When the nomination of Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. as Health and Human Services Secretary comes before the Senate, the spectre of the Samoan measles outbreak of 2019 will dramatically be invoked to challenge him. Kennedy’s critics have repeatedly relied on this topic, citing stories that claim he was responsible for an epidemic in 2019 that caused at least 83 children to die due to vaccine hesitancy. In recent articles, reporters quote previous news coverage relying on unsubstantiated and minimal data to justify their analysis.
These stories repeat dubious assertions, fail to discuss any pathological analysis, and dismiss Kennedy’s considered support of healthcare in Samoa. He had assisted the Samoan Government in developing a system for health officials to assess the efficacy and safety of medical interventions or drugs, including vaccines.
In November 2019, while the deaths of Samoan children were rapidly increasing, Kennedy wrote a comprehensive letter to the Samoan Prime Minister, presenting some possible causes of the unprecedented, virulent outbreak of measles. His concerns about the epidemic in Samoa highlight striking anomalies that were apparent to a few investigators at the time, although they remain unexplained.
The most convenient and generally accepted explanations of the outbreak claim the epidemic was the result of vaccine hesitancy, causing the population to be under-vaccinated. Measles, mumps, rubella (MMR) vaccination rates were reportedly low due to the deaths of two infants given improperly formulated injections in Samoa a year earlier.
Any considered analysis of the accessible facts soundly contradicts the conjecture that the high death count was related to low vaccination rates. News coverage continues to rely on a UNICEF report estimating the vaccination rate of one year-olds was as low as 31% as the epidemic started. However, the Samoan Government Health Ministry reported (p. 9) in June 2019 — three months before the measles outbreak began — that 80% of 12 month-old babies had received the MMR vaccine.
In past measles epidemics, dying children were often malnourished or immunocompromised. No deaths from measles have occurred in the U.S. in the last five years. From October through December of 2019, 1.5% of Samoan children with the disease died — over one in 100 — at a minimum, 10-fold more deaths than any previous outbreak in recent years. No accounting for this overt statistical deviance has been published.
Despite the presumptions of those who attack Kennedy, there was never any investigation into any aspect of this baffling tragedy. Edwin Tamasese, a health advocate who questioned Samoan Government policies during the outbreak, gave Kennedy some insight into what was happening.
Tamasese was concerned about the number of sick and dying Samoan children and began to assist families whose children were severely ill. He and his colleagues encountered conditions that contradicted the Government’s narrative.
While the press condemned him as an anti-vaxxer, Tamasese’s interventions and observations are revelatory. In an interview after the outbreak subsided, he said:
We were very careful to take statistics when we were going in to try to identify trends. When we assessed our numbers, 98% of those who were getting ill had been vaccinated consistently six to seven days prior to illness. The excuse was that the vaccine did not have time to become effective. However, according to an immunologist on the team, the six to seven-day period was also the length of time it would take an under-attenuated vaccine to make the recipient sick.
The MMR vaccine is a live, attenuated vaccine that contains weakened live strains of measles, mumps, and rubella (German measles).
Doctors in hospitals also reported that the very ill and dying children did not have symptoms consistent with normal cases of measles. When the outbreak began, blood from the first 39 cases had been sent to Australia; only seven samples were positive for measles.
The Government stopped testing to confirm the cause of these deaths in early November 2019. Without scientific confirmation, illness and mortality were attributed to low immunisation rates. Samoan health authorities continued to claim that the only remedy for the deadly epidemic was a drive to increase vaccination; however, the campaign appeared to increase the number of measles cases.
Neighbouring Pacific island countries, Tonga and Fiji, which had concurrent outbreaks of the virus — and had a different source of the measles vaccine — did not suffer the same dramatic mortality rates. This should have raised concerns, yet there hasn’t been an inquiry into why the Samoan Government switched vaccine sourcing from India to Belgium midway through the crisis.
A renewed effort to vaccinate with this alternate supply began in the first week of December 2019; it was hailed as the reason the outbreak subsided. Measles vaccines take at least 10 days before creating an immune response. There has been no explanation for the data confirming that the onset of cases dropped dramatically two weeks before this vaccination drive could have had any effect.
The Government response was not driven by factual analysis; the effort focused on promoting the vaccine and silencing those questioning authority.
With Samoan officials and the press deriding his work and views, Tamasese was arrested and charged with incitement of a Government order and treating children without a licence. Although this was deemed appropriate justice by the international news media as they echoed the Government’s praise of the vaccine, reporters again failed to present the questions raised by the outbreak.
The prosecution’s primary witness against Tamasese was a nurse whose child had measles. He had suggested that administering vitamins A and C could be helpful — and standard medical treatment for measles patients. She had taken his advice and admitted that her child recovered soon afterward.
Tamasese reported that when the nurse left the courtroom, the judge, in throwing out the case, said: “That witness may as well have represented the accused.” There was relative silence from the news media when all charges against him were dismissed.
While worldwide attention on Samoa ignored dramatic inconsistencies, Kennedy was one of the few people who asked detailed and important questions. His views were marginalised; it was easier and politically correct to blame the tragedy on low rates of vaccination.
The relatively few details known about the Samoan measles outbreak indicate that forces intent on presenting vaccines as an infallible, unquestionable remedy will not tolerate scrutiny or admit failures. This continuing devious tactic is applied internationally and is eagerly supported by most governments and the press.
Analysis of the COVID-19 pandemic has only recently vindicated those who were scorned for questioning the response. The parallels to the unfolding of the epidemic in Samoa are not obscure, and support Kennedy’s contention that vaccine development, manufacturing and application need much more effective evaluation and monitoring to prevent complications and death.
