow Card database (by June 2022 it was over 80% of all vaccine-related Yellow Cards). Specifically, they were concerned that:
- “With the majority of the vaccine dataset now comprised of reports for COVID-19 vaccines, these have the potential to unduly influence the disproportionality statistics for other vaccines.”
- “If the safety/reporting profile for the COVID-19 vaccines differs significantly from other vaccines then this will impact disproportionality statistics and either mask potential signals or result in more false positive signals.”
- “Additionally, there are potential issues with the large volume of COVID-19 vaccine reports impacting the disproportionality analyses for the COVID-19 vaccines themselves.”
The report concluded that the high number of Covid vaccine Yellow Cards was indeed suppressing signal detection for other vaccines. So the MHRA decided to remove Covid vaccine Yellow Cards from disproportionality analysis of other vaccines.
For disproportionality analysis of Covid vaccine Yellow Cards, the investigation led MHRA to decide to assess Covid vaccines against other drugs (rather than other vaccines) and ditch the use of EGBM/EB05 based on RRR (relative risk ratio, used since 2006) and revert to just using the simpler PRR (proportional risk ratio) technique.
So what, I hear you say. It’s somewhat reassuring that MHRA spotted a potential problem with its safety signal detection methods and acted on it. But it’s the opposite of reassuring, for at least three reasons. First, it is evidence that potential safety signals for the Covid vaccine (and other vaccines) were being missed as the number of Covid vaccine Yellow Cards quickly mounted. Secondly, the Commission on Human Medicines seems to have just meekly accepted MHRA’s report and recommendations (here) without asking any probing questions – such as what about the missed signals, can signals still be missed, what are other regulators doing? Thirdly, it should have been (but wasn’t) a reminder to MHRA that it should also actively follow-up individual fatal and serious Yellow Card reports and not rely so heavily on statistical analysis.
On that last point, MHRA said here that “the MHRA carefully evaluates reports of serious suspected side-effects as soon as they are received to consider whether the medicine or vaccine may have caused the event, or whether the event was likely to be purely coincidental”. However, I can’t see how that can possibly be true because it has also said that it:
- has no process for investigating individual Yellow Card reports;
- doesn’t know how many its has investigated;
- doesn’t know for all fatal and serious Yellow Card reports important things like the age of the subject, his or her medical history or the batch number of the Covid vaccine.
So how confident are you feeling about whether it does, indeed, “consider whether the medicine or vaccine may have caused the event, or whether the event was likely to be purely coincidental”?
To check this out, I’ve submitted an FOI to find out how many Covid vaccine Yellow Card reports of suspected serious adverse events MHRA has assessed as i) not related, ii) unlikely related, iii) possibly related, iv) probably related and v) definitely related. Those are the categories used for describing causality of adverse events in clinical trials, so it makes perfect sense it would use the same ones for assessing causality of spontaneous reports to the Yellow Card system – if indeed it actually does it at all. Watch this space.
Until Nick retired a few years ago, he was a Senior Civil Servant in the Ministry of Defence responsible for the safety and effectiveness of ammunition used by the Armed Forces. He is co-author of the Perseus Group report on U.K. drugs regulator the MHRA.
To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.
Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.
Couldn’t believe that vid of the young policeman slapping cuffs on someone for ‘Causing Anxiety’, seriously.
Marvellous. So what’s he doing about the Pakistani grooming gangs which are still visibly operating across his Policing area?
It looks like SFA.
Offence is taken, not given.
Or, as my lovely great aunt used to tell me,
“Sticks and stones may break my bones… but names?! They will never hurt me!”
She was the school secretary for decades at a secondary modern in Barton-upon-Humber. Never had children, but made a big, positive impact on many in her time. She would doubtless have been sacked these days, for saying it how it is and delivering a bit “toughen up, buttercup!”
There is a certain police
forceservice in my region that won’t arrest drug dealers dealing openly on the street on a housing estate where the council places vulnerable ex-addicts. The reason given: We can’t crack down on this area because that would show favouritism to one area over others and we don’t have the resources to tackle them all.That service: Greater Manchester Police.
Mr Watson should be judged by his actions, not his words.
The country has ‘gone to the dogs’. Nothing in this country is working as it should. The police are a joke chasing ‘hurty feelings’ rather than real crime. The government is a joke, they ignore the concerns of the electorate and follow the Agenda of the unelected WEF and WHO, the Judiciary is a joke for ignoring real law breakers and hounding those who stand up for our rights, the Health Service is a joke I’ve been waiting for a hospital appointment for 4 months and all I am told is ‘we can tell you it wont be this month’!
“He said he hoped officers could be empowered to apply their own common sense.”
Officer’s being allowed to use their ‘common sense’ is exactly the problem in the first place.
Anyone who is put into the unique position of being legally allowed to police anyone else needs concrete rules that if they break or overstep, they get a strike. Three strikes and they lose their job and lose their right to reapply.
Sadly it is bigger than this though, as long as we have ‘hate crime’ legislation we are all living in clown world.
A group of police officers turning up at your doorstep would be a likely source of anxiety. Perhaps they should form a circle and hand-cuff each other.
Woke policing in Colchester, Essex.
https://t.me/BerkshireFreedom/2256
This trio arrested people for holding Russian flags
Yellow Boards By The Road BUILD BACK FREEDOM
Thursday 4th August 11am to 12pm
Yellow Boards
Junction A321 Wargrave Road &
A4 New Bath Road
Twyford RG10 9PN
Stand in the Park Sundays 10.30am to 11.30am – make friends & keep sane
Wokingham
Howard Palmer Gardens Sturges Rd RG40 2HD
Bracknell
South Hill Park, Rear Lawn, RG12 7PA
Telegram http://t.me/astandintheparkbracknell
I applaud the views expressed by this Chief Constable and hope other forces can apply the same approach as his in Manchester. But wait a minute shouldn’t this be directed by our Home secretary? Someone who has proven to be useles at everything supposedly under her control, but clearly not. A more extreme example of incompetence in post can rarely be found. One good thing about our new government in early September is that she should surely be kicked out of any government position and replaced by someone who can do the job.