While high profile court cases and social media are the visible manifestations of the assault on freedom of speech they represent a fraction of the scenarios where, across Britain in 2024, employees as well as members of clubs, societies and congregations are being brow-beaten into silence and compliance, forced to wear a mask in public where their true opinions and thoughts are hidden. We rarely hear about the plight of these victims although we are all those victims, oppressed by an aggressive tyranny which has captured our institutions. I would argue that the impact on our society of this ‘soft’ tyranny is far more damaging than even legislation and it is exactly the technique used to control the population in the post-Stalin period in the USSR.
I have spent the last 30 years working as a Human Resources Executive in some of the U.K.’s leading organisations and over that time I have seen, first hand, the creep of radical ideological politics into the workplace. In many organisations HR is blamed for this, but this misunderstands the function of HR. HR, like every other profession, has been ideologically captured by critical race theory and radical trans ideology, both of which have tenets that run contrary to U.K. Employment Law and the Equality Act 2010, which some organisations have discovered to their cost. HR is merely the means of enforcement. As HR used to enforce IT pornography policies, it now enforces woke ideology, but it only does so because the organisation, and those who own or run the organisation, demand it does so.
I am sure the following situation is not unique. You are in a work meeting and discussing a proposal – for example, mandatory unconscious bias training. There are 12 of you in the meeting. One person (always white, usually middle class) is passionately advocating the training. Everyone else is either nodding along or sitting in silence. But they are all thinking the same:
- Is it a good idea to effectively accuse the majority of our employees of being racists just because they were born in a white skin? Isn’t that, in itself, a bit racist?
- Hold on a minute. What do we do if someone refuses to attend the training? If we force them and they continue to resist then we may end up with a constructive dismissal case which we are likely to lose, to the cost of the reputation, share price and finances of the business.
- I’m uncomfortable with this. Are we not politically indoctrinating our employees?
- I’ve read that the psychologist who developed the principle of ‘unconscious bias’ has since dialled back his research and has specifically said it shouldn’t be used for ‘training’ as it is likely to have the reverse effect to that intended.
- I’d better keep quiet. I’m in my 50s and the chances of landing another job if I get fired are thin.
You look at your colleagues, they have a rather fixed expression on their faces, somewhere between mild constipation and zealous earnestness. You know that they all have these concerns. Why? Because they are professionals, most of whom have spent the last decades honing their skills in analytical thinking and critical analysis in a business or organisational environment. But when the proposer asks, “do you agree?” someone agrees, several others nod along, some may even outdo each other and enthusiastically prostrate themselves at the altar of the idea. But usually no one disagrees.
In one such meeting I was reminded of a line in The Gulag Archipelago by Solzhenitsyn. During one of the Party Congresses in the 1930s, the applause after one of Stalin’s interminable speeches famously lasted for a very long time:
The applause went on – six, seven, eight minutes! They were done for! Their goose was cooked! They couldn’t stop now till they collapsed with heart attacks! At the rear of the hall, which was crowded, they could of course cheat a bit, clap less frequently, less vigorously, not so eagerly… Nine minutes! Ten!… Insanity! To the last man! With make-believe enthusiasm on their faces, looking at each other with faint hope, the district leaders were just going to go on and on applauding till they fell where they stood, till they were carried out of the hall on stretchers.
While it is relatively easy to understand why a Party Delegate may not wish to be the one who stops clapping, the penalties for upsetting the Stalinist state are on record. Surely, it is histrionic to compare such with a corporate meeting on unconscious bias training? However, the point is that the behaviour of the audience is the same when the penalty for not demonstrating sufficient enthusiasm for a DEI policy is significant enough to ruin your life. That’s the point: disagreement isn’t countenanced; anything short of enthusiastic endorsement is unacceptable.
Why is this?
