The Link Between Migrants and Animal Abuse

As sunny spring weather begins to appear, some of Europe’s warmer Mediterranean nations have entered barbecue season unexpectedly early: it must be all that global boiling. Unfortunately, in Italy this year pets appear to be on the menu. In mid-April, a shoeless Nigerian was caught cooking a cat on what was called “a makeshift barbecue” (i.e., a fire lit on the floor) in the middle of a children’s playground. The sight awaiting passing bambinos was horrific, but could have been even worse: at least the man didn’t do something else that rhymes with ‘cook’ to it instead.

Elsewhere in Italy at this same time, another poor feline, who was to become known alliteratively as ‘Rosi the Raped Roman Cat’, found herself likewise being kebabbed by an incomer in a public park, being tortured and then raped so badly that her intestines were damaged. The crime was allegedly perpetrated by another illegal African migrant, driving public protests by concerned Italians and animal rights activists who drew parallels between the way male migrants were treating both women and animals. Scarily, Rome’s animal welfare authorities said Rosi the Riveted’s case “cannot be considered an isolated incident”.

Heavy petting zoo

Stories of refugees being intimate with animals rarely make the mainstream media, for obvious reasons. To gain news of this kind of thing, you therefore need to head towards more alternative websites like Remix News, which are habitually labelled sources of ‘disinformation’ on account of the way they publish things traditional newspapers simply will not. If these stories really were made up, they’d be sort of amusing. But they appear to be true, so in fact are just highly disturbing.

On the above site, you can find many interesting real-life immigrant bestiality stories, the latest being that of the 19 year-old Afghan arrested in France on charges of a series of rapes perpetrated upon sheep and goats outside Marseilles. Farmers had been waking up to find their animals with legs tied apart and “clear signs of rape” splattered across their orifices. The rapist faces a potential €45,000 fine. But how, as a now-unemployable 19 year-old known Afghan animal-rapist, is he possibly going to be able to pay it? He isn’t.

Ponies seem the most common victims. In 2023, a black man was caught on camera raping a pony in its stable near Hamburg for “14 disgusting minutes”, while standing on a log and a wheelbarrow so he could reach its fun parts. In 2017, a Syrian raped another pony in broad daylight at Berlin’s Görlitzer Park petting zoo, in front of visiting children who were still young enough to be confused by his unorthodox mounting and riding technique. Apparently, it was “unclear” if the man was ever charged by police. Less unclear was the legal fate of a 52 year-old Turkish asylum seeker who broke into a stable before being literally caught with his pants down bouncing up and down on yet another unfortunate pony. Police did apprehend the miscreant, upon charges of trespassing and having “abused several ponies routinely”, but they then let him go because “that’s not enough for prison or deportation”, leaving village locals in fear the man might try playing horsey with their own children one day soon.

When post-war European jurists originally constructed their incipient edifice of human rights law, is it really likely they one day thought its protections would be extended towards people who bummed livestock? If the West can’t even deport animal rapists anymore, then we really are in trouble. Yet our courts do seem strangely reluctant to treat such perverts as harshly as they deserve.

Which came first, the chicken or its rapist?

Here in the UK, Rehan Baig, a Pakistani living in Bradford, decided that grooming local children did was just too much bother, and decided to get his kicks by raping chickens to death instead, enlisting his wife to watch and film events for future enjoyment.

Baig did also enjoy choking his chicken over images of young humans, however, leading to officers from the National Crime Agency raiding his home in 2019 and finding his laptop loaded with illegal images of children as young as six, as their prior investigations meant they had every reason to expect – but what they had not expected to find was a folder labelled ‘Family Vids’, featuring recordings of him and his wife “engaging in sex acts with a dog”, which is usually polite newspaper code for giving or receiving blowjobs, and of Rehan himself having full-blown intercourse with his pet chickens both before and after their deaths, prior to disposing of them in binbags. Inhabiting a place called Shepherd Street, he was probably just working his way up to luring some sheep into his basement to abuse too.

