Rishi Sunak’s recent announcement of new gas power generators to ensure reliable energy supply on the path to Net Zero is his King Canute moment.
The story of King Canute and the tide used to be much more often mentioned than it is nowadays. The earliest account of the event comes from Henry of Huntingdon writing in the 12th century, a hundred years after Canute (Cnut if one prefers). In Huntingdon’s account, Canute was deliberately demonstrating to his fawning courtiers the difference between two different types of law: laws of the land and natural laws – what today would be called scientific laws. It’s a distinction that’s still important.
Politicians are fond of laws, at least when they pass them, though one senses that a Conservative Government might, in retrospect, prefer not to have been stuck with the Equality Act and the Climate Change Act, both of which its MPs voted for. But it continues, with assistance from devolved assemblies, to legislate to promote the ‘good’ and prevent the ‘bad’, bent on ‘defeating Covid’, a disease largely untroubled by human intervention, and issuing ‘legally binding targets’ on biodiversity, air quality, waste efficiency, child poverty, hate speech, gender and racial discrimination.
Canute’s demonstration with the tide had one purpose only – to demonstrate the vanity, the uselessness, of human laws. Ordering his chair to be set on the shore, he commanded the incoming tide not to rise and wet his clothes or body – and of course his command had no effect. As he said: “Let all men know how empty and worthless is the power of kings, for there is none worthy of the name, but He whom heaven, earth and sea obey by eternal laws.”
Whether one thinks what Canute referred to as eternal laws are of divine origin or not, they are of quite a different nature from laws of the land. Natural laws are not things that tell the natural universe how to behave; rather they are simply descriptions of how the universe does behave. The job of us petty men is to observe and put up with the world. Tides go up and down twice a day and there is nothing we can do about it.
So why is Rishi’s recent announcement of new gas power generators a Canute moment?
The “legally binding target” of the 2008 Climate Act, modified by the 2019 Order, commands that: “It is the duty of the Secretary of State to ensure that the net U.K. carbon account for the year 2050 is at least 100% lower than the 1990 baseline.”
The crucial concept, “ensure that the net U.K. carbon… for 2050… is at least 100% lower than 1990”, means that we must reduce by 100% the net amount of carbon dioxide we are producing: 100% lower than what it was is zero, hence the term Net Zero.
As is gradually becoming apparent, Net Zero is physically impossible to achieve. However much governments legislate, achieving Net Zero is as likely as the tide obeying a king’s command not to advance.
The scientific reasons for the impossibility of Net Zero are multifactorial. They start off with our need for energy. At 50th out of 200 countries, the U.K. is already very energy efficient, particularly considering how far north we are and how cold. We contain 70 million warm-blooded humans (23% more than in 1997) who need heated houses and food to be grown, imported, processed and distributed. We need places to work and transport to and from the workplace. We need manufactured goods, many of which are essential – houses, boilers (or heat pumps), lorries, buses and so on. Even if there was political support for energy austerity and we prohibited recreational transport, meat consumption and the keeping of pets, insulated every building and banned all consumer goods (from children’s toys to golf clubs), we would be unlikely to see a reduction in energy consumption by as much as a quarter.
As for our production of energy, for all the hype about renewables and all the obvious wind turbines and solar panels we see around us, renewables are actually still just hype. Of the 2,000 billion units of energy we consume each year, renewables provide only 100 billion units, a mere 5% of the total (4% wind, 0.6% solar and 0.4% hydroelectric). Forget the figures about renewables providing half our energy. That’s only the electricity from the grid, which is one seventh (14%) of our energy use. Nuclear power, along with renewables, provides 5% of our total energy used but the stark fact is that 90% of the U.K.’s energy comes from burning things – fossil fuels for the most part but also, shockingly, forests we are currently paying to have chopped down in the U.S. and Canada.
The fairytale plan was to increase our dependence on wind – to take it from 4% to 80% – 20 times as much. But there is an obvious problem with that: for half the time, on average, the wind isn’t blowing. What are we going to do about that?