Cowardice is a very easy accusation to level if you haven’t got a family, mortgage, rent, cars to finance. Saying the ‘wrong words’ – a.k.a. your professional opinion – in these situations can literally destroy your life. Those of us who are at the level to make these decisions have increasingly specialised skill sets with limited employment options. Open your mouth and you don’t only lose your job – you lose your career as well as any freelance opportunities. There are literally hundreds and probably thousands of people on LinkedIn who have had their careers destroyed by questioning The Message. It is the new heresy and, in contrast to the Christian religion, humility, mercy, redemption and forgiveness are just not a thing.
Say the wrong thing as a white straight man and you are a racist. Say the wrong thing as a black straight man and you have been corrupted by ‘whiteness’. Say the wrong thing as a white woman, you’re a TERF, etc.
What is the ‘wrong thing?’ You thought that arguing against the motion was the wrong thing? Sorry, ‘silence is violence’, which means keeping your mouth shut won’t protect you. Unless you enthusiastically applaud the idea, you will be accused of causing physical harm to vulnerable people.
Now you might argue that it is the duty of us all to fight injustice even if that means poverty for your family, repossession, unemployment, etc. and, yes, the courts and employment tribunals often find in favour of the brave few. However, do not think that the justice system moves quickly. It also wants paying. It will usually take two to three years to bring a case. In that time, teenagers grow up, university courses are completed, marriages collapse due to the stress of unemployment. Yes, you may be vindicated in time, but at what cost? Look what happened to Graham Linehan. His ‘crime’? Suggesting that the transition of children might not be such a good idea. His punishment? He lost everything – his job, his income, his home, his marriage, his family. He is still being persecuted – banned from venues. His career as a comedy writer is over, although he may be able to rebuild it in time. He did nothing criminal, nothing wrong. He merely voiced an opinion that most people in Britain agree with. If they can do this to a high profile person like Graham they can do it to everyone, including a 50-something manager in a U.K. FTSE 250, especially if he’s white and straight. I could cope with my career being ended; I have other skills that don’t depend on my HR expertise. I have a strong marriage. But would I risk putting it under that amount of strain? Call me old-fashioned, call me ‘toxically masculine’, but my reason for existing is to be a husband, a father, a rock for my family. Without them I am nothing. Without them there is no reason to go on. I know myself pretty well and without my family I would self-destruct in a matter of months.
Of course, it was the DDR, East Germany, which perfected this psychological oppression. The Stasi and their masters realised that the mere process of the justice system could be used as punishment. Therefore, the mere threat of arrest or investigation over your words or thoughts was enough to enforce compliance. You didn’t have to be found guilty. The stigma of investigation would destroy your life as friends and clients turned their backs on you. Unemployment etc. soon followed. The East Germans even had a word for this: zerzertsung – punishment through process.
So, cowardice? That’s an opinion you may have in your 20s but put yourself in the shoes of others. Of course, employment law is meant to protect us from this, and to an extent it does. However, it’s extraordinary how many employers will happily persecute their employees for wrongthink because in their opinion it is ‘the right thing to do’ rather than in any way legal. Ten minutes perusing the pages of the Free Speech Union’s website is enough time to say: “What were they thinking?” These days, ‘progressive’ organisations act outside the law because they think it is the ‘right thing to do’ and never mind the cost. When you have the likes of Disney Corp losing an estimated $100bn in earnings due to its politicisation of content and alienation of customers, don’t be surprised if that regional building society you work for decides to break U.K. Employment Law and fire you because you’ve expressed a legally protected belief.
