The Cambridge Dictionary has declared that the word of the year is “Manifest”. It was looked up 130,000 times, the publication says, and hence is one of the most curious words of the year.
The word jumped from use in the self-help community and on social media to being widely used across mainstream media and beyond, as celebrities such as singer Dua Lipa, Olympic sprinter Gabby Thomas and England striker Ollie Watkins spoke of manifesting their success in 2024.
To read the rest of this article, you need to donate at least £5/month or £50/year to the Daily Sceptic, then create an account on this website. The easiest way to create an account after you’ve made a donation is to click on the ‘Log In’ button on the main menu bar, click ‘Register’ underneath the sign-in box, then create an account, making sure you enter the same email address as the one you used when making a donation. Once you’re logged in, you can then read all our paywalled content, including this article. Being a donor will also entitle you to comment below the line, discuss articles with our contributors and editors in a members-only Discord forum and access the premium content in the Sceptic, our weekly podcast. A one-off donation of at least £5 will also entitle you to the same benefits for one month. You can donate here.
There are more details about how to create an account, and a number of things you can try if you’re already a donor – and have an account – but cannot access the above perks on our Premium page.
To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.
Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.
Interesting hypothesis. Worth more investigation, I would think.
It also shows why calling ‘settled science’ and ‘misinformation’ are so dangerous in getting to the truth… The truth might just be something we really didn’t think about at all.
Nothing to do with Stabs, Nurse Confused says. Just the method of stabbination.
Afterwards, she told NM that he had been incredibly unlucky to have entered a blood vessel. The chances of this happening are like an artillery gun firing at the thin line of an enemy trench from five miles away… and hitting the target.
I will go out, way out, way way way out on the alt right, fascist, racist, white raving supremacist, I-am-another-Hitler- branch. I would guess the chemical poisons injected into the blood stream are causing blood poisoning, clotting and death. Yeah yeah yeah I know. Nothing to do with landing zones and careful skin entry. Just the ingredients from a criminal industry and all the SADS and injuries we can see around us. I know, I know. I am just another Hitler.
Indeed. Loving the downticks!
All ideas are equally valid until disproved.
The Dr Nurses (?) are rather torpedoing their argument. If the chance of hitting a blood vessel is so remote during intramuscular injection, what explains the high incidence of deaths and injuries from these experimental products?
If not via accidental introduction into the vascular system, how did they get to various parts of the body: blood vessels, heart muscle, nervous tissue, ovaries for example? Evidently some other mechanism is in play – or a lot of ‘incredibly unlucky’ people administering these injections.
But RW, NM, we’ve been raising the issue of legions of stabbers not aspirating for many, many months already? Is this the first time you’ve felt it necessary to write an article about this?
As you say, this issue has been known about for 18 months or more.
Indeed. One of the many issues. The contents of those vials being rather more serious, I propose!
I thought exactly the same. That’s why I didn’t read beyond the first paragraph. This is incredibly old news. But I suppose, at risk of stating the obvious, if your objective is not to safeguard the public, but to harm and kill instead, they aren’t going to give a stuff about proper, evidence-based protocol. The more harm they can do the better. They’re administering a bioweapon. Why would they care where it went? Just so long as it goes inside of a person. Case in point: They’re now tampering with our leafy veggies so we get the mRNA via our gobs. Takes “eat your 5 a day ” to a whole new level.
Even organic ones?
I’m just going by the Byram Bridle article I linked in the general comments. Can’t actually see it happening in reality though. The idea is fraught with problems. Plus, if vaccines ( inc the pseudo ones ) already exist in injection form then why oh why would you want to invent a lettuce that allegedly does the same thing, but obviously less efficiently and where you can’t measure or regulate the dose? Just seems like some very barmy and overly elaborate, not to mention unnecessary, notion to me. I don’t want anyone spiking my salad leaves, thank you very much.
can include the vax ‘hesitant’ then in any gene therapy night mare
plus many studies on how long the spikes remain in the bloodstream
I vaguely remember that 1 country (India?) did actually demand aspiration.
I remember very well the Covidians response as to why they wouldn’t entertain aspiration: Because it could waste some of the precious, scarce miracle juice!
“Could the Method Used When Injecting the Covid Vaccines be Causing Vaccine Injuries”
Yes, they are breaking the skin.
BINGO
This is an interesting and well-reasoned article going back several years prior to the scamdemic. It’s looking at the evidence of to aspirate or not. It would appear that a few years prior to 2020 the WHO and CDC stated IM injections should not be aspirated as it can increase pain and therefore “vaccine hesitancy”. But they give no evidence to support that assertion. A sceptic would say they’re intent on getting as many vaccines into as many arms as possible so anything to lower reluctance to get jabbed serves them well and to hell with the evidence which contradicts them.
https://totalityofevidence.com/aspiration-of-syringe-before-injection/
Dr John Campbell was talking about this a very long time ago. But it’s pure obfuscation. If they had done the long term safety studies that they are supposed to do for novel therapies it would have been identified as (yet another) a safety issue. But they didn’t and it wasn’t. I told you so.
‘We suspect expedience here…’
Yes there was a lot of that going on wasn’t there; masks, lockdowns, distancing, self-isolation, positive tests = ‘cases’?
Expediency became The Science™️ and to Hell with the cost and consequences.
That exact issue was raised last year and ignored for some reason.
Marc Giradot has been banging on about this for ages.