I was called up for jury service in the early 90s. I was in my mid 20s. After hearing the evidence in the first case I was assigned to, the jury retired to deliberate.
A middle-aged man volunteered to be the foreman of the jury; I and the other 10 were quite happy for him to take the role.
Once that was agreed, he asked: “Who doesn’t think the defendant is guilty?”
One juror made some comments but was soon made to see he was wrong and we all agreed vey quickly on the guilty verdict and called the clerk.
The reason for sharing this story is to hopefully shed some light on the recent decision to acquit the Extinction Rebellion activists of criminal damage at Southwark Crown Court last week despite the video evidence showing them damaging windows at HSBC’s offices.
I can only speculate but I would not be surprised if one or two members of the jury were either members of a climate activist group or work in a sector or department of a company that concerns itself with the ‘climate catastrophe’. They could just be someone that only uses the BBC for their information.
As evidenced by my own experience, it would not take much for a vocal member of the jury to volunteer himself as foreman and push the jury to the verdict that he himself wants.
The fact that this jury made requests including an explanation of the Paris Climate Agreement and information on what the British Government has done to address the climate crisis suggests there may have been some dissenting jurors that needed to be persuaded to agree to acquit.
I have not seen it reported that the jury requested any information that may have countered the idea that there is a climate crisis which would indicate that the jury was being led by someone sympathetic to the defendant’s cause.
If the jury decided to acquit based on the assumption that the defendant’s actions were necessary to prevent the world ending, why didn’t it request any information that opposed this idea in order to have a balanced view?
Why did the jury not ask for information about the additional emissions that would be generated by the manufacture, transportation and replacement of the broken windows?
If the defendants really believed that emissions were about to send the planet over the edge surely they would be too scared to increase them by even the tiniest amount?
These questions don’t appear to have been asked, which leads me to think that it is not speculation on my part.
This jury’s decision will no doubt lead to other activists damaging property in the name of their particular cause, with the expectation that a jury will acquit them too. But there will be a group in future that will be shocked to be found guilty as the one or two vocal jurors in their case are totally unsympathetic.
To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.
Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.
Nice earner there for some hotel proprietors!
Like the dozen private hire taxis ‘retained on standby’ for the Ministry of Ag & Fish hereabouts for the entire duration of the foot’n’mouth debacle to whisk Ministry officials to and from the railway station and their out of town offices.
Though paid for they were hardly ever used, just as well since they were hardly ever standing by.
Whilst the poor drop into poverty.
Nice ‘Dishy Rishi’ Sunak removes £20 per week from the 5.5 million poorest in the UK.
Let’s hope he enjoys his £400,000 house extension and swimming pool.
You aren’t a scumbag merely because you’ve been “vaccinated”. A bit gullible or cowardly, perhaps, but we’re all human, and that’s something reasonable folk can disagree about.
But whether or not you’ve let them inject the “vaccine” into you, if you don’t 100% oppose and absolutely refuse to collaborate with these evil discriminatory measures that have no rational justification whatsoever, then you are a scumbag, and that’s the end of it.
I allowed myself to be vaccinated not out of cowardice or gullibility but to avoid inconvenience for reasons I’ve outlined before.
For our mutual benefit this enables me to witness and report what a shambles their booster programme is.
I’m scared neither of covid or the vaccine; different matter were I still of reproductive age, especially if a lady.
Not my downtick btw, I’m all in favour of freedom of speech.
As I said, reasonable people can reasonably disagree about the issue of choosing to take the vaccine. Myself, I’m like you, no more scared of the vaccine than of the covid, but I adopted the position that decency required not taking it, both in order to stand with those resisting it, and to respond properly to the lies on which both the covid panic and the “emergency” authorisation and coercive imposition of the “vaccines” were based.
“Not my downtick btw, I’m all in favour of freedom of speech.”
Tbh I was expecting dislikes from people who had taken the vaccine and felt offended.
I got COVID and it wasn’t that bad for me, in fact it seemed less hassle than someone I know who had some days off work for the booster side-effects.
I just think that the risks of a jab that doesn’t stop you getting covid don’t add up, they certainly don’t add up WRT any passports or other bureaucracy.
The fact the jabs begin to harm the response to SARS2 post 20 weeks should be a worry that the MSM should raise if thye were not corrupt.
I’m always confused here – we hear that the PCR tests are not fit for purpose,and neither are the LFT kits – yet people keep telling us they’ve “had Covid”.
How can people know they’ve had Covid if there is no test for it?
Sorry, don’t care. Happy for those people stuck in the countries in question wanting to come back to UK, but otherwise don’t care.
Not vaxxed, won’t test, refuse to show any kind of health pass, won’t travel.
Ditto. Won’t wear a mask either so I doubt I’ll ever board a flight again as that rule will never be dropped unless the airlines suffer financially as a result. Sadly, they probably won’t as plenty are quite prepared to accept masks as a ‘price worth paying’. Not me.
