After a year of damaging revelations about the state of the Met Office’s temperature measuring network, the Green Blob-funded ‘fact-checker’ Science Feedback has sprung to the defence of the state-funded U.K. weather service. It has published a long ‘fact check’ seeking to exonerate practices that have recently come to light including the locating of stations with huge heat corrupted ‘uncertainties’ and the publication of invented data from 103 non-existent sites. Inept is a word that springs to mind. At one point, Science Feedback justifies the estimation of data at the non-existent stations by referring to the hastily changed Met Office explanation for station/location long-term averages. The original and now deleted Met Office webpage referenced station names and provided single location coordinates including one improbable siting next to the sea on Dover beach. This would appear to be a new low in the world of so-called fact-checking – designating copy as ‘misleading’ based on an explanation changed after the article was published.
The first Daily Sceptic article reporting on the existence of 103 non-existent stations can be read here. The second appeared last month here and detailed the unannounced web changes and the obvious cover-up intended to deflect criticism from the invented station data.
Under the verdict “misleading” Science Feedback claims that the average data going back 60 years for stations is not “fabricated” but estimated using “well-correlated related neighbouring stations”. This is said to be a scientific method that is published in peer-reviewed literature. The Met Office discloses it has “relatively few” stations with 30-year data from which long-term averages can be calculated. The distinction between estimated and fabricated is moot. A pundit calling the winner of a sports match before it has taken place is an estimation of the result, and the opinion is no less a fabrication or invention however distinguished the pundit and however well-regarded any peers signalling agreement might be.
Let us examine the claim of “well-correlated neighbouring stations” by taking an example from the Met Office’s now renamed “location-specific long-term averages” climate database. Cawood in the West Riding of Yorkshire is a pristine Class 1 site designated by the World Meteorological Organisation (WMO) as providing uncorrupted data over a large surrounding area. It also has an immaculate record of temperature recordings from the same site stretching back to 1959. But no rolling 30-year average for Cawood is provided. Instead the Met Office flags data for five other sites between two and 27 miles distant. Unlike Cawood, all of these have average data despite the fact that four no longer exist and the fifth, High Mowthorpe, is 27 miles away and at a 163 metres higher elevation.
Again we are obliged to the super sleuthing of Ray Sanders for bringing the Cawood data to light. He is not inclined to be charitable and notes:
The Met Office has opted not to perform a simple long-term averaging representation from just one Class 1 site’s readings (with no other inputs required) and in preference has supplied no fewer than five alternative much inferior sites with all manner of adjusted, amended, modified and likely corrupted so-called ‘data’ to confuse the public. The term ’smoke and mirrors’ comes to mind.
Why is the Met Office not showing the data for the long-running Class 1 Cawood site, he asks, adding: “What are you trying to hide?”
The Science Feedback puff for the Met Office takes aim at both the investigative work conducted by the Daily Sceptic and Ray Sanders who publishes on the Tallbloke’s Talkshop blog. It has all the hallmarks of being written in collaboration with the Met Office since its long and detailed explanations have mostly come from the latter.
Science Feedback is a partner with Meta where it acts to “verify the credibility of viral content” on Facebook and Instagram. In 2020 it was given seed funding from the Google News Initiative, “to build a database of fact-checked content, allowing to identify sources that repeatedly spread misinformation”. Regular readers will recall that Google has past form in trying to disadvantage inconvenient temperature information on the internet. In 2022, Dr. Roy Spencer’s page detailing accurate satellite temperature data, showing less long-term warming than that claimed by surface measurements, was kicked off Google AdSense for publishing “unreliable and harmful claims”. The decision looks more stupid by the day with Spencer’s UAH measurements confirming the recent short-lived spike in the global temperature. Regular readers will also recall that at a 2022 World Economic Forum ‘disinformation’ seminar, the UN’s global communication chief Melissa Fleming noted that her organisation had partnered with Google to ensure that only UN-approved climate research results appeared at the top of search inquiries. “We are becoming more proactive, we own the science and we think the world should know it,” she boasted.
Last March, the Daily Sceptic shocked the climate science world by revealing via a Freedom of Information (FOI) request that nearly eight in 10 Met Office sites across the U.K. were so poorly sited in junk Class 4 and super junk Class 5 that they had WMO ‘uncertainties’ of 2°C and 5°C respectively. Yet these measurements, used to calculate data to one hundredth of a degree centigrade, are a key climate indication backing the Net Zero fantasy.
