• Login
  • Register
The Daily Sceptic
No Result
View All Result
  • Articles
  • About
  • Archive
    • ARCHIVE
    • NEWS ROUND-UPS
  • Podcasts
  • Newsletter
  • Premium
  • Donate
  • Log In
The Daily Sceptic
No Result
View All Result

Vaccine Mandates Are “Scientifically Questionable” and “Ethically Problematic”, Say Researchers

by Noah Carl
31 March 2022 8:34 AM

A group of medical researchers and bioethicists have written a comprehensive assessment of Covid vaccine coercion policies, encompassing passports, mandates and segregated lockdowns. They argue in no uncertain terms that these measures are “scientifically questionable” and “ethically problematic”.

While most of the points in their article will be familiar to readers of the Daily Sceptic, the article is valuable in virtue of its sheer breadth and attention to detail. I’ll try to provide a brief summary.

Kevin Bardosh and colleagues begin by noting that the publicly communicated rationale for Covid vaccine policies has shifted over time, from ‘ending the pandemic’ and ‘getting back to normal’, to reducing the burden on the healthcare system. (Such shifts do not inspire confidence that policymakers really know what they’re doing.)

The authors spend the bulk of the article discussing the harmful unintended consequences of Covid vaccine policies, drawing on insights from the behavioural sciences, law and bioethics.

They cite evidence that the coercive nature of Covid vaccine policies is likely to reduce compliance with other public health measures, including recommendations to take existing vaccines (which have much longer track records than the Covid vaccines). This owes to mechanisms of psychological reactance and loss of trust in the health authorities.

The authors argue that such effects will be compounded by the use of stigmatisation as a public health strategy, and by the dissemination of misleading or false claims on the part of health authorities (such as Anthony Fauci’s claim that, once vaccinated, “you become a dead end to the virus”).

As regards the former, the authors have compiled a list of some of the most incendiary statements made by politicians about unvaccinated people.

Emmanuel Macron admitted his aim was “pissing them off”. Justin Trudeau described them as “extremists who don’t believe in science”, adding “they’re often misogynists, also often racists”. Naftali Bennett accused them of “endangering their health, those around them and the freedom of every Israeli citizen”.

Yet as Bardosh and colleagues note, many unvaccinated people had perfectly good reasons for remaining unvaccinated, such as being in a low-risk category or having natural immunity from previous infection.

Turning to the legality of Covid vaccine policies, the authors note that many measures were merely decrees, passed under states of emergency in the absence of normal democratic governance. As a result, injured parties (such as those who lost their livelihood) have had fewer or no opportunities for proper redress.

Vaccine passports also constitute a significant infringement on privacy, insofar as they require the sharing of medical information with people other than one’s doctor, including not only border officials, but owners of pubs, restaurants and nightclubs.

What’s more, vaccine mandates that disproportionately restrict people’s access to things like work, education and social life can be considered violations of basic human rights, the authors argue. This may explain why the WHO’s Director of Immunisation said in 2020, “I don’t think we envision any countries creating a mandate for vaccination.”

There are many other interesting observations in the paper itself, which is worth reading in full.

Tags: Mandatory VaccinesNatural immunityUnvaccinatedVaccines

Donate

We depend on your donations to keep this site going. Please give what you can.

Donate Today

Comment on this Article

You’ll need to set up an account to comment if you don’t already have one. We ask for a minimum donation of £5 if you'd like to make a comment or post in our Forums.

Sign Up
Previous Post

The Guardian Rewrites the Facts

Next Post

The Dangers of a Culture of Silence and Compliance Exposed in the Shrewsbury Maternity Scandal are Being Repeated in the Covid Vaccine Programme

Subscribe
Login
Notify of
Please log in to comment

To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.

Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.

129 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Free Lemming
Free Lemming
2 years ago

Almost all of this woke nonsense is coming from children who’ve been groomed by delusional lefties. Time for the adults to say ‘NO’.

167
-1
sskinner
sskinner
2 years ago
Reply to  Free Lemming

It’s ‘Lord of the Flies’ only with adults not wanting to take charge and just encouraging the children.

63
0
JXB
JXB
2 years ago
Reply to  Free Lemming

There is no noticeable difference, except size, between adults and children. Since the 1980 children have not progressed emotionally and intellectually beyond the age of two.

2
0
stewart
stewart
2 years ago

Dawkins is confronting the consequences of his actions.

He showed his arrogance and at the same time his naivety in his book “The God Delusion” in which he must have thought he was being terribly clever comparing the belief in god to the belief in the flying spaghetti monster.

He failed to consider properly what useful functions religions play in society beyond what he thinks are childish attachments to god figures. Well now he knows. A society untethered from any religion will… produce a religion. And this one wants to stop him from using words he likes and tell him how he wants to think.

Religions clearly go through authoritarian phases and they need to be “tamed” – for lack of a better word. Christianity in Britain in the late 20th century was completely tamed and for the most part a harmless institution giving some stability to our society. Dawkins did his bit to destroy what was left of it. He can now deal with what has grown in its place.

Another example of a clever person who is actually a bit stupid.