Most holiday flights require fairly full planes to turn a profit. As well as the unjabbed there will also be a good number of the vaxxed who won’t want the hassle that is now connected with flying. Inevitably there will be job losses and some airlines going bankrupt. However, this all seems to be part of the Great Reset plan.
Yes, I feel the same.
It’s been more than a decade since I boarded a even bus, seeing the masked up muppets on them means I wont be on one anytime soon either.
Won’t travel, or can’t travel?
Yes Toby, but most of the readership here is unvaccinated, so what are the rules for us now? Are we still limited to a weekend at Pontins in Prestatyn, even though we have a Rolls Royce immune system and are less of a threat to public health than the bejabbed?
I think your phrase “ are less of a threat to public health than the bejabbed?” is incorrect and illogical.
Both groups of people are essentially the same ‘threat’.
Also is there a public health threat at all? You seem to imply there is, which means that you are in agreement with the government’s view of the seriousness of the infection and logically you must agree with their measures.
Infected vaccinated people carry the same or even higher viral load than the unvaccinated, but are more likely to be asymptomatic and so pose a higher risk of being superspreaders than the unvaccinated. They are also more likely to think they are not a threat of being a COVID transmitter as a result of their vaccinated status, since they have not read all the science we have and rely on government propaganda for their knowledge.
And they shed spike proteins in the period following vaccination which constitute a public health risk to others in their vicinity.
All of which means they are more of a public health threat than the unvaccinated.
The question is whether infection with SARS-CoV-2 is actually a public health threat.
Again you consider asymptomatic spread a threat or possibility, is it?
Do you consider those of us who have had the flu vaccine a threat to public health? That vaccine does not prevent infection only reduces symptoms.
It has been well publicised that the SARS-CoV-2 vaccine does not prevent infection or infectiousness. My son and daughter-in-law both vaccinated and both had CoViD19.
When our adult children were babies and had the polio vaccination we had to be careful when changing their nappies as there was the potential to catch polio from the faeces.
I don’t know; sounds like a bit of a laugh. An ‘Unjabbed Weekender’ at some random Butlins/Pontins … who could we get to appear?
Eric Clapton and Van Morrison!
“Britain is one of the last countries in the world to have hotel quarantine with even Australia, pioneers of the policy, having dropped it.”
It really says something when even Fascist Australia don’t have Red List gulags anymore.
I’ve accepted that I’ll never ‘go abroad’ again. I don’t wear face nappies, will never get tested, & will NEVER EVER take the fake ‘vaccines’. Just as well I didn’t renew my passport in early 2020 (as I originally planned to).
Congratulations, such voluntary serfdom will surely be rewarded in the new Green World. You might get an extra carrot for that (I mean an actual carrot, do not expect anything more).
And your point is?
Or was that just a cheap windup?
The point is that restricting yourself and voluntarily going off the grid “to show them” is pretty childish behavior. Nobody up there cares about you throwing tantrums, refusing to play along, and locking yourself in your echo chamber along with a bunch of like-minded friends. If anything, they are glad to have you pacified and sulking like that.
I didn’t hear TruthHurts2077 saying they weren’t going to travel “to show them” or sounding like they were having a tantrum – just being clear they will not go along with what they disagree with.
Boris and pals don’t care. And people who say they’re not going to travel because they disagree with the regulations aren’t helping those who do want to travel without these silly Covid regulations.
It’s akin to saying “I’m alright, Jack!”
OK, so what’s your solution?
And yes I am well aware that Boris and pals don’t care.
I don’t think there are any solutions to all this any more. I think we’ve done the peaceful protests, on-line petitions and writing to your MPs….
It’s a matter of being ‘unvaxxed’ and suffering the expense of two PCR tests from an unreliable ‘company’ (such as Faisal of Halifax “£99 to you my friend”) and sticking yourself into a 10-day quarantine with the Mitie marshalls checking up on you to see if you really are there, or getting yourself ‘fully vaccinated’ to avoid the quarantine yet having to still be punished with having to buy an LFT test kit from another Faisal for Day 2.
That’s about it, really.
The pages of the calendar turn, and all I can see is the 3rd ‘booster’ shots being rolled out, with the 4th shots waiting for next Spring. Those who don’t get the jabs will eventually see their ‘vaccine pass’ become invalid – which suits the Government as they don’t want the poor travelling anywhere outside their own
countryprison.I would agree, though my personal choice is still to refuse to participate in covid safety theatre as much as I am able – but I accept others will face tricky choices for example for work reasons or close family. IMO giving in because you fancy a foreign holiday is selling oneself cheap, but I don’t want to create more division than there already is among sceptics.
I could also give all of my money to help the starving in Africa. However, I don’t want to. How far along the ‘moral path’ does one go?
