News Round-Up

A summary of the most interesting stories in the past 24 hours that challenge the prevailing orthodoxy about the ‘climate emergency’, public health ‘crises’ and the supposed moral defects of Western civilisation.

8 min read

If you have any tips for inclusion in the round-up, email us here.

Comments

This week across the site:

Email me alerts for this discussion
Notify of

To join in with the discussion please make a donation to the Daily Sceptic.

Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.

46 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Heretic
Heretic
3 months ago

“Andy Burnham plans to keep Shabana Mahmood as Home Secretary” 

WHAT ???!!! How FEEBLE can you get, “King of the North”?

This shows clearly that Burnham is just taking orders from the Satanic Globalist Mafia, who plan to force Britain to accept a PAKISTANI MUSLIM-MARXIST HARPY as Prime Minister.

And an Ethnic African ex-porn star from America on the throne, as Queen Regent for her Fake Illegitimate Sprogs, born to a White Surrogate mother because she had a HYSTERECTOMY at age 29.

pjar
pjar
3 months ago
Reply to  Heretic

At this point he’s saying what he needs to say, to get the job. To be fair, it’s worked for him thus far…

Dinger64
Dinger64
3 months ago

“Why is it so hot in the UK?”

🤔..it’s summer?!!

transmissionofflame
transmissionofflame
3 months ago

“New research finds that remote work “substantially increases isolation and worsens mental health, particularly for those living alone”, notes the Telegraph.”

I can believe that is the case for some, maybe many. In my case it has immeasurably improved my mental health – I can listen to the birds twittering in my garden while I work, or look at trees to seek inspiration, or watch the red kites wheeling in the sky, and avoid an hour and a half of expensive train travel complete with crowds of normies, people scrolling on Tiktok, rude and inconsiderate people who don’t know how to queue or share public space, kamikaze pedestrians, cyclists, scooterists, motorists walking to and from station to office, and my lefty colleagues talking crap in the office.

EppingBlogger
EppingBlogger
3 months ago

Having run WiFi speed tests my end I am satisfied the DS server is running slow.

For a fist full of roubles
For a fist full of roubles
3 months ago

“Why is it so hot in the UK? Scientists blame plume of warm air from Europe” And guess where the hot air over Europe has come from. Just look at a weather map and see the southerly winds across the Med pumping all that hot N African air into Europe.

Dinger64
Dinger64
3 months ago

..and blowing in lots of Africans with it!💨

soundofreason
soundofreason
3 months ago

Why is it so hot in the UK?

Er. Summer?

Dinger64
Dinger64
3 months ago
Reply to  soundofreason

Sorry sofr! I’ve said the exact thing lower down!
Anyone would think it was unnatural

pjar
pjar
3 months ago

“Oxford Union debate – full speech”

If you’ve skipped over this, it’s worth going back to read…

Mogwai
Mogwai
3 months ago

Important points from Rafe. The worst thing you can do is not vote, otherwise it’s definitely ‘game over’ and you’ve sealed your own fate;

”I’m tired of constantly having to say this:
In every British election more people vote for LEFT wing parties than for right. The right succeeded b4 because it was united & the left was split. Makerfield again shows the left are more willing to vote tactically to block Reform than the right is willing to vote tactically to block Labour. Green and Lib Dem voters showed no party loyalty, lending their vote to Labour. This was not reflected on the right. This is a disaster.
The right must get its act together and either unite or learn to vote tactically. Does our fractured right really hate each other so much that we are willing to allow the Left to form the next government? I’m afraid we don’t have time for this. Because there is another uncomfortable truth I keep repeating:

Right wing voters are dying at TWICE THE RATE of left wing voters And they are not being replenished amongst the young. We have the most radically left wing youth in history (3/4 of youth are… Read more »

pjar
pjar
3 months ago
Reply to  Mogwai

It occurred to me yesterday that by not voting, you are perhaps effectively endorsing whoever wins?

