- “Nigel Farage set to be only candidate in Clacton by-election” – Nigel Farage is set to be the only candidate from a major party to stand in the upcoming Clacton by-election after the Tories and Labour confirmed they would boycott the vote, reports the Mail. Can he beat Count Binface?
- “Why has Nigel Farage resigned? To seize control of the narrative” – Nigel Farage’s by-election gamble was meant to outmanoeuvre his critics and seize the narrative, but a cross-party boycott may have turned it into an embarrassing own goal, says Nick Gutteridge in the Telegraph.
- “Behind the Partridge-esque bluster, Nigel Five-Mil looks a worried man” – The Reform UK leader’s resignation speech was less The Thick of It, more Last of the Summer Whine, writes Ed Cumming in the Telegraph.
- “Who governs Britain? That is what’s at stake in Farage’s by-election” – Exasperated with the establishment, the Reform leader has instigated what amounts to a battle for the soul of the country, says Isabel Oakeshott in the Telegraph.
- “Trump backs Farage as Reform leader faces questions over finances” – Donald Trump has endorsed Farage’s claim that he is the victim of an “establishment hit job”, reports the Mail.
- “UK to toughen up political donation rules in latest crackdown” – Political donors will be required to wait a year after returning to the UK before giving more than £100,000, under newly proposed rules that threaten to hit Reform UK, says Bloomberg.
- “What we learnt from Prince Harry’s High Court battle with the Mail” – From revelations about royal family dynamics to candid courtroom disclosures, the Times provides the key takeaways from Harry’s High Court clash.
- “All the times Prince Harry’s evidence was contradicted in court” – Despite the judge stopping short of accusing Harry of lying, a detailed account by Gordon Rayner in the Telegraph reveals the numerous occasions when his testimony was contradicted during the trial.
- “I was a witness in Prince Harry’s phone hacking case” – The accusations against me were ludicrous, but the Duke did not care who he hurt in his crusade against the press, says Nicole Lampert in the Telegraph.
- “Prince Harry defiant in defeat, but his life’s work lies in ruins” – Prince Harry put on a brave face after losing his £50 million legal battle, but his dream of taking on the tabloids is in tatters, writes Hannah Furness in the Telegraph.
- “Baroness Lawrence was the true victim in Harry’s hacking case” – Prince Harry charged into his doomed court battle with Associated Newspapers with all the fanaticism of a kamikaze pilot – but Baroness Lawrence may be left wondering how she ever got caught up in a fight that was never hers to begin with, says Gordon Rayner in the Telegraph.
- “It’s time to remove Harry from the line of succession” – With the Duke of Sussex having stepped back from royal duties in 2021 and taxpayers still liable for costs associated with his position, the case for removing him from the line of succession entirely is now overwhelming, argues Allison Pearson in the Telegraph.
- “Burnham needs £120 billion of tax rises to avoid crisis” – Britain faces a debt crunch unless the next PM cuts spending or dramatically raises taxes, reports the Telegraph.
- “It’s painful to say, but an income tax raid is Burnham’s best option” – Despite Labour’s manifesto pledge against raising income tax, the Telegraph’s Jeremy Warner says it remains a less damaging route than targeting wealth creation in the search for a fiscal fix.
- “OBR warns minimum wage workers could end up paying 40% tax rate” – The Treasury’s fiscal watchdog has raised the stark prospect of minimum wage workers being dragged into the 40% tax band, according to the Mail.
- “Labour’s tinpot free speech crackdown” – In the Spectator, Gareth Roberts says Britain’s hard-won freedoms – achieved by reformers and free thinkers long dead – are to be ended not by legions of brutes rolling down Regent Street in tanks, but by a gaggle of gormless supply teachers.
- “Rochdale grooming gang leader must be deported” – Baroness Casey has demanded that ministers do everything in their power to deport the Pakistan-born ringleader of a Rochdale grooming gang, according to the Telegraph.
- “Starmer heads for a kicking from Trump at his final NATO summit” – Sir Keir Starmer is attending what may be his final NATO summit, and a bruising encounter with Donald Trump awaits, says the Mail.
- “How Britain let Europe down on defence” – Britain’s arms expenditure has grown by less than 35% since NATO spending goals were introduced, while most other member states have more than matched their targets, notes Joe Barnes in the Telegraph.
- “Marine Le Pen is ordered to wear an electronic tag” – A French appeals court has handed Marine Le Pen a one-year term with an ankle tag over a fake jobs scam in the European Parliament, casting doubt on whether she will be able to run for president next April, according to the Mail.
- “Did the NY Times whitewash allegations of sexual misconduct against hero-of-the-Left Graham Platner?” – On his Substack, Alex Berenson asks whether the New York Times buried allegations of sexual misconduct against Left-wing Maine senatorial candidate Graham Platner.
- “The three-word chant that demolishes the case for peace with Iran” – Mourners screaming “Death to America” at the funeral of Ayatollah Ali Khamenei proves it‘s pointless to try to appease the Tehran regime, says Jake Wallis Simons in the Telegraph.