Science Feedback states that the Met Office “clearly explains” on its website that many of its stations are of higher classes 3 and 4. Looking at the block graph above, a more accurate and clearer explanation would be that most, indeed almost all, of its stations are in Classes 4 and 5. The Met Office notes that WMO guidelines do not state that Class 5 sites cannot be used for climate reporting. In fact the WMO guidance states that a Class 1 location can be considered as a reference site, while a Class 5 site is a “inappropriate environment for a meteorological measurement that is intended to be representative of a wide area”. What this means is that ‘record’ temperatures collected besides airport runways swept by jet exhaust are useful for pilots operating in the immediate environment but are a bit of an ask when it comes to pumping the Net Zero climate emergency narrative.
As explained to Science Feedback by a Met Office spokesman, continued the curious fact check, “data will only be quoted in climate records if the weather station it comes from meets inspection standards”. Well it seems that that this depends on who is conducting the “inspections” – not the WMO, that is for sure. According to information released under a FOI request to Paul Homewood, the Met Office states it will only quote records from classes 1 to 4. Data from Class 5 “will be flagged and not quoted in national records”, it adds.
In reality, the Met Office barely pauses for breath in its rush to declare recent Class 5 site records. These include the highest daily maximum temperature in Northern Ireland set in 2021 at Castlederg. The highest January monthly temperature was set last year at Achfary and this Class 5 site also holds the record set in December 2019. Three U.K. area records have also been set at Class 5 locations including England NW, East Anglia and England SE and Central S. This latter record was provided by St. James’s Park, which was one of five sites that were said to top 40°C on July 19th, 2022. This particular event was lauded at the time by the Met Office as a “milestone in climate history”. The record 40.3°C was a 60-second spike of 0.6°C recorded around the same time as three Typhoon jets were landing at RAF Coningsby, while another 40°C site was Northolt airport, also designated Class 5. In total, all but two claimed records since 2000 arise from Class 4 and 5 locations.
The Met Office explains to Science Feedback that it continues to use its higher class stations because it has its own “long-standing inspections standards”. In other words, it marks its own homework as the block graph below, again the result of an FOI request, shows.
Clearly a big improvement since the Met Offices rates over nine out of 10 of its stations as ‘Excellent’, ‘Good’ and ‘Satisfactory’. Those of a cynical nature might riff on the warning from an earlier age that self-regulation, like self-stimulation, leads to blindness. Just 27 ‘Unsatisfactory’ stations, presumably real shockers, are to be found on the naughty step. The in-house inspections are said to “ensure data quality and minimise uncertainty”. If a site falls below the acceptable inspection standards it will be either closed or its measurements will not be used in climate records, promises the Met Office. Possibly an outbreak of extremely short sight explains why the highest recorded ‘record’ temperature in Wales was recorded at the ‘Unsatisfactory’ site of Hawarden Airport in 2022.
Chris Morrison is the Daily Sceptic’s Environment Editor.
To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.
Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.
Who the hell are the satisfied 29%??
People whose in-laws recently sadlydied in NHS care?
The SuddenlyDied™ and the SadlyDied™…
And the 100%SafeAndEffectives™ …
The lazy, overpaid gits who work in it.
The satisfied are the Doctors.
I work in the NHS and, for the few (mainly Doctors), it’s a licence to print money.
They’ll pay lip service to the state of the NHS but behind closed doors they’re rubbing their hands in glee.
There’s only one reason for the present crisis and that’s the GP’s are in a sulk because they’re now expected to see and treat patients after their extended paid leave during Covid and it’s not going down well. In retaliation for being expected to work they’ve taken to diverting the patients to A&E, preferably in an expensive Ambulance. No one questions them and so the A&E car park is rammed with Ambulances, filled with trivial ailments that the GP’s refuse to deal with.
Their Doctor colleagues in A&E gladly accept them and keep their mouths shut so that they can all keep their snouts in the trough.
You’d think they’d have some shame after slaughtering tens of thousands during Covid but they know they’re teflon with the general public so can basically do whatever they please.
Whilst I was abroad a little while back, my wife had an accident. She snapped the ball off one her femurs bones. My neighbour Whatapped me to tell me my wife had had an accident, I could hear her whining like a beaten dog in the background.
Luckily I have for some great neighbours who stayed all of the 12 hours it took for the ambulance to arrive. The hospital was only 4 miles away from my house.
Although it was unsettling to hear my wife crying like that the thing that really scared me was if she moved and dislodged a bone fragment which could possible pierce her femoral artery and she would bleed in.