The fairytale answer was to store surplus energy when the wind is blowing hard to give out when the wind stops blowing. But how does one store the energy in times of plenty?
Batteries were the obvious suggestion but that, it turns out, is another fairytale because they are environmentally terribly polluting to make, prone to bursting into flames, have a limited lifespan and need as much energy to make them as they store usefully over their lifetime.
The second suggestion for storage has been to use surplus wind to split water into hydrogen and oxygen. Then we can burn hydrogen when the wind stops blowing, use compressed hydrogen to power lorries and even pump hydrogen round the country in gas mains to power clean gas boilers. The hydrogen fairytale collapses because hydrogen doesn’t liquefy under pressure, so storage for vehicles is very difficult, plus the process of splitting water then compressing and storing the hydrogen wastes about three quarters of the energy from the wind. This means that we would need 80 times as many wind turbines as we have at the moment – prohibitively expensive even for a spendthrift Climate Change Committee.
So we come to the reason behind Rishi’s recent dash for gas, something that outrages advocates of Net Zero. The logic is simple and irrefutable. The only real renewable available in quantity is wind. Since our total energy needs are 2,000 billion units per year, let’s increase the number of wind turbines so that, at peak, they have a capacity of 2,000 billion units per year. Let’s also build gas turbine power plants which will generate 2,000 billion units per year. So when the wind is blowing at full strength, we use wind. When it is blowing at half strength, we use half wind and half gas, and when it is not blowing at all we use all gas. On average we will then be half wind and half fossil fuel – and paying a fortune for the privilege.
It’s simple arithmetic to see that this kicks out all notions of Net Zero. At best it’s Net 50%. As the Green Alliance think tank says, it “flies in the face” of Net Zero. It’s like Canute commanding the tides to hold back, while gradually backing up the beach so that his feet only get half wet. It’s a climb down. But that’s what happens when laws of the land conflict with natural law. It’s the former that have to give way.
To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.
Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.
According to the Guardian liars, Austria – “no violations”.
‘Nuff said.
“According to the Guardian” – ie ‘untrue’ – cue for instant turn off!
Guardian readers will actually believe these lies. The Guardian has long made its readers believe that black is white.
It is not ‘‘Nuff said’ at all. This follows on from a recent series of absolutely shoddy ill researched anti-sceptical articles from Noah Carl and Will Jones promoting (doubtless on Toby’s instructions) the MSM foreign policy agenda on all fronts. Not openly, perish the thought, but by the back door, Marcus Antonius ‘to bury not to praise’ style.
The vast majority of sceptics on here would not go to the Graun (or the BBC or the Indie) to sample their globalist brand of propaganda, de-facto apartheid and casual hatred against those they deem (in the words of the US Democrats) ‘deplorables’.
So instead, under the excuse of showing just how insidious the Graun is of course, DS promotes the article complete with map. Job done, and better than the 77th brigade could ever achieve, ATL is going to make sure sceptics are continuously bombarded with MSM propaganda. Look boys and girls, isn’t this article really BAD?
The Graun is no longer a news outlet, it is a Gates funded NWO mouthpiece that has long since stopped open comments as it slowly plunged into the gutter over the years. What the hell is DS giving the Graun free advertising for, except perhaps that both (ultimately) serve the same master?
I do hope your therapy sessions continue to go well.
And here’s me worried that original comments were a thing of the past on DS. Thanks for restoring my faith.
At least you were right about the Guardian.
At least you recognised that much.
Do you actually understand what you are jabbering on about?
“promoting (doubtless on Toby’s instructions) the MSM foreign policy agenda on all fronts”. Please show us one, just one, example.
Then you say “under the excuse of showing just how insidious the Graun is of course, DS promotes the article complete with map.”
What kind of stupid are you? The map is the one The Guardian printed and, obvious to a dead chimp, it is necessary in order to show how ridiculous The Guardians claims are.
I suggest you are in the wrong place. We don’t do idiots here.
If the DS still believes (in 2022) that it is necessary to show how ridiculous the Graun’s claims are on ANY subject then it has a serious problem with journalistic credibility. If only Toby & co had invested the same energy into calling the government out on vaxx for kids 2021 – but that was just too difficult, eh? Sorry if my point went over your head, btw, try again next year maybe?
