165997
Book your tickets here to the FSU’s live discussion with Matthew Goodwin about his new book. Book your tickets here to the FSU’s live discussion with Matthew Goodwin about his new book. Book your tickets here to the FSU’s live discussion with Matthew Goodwin about his new book.
  • Log in
The Daily Sceptic
No Result
View All Result
  • Articles
  • About
  • Archive
    • ARCHIVE
    • NEWS ROUND-UPS
  • Forum
  • Donate
  • Newsletter
The Daily Sceptic
No Result
View All Result

Busting the Myth that Covid Vaccines Are ‘Highly Effective’ Against Death

by Dr Eyal Shahar
12 April 2023 2:00 PM

How might Covid vaccines reduce mortality?

There are two possible mechanisms, thoughtfully explained in a thorough review and a recent article on Brownstone: Covid vaccines might reduce the risk of infection, or reduce the risk of death — if infected, or both. We can explain the mechanisms in words, with reference to ‘marginal and conditional probabilities’, or we can depict them in a causal diagram — a powerful methodological tool.

The first mechanism is simple: If a Covid vaccine reduces the risk of infection, it will also reduce the risk of death, because there is no doubt that getting infected increases the risk of death. Theoretical exceptions aside, if A affects B, and B affects C, then A affects C.

What if A does not affect B? What if a Covid vaccine does not reduce the risk of infection? Then it cannot reduce the risk of death through this mechanism. The causal chain does not exist. A link is broken.

By now we know that Covid vaccines appear temporarily to increase the risk of infection, and any subsequent benefit is nullified within months, if not turned again into harm (negative vaccine effectiveness). Therefore, according to the first mechanism, there is a short period when a Covid vaccine increases the risk of death, a limited period (a few months) when it decreases the risk of death, and a later period when the effect is null at best.

The second mechanism is more complicated. One aspect was explained in the Brownstone article and is related to a causal concept called ‘effect modification’. Like numerous epidemiological concepts, there are layers of complexity below superficial simplicity. I will keep it simple.

When two causes — Covid vaccine and Covid infection — operate on a single outcome (death), we may ask two causal questions:

  1. What is the effect of a Covid vaccine on the risk of death — if infected?
  2. What is the effect of a Covid vaccine on the risk of death — if not infected?

The second question is asking about vaccine-related death, the worst adverse effect. (A vaccine can be a cause of death even when someone is infected, but that’s another issue.)

Theoretically, the two types of effect could be different, in any possible way: magnitude and direction. Both might be harmful effects, yet of different magnitude. One might be beneficial and the other null, and so on. Add to that complexity time-varying effects, as noted earlier, and you can see how complicated causal reality might be.

Coincidentally, I encountered a relevant study at about the same time that I read the Brownstone article. That study provides insight into the two mechanisms by which Covid vaccines might reduce the risk of death, although the authors missed one aspect of their data (regarding reduced infections) and stopped short of the computation for the other (reduced mortality, if infected).

That’s not surprising. At times of biased media and biased science, we sometimes find insight from narrative-matched publications that missed interesting inference from the data.

Published as a ‘research letter‘, the study compared Covid mortality with mortality from seasonal flu. Using databases of the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA), the researchers identified patients who were hospitalised with an admission diagnosis of Covid or influenza and ascertained deaths. Most patients were elderly, the age group where Covid mortality is concentrated and effective vaccines are needed.

Did Covid vaccines reduce infections? Although the design was a classical retrospective cohort, the baseline data in the first table may be viewed as data from a hospital-based case-control study. (I cannot get into a technical explanation of ‘propensity score weighting’, but it can be ignored for a basic case-control analysis.)

We may consider Covid patients as cases (numbering 8,996) and seasonal influenza patients as controls (there are 2,403). In a typical hospital-based case-control study, controls are selected from multiple disease categories, but I don’t see a major problem with this control group, and perhaps there are referral-related advantages.

Many complicated issues arise from a case-control study. Nonetheless, the basic analysis is simple. We visually compare the distribution of the suspected causal variable (Covid vaccination status) in cases and controls and compute odds ratios. If the vaccines meaningfully reduced the risk of infection, we should get odds ratios much smaller than 1.

We have no such evidence in these data. The odds ratios are close to 1 (close to zero vaccine effectiveness) and they line up in the ‘wrong’ (unexpected) order of magnitude: the larger the number of doses, the weaker the apparent effect. The causal chain from vaccination to reduced mortality through reduced Covid infections is not corroborated.

Interestingly, we may also view influenza patients as cases and Covid patients as controls and compare the distribution of flu vaccination status in the two groups. Check their table above. There is no meaningful association either.

Might biases account for near-null associations? Biasing paths typically lead to a statistical association when there is no real cause-and-effect relation. Random error aside, it is unusual for biases to turn strong effects into near-null associations.

Did Covid vaccines reduce mortality, if infected? We turn next to the second mechanism by which a Covid vaccine might reduce mortality: reducing the risk of death, if infected. That part was addressed in the original design. Every member of the cohort was infected, either by SARS-Cov-2 or by influenza.

The authors have focused on a comparison of Covid mortality with flu mortality, but they added a secondary conclusion:

The increased risk of death was greater among unvaccinated individuals compared with those vaccinated or boosted — findings that highlight the importance of vaccination in reducing risk of COVID-19 death.

