• Login
  • Register
The Daily Sceptic
No Result
View All Result
  • Articles
  • About
  • Archive
    • ARCHIVE
    • NEWS ROUND-UPS
  • Podcasts
  • Newsletter
  • Premium
  • Donate
  • Log In
The Daily Sceptic
No Result
View All Result

Excess Deaths Since 2022 Primarily in Vaccinated, Official Data Suggest

by Will Jones
5 March 2024 7:00 AM

Excess deaths since 2022 were primarily in the vaccinated, official data suggest, fuelling fears that the Covid vaccines may be playing a significant role in the high excess deaths in recent years.

Data from the Office for National Statistics show that the proportion of total deaths in England among unvaccinated people dropped sharply in early 2022, even as excess deaths soared. The proportion then remained low throughout the following two years, indicating that the additional deaths during this period were concentrated in the vaccinated.

Is this why the authorities continue to resist releasing the full data on deaths by vaccination status? A cross-party group of 21 MPs and peers are the latest to write to request the data be released. Are the authorities refusing because they know the data show excess deaths predominantly in the vaccinated?

The striking effect was seen in every age group. The charts showing these results can be seen below (find the data here, table 5). The blue lines show the total deaths by month in the age group (left-hand axis) while the red lines show the proportion of deaths in the unvaccinated in the age group (right-hand axis; unvaccinated here means receiving no doses). The most striking feature on each chart is the steep drop in the red line in early 2022, which denotes a sharp and sustained drop in the proportion of deaths in the unvaccinated and a corresponding rise in the proportion in the vaccinated.

Note this is not because more people got vaccinated at that time, as the number getting their first dose in these age groups was almost zero by this point (see chart below, taken from here, data here). People getting their first dose may affect the trends seen in 2021, particularly in the first part of the year, though the over-60s were largely done with first doses by June 2021.

Here are the charts by age group. It’s worth pointing out that by using only death data they avoid the problems with the ONS population estimates highlighted by Professor Norman Fenton and others that have tended to exaggerate the death rate in the unvaccinated.

Note that the red lines during 2022 and 2023 are mostly flat, particularly for those in their 60s, 70s and 80s, even during many of the peaks in total deaths. This is particularly noticeable during winter 2022-23, where despite a large peak in deaths the red lines stay largely flat. This suggests that vaccine efficacy against death, at least from the Omicron variants, is very low, since if the virus was disproportionately killing the unvaccinated (i.e., the vaccines were protecting the vaccinated) the proportion of deaths in the unvaccinated should spike during waves. That it usually does not suggests low vaccine efficacy.

These charts include no comparison with death rates before the vaccination period so don’t allow us to say very much about the pre-Omicron period as there is little to compare it to. However, there are notable spikes in the red lines for those over 70 during the Delta wave of late 2021. On first sight this would seem to indicate vaccine efficacy against the Delta variant during that winter. Things may not be so straightforward, however. Notice that the other largish spike for those over 80 is in summer 2022. Importantly, this was not associated with a Covid wave; instead it was associated with a heatwave – that was when the heat dome was sitting over Europe causing record temperatures. This is significant because the vaccine obviously does not protect against heatwaves. This means the reason for the summer 2022 spike is not vaccine efficacy. What is it then?

It seems likely it is related to the ‘healthy vaccinee effect’ i.e., the fact that people who take vaccines tend to be people with better background health outcomes than those who don’t take vaccines. A number of studies indicate that vaccinated people have a background death rate around half that of unvaccinated people (this is a background death rate not related to vaccine efficacy or safety).

The poorer background health of the unvaccinated group means that any general cause of death that disproportionately affects the frail or those with comorbidities, such as a virus epidemic or a heatwave, will naturally, other things being equal, disproportionately affect the unvaccinated group, for reasons unrelated to the vaccine. This would explain the summer 2022 spike in the red lines and it may also explain some or much of the spike during the Delta wave as well. Assuming this is right, it makes the lack of spikes during other waves, such as winter 2022-23, even more striking, as one would normally expect the unvaccinated group to be disproportionately affected by a virus wave or a winter, yet instead the lines remain flat. These flat red lines during waves of deaths are therefore also potentially indicative of a concentration of excess deaths in the vaccinated.