In any event, you don’t have any grounds for complaining about whatever comes next…

Mogwai
Mogwai
3 months ago
Reply to  pjar

I’ll be honest, kindness to animals gets brownie points from me. Real men save hedgehogs! 🦔 They even named him Rupert😍

”Whilst out knocking on doors today in Makerfield, Restore Britain volunteers came across a lifeless baby hedgehog on a doorstep. After some water and lots of cuddles, they then found some locals who happened to rescue hedgehogs! I can report that Rupert the hedgehog has now been adopted and is on the road to a full recovery! Great work, patriots!”

https://x.com/LibertyLydia/status/2067607467572220262

Jon Garvey
Jon Garvey
3 months ago
Reply to  Mogwai

No doubt the hedgehog was placed on the doorstep as part of some vendetta against the residents, as a pig or dog could not be obtained, and Restore ruined it for them!

Mogwai
Mogwai
3 months ago

More and more people are saying it, so there’s definitely a consensus involving *both* sexes on this: men shouldn’t be allowed to adopt or become surrogate parents unless there’s a female in the picture. Sexism or common sense backed up by statistics?

”In their lifetime not all women have babies, not all can, and not all want to. Yet every person who gives birth is a woman and all mothers are female. You can’t and shouldn’t force women to be mothers, then, but at the same time men should not be allowed to completely replace women in the parenting of children, whether that is by adoption or surrogacy. Given the statistics on male violence against children, it simply isn’t safe for the child — and especially for babies — to be raised exclusively by male strangers.
This week saw the horrendously distressing court case of Baby Preston. Preston Davey was 13 months old when he was brutally murdered after serious sexual and physical cruelty, by two men who were allowed to adopt him.  

The stark reality is that these two male strangers should never have been allowed to parent Preston. Not because they were gay, not because they were insufficiently… Read more »

pjar
pjar
3 months ago
Reply to  Mogwai

It appears that the agency responsible for placing Preston with his murderers, was under pressure to make whatever placements they could, to hit targets for adoption, while faced with dwindling numbers of applicants.

I can’t see who was responsible for the pressure, or the targets, whether internal or external, nor whether they were related to funding, but…

Two things occur to me: first, this agency cannot be alone in being subjected to such pressures and, second, by creating these targets they create an environment which will attract predators anxious to take advantage of them.

The entire sector needs to be investigated and, where necessary overhauled, as appropriate.

Otherwise, we doom these youngsters to a life ‘in care’ where, it must be remembered, so many of the young victims of the rape gangs were to be found.

For a fist full of roubles
For a fist full of roubles
3 months ago

So if we are to believe the speculation, Ukraine’s strike on Moscow was not as effective as it had seemed when first crowed about.

EppingBlogger
EppingBlogger
3 months ago

What I have seen is that one fire appeared to be caused by a Russian manpad. That does not detract from the effectiveness if the Ukrainian attack.

Myra
Myra
3 months ago

Democracy has its problems, and the idea that we could end up with Burnham as PM based on a local election is preposterous when you look at it clinically.
Apart from the good people of Makerfield no other citizen voted for him.
If he does become PM he appears to think that it is ok to make decisions even further from the manifesto than Starmer is?

pjar
pjar
3 months ago
Reply to  Myra

The fact that ‘we’ didn’t vote for him is meaningless…

‘We’ didn’t actually vote for Starmer either, his constituents did, as Burnham’s did for him. Labour were elected, nominally at least, on the strength of their manifesto (though we all know they were actually elected on the basis that they were not the Conservatives).

The real point here is that ‘we’ didn’t vote for Burnham’s version of Labour’s vision for the country which he now, apparently, believes he has a mandated to impose.

If, as it seems, Burnham is intent on departing substantially from the manifesto on which the government was elected, there needs to be another General Election to ratify that.