Even in organisations which do adhere to the letter of the law, don’t expect promotion if you hold ‘undesirable’ opinions. For at least 20 years, ‘Diversity’ has been a key performance indicator in the behaviour matrix that HR people use to assess someone’s suitability for a job. The question is couched in an open format at interview or appraisal. It used to be: “Give me an example of when you demonstrated your commitment to diversity at work?” In 2024, you are more likely to get: “What ally-ship activities have you taken part in over the last 12 months?” If you answer this with anything other than an enthusiastic litany of how your team celebrated Black History Month or how your entire team travelled to your nearest Pride Festival on a Saturday, then don’t expect to score well – and if you don’t demonstrate you’re On Message you’ll be marked as ‘problematic’. So you may not lose your job, but you won’t get promoted. If you are lucky, like I was, you may get parked in a role where you cannot progress anywhere, but where your critical thinking and project troubleshooting skills are needed when the real world comes to bite. But the moment you’ve mopped up another disaster caused by overzealous enforcement of EDI dogma, it’s back to career Coventry with you.
Don’t think you’re safe in a small business. In the business-to-business market, The Message is enforced through procurement policies. If you want to supply, say, cleaning services, paper clips or potatoes to an NHS Trust or a large private company then before you can even start discussing contracts, Procurement Policies are used to weed out any supplier who isn’t ideologically aligned (or says he is). Such organisations want to know that they are working with the right type of supplier. This used to be sensible: asking for a valid health and safety policy, for example, or ensuring there is an anti-slavery policy in place to ensure the supply chain is free from modern-day slave labour – these are sensible demands. But those of us who questioned whether this opened the door to increasingly demanding requirements 20 years ago were ignored. Time has justified this concern. Want to sell to some NHS Trusts? Well you’d better have an Anti-Racism Policy in place – which means regurgitating the precepts of Critical Race Theory.
The general public don’t know about this because such procurement is carried out under the veil of ‘Commercial Confidentiality’. But it is rife and it is how DEI is enforced in small and medium-sized enterprises. Don’t think that you’ll get away with providing paperwork to shut them up. The DEI teams at your customer want more than box-ticking – they want evidence. You need to demonstrate that you are On Message.
In his 2007 book The Whisperers: Private Life in Stalin’s Russia, Orlando Figes studied dozens of unpublished private archives and family memories of those who lived in the USSR under Stalin. The book focuses on how normal people actually lived and survived under the Government and cultural orthodoxy of Communism. How do you live in a society when your own children may betray you to the Cheka (Humza Yousaf take note)? Where children who grass on their parents’ wrongthink are lauded as child saints like the loathsome Morozov. The answer is you wear a mask. One diary of a man living in the Soviet Union in the 1960s discusses how you wore the mask. You wore it in front of children, you wore it in front of your young children, you wore it at work, you wore it all the time. If it came off, it was only to those in whom you trusted absolutely and only when in a remote place where no one else was around. Under Stalin, you would get shot if your mask slipped. Under Brezhnev, your career would be ruined, your social life over. You might even go to prison.
Wearing a mask is living a lie – being socially forced to act and agree with something that you fundamentally believe is wrong is no life at all. It causes stress, depression, ill health. But it also demonstrates the corruption of the state and society. A society where the truth is suppressed, where opinion is regulated and where speech is policed is not a free society and that society will wither – economically, spiritually and socially – until it collapses under the weight of its own bullshit. This is why people who lived under the heel of the USSR, across Eastern Europe, are so attuned to the slippery slope we’re on in the West. We are already there in our work and cultural lives. We are already living under the threat of zersertsung.
Happily, we are not yet at this stage legally. The law still protects us to an extent in the U.K., despite organisations deliberately ignoring it. Countries like Scotland and Canada, however, are swiftly trying to bring the law into line with the new quasi-religious orthodoxy. Culturally, we now live in a society where ideological conformity among our employers is at the Brezhnev level. If you don’t believe me, put a post on your intranet company forum like “All lives matter” or “Medically transitioning children is not a good idea because they are minors” and see what happens.
