I don’t like to say things are huge, but this is huge. As promised, my own little article on COVID-19 vaccine negative effectiveness (where the jab increases one’s chance of Covid infection, hospitalisation and even death) has been published in a major medical journal, the Australian Journal of General Practice. Published by the Royal Australian College of General Practitioners, AJGP is literally the medical journal for general practitioners (family doctors) in Australia. Also discussed in what became an epic and frank discussion amongst several Australian health professionals are vaccine injuries and ‘Long Covid’ potentially being ‘long jab’.
This all started with Tindle’s article in AJGP earlier this year, which contained scarcely believable quotable quotes like: “Because COVID-19 vaccines were approved without long-term safety data and might cause immune dysfunction, it is perhaps premature to assume that past SARS-CoV-2 infection is the sole common factor in long Covid.” He declared that “COVID-19 vaccination per se might contribute to Long Covid, giving rise to the colloquial term ‘Long Vax(x)’”, since the “spike protein of SARS-CoV-2 exhibits pathogenic characteristics and is a possible cause of post-acute sequelae after SARS-CoV-2 infection or COVID-19 vaccination”. Not to mention the “class switch to IgG4 antibodies”, which Tindle thinks could lead to autoimmunity and cancer.
With the editorial team apparently happy to publish on the jab potentially causing immune dysfunction, I thought this could be my chance to once again bring up negative effectiveness in a major medical journal. Indeed, it accepted, and here is what I spoke about:
- I cite several articles apparently displaying some sort of COVID-19 vaccine negative effectiveness, including one published by NEJM, another published in a Lancet journal and the little discussion involving myself in the BMJ. In the worst cases, the vaccines’ effectiveness drops to zero, and even turns negative, within mere months.
- I cited the JECP4 articles, which show “that issues with counting windows have likely led to exaggerations of COVID-19 vaccine effectiveness and safety estimates, for both the clinical trials and later observational studies”.
- I also pointed to Fürst et al., a recent study revealing “strong evidence for the healthy vaccinee effect”, countering any excuse involving the idea that sicker people are the ones getting vaccinated. A pretty silly excuse anyway, since most adults took the jab.
- I conclude: “All this makes it plausible that the COVID-19 vaccines have always had an effectiveness that was very low, zero, or even negative, with inadequate methods allowing for a highly exaggerated effectiveness initially – an exaggeration that is lessened with time. It is, as Professor Tindle noted, possible that the vaccines could be causing immunosuppression. With the ubiquitousness of the vaccines, and the fact that some vaccine mandates are still in place, to say nothing of the upcoming Senate inquiry into excess mortality, I suggest we investigate this further.”
Awesome, huh? But wait, there’s more. A few more follow-up articles were published by AJGP, one involving Liu and Macartney (from the influential pro-jab Liu et al. study I’ve ‘refuted’, publishing forthcoming), with the usual attempts to “counter the unsubstantiated assertions that COVID-19 vaccination is causally associated with Long Covid”, customary claims that the jab “saved millions of lives” included.
Okay, so that bit of propaganda wasn’t so exciting, but another follow-up was also published, by Murnane. They were also concerned about “spikeopathy” and declared:
Professor Tindle’s concerns about ‘Long Vax(x)’ very much echo conditions I have observed working as a general practitioner. I have seen patients present with Long Covid symptoms post COVID-19 vaccine without prior COVID-19 infection. I have also observed patients with Long Covid that has been acquired post COVID-19 infection, who have experienced a worsening of their symptoms post COVID-19 vaccination. This is consistent with studies that have shown a worsening of symptoms in 21% to 31% of Long Covid sufferers post COVID-19 vaccination.
They also shared that they “personally suffered from a COVID-19 vaccine injury leading to dysautonomia, small fibre neuropathy, thyroiditis and mast cell activation syndrome (MCAS)”.
Finally, Tindle was granted the opportunity to wrap things up. He apparently agreed with my “case counting window concerns”, observations of negative effectiveness and the healthy vaccinee effect, countering Liu et al. Tindle is all of us when he opines that the “amount of spike protein from the vaccine is likely many fold greater than that from infection with virus because of stability mutations introduced into the vaccine mRNA, and the tissue penetrance of spike protein mRNA into a far more diverse set of tissues than infection”. In response to Murnane, Tindle claims that other GPs echoed similar concerns, about ‘Long Covid’ being “a side effect of the Covid vaccination”, and mentions the persecution of doctors who dared to speak out. Ending by questioning if the jabs are truly beneficial for all, Tindle even boldly noted that earlier “posts implicating COVID-19 vaccines were removed by the site moderators”. Things are changing. We’re winning.
Dr. Raphael Lataster is an Associate Lecturer at the University of Sydney, specialised in misinformation, and a former pharmacist. This article was first published in his Substack newsletter, Okay Then News. Read more on his research and legal actions, including his recent win against the healthcare vaccine mandate in New South Wales.
To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.
Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.
Imagine injecting poisons and heavy chemicals into a human shoulder to generate ‘spike proteins’ and finding out that it kills and injures and does nothing against a non-existent ‘viral genomic structure’. Shock news surely. No single isolated Sars II ‘virus’ in its ‘shell’ exists, making the creation of a ‘remedy’ rather difficult. $cience, fraudology and all that. See HIV for more info.