EppingBlogger
EppingBlogger
3 months ago
Reply to  pjar

We elected an MP in each constituency. It is their duty and purpose to control the Executive. As they have al
ost all of them failed for 30+ years that alone is reason enough to shop somewhere else.

Free Lemming
Free Lemming
3 months ago
Reply to  Myra

There is absolutely nothing that is remotely democratic about the last 30 years other than the public’s acceptance of the illusion of democracy. And it’s the acceptance of the illusion of democracy that guarantees that the people will never experience democracy. People will queue in droves to purchase their ticket to the next Proles Pantomime because they desperately want to believe they’re in control, even after it’s been made abundantly clear, year upon year, that they’re not. And that’s why they treat us like moronic apes that just need to be herded. Because we are.

JXB
JXB
3 months ago
Reply to  Myra

Democracy? Where do you see that?

NeilParkin
NeilParkin
3 months ago
For a fist full of roubles
For a fist full of roubles
3 months ago
Reply to  NeilParkin

How long before we, as part of Burnham’s new deal , have to collect our mail from them.

pjar
pjar
3 months ago

How long before we have top it round to wherever it’s going ourselves?

Monro
Monro
3 months ago

Today, on my final day as Director of National Intelligence, I’m releasing never-before-seen communications and documents exposing how Dr. Fauci provided millions in US taxpayer dollars to fund dangerous gain-of-function research at the Wuhan lab

Fauci and Farrar between them, via Biden, Macron, caused catastrophic damage to this country

‘Let me know if you think we need to do anything at a government level. My guess is it would be actively unhelpful…’

Whitty to Farrar 19 Jan 2020

https://covid19.public-inquiry.uk/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/08140822/INQ000047509_0002.pdf

What changed?

”We are about six weeks into this outbreak and this virus can now clearly spread between humans…It is not SARS. The virus is in a similar family as SARS but this looks different … and the difference is probably it is easier to pass between human beings.’

J. Farrar to World’s Press 23 Jan 2020 WEF Press Conference Davos

‘The next challenge was to find an appointment for a secure conference call that could bring in extra voices. We settled on Saturday 1 February 2020 at 7pm GMT, which was 2pm for Tony in Washington and 6am Sunday for Eddie in Sydney. Kristian and Eddie asked Andrew Rambaut and Bob Garry to dial in. The others on the call… Read more »

stewart
stewart
3 months ago

Andrew Sullivan argues that the failure of American aggression in the Middle East

Sorry, what? What failure?

The way I see it, the US together with the Gulf States is taming Iran and remaking the Middle East. It’s not by any means over, it’s the middle of the game but Iran is getting badly beaten.

NeilParkin
NeilParkin
3 months ago
Reply to  stewart

We have short attention spans and want instant results. The key is that this is not Israel and US against Arab states but all working together.

For a fist full of roubles
For a fist full of roubles
3 months ago
Reply to  stewart

The Gulf states were in the main targeted by Iran because they provided bases for the USA.
USA encroached on Iran in the same way that NATO (mainly USA) encroached on Russia, with inevitable consequences in both cases and very similar to America’s reaction to encroachment towards its territory by both nations and people.
The big difference is that although America claims it is doing it for world good, it is in fact doing it ultimately to acquire resources and sadly, in recent years, for the aggrandisement of its leader.

EppingBlogger
EppingBlogger
3 months ago
Reply to  stewart

Journos have to find some way to attack “Trump” as they insist on calling POTUS with venom on their lips. To admit the US has disarmed the Ayattolahs with so few deaths in such a short time, minimal boots on the ground and achieved remarkable unity among all nearby states, that might be thought to be praise for the President.

That might reduce their dinner party invitations. Can’t have that.

Monro
Monro
3 months ago
Reply to  EppingBlogger

Well said…in stark contrast to the comment above yours (regarding NATO ‘encroachment’. That has been authoritatively debunked by the major protagonists at the time themselves.