So, where do we go from here? Well, some of us have been fighting a rear guard action on this for years now. In my job, I’ve been doing this by pointing out the legal risks of excessively woke policies, as well as the business risks, evidencing these with examples from the big settlements the Free Speech Union has secured in the Employment Tribunal and the various examples of ‘go woke, go broke’, like Bud Light. However, it is no longer enough to rely on the courts to protect our freedom of speech. The system takes too long and the costs are prohibitive. While you may eventually be compensated, the damage to your life will already have happened. The best means of defence is deterrence and, thanks to the hard work of Free Speech Union, I can now warn employers and clients if they insist on firing an employee for ‘misgendering’ and point to examples of where the courts have sided with gender critical employees. Increasingly, I am seeing that mere membership of the FSU is enough to get an employer to back down, or at least pause to seek a compromise.
The insidious creep of increasingly draconian ‘hate speech’ laws is rapidly turning into a deluge, with Canada, Ireland and now Scotland all introducing laws which go way beyond the reasonable and which flout the very idea of a ‘law’ in the first place. Take Police Scotland’s patronising ‘Hate Monster’ who states in an advert warning the public (specifically 18-30 year old working class white men – wait, isn’t that racial profiling and breaking the very law it is designed to warn about?) that “before you know it, you’ve committed a Hate Crime”. One of the principles of a fair and transparent justice system is that you cannot break laws “before you know it” because the law is supposed to be reasonable, proportionate and understood. In this case, it is none of those things. Or take Trudeau’s even more sinister Bill C63, which introduces the concept of house arrest for ‘pre-crime’ Hate Criminals so if they think you might commit a hate crime they can lock you in your house and remove your online access. While this insanity is rapidly making headlines and, fortunately, causing a great deal of concern across the West, far more dangerous than Trudeau or Yousaf’s laws is the petty tyranny that woke has knitted into the fabric of our society through our workplaces and institutions and which forces us to wear ‘The Mask’ and live a lie.
What can you do to protect you and your family?
As an HR Professional, my advice to everyone is join the Free Speech Union. You cannot rely on your existing Trade Union to defend you – they have also been ideologically captured. As I said, I have seen companies back down when it’s pointed out that an employee they’re attempting to discipline or fire is a member of the Free Speech Union. Furthermore, I would urge students and anyone who is involved with an organisation, from the military to volunteering at a charity, to join.
The only way you can protect yourself and eventually remove masks from our society is to understand that united we stand, divided we fall.
C.J. Strachan is the pseudonym of a concerned Scot.
To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.
Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.
Censor away, YouTube. All you’re doing is helping alternative platforms to grow and, anyway, the vaccine side effect horse has long since bolted.
The problem is that on those alternative platforms you are preaching to the choir. On YouTube there is a chance people might come across this content and it may change their opinion. But if everyone moves to an alternate platform, no one will see any of that content.
Sure, you can then discuss these issues freely, but what is the point if the vast majority of people see nothing other than government propaganda?
The algorithms are there to help prevent those less likely to ask questions from seeing this kind of content anyway.
Yes you’re absolutely right; however, at some point, you would think a tipping point is reached and the minority view becomes the majority one. And in the meantime, the alternative platforms need to up their game to meet the demands of massively increased user bases, which they must have gained over the past 18 months.
(although cynically, and defeating my own argument, I think they’ll have turned off the Internet as we know it by the time said tipping point is reached!)
Parler is the perfect example of this. It was killed off for becoming a free alternative to Twitter.
Those alternative platforms are at a major disadvantage when it comes to hosting infrastructure. When companies like Amazon, Google, Microsoft decide to boot them from their respective clouds, they have to basically build some very fundamental services themselves, which may be prohibitively expensive.
They dismiss us: irrelevant, misinformed losers.
Only if significant numbers from their MXM and YouTube start looking will they do anything.
We will learn more and more with nobody listening to us. Like talking to zn empty auditorium.
People will remember their censorship.
Unlikely. People have very short memories.
Well, what do you expect from a platform which encourages its channel owners to shadowban people for posting “wrong” comments – forever, with no recourse. Nobody expects to find any uncensored content on YouTube anyway.
unlikely most people get their information from the BBC and the MSM, they believe the NHS is good, and Politicians only have the people’s best interest at heart. Give them their weekly dose of strictly, a meal out in a pub and a 10 pounds value meal with wine from the supermarket and they will do anything.