Fraudology indeed, the new pseudo-scientific umbrella term that encompasses virology, genomics and (sadly) epidemiology. I know of several fraudologists blissfully unaware they are, I guess they’re useful idiots.
The question is ‘how do we stop them?’
We may need to start with daddy fraudster himself, Loius Pasteur and his hubris, erroneous inferences and data manipulation. Swiftly followed up by exposing the epistomological flaws in ‘germ theory’ and the circular reasoning employed by virologists.
It’s going to be a long messy fight, but I’m game!
Here’s another recent one, if it hasn’t already been shared on here. Dr McCullough is one of the authors.
Results;
”Approximately 98% of the King County population received at least one dose of a COVID-19 vaccine by 2023. Our analysis revealed a 25.7% increase in total cardiopulmonary arrests and a 25.4% increase in cardiopulmonary arrest mortality from 2020 to 2023 in King County, WA.
Excess cardiopulmonary arrest deaths were estimated to have increased by 1,236% from 2020 to 2023, rising from 11 excess deaths (95% CI: -12, 34) in 2020 to 147 excess deaths (95% CI: 123, 170) in 2023. A quadratic increase in excess cardiopulmonary arrest mortality was observed with higher COVID-19 vaccination rates. The general population of King County sharply declined by 0.94% (21,300) in 2021, deviating from the expected population size.”
https://www.preprints.org/manuscript/202405.1665/v1
Regarding excess deaths/democide, Jacqui Deevoy makes this valid point. And I think the answer is simple, as somebody rightly points out in the comments: the police are obviously paid to prioritise and protect the government ( and their various agendas ), not the people. Examples of this abound across all of the government-pushed narratives. We are nothing more than cattle or collateral damage and zero f***s are given;
”We have recently seen evidence that the police have been told not to investigate jab injuries and deaths when a video showing a police officer explaining this to someone who’d gone to them about a jab death went viral.
I’ve believed for years that the police in the UK have been instructed not to investigate the Midazolam murders too.
It would appear that investigating democide – death by government policy – isn’t their thing.
This belief stems from my own experience of trying to get the police to look into my dad’s suspicious death back in 2021 and from hearing accounts from members of my support group who’ve approached the police about the involuntary euthanasia (i.e. murder) of their loved ones only to be turned away.
Can the police be forced to investigate these deaths? If not, how can it be that such blatant democide can be totally ignored?”
https://x.com/JacquiDeevoy1/status/1807418901589852466
Thanks Mogs
But negative effectiveness in itself is no problem.
The real problem is that they are actually er, shall we say rather toxic.
And there my kindness ends.
The bastards knew this, or should have known –
https://doorlesscarp953.substack.com/p/walkthrough-fcfc-interactions-and?utm_source=post-email-title&publication_id=650045&post_id=146127883&utm_campaign=email-post-title&isFreemail=false&r=x6a6a&triedRedirect=true&utm_medium=emailwn.
Were we not in Clown World, they would be facing prison.
Some might think a greater punishment should befall them.
Well, negative effectiveness is a problem if you’re elderly and, thus, more likely to be infected. For the elderly, even catching a cold can ultimately be fatal.
I’m glad I said no, wait and see, in March 2021.
During the next “pandemic”, which may come during your preferred Labour government, you may not get the option to “wait and see”: Sir Keir Starmer Reveals How He Would Handle Anti-Vaxxers & Reacts to the New COVID Measures | GMB Sir Keir Starmer Reveals How He Would Handle Anti-Vaxxers & Reacts to the New COVID Measures | GMB (youtube.com)
I understand that medical scientists want to write articles in a way that may get them “published in a major medical journal” but it’s been bleedin’ obvious for more than two years that the Covid vaccines are not effective. Anyone who wants to look (e.g. on the Worldometer website) can see the graphs showing the MASSIVE increases in Covid cases and Covid deaths in Australia, New Zealand and many Asian countries after mass vaccination compared to before. An effective vaccine is supposed to REDUCE cases and/or deaths, not be followed by MASSIVE INCREASES in cases and deaths, as the graphs for Australia, New Zealand, Japan, South Korea, Malaysia, Vietnam, Indonesia, Philippines, Thailand, and many other countries clearly show:
https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/
We need to add the possibility of the Antibody Dependent Enhancement Effect as an additional mechanism why Covid infection in vaccinated people flourish.
Antibodies developed after vaccination with a certain strain, can potentially enhance virus entry and replication by the next strain that is slightly different.
One of the reasons not to mass vaccinate during an outbreak.
What are the clear and specific symptoms identifying the illness named Covid-19? If there are none then maybe there is no such thing as Covid-19, especially if you can only identify a person as having the illness by means of a PCR analysis, when the inventor of PCR said you cannot use this method to identify illness.
And why did anyone believe, it being the case that Covid-19 takes on so many different forms of illness (like being run over by a bus), that a vaccine can be created to supposedly protect against this undefinable disease?
I suppose we should be happy our politicians did not react like they do with the bird flu – massacring whole bird populations at any sign that one of them is sick. Or maybe that is more or less exactly what they did …