‘Vaclav Havel spoke for Central and Eastern Europe, where memories of Russian colonial occupation were fresh. Those nations sought protection. They were not duped by Washington; they understood their history all too well. For them, NATO membership was a shield, not a dagger. 
Putin understood this all too well. Russia is a country built on the continuing and sometimes casual violation of international borders. It attacked Chechnya in the 1990s, Georgia in 2008, Crimea and Donbas since 2014, and has now been engaged in the full-scale invasion of Ukraine to erase its independence for three years. The Kremlin has used energy as a weapon, destabilized governments, and interfered in elections across Europe. Moscow’s actions are not a response to NATO’s enlargement but part of a consistent strategy of regional domination.’

To which might be added, a strategy of demographic expansionism, a goal of Putin’s since 2000.

stewart
stewart
3 months ago

Three parties are now jostling to become the true opposition to a Labour party revived by its victory in Makerfield,

Absolutely hilarious how these things are peddled over and over again as some sort of seismic shift, when what exactly has happened? Nothing. What is going to change? Nothing.

Net Zero will continue. Immigration will continue. Woke policy will continue. The debt pile will continue. Regulation will continue. The permanent bureaucratic government will remain in place. Nothing of any substance will change.

But, new hope this, revitalised that, the left this, the right that.

The same pantomime as always, new cast.

NeilParkin
NeilParkin
3 months ago
Reply to  stewart

Burnham is another talking about ‘change’, but can’t define what will change and how that is an improvement to our lives. The left are mentally ill.

For a fist full of roubles
For a fist full of roubles
3 months ago
Reply to  NeilParkin

Things certainly changed when Starmer was handed power by the inept Tories. Let us pray that Burnham doesn’t drag the country further down the change-for-the-worse route.

JXB
JXB
3 months ago

I don’t think prayer will work.

JXB
JXB
3 months ago
Reply to  NeilParkin

First he’s got to get Starmer out of Downing Street – no sign he has any intention of leaving.

Angelcake
Angelcake
3 months ago
Reply to  stewart

Always with the hopey changy thing but the same relentless tax and spend. It is Government by overgrown children for a people who act like children. I am not sure when reality will hit but when it does the vast majority will be utterly bewildered.

ComradeSvelte
ComradeSvelte
3 months ago
Reply to  Angelcake

Alas I get a sense that a ‘vast majority’ are just too stupid to actually get bewildered.

transmissionofflame
transmissionofflame
3 months ago
Reply to  stewart

I’m not especially optimistic but I think it’s plausible that a Reform government would make a significant difference, and that’s why opposition to them is so rabid. I don’t think they are such good actors that the whole thing is a complete fake.

pjar
pjar
3 months ago

There’s a saying, along the lines of: a bad man will burn down the country, to rule over the ashes… that seems to fit; these are bad men, and women.

transmissionofflame
transmissionofflame
3 months ago
Reply to  pjar

That is certainly borne out by despots everywhere throughout history.

JXB
JXB
3 months ago
Reply to  stewart

Three Jostling Parties – would these be the three Parties: Conservative, Lib Dem, Green which lost their deposits?

Labour Party “revived” – like a dead cat bounce?

Marcus Aurelius knew
Marcus Aurelius knew
3 months ago

Go Tulsi! Seeing Fauci in an orange jumpsuit, ah the stuff of which dreams are made.

stewart
stewart
3 months ago

The problem is that every single institution and every single person, except a handful of us that kept our heads, fell into the panic and participated in all the brutality that came after.

In order for something to come out of this would require mea culpas at a scale that just isn’t realistic.

I fully expect a defining silence from the media. At most it will be written off using the words Trump, MAGA, Musk and Far Right And we will be reminded that covid jabs saved “hundreds of millions” of lives.

Marcus Aurelius knew
Marcus Aurelius knew
3 months ago
Reply to  stewart

Indeed. My use of the word dreams was very intentional.

Thank you for reading. Please help us keep the Daily Sceptic going by becoming a donor.