Baig’s original judge accurately called his activities “depraved, perverted and despicable”, sentencing him to three years behind bars. But then, Baig had the nerve to appeal his already fairly lenient sentence, an appeal which, in 2021, he won. A pair of quite pathetic justices at the Court of Appeal in London called his initial punishment too severe and cut it by almost a third, to two years and four months. Baig’s wife didn’t even get this, being handed down only a six-month suspended sentence because, she said, she had been coerced into all this by her abusive, hen-pecking husband.

As I recently showed on this site, Sam Melia got two years in prison, and then a further subsequent year in a halfway house for ‘dangerous’ offenders, just for making some stickers expressing distaste for the deleterious effects upon life in this country caused by the mass immigration into it of people like the Baigs. Any society which considers it more serious to place stickers upon lampposts than it is to intimidate your own wife into pleasuring a dog is one with a seriously twisted sense of its own priorities. So softly was Baig treated by comparison, it’s a wonder the authorities didn’t allow him to serve his sentence inside a large chicken-coop.

Tall tales?

Not that you’d hear about cases like this from the BBC. In February, a horrific allegation was reported to Rupert Lowe’s rape-gang inquiry – and then completely ignored by TV and newspapers – that one childhood British grooming-gang victim was raped by a specially-trained dog and filmed by her captors, whilst the men stood around placing bets (regarding how long it would take the dog to ejaculate, I guess). Then, they made her watch the footage with her own eyes, to traumatise the child even further. Lowe’s open letter to MPs regarding this is reproduced below, if you can bear to read it.

Is this obscenity true? Some may castigate Lowe for acting irresponsibly here, accusing him of spreading unproven allegations which, if believed, may cause members of a ‘vulnerable and minoritised community’ to get attacked. If that’s so, they should also be chastising Left-wing, pro-Islam commentators like the Guardian’s Owen Jones, who has also been busy lately claiming there is “overwhelming evidence” Israeli Jews have been raping Palestinian detainees with specially-trained dogs of their own. UN Special Rapporteur Francesca Albanese has been saying the same, as has Novara Media.

Owen is correct in his tweet above that a dog called Volodia in General Pinochet’s Chile was once trained to do this. Other outlets, like Honest Reporting, disagree with the wider idea Israel has been copying Pinochet, though, calling it only part of a wider pattern of absurd antisemitic animal libels.

Type “Israel dog rape” into Google and several pages’ worth of relevant results ensue. Type “Muslim dog rape” into Google, and what comes up? The first main listed stories are all about Muslims allegedly being raped by dogs within Israeli prison camps. Type “Muslim dog rape UK” in and you get no relevant stories at all. It’s the same if you type in “Muslim dog rape UK Rupert Lowe” into the search bar. I myself only discovered Lowe’s accusation by accident, and you have to do a lot of digging to reach his letter; as far as I know, this present piece is the only UK website article to touch its contents with a barge-pole.

I have no idea about the truth of either sets of accusations; but I do recognise disparities in reporting when I see them. Jews can be potentially libelled about the most grotesque practices imaginable with impunity, whereas Muslims cannot, because otherwise ‘Muslims might get stabbed’. And yet, who is it that is actually getting stabbed in Britain at the moment? Jews. By whom? By Muslims.

Consequently, if Rupert Lowe’s claims are true, I doubt we’ll ever hear about them being confirmed from any mainstream official channels. A sitting MP writes to Parliament telling MPs Muslims are raping white children using animals, they all universally just ignore him – apparently this is somehow not news. Even if Lowe is mistaken, the very fact he has written this letter at all is surely far more sensational than 99% of our daily Westminster headlines. The main animal-related lesson our rulers want us to learn from such tales’ suppression is clearly that of the Three Wise Monkeys: hear no evil, see no evil, speak no evil. Or ‘celebrating diversity’, as that proverb is now generally known.

Steven Tucker is a journalist and the author of over 10 books.