We live in a free and open democracy. Isn’t it
wonderfuldoubleplusgood?Down the memoryhole it goes.
One could argue it’s a sign that the narrative is slipping away from them and they are having to double down
Youtube is likely to get totally banned very soon from Russia because it deleted its two RT channels in Germany. I suspect other countries are likely to follow – and good riddance too.
https://www.rt.com/russia/536133-zero-tolerance-youtube-censorship-rt/
Let’s hope so.
And there’s a fuckload of Republicans in the US who want to see the end of Google, Twitter and Facebook. They’ve made some very significant enemies!
Alphabet’s (agency) “advertising” tracking platform looks ever so like a spin off from internet surveillance.
It’s beyond me at this point why people aren’t mirroring all of their content to BitChute, Odysee & Rumble, providing links and encouraging the migration.
Dark Horse make a point of doing a short YouTube clip, like a trailer for the main show, which tells everyone where the full video is posted, eg on Odysee. A link can be found in the description and Bob’s your Uncle !
I’m pretty sure linking to other hosting platforms is against YouTube’s ToS.
I have abandoned youtube for exactly this.
If youtube wish to act as publishers pay the bloody taxes owed.
Utterly disgusting.
Nah. Why abandon it? Just get an adblocker.
I barely ever use it, having been a huge advocate for years. Full of ads anyway and sinister government sponsored messages it can fuck off!
These people took The jab and just look at how it improved their mental health:
https://twitter.com/i/status/1443216567118991368
https://twitter.com/i/status/1442968341048532994
That’s made my afternoon for all the wrong reasons!
Anyone remember a little known horror film from the 80s called “The Stuff”, and how the marketeers in it ran huge advertising campaigns to get people to take “the Stuff”? All this kind of reminds me of that!
I like it, trying to shove it down people’s arms in most ridiculous ways in combination with overreaching censorship will cause the most adverse reaction of rejecting all future pharma bs. It’s the same principle as with the crazy antivaxxers, all you need to do is let them scream loud and poke fun at them in order to gain public support for vaccination. Just in reverse.
High time a rival platform was set up.
“Bbbbbbbuuuuttttt MMR!!!”
Nice bit of whataboutery.
Matt Halprin… said vaccine misinformation was a global problem and had spilled over from the spreading of falsehoods about Covid jabs.
Hark, at them, they’re so threatened! What about the global problem of vaccine harm, injury and death, the highest of any vaccine programme ever??? Or the fact that these things DON’T stop transmission or infection??? This evil is being revealed to us more and more in all its vile colours. Go too far and even the normies will wake up – can’t have that now, can we?
THAT IS CLEARLY VACCINE MISINFORMATION YOU ARE BANNED!
As a normal person…just writing that gives me the shivers…these people have taken the money and lost their entire souls.
Lots of horror stories being reported at this website (restricted to medical professionals apparently, this is no “anti-vaxxer” site it’s owned by webmd):
“How concerned are you about adverse events related to the vaccines?”
https://www.medscape.com/sites/public/covid-19/vaccine-insights/how-concerned-are-you-about-vaccine-related-adverse-events
Actually it looks as if non-medical people may be able to post there, so I have some doubt, unfortunately I can’t now delete my comment. That’s not to say these reports aren’t mostly genuine however, and from the wording it does seem as if they are mostly reports from people with at least some medical knowledge.
Odysee, Rumble and telegram (which now offers live streaming) gain every time the deep state become more desperate.
For those wishing to host their own video’s on their own server – Peertube is an open piece of software. I’m running one myself on a virtual server ($5 a month job). This allows me to embed video on my blog.
Dear YouTube,
I hope you and your loved ones survive the experimental gene therapy.
