The World Health Organisation (WHO) is under pressure to withdraw guidance for schools recommending that toddlers “ask questions about sexuality”, “explore gender identities” and learn about “enjoyment” of “early childhood masturbation”. The Telegraph has the story.
The guidance says that “sexuality education starts from birth” and is described as a “framework for policy makers, educational and health authorities and specialists”.
Its advice on how to “talk about sexual matters” with young children was aimed at policymakers across Europe, and was translated into several European languages and promoted at national and international events, according to the WHO.
The document was also cited in a report consulted by Welsh ministers who last year rolled out a mandatory sexual education syllabus to schools in Wales, and has led to a backlash from the Government, MPs and activists.
The advice proposes that four-to-six year-olds should be taught to “talk about sexual matters” and “consolidate their gender identity”.
It recommends that children under the age of four should be told they have “the right to ask questions about sexuality” and “the right to explore gender identities”.
The WHO guidance also says that children aged four and under should be taught about “enjoyment and pleasure when touching one’s own body, early childhood masturbation”.
These topics are described as the “minimal standards that need to be covered by sexuality education”.
A Government spokesperson said: “The U.K. Government does not recognise this WHO guidance and we don’t agree with its recommendations. We have not distributed or promoted it to schools. We offer our own guidance to help schools to teach children and young people about relationships and health.”
However, the WHO guidance, first published in 2010, was cited in a 2017 report commissioned by Welsh ministers entitled ‘Informing the Future of the Sex and Relationships Curriculum in Wales‘.
Worth reading in full.
To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.
Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.
Very curious…now I’m wondering if those yellow ‘placebo’ ones were destined to go somewhere specific. Such as in the arms of the people pushing this entire agenda, namely the politicians and their advisors. I’m not sure if evidence exists of where they ended up. As I do not subscribe to ”cock-up theory” this is the only hypothesis I can come up with..
Mike Yeadon did some excellent work about a year ago exposing the co-ordination of different batches of jabs amongst the different manufactures: https://rumble.com/vsadoe-100-of-covid-19-vaccine-deaths-were-caused-by-just-5-of-the-batches.html. https://howbadismybatch.com/ is also worth a look to identify the most harmful batches.
One can see the attraction for power-hungry psychopaths of mandated, regular jabs whose content can be varied at will: killing-off the sick and elderly to decrease state and private pension liabilities; removing political opponents; spreading sickness when people ‘don’t follow the rules’ or threaten to rebel; ensuring long term dependency on state health services and pharmaceutical companies; and all the time creating plausible deniability as many (who received saline) don’t experience such adverse reactions. Fortunately, however, this has been a cocked-up conspiracy from the outset.
I don’t believe it’s just pot luck that nobody who was pushing the world to get jabbed ended up getting injured. I think there was a couple of US governors, wasn’t one Newsome and the other guy ( can’t remember his name ) who can no longer string a coherent sentence together, but there’s a reason world leaders and people like Fauci remain perfectly fine while everyone else fills up the various adverse event reporting systems. No such thing as coincidences. Can you imagine some VIP, a really prominent person dropping dead suddenly or getting a severe vax injury? It would just take one incident like that and it would be enough to influence the uptake of jabs going forward and could decimate the entire narrative which so much rests on. So I believe there’s placebos being set aside for a reason.
Also, thanks to Jikky’s revelation ages ago, we know in Australia at least, batches were reserved for Pfizer staff that had no safety reports associated with them, so controlling who gets what batch is totally doable in all countries presumably. I’ll have to have a look at the Yeadon vid as I’ve seen it advertised but don’t think I ever got around to watching it. Thanks for the share. Jikky’s interesting thread;
”Do you know what else is not in the death batch log?
Any of the 7 batches reserved for Pfizer employees.
No, I’m not kidding:
FF0884
FA4598
FE3064
FA7338
FA7812
FC8736
FC3558”
https://twitter.com/Jikkyleaks/status/1607609256521633798
It is also interesting that Fauci takes high dose Vitamin D3 (I think he admitted it in an interview quite a while back), yet doesn’t recommend it as a general policy. Hmmm.
Actually it was Mike’s colleagues Craig Paardekooper and Sasha Latypova’s Project Enigma team who built the database behind howbadismybatch.com – I know he’d be pleased to accord credit where credit is due.