The headline finding from these charts is the striking concentration of excess deaths in the vaccinated after early 2022, just as Omicron appeared. This worrying observation may be why the authorities are keeping the full data, which would confirm or rule out such a finding, firmly under wraps.

Tags: COVID-19Excess deathsONSSide-effectsVaccine

Donate

We depend on your donations to keep this site going. Please give what you can.

Donate Today

Comment on this Article

You’ll need to set up an account to comment if you don’t already have one. We ask for a minimum donation of £5 if you'd like to make a comment or post in our Forums.

Sign Up
Previous Post

News Round-Up

Next Post

Tax the Non-Doms? We’d be Better Served if Politicians Embraced Tax Competition

Subscribe
Login
Notify of
Please log in to comment

To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.

Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.

30 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Monro
Monro
1 year ago

‘The headline finding from these charts is the striking concentration of excess deaths in the vaccinated after early 2022, just as Omicron appeared. This worrying observation may well be why the authorities are keeping the full data, which would confirm or rule out such an observation, firmly under wraps.’

The solution?

It’s time to take a chainsaw to the British civil service

The conservative policy review after the election will be interesting, depending on who remains within the 25 MPs left to them…….

124
0
roger white
roger white
1 year ago

The only way to judge ” excess deaths” as the ONS said during the pandemic and have repeated after a major review very recently, is to use age standardised rates.
These adjust for growth in population and ageing of the population.
It is clearly silly to use total deaths, when the population is larger in 2022 than in the average period 2015-19 used as the comparator on crude data.
ASMR shows a surge in excess deaths in 2020 as the pandemic hit, but pretty ” normal” rates since ( 21/22).
Interestingly ASMR also shows 2019 was way below normal, and that combining the very low year of 2019 when flu was pretty much absent & pandemic year 2020 – results in a 2 year average not much above ” normal”
The continued use of raw data unadjusted for the substantial increase in population and slight ageing is really inexplicable.

19
-53
transmissionofflame
transmissionofflame
1 year ago
Reply to  roger white

I would like to see deaths per capita divided into age bands, by vaccination status.

94
0
Dinger64
Dinger64
1 year ago
Reply to  roger white

So why will they not release the figures by vaccination status?
The one measurement that would reveal the truth!

111
0
iconoclast
iconoclast
1 year ago
Reply to  Dinger64

There was some great data published during the Pharcedemic covering NHS patients which showed that the jabbed were at greater risk than the unjabbed.

8
0
NickR
NickR
1 year ago

2 points.
1. Vaccination rates as Fenton et al have demonstrated were significantly overstated due to ONS not knowing the population. They knew how many were jabbed so assumed the unjabbed were: population – jabbed. Understate the population & you understate the unjabbed. A 2% error on the population of over 80s leads to a 100% error on the over 80s unjabbed.
2. The healthy vaccinee effect tends to be short lived. We’re looking at ‘ever-vaccinated’, the people who were too vulnerable to be vaxxed in early 21 would, I assume, not still be hanging around in early 22.
Both these factors would tend to worsen the outcome for the vaccinated.

50
-1
Marcus Aurelius knew
Marcus Aurelius knew
1 year ago

If I’d been jabbed the stress would kill me.

Never mind the rest.

Last edited 1 year ago by Marcus Aurelius knew
149
0
FerdIII
FerdIII
1 year ago

There are spikes in deaths post each major stabbination drive (3). This means the quackcines killed. We have known for at least a year that some 95% of excess deaths are in the stabbinated and that from Dec 2020 90% + of the dead were quacked up. Case closed.

I am still awaiting the Dec 2021 prediction that healthy fit people like myself – the unquacked – were going to die at the rate of 5000 per day. Models say. Teacher say. BBC say. Experts say.