Speaking of unhappiness, here is an issue the NHS have been rubbish at tackling these last couple of years; loneliness.
Useless NHS!
https://rumble.com/vsgwlc-unvaccinated-man-feeling-left-out-as-all-his-vaccinated-friends-have-covid.html
And the solution is: Coronascrabble! Everytime you get a boring old cold, keeping testing until you finally hit the jackpot. Once you’ve managed to get a positive test, you may swap the old and boring L in C-O-L-D for a fresh and exciting V-I to make C-O-V-I-D and then, you belong again!
Masks not included.
You may have hit on something! “L” in Roman numerals is 50. “VI” is 6. The ratio is roughly 8.3. As a bit of a mystic meg, I wonder if between 8 and 9 “cases” of covid are actually colds?
Not quite. Roman numbers always proceed from large to small. If a small number is placed in front of a larger one, it’s meant to be subtracted from it. Hence LD = 500 – 50 = 450 and VID is probably a swapped DIV which is 504.
Assuming the 450 was placed in a cyclic, decimal shift register and rotated one place to the left, the outcome would be 504. Which gets me back to my original point: COVID is that The Science[tm] makes out of COLD with Fancy Computer Tech[tm]. Among afficionados, COVID is thus also informally known as Smart Cold, a disease globally deployed in numerous variants since 2020 and originally supposed to enable ModeRNA to finally come to market with some product based on their innovative As Dangerous As Useless[tm] (patent pending) mRNA technology. The codename for this was Operation Daft Sweep.
Conspiracy Theory Thursday: Why the mad drive to inject more and more people with covaxxes despite they’re not the least bit at a risk from COVID?
Answer: If everybody – or almost everybody – is vaccinated, especially a lot of younger people who are generally more robust wrt infections than members of the so-called vulnerable groups, then, nobody will notice that we have a real killer product here, at least for some time.
How many of the people who got the first round injections in Dec 2020/ Jan 2021 because they were deemed especially vulnerable are still alive?
Interestingly in the early 2000s research into coronaviruses used a PCR test to identify ~396 base pairs. The same tests are being used to identify ‘covid’…. How many of of those positive tests have found something which is similar?
A basic this is the science behind the process, so how the hell can what is claimed to be found be true?
Well, this is a real ‘No Shit Sherlock’ story isn’t it?
One assumes it’s quite challenging for most of the staff to remain motivated and cheerful as they come to terms with their blind cooperation in this grotesquely horrific medical holo-caust.
Does anybody know if there’s an increase in ambulance call outs in the UK ( or wherever you are ) still? Here’s Dr Bridle observing the significant increase in such calls in a part of Canada, way higher than when there was a deadly virus on the loose and no ”highly effective” pseudo-vaccines to protect folk;
”Notably, this increase correlates with increases in all-cause mortality around the world. Would it be worth considering the ‘elephant in the room’; i.e., the possibility that the COVID-19 shots might have a role to play here? Any experts who definitively say ‘“no” better have some solid data to prove it.
It would be great if we could get paramedic service data from all across Canada and other countries. Specifically, it would be helpful to know what call volumes looked like in 2020 (no shots but a ‘deadly virus that overwhelmed the medical system’), 2021 and 2022 (‘COVID-19 ‘vaccine’ rollout), and pre-pandemic (baseline).”
https://viralimmunologist.substack.com/p/call-volume-for-paramedics-went-down
I popped into my local hospital to find that you must wear a mask again. It’s mandatory! This is insane as not only do they do nothing in relation to any airborne virus but they are single use plastic. How much money has been spent on masks and who has the contract to supply them? In addition there was a poster saying something about ZeroCovid!!!! For **** sake, has nothing been learned in 3 years? Why is anyone pushing the insane idea that you can completely eliminate Covid and now? I now have a visceral dislike of any intent that involves the word ‘zero’. There is nothing good in it.
Mandatory only in some administrator’s warped view of the world with no knowledge of the lawful position on consent to a medical intervention – masking is a medical intervention – the simplest thing to do is to say that you’re exempt.
Also, the taxpayer will pay for these and probably for the management of procuring them as well as disposal. we paid for the ‘vaccines’ and we will pay for damages caused by the ‘vaccines’.