That’s more charity than they deserve.
True. I ‘d just woken from a dream where Keir Starmer was an anti Vax leader of the Labour Party, and then I woke up.
Scared, aren’t tney?
They are not the only source of information, only a leading source of lies.
As a thought, for people who get a serious adverse reaction to the vaccine, why would they not sue Google as with this release it is clear they are consciously stopping them from getting potential warnings which may have influenced their decision?
I am not I’m law so not sure that would stand up but if you cannot go after the manufacturer due to government liability waivers may as well go after YouTube! Isn’t that the American way of law chuck lawsuits at everyone who can be linked at all and see what sticks?
Fair point.
Will they be blocking the videos of those who have suffered severe adverse reaction from the poison too?
THERE IS NO SUCH THING! THAT IS VACCINE MISINFORMATION, YOU ARE BANNED!
Nope…still gives me the willys to write that, even in jest! We are now in the time of the New Nazis.
So……if you were in any doubt about whether or not the Covid issue was a joint government-corporate stitch-up……
…..look no further than this extension of this egregious and fatuous censorship.
Do they think we won’t notice?
“My heart is broken.
I now have had confirmation of two U.K. teenage deaths post Pfizer.
A sixth form student in Solihull received the jab last week, suffered blood clots, a cardiac arrest and died on Monday.
A 17 year old girl from Braintree died in her sleep with no underlying health conditions just 24 hours after the jab.
I knew this day would come. I did everything I could to stop it and we all must continue to do everything we can. The best we can hope for now is to limit the deaths these weapons will cause
Our children deserve so much better.
”
On telegram, No idea if this is true, but if it is……
If only Toby Young would make some basic enquiries.
In reality, he appears to be a bit more of a mate of Boris and Gove than the people of Britain.
A 17 year old girl has died in France some days after getting the Pfizer jab. Here’s the sad story. Sofia Benharira: 17-Year-Old Student Dies 7 Days After Receiving The Pfizer COVID-19 Vaccine, Family Seeks Answers : The COVID World
Also Alderbrook School, Solihull, Birmingham
https://twitter.com/Mandy90375141/status/1442877019499294737
https://insideeko.com/adam-ali-death-obituary/
Although no evidence it was the vaccine wotdunnit.
By now I’ve read several of these reports of young people dying suddenly of basically nothing. It’s maddening that the press won’t ask the one question everyone is thinking: Was this person vaccinated? Is it possible the vaccination caused this death? The press won’t do its job – asking questions and obtaining relevant information – so really are these people really journalists? I don’t think so.
How many healthy 17-year-olds simply die in their sleep? If you are healthy and die at 17, you typically died in an accident, a drug overdose, suicide or had cancer. Most of these more common causes of death have been ruled out, which leaves …
Investigation: Deaths among Teenagers have increased by 47% in the UK since they started getting the Covid-19 Vaccine according to official ONS data
https://theexpose.uk/2021/09/30/deaths-among-teenagers-have-increased-by-47-percent-since-covid-vaccination-began/
19-Year-Old Ukrainian Student Gets Pfizer Vaccine Behind his Family’s Back, Dies Seven Hours Later
https://theexpose.uk/2021/09/29/19-year-old-ukrainian-student-gets-pfizer-vaccine-behind-his-familys-back-dies-seven-hours-later/
The policeman who murdered Sarah Everard got life imprisonment (and rightly so).
Meanwhile over 1600 have been murdered by the “vaccines” and now as predicted children too.
The perpetartors will get knighthoods and peerages.
‘Censorship’ eh? Why can’t ordinary people look at the facts and make their own interpretation?
For example, NOBODY is really dying of C-19 in Australia (or NZ)……but those numbers are changing. Why? Possibly, because medicine that people don’t need is being put into their bodies.
A bit of basic data analysis of numbers is handy.
Data I refer to is from here.
Info on Australia’s vaccination programme is here.
