If the recent return of the British-Pakistani Muslim rape gang scandal to our nation’s headlines proves one thing, it is this: nobody hates women quite as much as a fourth-wave feminist.
So-called ‘women’s rights’ campaigners in this country today possess notions of justice riddled with double-standards so severe they make Two-Tier Keir resemble King Solomon. Whenever there is a trivial, minor cause relating to sexist microaggressions of a nature so exceedingly ‘micro’ they require an electron-microscope to be detected, like the shocking existence of pink pens marketed to girls, they shout and scream every bit as loudly as Angela Rayner giving birth to macrocephalic triplets on a rollercoaster. Faced with a sexist macroaggression like the systematic rape, abuse and sexual torture of thousands of white (and indeed Hindu and Sikh) girls up and down the land by the wrong sort of perpetrators, however, and they immediately clam up every bit as fully as Greta Garbo with a throat full of superglue.
To read the rest of this article, you need to donate at least £5/month or £50/year to the Daily Sceptic, then create an account on this website. The easiest way to create an account after you’ve made a donation is to click on the ‘Log In’ button on the main menu bar, click ‘Register’ underneath the sign-in box, then create an account, making sure you enter the same email address as the one you used when making a donation. Once you’re logged in, you can then read all our paywalled content, including this article. Being a donor will also entitle you to comment below the line, discuss articles with our contributors and editors in a members-only Discord forum and access the premium content in the Sceptic, our weekly podcast. A one-off donation of at least £5 will also entitle you to the same benefits for one month. You can donate here.
There are more details about how to create an account, and a number of things you can try if you’re already a donor – and have an account – but cannot access the above perks on our Premium page.
To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.
Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.
That has always been true for me except for one thing.
I phoned The Samaritans for help.
They advised: ‘Smile. It could be worse.’
So following their advice, I did.
And it was.
P.S this quotation is ‘self-proving’ example!
You can achieve absolutely anything as long as you don’t expect the credit
It was both cock up and conspiracy.
Yes, but the conspiracy came first.
Conspiracy, connivance and credulity. No cock-up.
You appear to have forgotten Merton’s Law of Unintended Consequences:
“The law of unintended consequences, often cited but rarely defined, is that actions of people, and especially of governments, always have effects that are unanticipated or “unintended.”
I guess OUR problem is working out which consequences were unintended and which have delivered precisely what they wanted, whilst lying that they didn’t.
I believe that the destruction of our energy security, food security, border-national security, financial security etc are NOT unintended consequences of their actions, but the whole point of the process …. whilst they loudly proclaim the opposite.
But I DO think that the large and growing number of “sceptics” IS an unintended consequence of them acting too hastily over the Covid Tyranny and over-reaching with their intended process of CONTROL.
Quite. POSIWID. Purpose of a system is what it does.
Since Net Zero doesn’t deliver what is claimed, its purpose is evident in what it does.
Law of the lefty activist :
“What I believe is correct and always will be, so there!”
Not to mention ….
“The exception proves the rule”, almost ALWAYS wrongly used.
“proves” in this case not meaning “confirmed”, rather “tests”
“Maier’s Law: If the facts do not conform to the theory, they must be disposed of.”
This should be renamed “Mann’s Law”.
Little ice age. Medieval warm period, gone.
What little ice age, what mediaeval warm period? A figment of a deniers imagination. Mann says so so must be right – believe or be sued.
Super article by the dependable James. Made me laugh throughout as so many laws and rules are true and many apply directly to me ….. and you as well, I suspect.
“Excellence is the enemy of the Very Good” was one that I thought I had invented until many year later, I discovered that Aristotle had said something similar – Pride cometh before a fall.
Blunt’s 1st law of leadership: even an idiot does what’s right for the people sometimes.
Blunt’s 2nd law of leadership: when nothing that they do is the right thing for the people, it’s malice, not idiocy.
Here’s one I claim to have discovered: Nobody ever changed his opinion on anything just because it didn’t make any sense.
And… nobody ever changed his opinion on anything when his livelihood depended on it.
And Jonathan Swift: You cannot reason a man out of something he hasn’t reasoned himself into.
Stafford Beer’s principle: POSIWID = the propose of a system is what it does.
So no point in claiming the purpose of a system is that which it constantly fail to do – like Socialism or “democracy”, or well-intentioned policies, or the NHS, anti-racial descrimination, equality, welfare state… for example.
I note that the Starmeristas are closely following the rules of The Dictator’s Handbook.
That’s a really old one, actually: Ye shall know them by their fruits.
Why is your library called Murphy’s Law
Something I came across many years ago, and which I have followed ever since, not sure of its origin. Given that all our politicians live their lives assuming things, usually to our detriment, they should live by this law. “All assumptions are false. This is equally true of obvious assumptions”.