How important is vaccination? What was the vaccine effectiveness — if infected? They don’t say.

If Covid vaccines no longer reduce the risk of infection, that’s the only source of vaccine effectiveness (VE) against death.

Below you will find their table and my computation:

VE of 30% or 40% in the vulnerable population is far from ‘highly effective’, a perpetuated claim. The incremental benefit of booster vaccine (one or more doses, per supplementary material) was even smaller (risk ratio 0.83, VE 17%).

Moreover, 30% to 40% is not necessarily the true effectiveness. We have clear evidence of ‘healthy vaccinee bias‘, a type of confounding bias, in both the U.S. and the U.K.. People of the same age who were vaccinated against Covid were healthier, on average, than their unvaccinated counterparts, as evident by lower non-Covid mortality. Therefore, the unbiased VE should be smaller. For example, a modest bias correction factor around 1.5 would drive VE of 40% close to zero.

Billions have been vaccinated under the slogan ”safe and effective’.

It was neither.

Dr. Eyal Shahar is Professor Emeritus of Public Health at the University of Arizona. This article first appeared on Medium.

Tags: COVID-19United StatesVaccineVaccine efficacyVaccine injury

Donate

We depend on your donations to keep this site going. Please give what you can.

Donate Today

Comment on this Article

You’ll need to set up an account to comment if you don’t already have one. We ask for a minimum donation of £5 if you'd like to make a comment or post in our Forums.

Sign Up
Previous Post

Militant Left-Wing Leader of Junior Doctors’ Strike is Ex-Public Schoolboy and Director of Multi-Million Pound Family Investment Company – Shock!

Next Post

“You Don’t Know What You Are Talking About”: Elon Musk Accuses BBC Reporter of Lying Over Whether ‘Hate Speech’ is On the Rise on Twitter

Subscribe
Login
Notify of
Please log in to comment

Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.

23 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

NEWSLETTER

View today’s newsletter

To receive our latest news in the form of a daily email, enter your details here:

 

DONATE

PODCAST

Nick Dixon and Toby Young Talk About Philip Schofield’s Swift Exit, the BBC’s Fondness for Satanists and the Target Boycott

by Toby Young
30 May 2023
2

LISTED ARTICLES

  • Most Read
  • Most Commented
  • Editors Picks

Just Stop Oil’s Hollywood Patron Has Holiday Home in Ireland That he Jets Off to “When the Going Gets Tough”

29 May 2023
by Toby Young
A participant holds a drawing depicting Swedish environmental activist Greta Thunberg during a protest march to call for action against climate change, in The Hague, Netherlands September 27, 2019. REUTERS/Piroschka van de Wouw

Media Bombshell: Shocking Outbreak of ‘Climate Disinformation’ in the Media, i.e., Journalists Asking Questions About Net Zero on GB News and Talk TV

30 May 2023
by Chris Morrison

News Round-Up

30 May 2023
by Toby Young

A Note to Legislators About What Ceding Power to the World Health Organisation Really Means

30 May 2023
by Dr David Bell

Rishi Sunak Backs Kathleen Stock in Free Speech Row

30 May 2023
by Toby Young

News Round-Up

38
A participant holds a drawing depicting Swedish environmental activist Greta Thunberg during a protest march to call for action against climate change, in The Hague, Netherlands September 27, 2019. REUTERS/Piroschka van de Wouw

Media Bombshell: Shocking Outbreak of ‘Climate Disinformation’ in the Media, i.e., Journalists Asking Questions About Net Zero on GB News and Talk TV

37

A Note to Legislators About What Ceding Power to the World Health Organisation Really Means

21

Rishi Sunak Backs Kathleen Stock in Free Speech Row

19

On Wokeness, Its Nature, and Its Prospects

11

On Wokeness, Its Nature, and Its Prospects

30 May 2023
by Eugyppius

Elon Musk’s Claim to be Defying the EU’s Censorship Code is an Empty Boast

30 May 2023
by Robert Kogon

A Note to Legislators About What Ceding Power to the World Health Organisation Really Means

30 May 2023
by Dr David Bell
A participant holds a drawing depicting Swedish environmental activist Greta Thunberg during a protest march to call for action against climate change, in The Hague, Netherlands September 27, 2019. REUTERS/Piroschka van de Wouw

Media Bombshell: Shocking Outbreak of ‘Climate Disinformation’ in the Media, i.e., Journalists Asking Questions About Net Zero on GB News and Talk TV

30 May 2023
by Chris Morrison

Sunak’s Solution to Food Price Inflation: Socialism!

29 May 2023
by Noah Carl

POSTS BY DATE

April 2023
M T W T F S S
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
« Mar   May »

SOCIAL LINKS

Free Speech Union
  • Home
  • About us
  • Donate
  • Privacy Policy

Facebook

Twitter

Instagram

RSS

Subscribe to our newsletter

© Skeptics Ltd.

No Result
View All Result
  • Articles
  • About
  • Archive
    • ARCHIVE
    • NEWS ROUND-UPS
  • Forum
  • Donate
  • Newsletter

© Skeptics Ltd.

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Create New Account!

Please note: To be able to comment on our articles you'll need to be a registered donor

Already have an account?
Please click here to login Log In

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
wpDiscuz
You are going to send email to

Move Comment