Craig has continued his analyses, and has a Telegram channel. Sasha has a Substack, and has done truly remarkable work in conjunction with Katherine Watt (substack Bailiwick News).
All four – Mike, Craig, Sasha and Katherine – are absolute heroes.
Incredibly modest heroes who don’t see that the work they’re doing makes them anything special.
Yes, I read Mike Yeadons report and go with it entirely. Bottom line.. they were fishing for results of the different batches, which in turn gave them plausible deniability..
The great unwashed would have surely been spooked if people all around them started dropping like flies. This whole covid thing was obviously ‘war gamed’ well in advance, and every possible scenario envisaged..
My first thought – giving 30% of placebo doses will, at a stroke, reduce the recorded rate of adverse effects significantly. Safe.
And if they already knew that the jabs wouldn’t reduce any of the parameters of efficacy except by statistical sleight of hand, then there’s zero cost in terms of measuring the pandemic. Effective.
But should anyone analyse random phials, there’s a 70% chance of finding a real vaccine, so the scam remains hidden, at least until now, when the authorities are able to say, “It’s all over – let’s move on.”
The hypothesis could be validated by checking to see if the yellow batches were mostly later ones.
Wow just wow. Tell me again about the ‘science’. Denmark — 5% of the batches produced 50% of injury and death. 30% were placebos and harmless. 65% produced the other 50% of death and injury. So the lots, batches and QA are all. over. the place. ‘Safe and effective’ the idiots moan. How did 5% get manufactured to cause so much damage? Who got the 30% that were placebos?
https://www.globalresearch.ca/how-the-flu-disappeared-during-the-covid-era/5823860
The C1984 was re-branded ‘flu as Dr Mike Yeadon has been saying for a couple of years.
It sure was.. I’ve relayed this to many people, and if I’d got a fiver for the amount of blank stares I received in answer to my information I’d have been able to take myself off on a very exotic holiday.
Of course I’d have made sure I was double boosted and had a good supply of masks before I left for said exotic climes..
I suppose there’s no way to fill in the data with how many caught the bug correlated with the batch numbers their jab doses came from?
Of course not.
Has anyone done work on the death rate among the political class. I have not heard of a single MO dying of Covid and I wonder what is the statistical probability of such an outcome.
Over 18 months ago, Craig Paardekooper knew from very simple analysis of the publically available VAERS data (which captures batch number amongst several other factors) that certain batch numbers were responsible for far more adverse events. Pfizer “inserted” these batches at three very specific intervals, apparently in gradually reducing ‘toxicity’, whereas Moderna appeared to have randomised it.
He also noticed that those batch numbers had a specific pattern to their suffixes.
I was able to reproduce his results independently (I am a Data Scientist, for the last 12 years professionally).
Perhaps it is some kind of experiment
Yes, all one big placebo controlled experiment. What’s more they knew in advance that some of those batches with the specific suffixes would do tremendous damage, and released them anyway. There should be a Nuremberg style trial for these people.
How do these numbers fit in with the 10-15% weekly excess deaths reported across the world, not to mention increases in disabilities and work hours lost? Are the EU percentages of bad, very bad, and placebo represented across the world? I suppose an individual member of the political class will know where he fits in the pecking order if he experienced an adverse effect.
Also, if the placebos were deliberate, then we can rule out lack of spike protein observed in some people to doses being stored at the wrong temperature, located at the top or bottom of the vial, or injected into the blood instead of muscle, as some have surmised.
Good post..
What a brilliant bioweapon for the Malthusian Globalists – release a vaccine where you can select toxicity depending on the batch administered.
Exactly Richard.. a brilliant bioweapon indeed..
If you’ve created a novel bio-medical product which is undergoing a mass human experiment, it seems to me it would be highly likely that several versions will have been created for testing …..to see which is most efficacious.
They weren’t trying to cure or prevent Covid: if they were, the jabs would have been rejected at first base since they did neither.
They were carrying out a mass human experiment since the plan is to use mRNA as a platform technology in the future.
And behaviour, access to parts of society, ability to work and travel was all controlled by the EU Green Pass despite many people knowingly being given a shot of saline. Jail is too good for some people involved in this.
It all looks like an experiment to me, a control group (yellow) and two different doses,one of which was very dangerous. This cannot be a mistake!