Last edited 2 years ago by stewart
136
-61
Marcus Aurelius knew
Marcus Aurelius knew
2 years ago
Reply to  stewart

There are hundreds of gods, but don’t worry! – yours is the best!

39
-24
godknowsimgood
godknowsimgood
2 years ago
Reply to  Marcus Aurelius knew

There are hundreds of theological and atheistic beliefs, Marcus, but don’t worry – yours is the best!

23
-16
JXB
JXB
2 years ago
Reply to  godknowsimgood

Atheism is not a belief, it is an absence of belief.

5
-3
GMO
GMO
2 years ago
Reply to  JXB

Atheism is a faith that there is no G(g)od(s).

6
-4
Nearhorburian
Nearhorburian
2 years ago
Reply to  stewart

“Dawkins is confronting the consequences of his actions”

The idea that he is in any way responsible for the collapse of Christianity in the UK is ridiculous.

45
-18
Nicholas Britton
Nicholas Britton
2 years ago
Reply to  stewart

Western societies have created their own religions, or idols at least: climate alarmism, diversity, identity politics, safetyism, etc.. They call them “the science” but as we know there is little if any science to support them. So they have become systems of beliefs instead and are being enforced in the way cults control their members, through the use of tyranny. We are all paying a terrible price for it too.

24
0
Boomer Bloke
Boomer Bloke
2 years ago

And yet the most hated of dictators is happy to state that “mothers are women and fathers are men”. A statement that our own politicians refute or at least shy away from, on the grounds of multiple phobias or isms.

68
-2
True Spirit of America Party
True Spirit of America Party
2 years ago

This is beyond Orwellian, it is literally straight out of The Giver by Lois Lowry.

They called it “Precision of Language”.

Ditto for Brave New World.

Last edited 2 years ago by True Spirit of America Party
41
0
Mogwai
Mogwai
2 years ago

Good on Dawkins. What ridiculous, disgusting and insulting terminology though. He is a controversial figure and I don’t agree with him on everything, for instance, did he not famously say that babies with Down’s Syndrome should be aborted? Anyway, with this farcical nonsense we are on the same page.

45
0
stewart
stewart
2 years ago
Reply to  Mogwai

As an evolutionary biologist, engaging in a debate about religion, the question was put to him whether religion served an evolutionary purpose and he answered yes. Asked then what it was, he said he didn’t know. Which is fair enough.

But it didn’t seem to make him reconsider his militant advocacy for atheism. Seems like quite a few scientists have a proclivity for just going for it and worrying about the consequences later. Mainly those who stray beyond scientific enquiry and into policy making.

24
-14
Nearhorburian
Nearhorburian
2 years ago
Reply to  stewart

The collapse of the C of E is down to the leadership of the C of E, not to people like Dawkins.

71
-2
huxleypiggles
huxleypiggles
2 years ago

I have a very un PC and non woke response to Orwellian garbage such as this:

F#ck Off!

83
-1
Marcus Aurelius knew
Marcus Aurelius knew
2 years ago

Let’s just ban communication. Lot easier.

15
0
DavidJSimpson52
DavidJSimpson52
2 years ago

Could this be a wind up?

2
0
Geoff Cox
Geoff Cox
2 years ago

Hi Stewart and all on this thread within a thread. I gave up my religion when I was 15 or 16 and was for many years a Dawkins fanboy. I was active on his website in the early days when he used to actually add his comments below the line. I’m still an atheist and I have not found much sense in any of the new forms of religion that many of our friends in our loose sceptic alliance hold dear. But as Stewart says, religion and the CofE in particular have “useful functions … in society” and I have come to regret the loss of an institution that, for a while, on some questions, stood in opposition to government. In the old days, we had the government, the church, the media and the crown all competing with each other. Now the government is in complete charge … and dare I say, Heaven help us.

37
-1
DomTaylor
DomTaylor
2 years ago

Richard Dawkins was the Noah Harari of his day. Rather than claiming to be on the side of Humanity, he would do well to contemplate the dystopian world that he helped create in the name of scientific rationalism and ask himself if he really is so sure there is no God to whom he will be called to give account.

14
-6
Jumpin' Jehosaphat
Jumpin' Jehosaphat
2 years ago

The academics calling for this gibberish are most likely all Ph.Ds, a credential that increasingly demonstrates a very specific kind of stupidity.

13
0
Nicholas Britton
Nicholas Britton
2 years ago

As a devout atheist and crusader against Judaeo-Christian beliefs, Richard Dawkins finds himself swimming in a cesspool that is partly of his making. Nevertheless, I’m sure he believes that secularism is going very well.

Last edited 2 years ago by Nicholas Britton
9
-1
RW
RW
2 years ago

Dawkins was also a lockdown fanatic and Force-vax ’em all enthusiast. This came on top of him already being an unpleasant person with a god delusion.

12
0
damask-rose
damask-rose
2 years ago
Reply to  RW

Didn’t know that (your 1st sentence).
in which case, not sure his intervention is helpful here.
one of those people whom one would be glad when/if they realise “Silence is Golden”.