This is baffling – do I understand you correctly? You’re suggesting that T Young et al are in league with the MSM? And your evidence for this is that they’ve reproduced a Guardian article which might influence DS readers in the Guardian’s favour? If I’m reading you right, this is a truly bizarre interpretation. As a long-time DS reader and a long-time Guardian avoider, I wouldn’t have seen this article if it hadn’t been reproduced here, in all its weird twisted nuttiness. You’re actually suggesting that the DS is no more than a mouthpiece for the ‘other side’? I don’t suppose you’ve been described as ‘disgruntled’ recently, have you?
I agree entirely. Seeing the article was important to me. I don’t read the Guardian (of course), but I need to understand the way it and it’s readers think in order to help me understand their nuttiness
explaining reality to a guardian columnist feels like that sketch from father ted whereby father ted and dougal were in a caravan and ted says to dougal “these are small, but the ones out there are far away”
The gaslighting is so thick you could cut it with a knife.
https://www.v-dem.net/research_projects.html
Suspiciously slick and well funded website, supporting the suspicions raised by their openly and obviously dishonest conclusions.
“In case you’re wondering what Belgium did to earn its status as the “the only western country where people’s freedoms were moderately violated”, we’re told that it “recorded ethnic profiling during the pandemic … with abusive police practices disproportionately affecting minority ethnic communities”.”
More confirmation, from their absurd pandering to woke dogma.
Contemptible stuff!
The Pandemic Violations of Democratic Standards Index (PanDem) captures the extent to which state responses to Covid-19 violate democratic standards for emergency responses.
According to these self-appointed clowns, emergency response conform to democratic standards if they aren’t
Why this interesting list is referred to as democratic standards is anybody’s guess as there’s only one point applicable to democracy in it. This is consistent with the mission statement of the institute behind this which names electoral, liberal, participatory, deliberative, and egalitarian as high-level democratic principles.
The short version of that is Only wokeism is truly democratic, even despite it’s actually corporate and not democratic.
Pretty good summary.
The Guardian, have the begging bowl statement everyday, this is why
Please let the Guardian close down -don’t let Gates rescue it!
Gates will keep it open if he is planning another “pandemic”, so it is probably safe for the next year or two.
Romania still has segregated access for non-vaccinated people. Mask wearing is still mandatory. And going beyond covid restrictions, it is one of the most corrupt countries in Europe, with incredibly restrictive barriers set in people’s path. Unless you know someone in a higher position, you will never become anything more than a slave to the wage.
But of course they say Romania has been a great democracy. The government is doing anything and everything the EU dictates.
I’m assuming refugees there get a free pass when it comes to the jab!
I honestly don’t know.
Compared to how it was under Ceausescu, it is like paradise, I assure you.
I am not so sure about that. And that is not to say that it was great under Ceausescu. For better or worse, people back then all had a roof over their heads. Yeah, they forced people to take in tenants, but at least there were no homeless people. People had a job, even though it might be a useless job. At least they weren’t out stealing and beating up people. And yes, there were the dreaded food queues. But at least here were food queues. Now people just starve to death. Romania was producing things. It had a pretty strong agricultural industry. It produced steel and aluminium. It had one of the most advanced nuclear power stations in Europe. It had loads of hydroelectric stations, including a massive one on the Danube. And they all worked.
But what is more important, back then society was much more cohesive. People would stand up to anti-social behaviour. Police would do their job to keep the streets safe. You didn’t have to be constantly on edge for fear of being mugged at night. Kids would receive a very good education, as opposed to kids these days who learn nothing in school.
As bad as communism was and still is, it still was better than what’s going on today. And that is saying a lot. Globalism is a much greater evil than communism. Give it a few decades and the genocides will start happening. A warning to all who seek to end communism: Be careful what you replace it with.
And I know that despite me repeatedly saying that communism has always been bad, no matter which coat it wears, I know there will be people who will try to pretend like I’m saying the exact opposite. To whoever does this: get stuffed.
