If the recent return of the British-Pakistani Muslim rape gang scandal to our nation’s headlines proves one thing, it is this: nobody hates women quite as much as a fourth-wave feminist.
So-called ‘women’s rights’ campaigners in this country today possess notions of justice riddled with double-standards so severe they make Two-Tier Keir resemble King Solomon. Whenever there is a trivial, minor cause relating to sexist microaggressions of a nature so exceedingly ‘micro’ they require an electron-microscope to be detected, like the shocking existence of pink pens marketed to girls, they shout and scream every bit as loudly as Angela Rayner giving birth to macrocephalic triplets on a rollercoaster. Faced with a sexist macroaggression like the systematic rape, abuse and sexual torture of thousands of white (and indeed Hindu and Sikh) girls up and down the land by the wrong sort of perpetrators, however, and they immediately clam up every bit as fully as Greta Garbo with a throat full of superglue.
To read the rest of this article, you need to donate at least £5/month or £50/year to the Daily Sceptic, then create an account on this website. The easiest way to create an account after you’ve made a donation is to click on the ‘Log In’ button on the main menu bar, click ‘Register’ underneath the sign-in box, then create an account, making sure you enter the same email address as the one you used when making a donation. Once you’re logged in, you can then read all our paywalled content, including this article. Being a donor will also entitle you to comment below the line, discuss articles with our contributors and editors in a members-only Discord forum and access the premium content in the Sceptic, our weekly podcast. A one-off donation of at least £5 will also entitle you to the same benefits for one month. You can donate here.
There are more details about how to create an account, and a number of things you can try if you’re already a donor – and have an account – but cannot access the above perks on our Premium page.
To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.
Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.
Feminists are the Marxists useful idiots. It’s as simple as that
A bit like “racist”, I think “feminist” has become an unhelpful term with different meanings to different people and unless those using the terms define what they mean by them I can’t really process articles or statements centred on those terms.
Yes they certainly demonstrate their allegiance, plus massive hypocrisy on the regular.
Modern feminism has bugger all to do with defending women’s rights, it seems. Otherwise they wouldn’t support mass immigration and the transtifa mafia. Both of which have demonstrably put the safety and rights of females at risk. Come to think of it, I’ll expect they all hate Trump also. Feminism is like a contradiction within a contradiction.
The only underlying, consistent principle I have ever been able to establish about 99% of feminists is that they hate men.
Just like the socialists: it’s not so much that they loved the poor, they just hated the rich. (And above all, loved power.)
They mostly hate women too but they hide that fact.
They mostly hate women who don’t hate men, and also like to be feminine and beautiful.
I often think it’s a shame there’s no feminists here on DS whenever articles such as this are dropped. It would be interesting to have them chime in with their take on things. I’d also like to ask them why they choose to identify as such and what they feel the relevance is to their ideology nowadays. But, alas, they’re nowhere to be found. 👀
I’ve identified as a feminist for the past 50 years. For me it means being treated equally and fairly by men and women and treating other men and women as I would like to be treated.
Can the “anti-feminists” who post here really say that they would like to be treated as they treat their version(s) of “feminist”?
Everyone has a different definition of the word and so it becomes meaningless in the wider debate apart from being some sort of insult and suggesting that it is something to be ashamed of.
Just remember your manners and treat us as you would like everyone to treat your mother, grandmother, aunts, sisters and daughters. We are half the human race after all and we gave birth to you, fed you, nurtured you and brought you up so some tolerance and respect is due.
”Just remember your manners and treat us as you would like everyone to treat your mother, grandmother, aunts, sisters and daughters. We are half the human race after all and we gave birth to you, fed you, nurtured you and brought you up so some tolerance and respect is due.”
Well, precisely. But they don’t though, do they? To be honest, the derogatory and disrespectful way in which some men on here talk about women, I’m wondering how they treat female family members in real life. Is it that they’re harbouring this deep-seated resentment and hostility which is always simmering under the surface and they have to come on here and get it out of their systems, or something?
But you probably know what rule number 1 of the DS Boys’ Club is by now: ”Never call out a fellow man’s disrespectful and sexist remarks about women. Close ranks at all times”. Which basically just tells me loud and clear that men on here show more loyalty towards a bunch of strangers online that they’re never going to meet in real life than any loyalty to any women in their lives. Is it cowardice or agreement? It has to be one or the other. Because that’s what it amounts to: ‘Sexism is acceptable, as long as it’s the ‘right’ kind of sexism.’ Go figure. ”Offence is never given, only taken” is another one that seems to only apply when it suits. They have problems with taking a dose of their own medicine, 😉
Let’s stick to football, chaps and chapesses. Despite what the British Broadcasting Commentariat says, still at heart a Man’s Game.