3
0
WyrdWoman
WyrdWoman
2 years ago

I had to read and write papers on several of Dawkins’ publications for various degrees. His own fanatical scientism and ‘contemptuous ridicule’ of anything not deemed acceptable to The Science™ – often using the same emotive language as the most staunch religionists – shone through it all. Even some of the most committed atheists were embarrassed by The God Delusion. He is a True Believer right enough but it now appears that even he has his limits.

8
0
GMO
GMO
2 years ago

A rose by any other name is still a rose.Is a woman by any other name still a woman?

3
0

NEWSLETTER

View today’s newsletter

To receive our latest news in the form of a daily email, enter your details here:

DONATE

PODCAST

The Sceptic EP.38: Chris Bayliss on the Commonwealth Voting Scandal, Sarah Phillimore on the Bar’s Scrapped EDI Plans and Eugyppius on ‘White Genocide’

by Richard Eldred
30 May 2025
1

LISTED ARTICLES

  • Most Read
  • Most Commented
  • Editor’s Picks

German Pensioner Receives 75-Day Prison Sentence in Latest Speech Crime Scandal to Hit the Federal Republic

29 May 2025
by Eugyppius

There Will Be No Climate Catastrophe: MIT Professor Dr Richard Lindzen

29 May 2025
by Hannes Sarv

News Round-Up

30 May 2025
by Toby Young

Miliband Accused of Pitting “Neighbours Against Neighbours” After Scrapping Heat Pump Rule

29 May 2025
by Richard Eldred

BBC ‘Damages Countryside’ to Film Chris Packham’s Springwatch

30 May 2025
by Richard Eldred

News Round-Up

32

German Pensioner Receives 75-Day Prison Sentence in Latest Speech Crime Scandal to Hit the Federal Republic

23

Miliband Attacks Blair Over Net Zero Criticism and Admits He Could Lose Seat to Reform

17

Miliband Accused of Pitting “Neighbours Against Neighbours” After Scrapping Heat Pump Rule

19

There Will Be No Climate Catastrophe: MIT Professor Dr Richard Lindzen

25

Trump is Handing Africa to the Chinese for the Sake of Social Media Clout

29 May 2025
by Noah Carl

Hooked on Freedom: Why Medical Autonomy Matters

29 May 2025
by Dr David Bell

So Renters WILL Pay the Costs of Net Zero

29 May 2025
by Ben Pile

The Net Zero Agenda’s Continued Collapse Into Chaos

28 May 2025
by Ben Pile

Alasdair MacIntyre 1929-2025

27 May 2025
by James Alexander

POSTS BY DATE

March 2022
M T W T F S S
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
28293031  
« Feb   Apr »

SOCIAL LINKS

Free Speech Union

NEWSLETTER

View today’s newsletter

To receive our latest news in the form of a daily email, enter your details here:

POSTS BY DATE

March 2022
M T W T F S S
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
28293031  
« Feb   Apr »

DONATE

LISTED ARTICLES

  • Most Read
  • Most Commented
  • Editor’s Picks

German Pensioner Receives 75-Day Prison Sentence in Latest Speech Crime Scandal to Hit the Federal Republic

29 May 2025
by Eugyppius

There Will Be No Climate Catastrophe: MIT Professor Dr Richard Lindzen

29 May 2025
by Hannes Sarv

News Round-Up

30 May 2025
by Toby Young

Miliband Accused of Pitting “Neighbours Against Neighbours” After Scrapping Heat Pump Rule

29 May 2025
by Richard Eldred

BBC ‘Damages Countryside’ to Film Chris Packham’s Springwatch

30 May 2025
by Richard Eldred

News Round-Up

32

German Pensioner Receives 75-Day Prison Sentence in Latest Speech Crime Scandal to Hit the Federal Republic

23

Miliband Attacks Blair Over Net Zero Criticism and Admits He Could Lose Seat to Reform

17

Miliband Accused of Pitting “Neighbours Against Neighbours” After Scrapping Heat Pump Rule

19

There Will Be No Climate Catastrophe: MIT Professor Dr Richard Lindzen

25

Trump is Handing Africa to the Chinese for the Sake of Social Media Clout

29 May 2025
by Noah Carl

Hooked on Freedom: Why Medical Autonomy Matters

29 May 2025
by Dr David Bell

So Renters WILL Pay the Costs of Net Zero

29 May 2025
by Ben Pile

The Net Zero Agenda’s Continued Collapse Into Chaos

28 May 2025
by Ben Pile

Alasdair MacIntyre 1929-2025

27 May 2025
by James Alexander

SOCIAL LINKS

Free Speech Union
  • Home
  • About us
  • Donate
  • Privacy Policy

Facebook

  • X

Instagram

RSS

Subscribe to our newsletter

© Skeptics Ltd.

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password? Sign Up

Create New Account!

Fill the forms below to register

All fields are required. Log In

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
No Result
View All Result
  • Articles
  • About
  • Archive
    • ARCHIVE
    • NEWS ROUND-UPS
  • Podcasts
  • Newsletter
  • Premium
  • Donate
  • Log In

© Skeptics Ltd.

wpDiscuz
You are going to send email to

Move Comment
Perfecty
Do you wish to receive notifications of new articles?
Notifications preferences