- “Is the conversion therapy bill really worth £783 million?” – The Cabinet Office’s impact assessment of the Government’s conversion therapy ban projects £783 million in benefits over 10 years – but the assumptions underpinning that figure are far shakier than they appear, writes John Armstrong in the Spectator.
- “Three in four London jobs ‘at risk from AI’” – A new report identifies London as the most exposed city in the developed world to an AI-driven jobs bloodbath, says This is Money.
- “Do doctors think tax rises shouldn’t apply to them?” – NHS consultants seem to think they ought to be compensated for the tax increases which are paying their salaries and pensions, writes Ross Clark in the Spectator.
- “Grid operator accused of cover-up over blackout threat” – Britain’s grid operator has been accused of covering up system failures that threaten to trigger blackouts, according to the Telegraph.
- “Climate ruling could make all North Sea drilling illegal” – Senior judges, including the former Lord Chief Justice, have warned that a new climate litigation ruling could render all North Sea drilling an illegal act, reports the Times.
- “Miliband’s heat pump revolution leaves taxpayers in the cold” – In the Spectator, Steerpike notes that Ed Miliband’s heat pump subsidies cost taxpayers and bill-payers £498.6 million in 2025/26, with new analysis of Government data confirming the renewables market remains entirely dependent on state support.
- “How climate storytelling is being embedded into ITV and BBC productions” – On her Substack, Charlotte Gill exposes the organisations systematically embedding climate narratives into ITV and BBC productions, revealing who is bankrolling the push for environmental storytelling.
- “Greens to charge employers for offering free staff parking” – Employers could face charges of up to £1,250 a year for Bristol city-centre car parks under Green Party plans designed to push workers out of their cars and onto greener forms of transport, says GB News.
- “How the family car became the preserve of the wealthy” – Soaring costs and Government policy are combining to price ordinary families out of car ownership, warns Joe Wright in the Telegraph.
- “Oil and gas prices rise after tanker hit by missile in Strait of Hormuz” – Brent crude climbed 1.4% to $73 a barrel after a missile struck a liquefied natural gas tanker in the Strait of Hormuz, according to CNBC.
- “Female pool player’s discrimination case against professional body” – A pool player who spearheaded demands for biological men to be banned from female competitions claims she has been excluded from tournaments because of her gender-critical stance, says the Mail.
- “The shame of Pride” – In the Spectator, Brendan O’Neill writes that the rainbow-coloured Pride movement, which claims to champion tolerance, proved shockingly intolerant of Jews.
- “An attack on all our rights” – On his Substack, Dr David McGrogan argues that the human rights activist complex fundamentally misunderstands its own subject.
- “Give the young reason to be proud of Britain” – With the nation state making a comeback, it is now vital to engender genuine patriotism among a sceptical Gen Z, says Munira Mirza in the Times.
- “On 2nd June I raised concerns about the security of our electricity grid. I was told by Ed Miliband that I was scaremongering” – Claire Couthino in the Commons reveals that she’s been contacted by a whistleblower who has confirmed her fears are well-founded.
If you have any tips for inclusion in the round-up, email us here.


Discussion
Comments
This week across the site:
To join in with the discussion please make a donation to the Daily Sceptic.
Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.
As I understand it…
Now that Farage’s request to stand down has been accepted, he’s no longer an MP? So, his declaration of interests is surely moot.
If he wins the by-election, he will then become an MP again… what happens to his past declaration of interests? Presumably, he will have to declare again; and then, what happens if he declares the £5m next time?
The Government isn’t asleep at the wheel, it knows the truth but doesn’t care.
The electricity grid must operate at and maintain a frequency of 50Hz – which must not drop below 40.5Hz or above 50.5Hz.
This frequency is set by spinning generators (gas, coal, nuclear driven) turning at 3 000rpm thus 50Hz. They maintain frequency from the inertia of fast spinning machinery and governors on the generators which prevent them going to fast or too slow. They can respond instantly to anything trying to slow them down or speed them up.
Wind, solar, batteries cannot do this.
Grid frequency can be challenged by, for example, lightening strikes on power lines, faults in transformers or other grid equipment, power stations suddenly going off-line, faults in consumer equipment, fast increase/decrease in demand. These events happen often.
The more wind and solar that replaces spinning generation increases the risk of frequency instability. This is exactly what happened in Spain in April when 73% of supply was solar and wind – mostly solar. A fault occurred, the frequency changed, there was not enough inertia in the grid to correct and maintain it, so the grid went down.
… Read more »
Excellent, informative post. We need you in Parliament!
Correct, a stable grid absolutely needs rotational inertia!