When the U.S. Government assures the public that any vaccine or medication is safe and effective, this must come from an independent, thorough and transparent process, rather than relying only on the words and actions of those with vested interests.
The current criticism of Kennedy is an endeavour to make him look dangerously ignorant and irresponsible to sway members of the Senate. Much to the chagrin of those who vilify him, his efforts to understand and assist in the Samoan measles outbreak exemplify his thoughtfulness and capabilities.
RFK, Jr. is at the forefront of healthcare oversight; his confirmation as HHS Secretary will ensure that Americans benefit from his experience and knowledge.
David Marks is a veteran investigative reporter and documentary producer. He has made films for PBS Frontline and the BBC, including Nazi Gold, which challenged the assumption of Switzerland’s neutrality in WWII. This article was first published in Brownstone Journal.
To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.
Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.
Yeah well maybe.
I am optimistic about RFK and I see him as potentially a force for good.
However on our side of the church we have to be super careful to ensure all our assertions are fully backed up by at least 2 independent sources.
Our enemies will leap on anything to discredit us.
The truth is no defence or rather it us only when it is unimpeachable.
Paging Bill Gates!
Paging Billy!
Vaccines are way down the list when it comes to health care.
First are surely:
Clean drinking water
Sewage treatment
Nutrition
Other preventive health care such as vit c,d zinc magnesium etc.
Correct use of antibiotics
Mosquito nets (sub saharan africa)
Etc etc
All boring, and guess what? Billy fucking gates is nowhere to be seen.
We’ve provided sufficient aid in the last 30 years to pay for Africa to have the first three. Only thing is it keeps turning up in NGO coffers, or the Presidents Swiss bank account, or covers the Rolls Royce and AK47’s. There is one other factor for good health, cheap and abundant electricity which facilitates a lot of the other things.
He is there, testing experimental jabs in places like India & Africa. And the Indian seed farmers are not a fan of Gates too.
The blob will try to undermine Trump’s administration. For they are communists. And commies can never win their argument legally, so theyie, cheat and steal their way to power and influence.
He should work with the FSB to take out the obstructive members of the Blob. Or Mossad as they have a good record of dealing with people. Obviously can’t trust the FBI or CIA.
it wouldn’t surprise me if the CIA are in bed with Mossad. Don’t trust any of them.
Big Pharma and it’s enablers, such as the WEF and Billy, now have such a stinking track record, when it comes to vaccines, only the truly obedient will follow……and this is before the Trump admin has them up before investigations.
For a little perspective this helps:
https://x.com/wideawake_media/status/1868957191585087664
Measles is nothing more than a bad rash and has never been proven to be caused by a virus… sound familiar?
Tic tok, it’s just a matter of time until the whole pseudo-scientific world of germ theory comes crashing down.
I was at a lunch yesterday and somehow Covid came up.. (I did not start this!). I mentioned that I was really pleased Bhattacharya had been nominated as the head of NIH. The response was ‘I thought Kennedy had been appointed and he is an anti-vaxxer’.
So I told them….
At the end one person did say she thanked me for educating her and showing her a different view.
How do other people deal with instances where people state something, which you feel is not quite right?
i never feel good after conversations like this, but find it really difficult to stay quiet.
Or is this part of ‘changing peoples mind one by one’?
It is a difficult subject and you handled it well.
Sadly, it is too late for people to have the jab contents removed from their bodies, so I say nothing re Covid.
However, I do speak up over the increase in kids showing autistic behaviour and whether it is a good plan to have multiple jabs in one session on cost grounds or separate jabs at long intervals on health grounds.
I am also having to explain basic biology to those who do not understand why you are born with XX or XY chromosomes as this, is not surprisingly, explained in some schools.
I have been reflecting on this and I probably would feel better if I countered something I did not agree with by asking an open question like ‘why do you think that?’. I tend to dive in a bit too much I think. Anyway, always room for improvement;).
I was looked at like I was mad when I slagged off Carbon Capture, and said how insane sending 21 billion was just to filter the air over a fairy tale.
As I quoted when commenting yesterday’s Why Did Excess Deaths Not Drop After Covid? article, the promotion of vaccines has become a protection racket.
There are many sceptical reports in The Exposé on MMR vaccines, e.g. https://expose-news.com/2023/06/08/ukhsa-nudges-festival-goers-to-get-mmr-vaccines/, https://expose-news.com/2024/10/01/bill-gates-uses-vaccines-and-genetically/, https://expose-news.com/2024/07/22/gates-plan-to-inject-500-million-children/, https://expose-news.com/2024/07/12/vaccines-cause-sudden-infant-death-syndrome-sids/, linking these vaccines (and vaccines in general) to health problems and even death.
More positive reports link supposed protection from vaccines to the variation of the specifically modelled pathogen in the vaccine which will not necessarily (or even seldom) correspond to a spreading illness in real life.
I personally do not accept the general idea that injecting a pathogen into the body, thereby bypassing all the body’s natural defences, is supposed to lead to a healthy outcome or some sort of advanced protection against an illness.
“The less we vaccinate, the healthier the population” says a paediatrician in the Exposé report.
Looking at historical charts regarding Small Pox & polio vaccines, the correlation seem to be sanitation defeating these illnesses before any vaccine is introduced, but the MSM peddles the lie that it’s the “jabs wot done it”…..In the 1800s they had the first Anti-Vax movements. If the jabs were so wonderful, why did movements like them emerge?