Have you ever tried to commit genocide? You may well think the answer is ‘no’, but one day you could wake up surprised to find the police knocking on your door and telling you that the answer is actually ‘yes’ – you just hadn’t realised the fact. This, at least, may end up being your fate if you are unlucky enough to live in Canada these days, a country where, so fashionable and du jour has genocide now become, that even the nation’s Prime Minister, Justin Trudeau, has recently got in on the act, at least according to this widespread online meme:
So, Genocide Justin is now deliberately engineering the systematic demographic replacement of white people all across Canada, eh? Perhaps this sneaky plot of racial annihilation finally explains why Trudeau has in the past proved so eager to black up in public: it’s the best way of a pasty-faced untermensch like him avoiding being immediately carted off to the forthcoming whites-only death-camps soon due to be built down Ottawa way. Or, then again, perhaps not, as the whole quote would appear to be a total fake, created by person or persons unknown, and then spread online by political opponents from around 2017 onwards, in order to put people off voting for him.
This just shows how easy it is for any old Canadian to make a false accusation about such matters online – look, it’s even happened to the country’s leader, so clearly no-one is safe from falling foul of such malicious slander. A fact which makes it all the more surprising, then, that PM Trudeau himself is currently pushing through a potentially dangerous new law so poorly drafted that it could almost be considered an open inducement for any given malcontent to make false accusations against those they happen to dislike.
Trudeau or False?
As I have detailed on this site previously, Canada’s forthcoming new Online Harms Act, also known as Bill C-63, not only rather ambitiously aims to eliminate free speech online hate from the nation’s cyber-sphere forever, but also aspires to outlaw the alleged instigation of genocide over the internet to boot. However, the Act is not yet quite so totalitarian in scope that it allows for people to be prosecuted for calls for genocide that they never actually made in the first place… or does it? Actually it kind of does: Bill C-63 makes specific provision for people to be placed under house arrest for things they have not yet said, but may be deemed likely by a judge to one day say, at some point in the hypothetical future.
So, just because Trudeau hasn’t actually said the specific made-up words attributed to him in the above fake meme, he can’t necessarily presume he will be wholly safe from being locked away in his bedroom with no supper for the next 10 years by some power-crazed activist judge anyway, on the absurd charges that he might potentially say broadly comparable words of similar basic intent on Instagram in the year 2035.
Any political opponent with a grudge could easily take advantage of another wrong-headed aspect of Trudeau’s Act, that which seeks to define calling for genocide on the internet not simply as typing out an obviously cut-and-dried statement like “Kill all the Jews now, do it with anthrax!!”, but in a much wider sense as seeking to portray any given protected group as being “inherently violent” or “unhuman” – an aspect of the legislation I like to call the ‘Outlawing All Future Criticism of Islam Forever Clause’.
With this specific, incredibly loose, legal (re-)definition of genocide in mind, had Bill C-63 been passed into law several years earlier back in 2019, Mr. Trudeau may already have faced prosecution for encouraging the mass extermination of the white race across Canada. In this year, his Government chose to amend a report on then-pressing countrywide terrorist threats by removing any explicit mention of the term “Sikh extremism” from within its pages (Canada has a specific problem with this issue). Apparently, this was done on the grounds that “entire religions should never be equated with terrorism”. This rubbed Maxime Bernier, the founder of the Right-wing opposition People’s Party of Canada, up the wrong way, as he complained that, when discussing this same now-censored report previously, Trudeau had “been warning us for weeks about the dangers of ‘white supremacy’, [thereby] equating an entire ethnicity with terrorism”.
Back in 2019, all this left Trudeau open to was an accusation of double-standards. Come the end of 2024, by which time his stupid Online Harms Act is expected to be passed fully into law, could it have led to his potential prosecution for inaccurately portraying an entire ethnic group (i.e., his own) as being “inherently violent”? If Mr. Bernier had wished to cause Trudeau a political problem, and gain him some bad headlines, he easily could have made an official complaint about him to the authorities on this matter, then made a very public announcement of the fact to the media: even if the case was found to be wholly without merit, the process is the punishment, as they say, even for Prime Ministers.
Oh, Canada!
According to an opinion survey conducted in mid-2022, around 37% of Canadians (approximately 11 million people) believe that “there is a group of people in this country who are trying to replace native-born Canadians [i.e., white ones] with immigrants who agree with their political views”, something often known as the ‘Great Replacement’ and habitually dismissed by mainstream politicians and media as being a conspiracy theory. But is it really? To many people with eyes, the falling percentage of of white people and the rising percentage of non-white people across the West is a simple demographic fact, directly observable with their own eyes every time they so much as walk down their own local high-street, not a ‘conspiracy theory’.