Over TWO winters, Australia has seen 1,278 deaths……..[NZ 27 after months with no change……..HK 213 an increase of 1 in about 8 months].
The ‘worst’ day of the pandemic in Australia was 3rd September 2020, when 22 people were taken – or at least had their demise subscribed to C-19.
In 2020, 909 Australians died of C-19.
In 2021, from 1st January to 30th June, 1 Australian died of C-19.
From 1st July, 368 Australians have been added to the list.
It was in June/July 2021 that the jabbing programme accelerated – particularly that of the second doses.
Since then, certainly ‘cases’ have absolutely rocketed, and after a short lull, the C-19 deaths began to occur again…….second jabs appear to be responsible for a rise in cases and deaths.
So help solve the conundrum, we need to know the age profile and health condition of the first 909 who died……and compare it with the next 369……..AND then look at how many of the second 369 were jabbed……we know exactly how many one the first 909 who died were jabbed – NONE.
The 1,278 Aussie deaths are comprised;
Vic – 856……….0 since October 2020, then the majority of all deaths since July 2021
NSW – 385…….0 from December 2020, then the majority of all deaths since July 2021
Tas – 13…………0 since May 2020
WA – 9………….1 since May 2020
Qld – 7…………1 since May 2020
SA – 4…………..0 since April 2020
ACT – 5………..1 since April 2020
NT – 0
Why is there such a big difference in deaths between NSW and Vic and the rest of Australia? Big cities? Maybe. Needs looking at.
In any case, relative to the rest of the world, the numbers of Aussie deaths are very, very low. The question should be ‘who is doing the dying’?
After all, if it was that ‘infectious’ or ‘deadly’, then surely scores of thousands would be dropping like flies…….especially after all the protestors in Melbourne mingling closely.
Australia’s response is one of massive disproportionality – and it is clear that human freedoms have been abused to a degree that is way out of kilter with the problem.
What is it that they are not telling us? Why are Berejiklian, Andrews, Hazzard & co. making threats and using the kind of language last heard in 1930s Germany, 1950s USA or 1970s South Africa? They are bullying the people, it’s not a good luck, and is never successful.
Lastly, England cricket captain Joe Root says he and his players won’t commit to the Ashes tour because of ‘bubble’ issues………perhaps he should also add ‘concern add human rights issues’.
Hmm, looks like they will have to block all health authorities that provide statistics about those adverse reactions then.
I think it’s time they renamed YouTube to GoogleTube to match their policies and content. GovTube would be also ok.
I’ve been looking at brandnewtube this year. Sometimes there are gems to be found. Vernon Coleman I liked at first, but it’s just more of the same now, and I liked the Rex Colt videos – but, again, once he’s talked about what the Covid scam is all about, what more is there to add?
Problem the brandnewtube is that most of the comments below the videos are nonsensical, or spam (“I make $30,000 from working at home”) and this reflects badly on the owner of brandnewtube who should, I think, get rid of the rubbish contents.
Many of the videos on bnt are just re-hashed copies of copies over and over again, many are badly made 11-second clips of nothing very much, and there’s a whole bunch of nutty religious ‘Mark of the Beast’ tosh. I’m not one for censorship but I think in the case of bnt a lot of ‘pruning’ is needed to make it look less tawdry.
Also the video ‘slider’ doesn’t really work very well at all.
I do agree that Google has become too big – and too nosey. Now they claim, after some years of my presence (Google Photos / Youtube videos I’ve made) that I’m under 18 years of age and want to see my credit card details as proof of age… to which I say: “I don’t think so!!”
Google has provided a useful, free service – but now they have become too invasive, and it is riddled with ‘faults’ where you can’t, for example, get rid of people who have invited themselves onto your photos account/albums – and you can’t log out of Google on your mobile phone. I have read about these issues, and it appears it not just me. Google is spying on you, no doubt about it.