Well if doctors and nurses are still seeing fit to bump off old folk with their midazolam/morphine death cocktail then they won’t think anything of continuing to fly in the face of an Everest-sized mountain of contradictory evidence and keep dehumanizing patients in the face-nappy dept too. Because that’s basically how they see most patients, as subhuman, or so it would seem anyway. Here’s a documentary, for anyone who hasn’t yet seen it, on the whole morphine/midazolam thing. As much as I despise Handcockup, the buck stops with the doctors who prescribe this death sentence and the nurses who administer it.
https://odysee.com/@Belfasteye.com:9/aGoodDeath:1
Agreed, Net Zero the same. Did this start with Pol Pot and his Year Zero, which also sounds similar to a ‘Great Reset’?
Just refuse. Firstly as BB says these are a medical intervention and secondly ask to see written confirmation that they are mandatory and under whose authority because it is not government.
Of course the structural issues within the NHS were already there but the following piece of excellent journalism shows who was responsible for driving all the terrible decisions that have pushed many of our institutions into untenable positions. Perhaps there was intent in all this?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3FPQJD-fQQI&t=0s
Amazing True Story: The Actual Origins of Lockdown ‘Science’ !
Here is a Short from this video showing a very key person – Bruce Aylward.
https://youtu.be/lbe1ISGHS4k
Here is Bruce Aylward being asked why Taiwan is not recognized by the WHO
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UlCYFh8U2xM
I hope the connection is clear?
let’s hope the public soon wake up to the real reason for the inadequacy of the NHS like all the public sector, is nothing to do with a lack of money.
More people, more money is the cry of those unable to think critically. The NHS already consumes 1 in every £10 of the tax take and employs 1 in 25 working age adults. How much more can we give it..?
“You will never understand bureaucracies until you understand that for bureaucrats procedure is everything and outcomes are nothing.” – Thomas Sowell
The NHS will never get fixed. Politically, Labour make out that it is a national treasure and the envy of the world and that “The Evil Tories” want to destroy; however, when they get in power they are clueless and fearful of reform (and upsetting the Public Sector unions). The Conservatives are so frightened of the media outcry if they even attempt reform that they just pump more money into it and continue the status quo.
It’ll take war or the government facing bankrupcy before real reform takes place.
What a wonderful job lockdown did protecting the NHS.
/s
Wonder how many would be outside every week banging their pots and pans nowadays…
Doesn’t pot-banging bring on ‘Sudden Death Syndrome’ or Sadly Died Syndrome first identified by The Science ™ in 1977 as a silent killer? (along with happiness)
Senator Babet is one to watch down under. He’s the same on other issues such as trans ideology and climate twaddle. Good man! But 97.5% Aussies over 16yrs have been jabbed though??
https://twitter.com/goddeketal/status/1638885872769679360?cxt=HHwWgIC-nZSBv74tAAAA
You have to wonder how much money would be enough for the 50% who think it doesn’t get enough.
The administrative bureaucracy of the management layer is now so dense no increase in funding money could ever reach the front line
Let’s hope people don’t think the problem is under funding.
Monday 3rd April 11am to 12pm
Yellow Freedom Boards
Junction Broad Lane &
A3095/A322 Bagshot Road
Bracknell RG12 9RA
They do! There seem to be an awful lot of people who won’t be happy until 100% of our tax take is funding ‘our’ NHS.
Remember the psyop. Clap for the NHS. I thought it was daft then. It looks insane now! I honestly believe (and hope) that the NHS is finished. We need a new system that promotes healthy living and that is not beholden to big pharma.
I thought we were clapping the TikTok videos
Echoing Miss Dolly’s comment, whenever I mention the NHS and how difficult it is to see a GP (I havent seen one face to face for 4 years!!!!), my friends living in the countryside would say how wonderful their local NHS is! From GP appointments to hospitalisation, they are thrilled and satisfied. So, my question is, is it the London based NHS service that is failing us? But not the countryside? If so, why are the city hospitals and GP’s so incompetent?
“Majority of Public Unhappy with NHS for First Time…”
Just woke up have they?
Just shows what a nations of nitwits Britain is. They deserve all they get – or in the case of the NHS, don’t get.
Amazingly high level of support considering they have spent the last 2 years peddling a lethal injection for us. Wait till the majority understand the full implications of this crime….
Meanwhile staff TikTok routines are going from strength to strength
Very very depressing. Yesterday I “enjoyed” the company of friends from my old workplace . Without going into too much detail I had lunch with one lot and dinner with a different set. To a man and woman they were fully engaged with government policy over covid. All had been fully “vaccinated” and boosted and proud of it. The final coup de grace came when one proudly announced he has just bought an electric car!
Naturally, because of my views I was passed off as a conspiracy theorist and told I had “gone down too many ‘worm’ holes”!
Thank God for you lot!