It is certainly possible to construct a false conspiratorial narrative atop of this basic demographic fact, such as ‘The Jews are behind it all’, but, long-term, white people really are being pushed into minority status in their own ethnic homelands. In Canada, according to one 2018 paper by political academics Eric Kaufmann and Matthew Goodwin, this is expected to occur sometime around 2050. But why is such a thing happening at all? A key factor surely has to be the policy of Justin Trudeau and his own current Liberal Party government to import foreign immigrants – a policy which has recently been described by Kaufmann (Canadian-born himself, and multi-ethnic) as a pro-immigration “cult”.
Already, around one in four people who live in Canada came there as an immigrant (albeit not necessarily a non-white one), but for Trudeau & Co. this was nowhere near enough. In 2022, the Liberal Party proudly announced plans to bring in an annual quota of 500,000 immigrants per year, or five million per decade. By as soon as 2032, it is expected mass immigration will effectively account for all of Canada’s population growth. Apparently, the plan has been going better than even Trudeau could have expected; during the last quarter of 2023, Canada’s population grew by 430,000 (and with a below-replacement birth rate, all of this net growth is due to immigration).
The Liberals say they are doing this because Canada, with its relatively small population of around 40 million, and massive, mostly unpopulated, landmass, is facing a demographic crisis, with an aging population and low birth-rate, but others may disagree. Back in 1971, Justin’s father Pierre, also once a Liberal Party PM, adopted an official policy of multiculturalism for Canada. By 2015, Trudeau Jr. was taking this idea to its logical conclusion, giving a controversial interview in which he boasted that, under his leadership, Canada would become the world’s “first post-national state”, one in which the country – if it could even any longer really be called such a thing – would have “no core identity”.
The thing is, many ordinary voters across Canada, primitive little things that they are, still desire to retain some form of shared “core identity”, to the extent that around two thirds of them now think the Liberals’ annual mass immigration target is too high. Even Trudeau has to accept such polling may prove electorally costly and has recently changed tack a little, now saying the rate of mass immigration of temporary migrants is indeed excessive – but just of temporary migrants, please note, not permanent ones.
Given all this, it is not really all that surprising that 37% of Canadians now believe that “there is a group of people in this country who are trying to replace native-born Canadians with immigrants who agree with their political views” – because there quite clearly is. They’re not the wholly mythical Elders of Zion any more, though. Instead, they’re the sadly quite genuine and wholly extant Liberal Party of Canada.
Justin Side the Bounds of the Law?
Trudeau is known for making innumerable public statements online and elsewhere, continually extolling the alleged virtues of multiculturalism and mass immigration. By doing so, could Canada’s PM quite unknowingly be leaving himself open to future Bill C-63 complaints being made against him by certain politically dissatisfied individuals who would consider his remarks to be tantamount to the encouragement of so-called ‘genocide by substitution’ against those “Old Stock White Canadians” he was once supposed to have derided in that old fake meme of his?
Let’s have a look at Trudeau’s imaginary white genocide-encouraging words once again. Clearly, he never actually said them: not even he is stupid and hubristic enough to mouth such things out loud, and hang the electoral consequences. But given the many only slightly less anti-white, pro-mass immigration, things he has said down the years, could it be plausibly imagined that he might utter such words at some given time in the future – sometime after 2050, say, when whites finally will be in the minority across Canada demographically, and he will long since have ceased to be a Prime Minister in temporary need of their continued votes?
A political opponent like Maxime Bernier – or one of those other 11 million Canadians who apparently believe in the truth of the Great Replacement – could certainly make a complaint to the authorities to this effect and demand it be acted upon. Remember, under Bill C-63’s terms, it only needs to be deemed there are “reasonable grounds” to suspect a person may incite genocide in the future for them to be successfully sentenced.
Given the ideological leanings of the majority of the West’s judiciary these days, I doubt any such prosecution against Trudeau himself would succeed, of course – just look at how Police Scotland conspicuously failed to arrest First Minister Humza Yousaf for his now infamous speech about white people following the introduction of Scotland’s Online Harms Act equivalent recently – but even to suffer such a public accusation would be enough to cause Justin PR problems.
Diagnosis Murder
Plus, when it comes to genocide (real genocide, I mean, not its current absurd Canadian re-definition as “saying mean things about black homosexuals on social media”), we must not forget that one of Justin Trudeau’s other key flagship social policies is the Medical Assistance in Dying (MAiD) Act, passed in 2016, which essentially legalised euthanasia across Canada, specifically for those with terminal diseases who wish to have doctors throw them out of a hospital window to be crushed beneath the wheels of a passing ambulance before their pain and suffering grows too great for them to handle.