From today’s News Round Up:
“Alan Brazil has been branded a ‘dinosaur’ by his female talkSPORT co-host after he argued that Manchester United’s primary focus should be on the men’s team…”
…Home truths hurt. Of course peformance of the heirs to Busby, Charlton, Law, Best, Ferguson, Beckham, Rooney and the rest matters more than imposters peforming at the level of a youth team Sunday league side.
No substitute for the real thing, driven by XY chromosomes, testosterone, physical fitness, athleticism and rivalry delivering at the top level of sport.
Ms Proudman doesn’t look the footie type, but you never know. C’mon, post on X, make my day.
How much are we betting this Spanish female footballer identifies as a feminist, though? The way this was escalated into an actual ‘crime’ is just insane beyond words;
”We live in an era of blatant contradictions, where the narrative matters more than reality, and the identity of the person committing the act weighs more than the act itself. The Rubiales case in Spain is proof of this.
Luis Rubiales was the president of the Royal Spanish Football Federation and UEFA vice president. After the Spanish women’s football team won the World Cup in 2023, during the victory celebration, in a moment of emotion, he kissed Jenni Hermoso on the lips, one of the best players in the tournament and an influential figure on the team.
A non-consensual kiss, criticizable and reprehensible, but far from any serious sexual assault, has been turned into a scandal of historic proportions. A disproportionate media and judicial lynching could potentially result in a man serving more than two years in prison. In England, for decades, the horror of sexual exploitation networks in cities like Rotherham, Rochdale, or Telford, where thousands of girls were raped and abused by gangs of Pakistani origin, was covered up. The media and authorities looked the other way for fear of being labeled racist. In Germany, France, and Sweden, hundreds of women have been victims of sexual assaults during events such as the 2015 New Year’s Eve in Cologne and in other systematic attacks, yet these incidents do not receive the same outraged media coverage as a kiss at a sports celebration. Why?
This double standard is one of the most significant aberrations of our time. Selective justice and outrage have created a system where the crime does not matter as much as the identity of the perpetrator. If the offender is a white European man of a certain status, the machinery of cancellation and public condemnation is unleashed without restraint. If, on the other hand, the aggressor belongs to a group considered vulnerable under the progressive dogma, accusations are minimized, victims are left unprotected, and indignation vanishes.
We are witnessing the destruction of values and social cohesion based on hypocrisy and political convenience. In this dystopia, the truth is hidden, justice is selective, and equality before the law has become an illusion. The message is clear: the crime does not matter; who commits it matters.”
https://europeanconservative.com/articles/commentary/rubiales-case-spain-football-sexual-harassment-double-standard/
Poor chap. Seems discretion nowadays better part of valour.
Casts in different light those occasional booze-fuelled, mutually acceptable embraces to Procul Harem of half a century ago, despite which the other chap always got to go home with the girl and the shrinking violets went back to digs to catch up on science practical write ups and subsidiary Maths tutorial work.
No wonder the birth rate is nowadays at an all time low.
Another way of looking at the Premier League is for working class people to stop buying tickets, funding these obscene pay packets. 30K per week FFS!
£300K per week more like. Throw in Sky, sponsorship and Arab money too.
The underbelly of capitalism with an unlimited appetite for being tickled.
I’ve got a BT/EE/TNT/whatever-they’re-called TV sports package because I want to watch rugby and MotoGP and World Superbikes so I pay for a package that includes football. I’ve had several conversations with the provider’s workers and those who understand what the problem is say that nothing can be done. This is nonsense, of course. They could and should make it possible for the viewer not to subsidize these grotesque salaries.
Still, it’s not just football where huge amounts of money aggregate.
I mean “for the non-viewer”.
“Not all man”…..I’m in no doubt that she is a Miss!
Another celebrity chef is in the news for saying saucy words, those rape gang victims stories fade into insignificance compared to what these middle class women went through with all those saucy words by him, like being forced to watch a Benny Hill chasing a lady in the park.
There is a point at which one realises that whatever men do will never be enough to avoid being accused of misogyny. Very much like , if white, racist or far right. This Kafkaesque torment is exhausting. Why not admit to being all of them and hopefully the accusers will go away.