The quacked are dying of everything from cancer to heart attacks. Case closed. Fact checked.

179
0
JohnK
JohnK
1 year ago
Reply to  FerdIII

It certainly shows that is was wise to step back and wait and see, given the way the product was sold to us. Glad I didn’t use it at all – and I’m over 60.

131
0
soundofreason
soundofreason
1 year ago
Reply to  JohnK

I took the AstraZeneca product – both shots. My view was that if there was something bad going to happen I wanted it discovered before they stuck it in my kids or grand-kids. The vaccine pushers managed to move faster than I expected and my kids were being offered a different jab just 3 months later.

I used to take part in phase 1 clinical trials when I was young – but not for altruistic reasons. I bought a (cheap) motorbike on the proceeds of one trial.

28
-5
Jon Mors
Jon Mors
1 year ago
Reply to  soundofreason

Twenty years ago I had an acquaintance who participated in phase 1 trials, and he suffered some side effects. Can’t recall the details or whether he recovered. I had another acquaintance (much older), who took part in trials for Lariam, and had bad side effects. My dad has a bad case of ‘trust the scientists’ and he also took Lariam (rather than HCQ) when in the tropics, and he almost went nuts and had to stop.

22
0
For a fist full of roubles
For a fist full of roubles
1 year ago

The deaths are only the most extreme manifestation of vaccine injuries.
Hardly a week goes by without hearing of yet another acquaintance who has developed severe breathing difficulties.
Only yesterday we heard about an elderly woman friend who passed out on her way to a hospital appointment for a joint problem only to wake up in resus on oxygen. She then went into the ward pass-the-parcel game trying to find her a bed.

Last edited 1 year ago by For a fist full of roubles
72
0
soundofreason
soundofreason
1 year ago
Reply to  For a fist full of roubles

Close relative suffered sudden giant cell arteritis / temporal vasculitis. Steroid treatment has caused her to swell up (looks like Cushing’s syndrome). Now slowly coming off the steroids and improving but, I think, unlikely ever to fully recover – to be fair, partly because she’s not going to get any younger.

She will not hear any discussion about the ‘vaccines’.

47
0
Jon Mors
Jon Mors
1 year ago
Reply to  soundofreason

To be fair, on an individual case by case basis it isn’t really possible to attribute suddenly emerging health conditions to the ‘vaccine’. Exceptions being when there is a clearly established link, e.g. myocarditis and pericarditis shortly after ‘vaccination’. I know one such person (pericarditis) and he acknowledges that it was due to the vaccine.

22
0
For a fist full of roubles
For a fist full of roubles
1 year ago
Reply to  Jon Mors

“To be fair” is never a consideration by the panic and vaccine promoters.

39
0
Monro
Monro
1 year ago
Reply to  Jon Mors

GCA is a fairly well known side effect of influenza vaccination:

‘….we report 10 cases of previously healthy subjects who developed GCA/PMR within 3 months of influenza vaccination (Inf-V). A Medline search uncovered additional 11 isolated cases of GCA/PMR occurring after Inf-V.’

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22235046/

It also now appears to be a fairly well known side effect of the covid vaccine:

‘Fourteen reported cases of GCA after COVID-19 vaccination was reviewed to reveal a diverse clinical picture and treatment response. The time from onset of symptoms to GCA diagnosis varied from two weeks to four months.’

https://www.mdpi.com/1648-9144/59/12/2127

This research took about five minutes.

The steroid treatment of GCA leads to dementia:

‘We had identified that > 90-day corticosteroid administration is a significant dementia risk factor in both female and male patients of all ages, especially in the 50-60-year-old group.’