However, MAiD has since got badly out of hand, and people have now begun being approved for medical murder on the grounds that they are homeless or lonely and thus depressed – depression, of course, also being a potentially terminal medical condition, as it can lead to sufferers committing suicide, thus leading to the Pythonesque situation of patients trying to emotionally blackmail their doctors by turning up to their offices and warning them to “Kill me or I’ll kill myself!” In the latest mad judicial ruling, it has even now been determined that autistic people can be given lethal injections, should they really want to receive them. Facilitating managed deaths for cancer patients in terrible pain is one thing, but bumping off the mentally vulnerable on demand does sound rather like a potential programme of mass medical killing in the making to me.
Therefore, unlike, say, some random nutter typing “Sterilise the Japanese!!” to his five bored followers on Instagram, Justin Trudeau’s MAiD Act, and the rhetoric he has used to encourage and promote it, online and elsewhere, has had some genuine substantial real-world consequences, in terms of actual human deaths. As recently as 2015, legally administered fatalities from euthanasia in Canada were zero, as the practice was obviously against the law. By 2021, they had risen to 10,064 in number, amounting to 3.3% of all deaths in the country. As the nation’s leader, you could make a plausible enough argument Trudeau was directly responsible for all those killings himself. So, by some disapproving assessments, he is an actual genocidal mass murderer, isn’t he, not just an aspirant online keyboard warrior one?
Plus, although I have not seen any figures to this actual effect, you would have to presume the vast majority of medical killings in Canada will have been performed upon older people, as these tend to be the patients who most often end up getting terminal diseases like cancer and Alzheimer’s. Demographically speaking, of course, the older a person in Canada is, the more likely they are to be white. By facilitating their accelerated mass death in this way, might some paranoid commentators view this as being just yet another cunning means of Trudeau speeding up the Great Replacement by fair means or foul? Again, whether such an overblown accusation be true or not, even making it in the first place would be an easy, sure-fire means of a political rival getting some free publicity for themselves and turning certain voters against their opponent.
I’m not ordinarily in favour of spurious false accusations being made against people, whether they be in the public eye or otherwise – but when it comes to Justin Trudeau, I may make an exception. Perhaps if enough people file anti-white hate-speech complaints against him once Bill C-63 has gone through, he might even feel forced into committing an ironic act of political self-euthanasia?
Steven Tucker is a journalist and the author of over 10 books, the latest being Hitler’s & Stalin’s Misuse of Science: When Science Fiction Was Turned Into Science Fact by the Nazis and the Soviets (Pen & Sword/Frontline), which is out now.
To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.
Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.
Similar to Yousaf and his anti white remarks, which ofcourse we are all supposed to accept we took “out of context”. ——I wonder if these two dumb Cultural Marxists would go the Congo and tell them they were all too black
And remember former Prime Minister David Cameron declaring that “Parliament is too white”.
I voted for that man twice, to my eternal shame.
Not shame, because we have all been deceived by politicians, especially the poor deluded American Patriots who believe AntiChrist Drumpf is their “Saviour”. And now even RFK Jr. has bizarrely chosen a serial adulteress as his presidential running mate.
OK you don’t like Trump. But I would rather vote for a chair than a phony planet saving democrat.
I’m with you Varmint everything since 2020 shows a Trump presidency would be infinitely preferable to this demented psycho.
I find myself skipping Mr Tuckers content. I am sure he has a valid point but to many words
Well don’t stop by empty-handed. At least contribute an off-topic dump.
I’m sure that’ll go down like a bowl of cold sick with certain posters!
”…you would have to presume the vast majority of medical killings in Canada will have been performed upon older people, as these tend to be the patients who most often end up getting terminal diseases like cancer and Alzheimer’s.”
In the same vein we have this charmer from Belgium. Apparently when you’re of advanced age you’re just an expensive burden on society and are better off ‘opting out’. Not very ‘Christian’ of him, is it? Imagine living in a so-called ‘civilized society’ and then devaluing people’s lives like this. He should move to Canada! Is this really where we are at now?
”The president of Belgium’s largest health care fund has promoted euthanasia as a solution for the country’s aging population problem.
Luc Van Gorp, head of Christian Mutuality (CM), pointed out that the number of people over 80 in Belgium will double up to 1.2 million by 2050, putting large financial pressure on the health care system and insurance companies.
According to De Specialist, Van Gorp said the problem cannot be solved with more money and called for “a radically different approach.”
“Doctors and other health professionals are now doing their utmost to make everyone live longer, but for what purpose? Living longer is not an end in itself, is it? It must first of all be about the question: how long can I live with quality [of life].”
“What about the category of older people who receive maximum care, but who still do not have the quality of life they want? That question is asked far too little,” he stated.
Van Gorp said that in addition to the current euthanasia law, there “should also be a softer form for people who feel that their lives are complete,” adding that “Many elderly people are tired of life.”
Instead of calling the process suicide, which has negative connotations, he “would rather call it: giving life back.”
“I know it is sensitive, but we really have to dare to have that debate.”