You sound like you know a thing or two about the real Romania. Respect to you. I sense real experience in your words – and you’re quite right – know matter how you express yourself, you’ll be referred to as a communist sympathiser over and over again. Just keep on telling them to Get Stuffed!
More smug superiority and actually racist thought processes from “liberals”.
Look, just because the Guardian employees the mentally subnormal and psychologically affected doesn’t mean you have to publicise their cretinous rubbish, does it?
The following democratic freedoms were violated everywhere:
Basically, the Coronavirus Act was a violation of democratic rights. It allowed Government by fiat without a referendum of the people to give it legitimacy.
The Guardian should now be put in the children’s fiction section of every public library.
I agree, but most of it was done under the Public Health Act 1984, which unless it is amended will remain and things can happen again and again.
The Guardian should now be put in the children’s fiction section of every public library.
Where Uncle Bill can read them a fairy story.
Whilst broadly agreeing, the last place I’d put the Grauniad is anywhere some child might pick it up and read it.
Roll it up, shove up the ars@s of its journalists and owners, set fire to it.
Nearly the same argument as BF Finlayson, above. I see your point, but, as I said to him (Finlayson), some of us are fascinated by Guardian weirdness, which we wouldn’t be able to enjoy if it weren’t reproduced in places like this. And I assure you there’s no danger of my being influenced in the Guardian’s favour! Good grief! Again, reproducing leftist lies here is perfectly reasonable.
Yet another bunch of people trying to rewrite history rather than admit they were wrong.
Story of the Deranged Extreme Left for over a century
It can’t be long before they start blaming it all on Thatcher.
They can’t admit they were wrong. If they acknowledge all the misery and unnecessary deaths these policies really created – and they have any kind of conscience – they would have a mental breakdown.
In short, they literally “can’t handle the truth.”
…they would have a mental breakdown.
And hopefully spend the rest of their lives in prison.
This must be one of the most ridiculous things I’ve ever seen. No violations at all in Austria, where bodily autonomy was violated by the state under the threat of financial ruin and imprisonment? Are these people insane? Or just liars?
Liars employing the insane, would be my guess.
Just Liars.
Likely criminally insane.
It’s the Guardian!
Quis custodiet?!
I see our new government at the WHO are becoming quite adept at rewriting the English dictionary. Fortunately, the Groan is on hand to explain all.
And rewriting the definition of a ‘pandemic’….They needed to get that in order to have the excuse to carry out what they did.
I took it for granted that people on here would make that connection.
Democratic Values and Human Rights are what the state graciously give you according to the Left
Democratic Values and Human Rights are what every individual has and will will fight to prevent the state taking them away
Its a simple case of the Left redefining what they mean to fit their beliefs. Theyre wrong of course – you cant redefine them – but thats what they do. If you cant give an honest answer to a question, then change the question until you can give the answer you want to!
Absurd and derisory but we me must be used to it by now arent we.
Sad that the Guardian is now no better than the inversion of the ‘Völkischer Beobachter ‘- what a fall from integrity!
I wonder what C. P, Scott would think?
The current rag does not deserve its title.
Its so far from its working class roots in Manchester.
A friend of mine has a t-shirt that reads thus:
The Guardian
Wrong about everything.
German court rules that security services can spy on a legitimate political party represented in the Bundestag. https://www.rt.com/news/551543-alternative-for-germany-court-spy/
All part of the general descent into totalitarianism in the US sphere, as the ruling elites struggle to contain populist dissent.
Mainstream media journo caught admitting to lies about the January 6th “insurrection” that the Trump-deranged Dems and their media shills have been going on about endlessly (and numerous political detainees have been confined over).
https://www.zerohedge.com/political/nyt-reporter-says-ton-fbi-informants-were-j6-calls-traumatized-fellow-journos-biches
What populist dissent? There doesn’t seem to be much of a’ struggle.’- more of a ‘cave-in’.
In Germany, mostly the “far rjght”. In the US, Trump Republicans. Here, the politically unrepresented dissenters from the elite woke bipartisan consensus.