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8040399/

It is at least arguable that dramatic rises in dementia/alzheimers are attributable to flu/covid vaccination indirectly via steroid treatment for vaccine side effects:

‘Glucocorticoid treatment is frequently associated with transiently impaired attention, concentration, and memory. In rare cases, cognitive changes may be prominent and may persist for substantial periods of time after steroid discontinuation. This largely unrecognized complication has been termed the “steroid dementia syndrome” and may reflect steroid neuroendangerment or neurotoxicity.’

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/8055523_The_Steroid_Dementia_Syndrome_An_Unrecognized_Complication_of_Glucocorticoid_Treatment

Last edited 1 year ago by Monro
20
0
Sforzesca
Sforzesca
1 year ago
Reply to  Monro

It’s weird isn’t it, almost as though putting man made chemicals etc. into the human body that its immune systems have never before encountered would have unforseen and undesirable effects.
Statins are perhapse the latest example-

https://www.midwesterndoctor.com/p/what-can-statins-teach-us-about-the?utm_source=substack&utm_campaign=post_embed&utm_medium=web

31
0
Monro
Monro
1 year ago
Reply to  Sforzesca

Couldn’t agree more, particularly re statins which are probably also contributing to the increased incidence of dementia.

21
0
Grahamb
Grahamb
1 year ago

They are keeping the data out of the hands of the public so that it can be scrubbed and that will take time as it was released for awhile and it will have to be consistent through out. Something I previously thought would never be considered, a bit like changing how excess deaths are calculated!

95
0
varmint
varmint
1 year ago

The most likely thing usually turns out to be true, or the one that requires the least amount of unnecessary explanation. ——–“occams razor”——–or some people might call it “the bleeding obvious”

73
0
WyrdWoman
WyrdWoman
1 year ago

No no no, you’ve got the numbers all wrong – this nice AI lady from the ONS said so and I believe her! /sarc

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qGReqsEd5_o

30
0
MTF
MTF
1 year ago

The figure that Will Jones has calculated – proportion of deaths amongst the unvaccinated – is hard to interpret. The general pattern is obvious – it gets lower as time goes on and seems to almost flatten out at the end. This makes sense as Covid comes under control and so vaccination has less and less effect on mortality. But it is a heroic assumption to go from there to concluding excess deaths are proportionally more amongst the vaccinated. In fact the ONS data provides a more straightforward way of looking at things. Is the ASMR higher amongst the vaccinated or the unvaccinated. The chart is attached. You can see that during the height of the epidemic (Apr 21 to Jan 22) the ASMR was much higher for the unvaccinated. From Jan to April 22 the unvaccinated rate dropped but remained higher than the vaccinated rate. From about May 22 the difference between the two is more or less constant. So if there if this ASMR reflects excess deaths during that period is does so more or less equally between the two groups.

Age-standardised-mortality-rate-_-100000-person-years-and
1
-15
GroundhogDayAgain
GroundhogDayAgain
1 year ago

Not to take anything away from Will’s analysis, but a few points worth repeating:

  • It’s not, and never was, a vaccine, it’s a gene therapy and should have been subject to additional regulatory scrutiny.
  • The definition of vaccine was conveniently altered just in time for the coof.
  • The clinical trial was unblinded, eliminating the control group.
  • Those who fell ill were dropped from the trial (e.g. Maddie de Garay) and left to fend for themselves.
  • There’s little evidence that anyone was ‘saved’, the case for jabbing the elderly was marginal. There never was a case for jabbing the young.
  • The general public didn’t even receive the gunk tested in the clinical trial, but gunk made using a different method which resulted in (some) batches being horribly contaminated. Quality control was weak to non existent.
  • Vaccination status was fudged by allowing a 14 day window after jab was administered. Thus a fatal heart attack on day 1 could be recorded as an unjabbed death.
  • The RNA transcription process was unreliable, sometimes resulting in random proteins being created. But that’s fine apparently.
  • The RNA was synthetic, made using pseudo uridine, not uridine. It stays in the body for an unknown duration, not a few weeks as originally claimed.
  • The spike travelled everywhere in the body, including heart muscle, not remaining in the deltoid muscle as originally claimed.
  • The spike was based on the original coof, thus couldn’t have worked on the subsequent scariants.
  • The spike was a general irritant to the immune system, which initially created antibodies but after multiple jabs resulted in a ‘meh’ response from the body.
  • Antibodies are only part of the picture, yet the authorities focused only on these. T-Cells are your long term immune memory
  • The jab was never tested for transmissibility, yet vaxxports were imposed to ‘keep others safe’
  • Relative efficacy, quoted as 95%, was a blatant lie and ignored the tiny ‘absolute risk’
  • Doctors were forbidden from raising concerns. Those who did were mostly retired and had little to lose.
  • Yellow card submissions should be made for any proximal event. It’s not for the doctor to decide causality.
  • As far as I know, we still haven’t received the phase 3 trial results.
  • There was no pandemic.
  • Rampant PCR testing at unknown CT results in a self-perpetuating number of ‘cases’ gleefully reported by a complicit media.
  • Every death associated with a positive PCR was counted as a coof death. The number of deaths from coof alone was miniscule by comparison.
  • Nosocomial infection in Hospitals was a major source of transmission.
  • A large number of the deaths in early 2020 were iatrogenic (killed by the treatment)

I’m sure there are others, but the list grew quite quickly and was turning into a rant.

Based on the above, there was never ever a case for mandating the jab. All risk, no benefit. The deaths arising should be considered culpable manslaughter.

Those of us who resisted the coercive jabbination campaign are vindicated in retrospect.

Last edited 1 year ago by GroundhogDayAgain
66
0
Curio
Curio
1 year ago

The ONS has just changed to a “more sophisticated” approach to “reflect better” excess deaths (or, “excess mortality” as they call it)?
The new method found that there were only 10,994 excess deaths in 2023 and not 31,442 as the old method had calculated.
I wonder if the author is aware of the change.

8
-1
Roy Everett
Roy Everett
1 year ago

I wonder if the German chap who got vaccinated 217 times caught Covid-19?

6
0
True Spirit of America Party
True Spirit of America Party
1 year ago

Who woulda thunk it?

5
0
JohnnyDollar
JohnnyDollar
1 year ago

No Surprised Here! “Safe” for politicians & Pharma with criminal impunity & “Effective” to Harm 

6
0
Jerry Lanning
Jerry Lanning
1 year ago

Between June 2022 and May 2023 in England, there were 18,141 all-cause deaths in the unvaccinated and 472,563 in the vaccinated. (3.7% and 96.3% of the total respectively.) But only about 80% of the population were vaccinated, so deaths in the vaccinated were much higher than expected. I sent these figures to several MPs months ago. There was no response.

10
0
Chris Williams
Chris Williams
1 year ago

Thanks to the propaganda onslaught, it appears to have been forgotten that it’s up to the experimenters to demonstrate, beyond any reasonable doubt, that their experimental product is not the cause of the excess deaths – particularly given that the death waves coincide with the vaccine roll-out waves. The fact that key information is being withheld by the UK ONS completely discredits the UK ‘party line’. The experimental “vaccines” are so obviously the more than likely cause of the carnage – of excess deaths and the upsurge in life-changing disabilities. (Also corroborated by the surge in death and disability claims being experienced by the Group Life Insurance industry since 2021).

7
0
GroundhogDayAgain
GroundhogDayAgain
1 year ago

Some nutter in Germany took the jab 217 times over 29 months.

🤡😆

0
0

NEWSLETTER

View today’s newsletter

To receive our latest news in the form of a daily email, enter your details here:

DONATE

PODCAST

The Sceptic | Episode 45: Jack Hadfield on the Anti-Asylum Protests, Alan Miller on the Tyranny of Digital ID and James Graham on the Net Zero Pension Threat

by Richard Eldred
25 July 2025
0

LISTED ARTICLES

  • Most Read
  • Most Commented
  • Editor’s Picks

The False Promises of Electric Vehicles Are Being Exposed

29 July 2025
by Tilak Doshi

Is the Tide Turning Against Woke Comedy?