In a telling remark, the executive used the metaphor of a “mountain of meat” that begins to smell to describe elderly citizens.”
https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/president-belgian-health-insurance-euthanasia-aging-population/?utm_source=most_recent&utm_campaign=usa
The “total fake” link provided in this article about the “meme” says this:
“Henry Markow, a blogger described by the National Post as a “prominent anti-Semitic conspiracy theorist,” posted the meme on his blog about neo-Nazi Paul Fromm and the “the globalist Jewish agenda.”
Henry MAKOW is himself Jewish, a Canadian citizen. His Canadian website is “Save the Males”.
I do not believe the meme is fake.
The law is to be used against our side not their side, IE ppl who deny climate change, holes in ozone layers, non existent pandemics etc. Such laws would not be introduced unless of course the judiciary were already sufficiently politicised. It never ceases to amaze me how ppl think this is somehow a fair fight, and the weapons of our oppressors are about to be turned on themselves, they are of course not.
The big mistake all of the Cultural Marxists and Critical Race Theorists make is that they look at the real racism of the past, then use that to describe the social structures that exist today. The idea they have is to flip the ladder of oppression. They think the only solution to perceived discrimination is more discrimination in the other direction. So what they end doing is indulging in intolerance in the name of tolerance.
I don’t think there was much racism really ever, rather it was the powerful ppl exploiting the weak. The race thing is just a psyop to divide and conquer.
Their was clear Jim Crow Racism in the US.
“And we will replace them”…..Well you are one of them so lead by example!
“he easily could have made an official complaint about him to the authorities on this matter, then made a very public announcement of the fact to the media”
This is Canadian media we are talking about, even more far left than the BBC. There would be silence all round.
“Elders of Zion”…..I read somewhere that it was a forgery, therefore forgery from where?
So it did exist then? Bavarian Illuminate come to mind with names like Jacob Venedey 1805 – 1871. Rousseau. Maurice Joly 1829 – 1878. Protocols of Zion.
” that autistic people can be given lethal injections”
Just watched Nazi Hunters where they traced Dr Mengele Angel of Death. Do we ever learn from history!
Maybe Trudeau’s enthusiasm for immigration cab be harnessed, and the UK can direct its illegals there instead of Rwanda…
I sent this article to a friend in Canada. This was their response, which I think is interesting:
“What they say about this Bill C-63 is true; it’s dangerous and shouldn’t be passed, but it will. But a couple of other things caught my attention. Why would they call Maxine Bernier’s party ‘Right-wing’ like that? That’s what the press does to let the reader know to dismiss anything these guys represent. He represents common sense and freedom. He was against the mandates, lockdowns, persecution if you weren’t vaxxed, pro truckers, and all the rest of it.
Secondly, they quote something Trudeau said before he was ever elected in the first place: the quote superimposed on his photo about old European stock. They are calling that a meme, but he said it. I heard him say it, and tried to raise the alarm bell about this guy before people voted for him. They didn’t want to know! It was just dismissed as nothing important. That’s the story here as far as I’m concerned. People just don’t want to know what they don’t want to hear, and so it goes on. We can absolutely believe he said that because of what he said about me and all the other unvaxxed Canadians. Here it is again as a reminder (I will never forget this quote or the one in the article):
“They don’t believe in science/progress and the are very often misogynistic and racist. It’s a very small group of people but they don’t shy away from the fact that they take up some space. This leads us as a country, as a leader, to make a choice: do we tolerate these people?”
It’s not very grammatical but then he’s not very smart. He’s not even smart enough to know you don’t say ‘do we tolerate these people’. But he gets away with it, as he has with everything, because he’s superficially attractive. That’s my reading of it anyway. We are charmed as snakes by the snake charmer.
Trudeau is a narcissistic authoritarian who says what he thinks and doesn’t seem to alarm people. Or at least he didn’t alarm enough people to not vote for him. It seems to me that the bigger problem for him is the cost of living. That’s what ticks people off. We’re paying higher prices for everything, in large part because of his green agenda, and people are annoyed about that. Freedom? Well, what’s that eh?
We have an articulate and presentable choice now in the form of Pierre Poilievre and it seems like he just might wipe the floor with Trudeau the next time around. I live in hope!”
Is his nickname ‘Teflon Trudeau’? The muck just slides off him? He’s making crazy laws.
He blacked up and I believe admitted to some paedophile activity for which he was ‘very sorry’. I’ve seen footage of him embracing women in an entirely creepy way and staring into their eyes as if he was trying to ‘lovebomb’ them. His mother’s past behaviour suggests there is mental illness in the family and I think this man has been influenced by neo-nazi Klaus Schwab & the WEF, as were Jacinda Ardern, Mark Rutte (of Holland), Macron and possibly Tony Bliar; all totally crap, dangerous rulers.
FFS, if Canada doesn’t get rid of this neo-nazi, I fear greatly for the future of your country and the West in general.