In general you can tell who the genuine populists are by the way they are targeted for demonisation and suppression by the regime and by the political elite.
In Germany, you’re either green or a post-communist or far right to varying degrees. The term has absolutely no meaning beyond political position the self-appointed progressive establishment really dislikes. It’s equally applied to actual Neonazis, people who want any controls on immigration, environmental activists opposed to wind turbines and people who don’t think Corona vaccines are mandkind’s greatest invention so far and thus, everybody must have as many of them as possible.
“green or a post-communist or far right to varying degrees. The term has absolutely no meaning beyond political position to self-appointed progressive establishment really dislikes.”
Yes, that’s pretty much what I was getting at. “Far right” are the populists basically, some of who are actually meaningfully “far right” in the old sense, and many who are not but are nevertheless outside the window of acceptability. Greens and post-communists are not deplorable in the same sense, as far as I can tell.
Practical example: Someone who believes that asylum seekers should not be accepted automatically and that rejection of a claim should ultimatively lead to deportation would be considered unspeakably far-right, IOW, clearly a Nazi or at least indistinguishably close to one, by most, if not all[*], of the members of at least two of the parties in the current ruling coalition (SPD and Greens).
[*] whoever might think in this way would be well-advised to keep these opinions to himself to avoid endangering his political career.
“Someone who believes that asylum seekers should not be accepted automatically and that rejection of a claim should ultimatively lead to deportation would be considered unspeakably far-right, IOW, clearly a Nazi or at least indistinguishably close to one…“
That would be me, but I’m certainly not a Nazi. I use that term quite specifically, usually (which is why I’m quite careful about using it in relation to Ukrainian nationalists generally).
“.…by most, if not all[*], of the members of at least two of the parties in the current ruling coalition (SPD and Greens).”
Indeed. But such people are generally dishonest, delusional and/or corrupt anyway.
Hitler is …………… (please see attachment).
I’ve had so many argument with young people over the last few years when they call everyone to the right of Corbyn a ‘Nazi’. I’m often called one when I say I’m a Libertarian. Just trying to point out that they were socialists seems to cause something to fuse in their brains- they simply will not accept it or even think about it. That’s history completely re-written.
That’s the usual confusion with German words and 19th century history. Originally, the socialists where people who formed social clubs for workers. That’s why they called them themselves socialists (Sozialisten). The idea behind that was to improve the circumstances of their lives through self-improvement, ie, self-educiation and collective action. Ultimatively, these fused into a political party called SPD (social-democratic party). At some point in time, the SPD pro forma approved Marxism, an independent, theoretical development of German emigrants living in England, as their official ideology despite – as historical events would show – they never really meant that, ie, they had a lot of revolutionary rethoric but didn’t want a revolution or at least not the kind of revolution which was to take place in Russia.
Hitler encountered the formerly socialist marxists during a time when he was a construction worker in Vienna which ultimatively ended with him being driven out of this trade due to his unwillingness to conform to this party line (which he considered part of the Jewish conspiracy to destroy [European] civilization). While being opposed to this ideology, he nevertheless realized that the circumstances of factory workers were bad and desparately needed improvement if those worker were to be rescued from their false leaders and won back for the national cause. He also realized that winning over the masses was a necessary precondition for any kind of movement to succeed. That’s the reason why the DAP (Deutsche Arbeitpartei, an amateur club of working class people from Munich who rejected internationalist Marxism) was ultimatively renamed NSDAP (national socialist german worker’s party), harking back to the original meaning of the term socialist.
I’ve now been writing this a couple of times but I’m entirely convinced that this attempt to rewrite history based on homonyms with whose actual history a modern (American) audience isn’t familiar with will not come to an end because of this. Looking forward to seeing the estates/ multinational corporation confusion attempt again. Not.
It is the German courts that are no longer ‘Legitimate’ -what happened to the of rights guaranteed by the Grund Gesetz they are supposed to defend?.