“There is still a lot of challenges around MMR and people arguing whether that causes autism. And as we know, the science is very stable that vaccines do not cause autism,” he said.
Not so fast.
Try reading this then come back and talk about your ‘stable science’:
How to end the Autism Epidemic by J.B. Handley
The full pathway has now been exposed. It’s the aluminium adjuvants.
It’s noticeable that the separate vaccines have a much better safety profile than the combined jab. Do they not have aluminium then?
Earlier vaccines had mercury as an adjuvant, also no bueno.
What’s that quote by Tyrion Lannister in Game of Thrones? “When you tear out a man’s tongue, you are not proving him a liar, you’re only telling the world that you fear what he might say.”
Censor away. All they are doing is proving that they fear the truth coming to light.
“The further a society drifts from the truth, the more it will hate those that speak it.”
For me, this George Orwell quote says everything anyone needs to know regarding big tech’s censorship of the
truthmisinformation.Someone confident of their case isn’t afraid to argue it.
The Globalists are scared.
What will they do when they’ve cancelled all but themselves? Continue to cancel or stop?
Great to hear that a sharing service that allows people to watch ISIS at work, people taking a dump etc has decided that it is medically qualified to censor open debate on the vaccines, I assume that the VAERS and the yellow card system will be banned from being shown too. By a bunch of jumped up computer nerds who believe because they invented an App it makes them qualified to tell the rest of us, including Nobel prize winning scientists what to think and say. I wonder who they tied that little deal up with
I suppose this means that Mike Graham will stop speaking to Mike Yardley (I think that’s his name) on Talk Radio about the terrible consequences he suffered after taking the vaccine.
I sense this has already happened as the spate of calls taken relaying similar testimony has dried up.
No doubt they are looking to being taken down from YouTube if too much is made of it.
(And as MG has obviously been jabbed in order to be able to fly to the USA, he’s lost interest in the topic; many of the jabbed appear to acquire a form of deafness, probably as a defensive mechanism).
Trust the experts folks
Better get this out there then before we’re all banned!!
https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/safety-signals-covid-vaccines-full-transparency-cdc-fda/
If they say mRna SPIKE PROTEINS work, then that’s that.
The vast group wouldn’t listen anyway. Being part of a vast group run by powerful people is important to these people.
Facts mean nothing, can be trashed.
I wonder why we’d have to learn more on ‘ain’t it awful if it goes nowhere and if their ears are closed?
Maybe it would be time to move on.
Alternatively, videos debunking what will be on YouTube likely helps us. And how to do that.
MMR? My little niece’s life changed dramatically and irrevocably the day after the MMR. A happy, lively, tottering 13-month-old became a screaming mess who was unable to lift her body or use any of her limbs. At the hospital a health-visitor exclaimed “what on earth has happened to this child? She was perfectly all right a few days ago!”
But that was the last and only comment; everybody clammed up after that. Several years later the NHS made her long sturdy leather boots to strengthen her legs to enable to hold her body weight so she could stand up. After years of treatment, physio etc., she’s almost perfectly mobile.
But this sweet child is forever damaged; she is in a remedial class, what we used to call ‘backward’. That she is vaccine-damaged there can be no doubt, but it became another of the growing list of things we mustn’t talk about.
If we don’t stop these monsters, damaged humanity will become the normal state, lives unsustainable without buckets full of drugs and Big Pharma the benevolent, philanthropic leader who controls all. The nightmare is not around the corner; it’s already here, it slipped in while our attention was diverted and we are living it here, now, today.
That’s a horrendous story and there are probably many thousands more. My heart goes out to you, Lorrinet. I hope your niece gets to live a fulfilling life as much as she can. We are truly up against a monster. There has to be a way to defeat it.
So we have private firms that are omnipotent enough to define “the truth”.
Sounds like they have ambition to be an equivalent to the Roman Catholic Church of the Late Middle Ages.
What an arrogant and evil bunch of characters.