May I add this to the Round-Up, as yet another example of TREASON:
Mahmood: Military bases are the future of migrant housing
Some comments from the public:
—” Another food for thought, seeing as most the migrants are young males of fighting age why not offer them an unconditional draft in the millitary if they wish to become british? two birds one stone, those that are desperate to stay will fill our depleted army and also be a detterent for any other opportunists.” [says an Ethnic Indian]
—” Ohh you wanna be one step ahead and give them guns already while disbanding the British Army, how smart of you.”
—” This could not work the risk of undocumented insurgents entering our military would be scary as vetting would be impossible .”
—” Yep, let’s get them all together so they can train in secret. She is complicit in the destruction of the country.”
—” Building a new Army already….”
—” Mahmood is another one that got here and is taking over.”
—” Bring in young men and put them in military bases, under the illusion of “housing”. Easiest takeover of a country yet. Not even a shot fired.
And the… Read more »
The speed and common language used by Uniparty and the usual organs and writers in the MSM makes me wonder: have they got a WhatsApp account to ensure compliance with the message. This has been especially clear in their attacks on Nigel Farage.
Many years afterwards we learned that all parties and all significant newspapers actually met daily to decide the line to take in support of Wilson’s “Stay in the EEC” referendum. Has WhatsApp saved the drudgery of physically meeting together.
We understand why they want rid of him. He threatens their cosy club of incompetence and globalisation.
Birds of a feather sing together.
It’s reported that none of the major parties are planning to field a candidate against Farage. As he is such a polarising figure, I guess most people who would have voted for one of the other parties think this is a noble and just decision, and can’t see that (1) it’s an admission they would get trounced and (2) they are taking away from their voters the opportunity to express their view. Pathetic.
Double tick.
“Ed Miliband’s heat pump subsidies cost taxpayers and bill-payers £498.6 million in 2025/26, with new analysis of Government data confirming the renewables market remains entirely dependent on state support”
in other words sustainability is unsustainable!
“Climate ruling could make all North Sea drilling illegal”
And this includes Norway does it?
Farage. Reform. Burnham. The system preparing a GE? Getting the hardcore Marxist party another five year ‘mandate’ guarantees that the machine will roll over the line in the shortest possible time.
Who governs Britain? That is what’s at stake in Farage’s by-election
Mr Farage’s decision to resign as an MP and fight again for his own seat in a byelection has happened before. Despite all the bluster from elsewhere, the decision will connect with voters entirely disillusioned with Whitehall/Westminster who prefer to make up their own minds:
1912George Lansbury, the Labour MP for Bow and Bromley, resigned to fight a byelection to express his support for the suffragette movement.
1929A Liberal MP, William Jowitt, resigned…he had been offered the post of attorney general in the minority Labour government. (Labour did not have many lawyers in its ranks.).
1938The Duchess of Atholl resigned as Conservative MP for Kinross and West Perth in protest at Neville Chamberlain’s policy of appeasement of Adolf Hitler.
1955Richard Acland resigned as Labour MP for Gravesend in protest at his party’s support for the Conservative government’s pro-nuclear defence policy.
1973Dick Taverne resigned as Labour MP for Lincoln after he fell out with his local party over its opposition to his pro-European views.
1982Bruce Douglas-Mann, who had been the Labour MP for Mitcham and Morden, resigned when he defected to the SDP.
1986Fifteen Ulster Unionists resigned en masse to… Read more »
It used to be required of any MP who accepted a job in government. It was either an Irishman, Catholic or Jew who stood repeatedly because each time he was elected the Commons refused to swear him in.
David Davis did the same to draw attention to the authoritarianism from his own government.
The look isn’t good when Uniparty MPs and their MSM supporters decry the democratic process and have hissy fits and refuse to take part in
In passing I note that all MPs I have heard comment so far have pre judged the Parliamentary Enquiry into the gift Nigel Farage received.
Who governs Britain? A confederation of bureaucrats, corrupt politicians, NGOs, quangos, international bodies, large corporations, banks & financiers, and monied interests.
I think one could argue, pretty convincingly, that it should also have happened more frequently? Every time an MP leaves the party he was elected to support, for a start?
The attempted take downs of Farage and Le Penn (and the AfD) show exactly what the bureaucraric establishment is: a dictatorial authoritarian power that will not tolerate opposition or dissent.
It needs to be taken down and stripped of all power urgently before its take over of western societies is complete and irreversible.
Spot on!
It proves Farage correct, all the establishment sticks together against the opposition….Reform!
they are the blob,the establishment and they’ve just highlighted the fact with a bright spotlight
Democracy is no longer a system of representation of the people to limit or remove those it elects to govern, and to choose a replacement.
It has been captured by an entrenched ruling elite to be use as a tool to guarantee their survival and continual power and control, by removing any practical possibility for the people to decide how they are governed and by whom.
They will subvert the law, manipulate the institutions of State, legislate, to prevent ant credible challenge to the status-quo.
People who say “populism” is a threat to democracy know that “populism” is actually what democracy is supposed to be, power in the hands of the people not those who think they have a divine right to rule.
Beautifully put 👏