Red Green Fascism is now the liedmotiv of this “Neues Deutschland” So how could there be any “Alternative” allowed – never mind one for “Deutschland”
In fact, isn’t the name “Deutschland” itself nationalistic, racist and sexist … full of Nazi connotations ..how about renaming it ‘Menschland’ …or could that also be full of ‘racist’ undertones ( über or unter?)?
“Mitteleuropa” has old connotations of expansionism – so perhaps settle for “Mitteleuropäischeunion” and abolish “Germany” altogether?
Would that please the Red-Green Loons and the Courts?
There’s actually a movement in the German Green Party which seeks to strip the word Germany/ Deutschland out of anything the party publishes.
I have a flying pig to sell them.
Just don’t ever read the guardian.
it would be amusing to replay some of the comments back to the commenters and see if they still believe the bile they come out with?
“Austria – which had two protracted lockdowns with months of stay-at-home orders, and even considered mandatory vaccination.”
They also have a lockdown for the unvaccinated, the Youtube UnHeard interviewed those who hadn’t had the jab along with attitudes from the public. The response was chilling considering their living history.
Because for socialists if everyone is EQUALLY enslaved, it’s not slavery.
As plain as plain could be.
This is “disinformation” to use their vernacular.
To anyone who has half a brain, it’s shit – and they know it is.
They should be in jail e.g. for encouraging/mandating the taking of a poison/noxious substance, S. 23 and 24 Offences against the person Act 1861.
To think that over 18 months ago I was banned from their comments section for spreading disinformation about the covid scam/lies.
Apparently too many people objected – to me suggesting they used what was left of their brains and think critically about covid “The Science”.
This whitewashing of the tyranny of the last 2 years is dreadful. I just can’t believe it’s happening. What about the rubber bullets that the police used to shoot at protestors in Holland? Forced vaccinations of careworkers? Elderly people in care homes dying alone? WTF Guardian?
Radiation used in Australia, including injuring kids.
The Grauniad – ‘nuff said.
Earth calling. Earth calling.
Personally, when I see a lying, Guardian-type ostrich with its stupid head (likely covered with some face rag) stuck in the sand, I itch to shoot it in the backside.
Every country in Western Europe, except perhaps for Sweden, hasn’t hesitated to exercise assorted forms of repression, oppression, coercion and terrorism. The Guardian is just cretinism personified.
Without 100 percent (okay, maybe 99.9 percent) of the corporate press helping create and then perpetuate the “sky is falling” narrative, none of what’s happened – and is still happening – could have happened. Of all the “captured” professions and institutions, the capture of the “watchdog” press corp is the most ominous for the future of civilization.
Who is ever going to expose great scandals or “crimes against humanity?” We know the government isn’t going to expose or convict itself …. which leaves us with a few contrarian sites (like this one) and a network of Sustack independent journalists … who have been easily pushed into a tiny corner with no real “reach.”
Where are the “fact checkers” when they’re needed?
Who “fact checks” the (authorized) “fact checkers?”
Answer: Actually a lot of people and organizations. It’s just that hardly anyone sees these fact checks.
Please define ‘left-wing’. I’ve hardly changed my views in 45 years but those a generation or more younger do seem to yearn for an authoritarianism which I find repugnant.
There was a time when probably more libertarians were ‘left-wing’ than ‘right-wing’
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Left-libertarianism
Thatcher was regarded as an authoritarian figure. On everything except the economy, she was.
In short, unless words are clearly defined, mostly no-one understands what the hell anyone else is talking about. This makes such debate a waste of time and effort.
It’s typical of the Left today. They say nothing about abuse of power unless it suits them. Tony Benn would never have stood for what has happened in the last two years. I never agreed with his politics, Socialism is a pile of nasty smelly stuff, but he stood for what is right. Lying is not right and that is largely what “Media” do today.
I think a lot of politicians from Benn’s time were genuine- even if I disagreed with most of them. They had character and a stature that no-one today seems to possess.
Alas, the “violation of democratic values” has only just begun.
I recently watched a compelling video by Dr. Michael Yeaden, former chief scientist with Pfizer, who outlines what the Powers that Be are trying to achieve with this pandemic “crisis.”