29 July 2025
by C.J. Strachan

Leaked Email Blows Apart BBC’s Impartiality Claims Over Gaza

29 July 2025
by Will Jones

News Round-Up

30 July 2025
by Toby Young

The NHS ‘Non-Jobs’ Bonanza

29 July 2025
by David Craig

Starmer to Recognise a Palestinian State

44

Farage Demands Apology After Labour Minister Says He is on the Side of Predators like Jimmy Savile for Wanting to Scrap Online Safety Act Over Free Speech Concerns

29

The False Promises of Electric Vehicles Are Being Exposed

44

Is the Tide Turning Against Woke Comedy?

22

Leaked Email Blows Apart BBC’s Impartiality Claims Over Gaza

20

Edinburgh University’s Decolonisation Report is Pure Left-Wing Politics

30 July 2025
by James Alexander

Trump Was Right to Skewer Starmer Over Britain’s “Windmills Scam”

30 July 2025
by Ben Pile

The NHS ‘Non-Jobs’ Bonanza

29 July 2025
by David Craig

Is the Tide Turning Against Woke Comedy?

29 July 2025
by C.J. Strachan

The Claim that the Epping Protest is Really a ‘Nazi Pogrom’ is a Classic Left-Wing Conspiracy Theory

29 July 2025
by Steven Tucker

POSTS BY DATE

March 2024
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031
« Feb   Apr »

SOCIAL LINKS

Free Speech Union

NEWSLETTER

View today’s newsletter

To receive our latest news in the form of a daily email, enter your details here:

POSTS BY DATE

March 2024
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031
« Feb   Apr »

DONATE

LISTED ARTICLES

  • Most Read
  • Most Commented
  • Editor’s Picks

The False Promises of Electric Vehicles Are Being Exposed

29 July 2025
by Tilak Doshi

Is the Tide Turning Against Woke Comedy?

29 July 2025
by C.J. Strachan

Leaked Email Blows Apart BBC’s Impartiality Claims Over Gaza

29 July 2025
by Will Jones

News Round-Up

30 July 2025
by Toby Young

The NHS ‘Non-Jobs’ Bonanza

29 July 2025
by David Craig

Starmer to Recognise a Palestinian State

44

Farage Demands Apology After Labour Minister Says He is on the Side of Predators like Jimmy Savile for Wanting to Scrap Online Safety Act Over Free Speech Concerns

29

The False Promises of Electric Vehicles Are Being Exposed

44

Is the Tide Turning Against Woke Comedy?

22

Leaked Email Blows Apart BBC’s Impartiality Claims Over Gaza

20

Edinburgh University’s Decolonisation Report is Pure Left-Wing Politics

30 July 2025
by James Alexander

Trump Was Right to Skewer Starmer Over Britain’s “Windmills Scam”

30 July 2025
by Ben Pile

The NHS ‘Non-Jobs’ Bonanza

29 July 2025
by David Craig

Is the Tide Turning Against Woke Comedy?

29 July 2025
by C.J. Strachan

The Claim that the Epping Protest is Really a ‘Nazi Pogrom’ is a Classic Left-Wing Conspiracy Theory

29 July 2025
by Steven Tucker

SOCIAL LINKS

Free Speech Union
  • Home
  • About us
  • Donate
  • Privacy Policy

Facebook

  • X

Instagram

RSS

Subscribe to our newsletter

© Skeptics Ltd.

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password? Sign Up

Create New Account!

Fill the forms below to register

All fields are required. Log In

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
No Result
View All Result
  • Articles
  • About
  • Archive
    • ARCHIVE
    • NEWS ROUND-UPS
  • Podcasts
  • Newsletter
  • Premium
  • Donate
  • Log In

© Skeptics Ltd.

wpDiscuz
You are going to send email to

Move Comment
Perfecty
Do you wish to receive notifications of new articles?
Notifications preferences