One thing that struck me is Yeaden’s acknowledgment that his thoughts and warnings won’t make any difference. Due to censorship and the massive groupthink that “protects the authorized narrative,” he knows his view is not going to resonate with enough people to expose these crimes and frauds.
This leaves those who strongly sense what is happening with the greatest feeling of impotence and powerlessness. What’s worse than knowing a massive crime is being committed and knowing that nobody (who matters) cares or is going to do anything to prosecute or expose the guilty?
Here’s my summary of a few points Dr. Yeaden made in one of his video presentations. (He thinks the ultimate agenda is the digital currency and “social credit” surveillance systems).
– The Purpose is complete totalitarian control. This will give the State complete control over everything you do. This will be “the end of human freedoms.”
– The M.O. of the PTB: Frighten everyone to death and then censor and intimidate people who are challenging the accepted narrative.
– “Nobody has heard of me ….” There will be some noisy individuals – but the Powers that Be control the “shares” or reach of these people so they don’t have to worry about them.
– I’m ineffective – they know I can’t reach anybody.
– They have complete control of the media. I doubt I will convert many people – the people I need to reach I can’t reach – they control.
Independent journalist Corey Lynn has an excellent website (where I found Dr. Yeaden’s video).
At the bottom of this link, she lists 22 ways to “stop Vaccine ID passports.”
Of all things, she starts off talking about rabies vaccines, but, after reading this dispatch, I see that this topic is perhaps germane to what’s happening in the world today.
https://www.coreysdigs.com/health-science/22-ways-to-stop-vaccine-id-passports-in-2022-and-why-we-must/
Yup we shouldn’t worry about “evil Putin” too much, with our own government the way it is.
Nice distraction though. Amazing when you consider what the great PM in Canada has been up to.
All you really need to know about this is who funds The Guardian. Now, tell me again why we are starting a war with none other than Russia over Eastern Europe and the Left are saying next to nothing?
https://www.gatesfoundation.org/about/committed-grants/2020/09/inv017377
This tells us what the Guyardian thinks of as democratic. Doing what bureaucrats (“scientists”) say and the Guardian approves – that is democracy for them. Freedom – forget it.
guardian thinks fantasy and reality are the same thing.
some citizens – “but we saw the violations with our own eyes”
guardian – “no you didn’t, you have covid brain”
…whilst DS supports the mainstream BS that there was a pandemic over the last two years.
Various doctors say families of loved ones hospitalized with covid19 are resorting to desperate measures when approved treatments(slow death protocols) have failed. When it’s not too late, some have seen tremendous success by sneaking Ivermectin medication prohibited by hospitals to patients. It is really sad situation what has our country become. You can get your ivm by visiting https://ivmpharmacy.com
France is a prison state. It stops its residents leaving. The Guardian is a worthless rag.
Interestingly, Belarus, who had even fewer restrictions than Sweden and basically ignored the pandemic for the most part, is listed as “major violations”. That’s rich. While they probably did indeed have major violations, since they have been an authoritarian regime ever since they became independent in 1994 (and before that in the Soviet Union), it is unlikely than any of these violations had anything to do with the pandemic, and more like “business as usual” for Belarus.
Reminds me of how starting in February 2021, the Oxford Stringency Index was arbitrarily, retroactively, and surreptitiously gamed just for no-lockdown Sweden to look far more stringent than they actually were, and seemingly about as strict as the UK or stricter (that’s rich!). Why? Most likely to make the UK look not so bad despite it’s far worse performance in terms of both death rates and economic damage relative to Sweden.
This is satire, right?
The guardian is MSM. Why would anyone quote any nonsense that comes from MSM? Haven’t the last two years of misinformation been enough for you. Please stop reading or listening to MSM until they begin to report with integrity and honesty. That has not happened yet. There are so many social platforms to choose from with some outstanding data, information, honesty and integrity.
Very true. It is MSM, and no longer anything to do with ‘news’. It is simply a narrative. Yet, I am constantly derided for not listening to, watching or reading the ‘news’.