I see nothing wrong with international travel, it is something I have worked for and earned in my opinion, and ‘holidays abroad’ are not all about laying on a beach doing nothing, or dancing away at the disco.
I’d like to carry on travelling as I was before March 2020, but all governments have been ordered ‘from above’ to create the Covid scam and ruin the lives of millions.
Families have been prevented from seeing one another.
Well, giving all your money to the starving in Africa probably wouldn’t help them much.
Holidays abroad are indeed about many things and I would not judge anyone for what they get pleasure from. We all have our breaking points.
I am not an especially moral person I don’t think, and my choice is to make me feel better because I would not feel comfortable going along with a Big Lie. But that’s just me. I do think though that change only happens with personal choices. Of course my choice is unlikely to make a difference, but if everyone chose my path, things might change. If no-one chooses my path, they probably won’t change. Accepting the inevitable (rain, viruses) with stoic resignation is fine, but one ought to try and resist things you can change, even if the possibility of change is remote.
I hear what you are saying, but I don’t agree. I think Julian’s position is the correct one here.
The fact that some (very wealthy and powerful) groups along with green nutters and their dupes want to use this as a pretext for shutting down mass travel is not what matters here. In the end, the only way out of this is mass unrest resulting from those in charge pushing too hard
Continued large drops in travel contribute to that, because travel is vital for modern economies to function as they have been. By jumping through the hoops to conform in order to get their permission to travel you enable them to continue their regime of control, and allow the reduction of mass travel to be a softer landing for them.
So you can argue the practicalities either way, but at least the stay at home position is correct from the personal pov of refusing to collaborate.
There hasn’t been much ‘mass unrest’ so far – as Julian points out there were a lot of people at Stansted Airport the other night – it’s a scramble – some are getting their papers and ‘vaccinations’ in order and travelling, others are stubbornly refusing and not travelling.
I could stay at home for the rest of my life. It would be a pretty miserable existence, but I could say I did it “for the cause”. Or I could go and get my two (three!?!) (four?!?) jabs next year so that I can travel without the inconvenience of a 10-day quarantine.
I don’t want the jabs, but so far I haven’t seen much resistance to them. I really don’t think any more on-line petitions are going to help, we all know that writing to your MP just sees a standard pre-written reply (if that!), and the peaceful demonstrations have got people to meet up and make friends and become encouraged to continue the fight, but they haven’t dislodged Boris and pals from their positions of power.
I’m hoping things will change, but with Mitie marshall contracts signed up to 2023, and more ‘vaccines’ ordered for 2022, it does look like the game board has already been set to keep this fraud going.
And, of course, one can’t believe everything one reads on-line – my partner has been double-jabbed and I haven’t “had Covid” from the spike proteins she’s ‘shedding’! Or… maybe I have had Covid, but just didn’t know it. After all, it is a virus that moves in mysterious ways!
As compensation, I generally regard comments on this forum as having more weight than what the Government spews out (which I generally see as propaganda) – there are sensible views expressed here – I read a lot and try to make up my own mind.
“There hasn’t been much ‘mass unrest’ so far – as Julian points out there were a lot of people at Stansted Airport the other night – it’s a scramble – some are getting their papers and ‘vaccinations’ in order and travelling, others are stubbornly refusing and not travelling.”
Arguably, the reason there hasn’t been mass unrest is precisely because they were able to release some of the pressure by authorising travel, but using it as a further reinforcement of the panic by requiring people to jump through hoops to do it (and also use open discrimination to increase “vaccine” coercion).
In truth, there’s no easy way to fight this, and my and Julian’s response won’t necessarily help any more than does yours. But our position is, imo, both morally and practically justifiable.
“I could stay at home for the rest of my life. It would be a pretty miserable existence, but I could say I did it “for the cause”. Or I could go and get my two (three!?!) (four?!?) jabs next year so that I can travel without the inconvenience of a 10-day quarantine.”
This is obviously an easier decision for Julian and me, having done plenty of travelling already and being of an age where it isn’t nearly as exciting or important (I make some assumptions here on Julian’s behalf). But I would say it isn’t necessary to commit to never travelling again. This travel issue will be over one way or the other in a couple of years, and you can always revisit the decision then.
Assumptions correct, but if my Mrs had to visit her Mum abroad in the case where she was for example not long for this world I would take a test if she told me she needed my support. As I said, everyone has a limit. Your Mum comes first, in this case.
“The point is that restricting yourself and voluntarily going off the grid “to show them” is pretty childish behavior. “
I don’t think that’s what TruthHurts2077 said, though. He merely indicated that he would not be jumping through the hoops that the regime has set out to demonstrate compliance in order to be allowed access to foreign travel.
Would one better help resistance to the new totalitarianism by getting the jab in order to travel, or by complying with their face-nappying and testing? Or are you arguing that we should all make some kind of protest at airports and on planes by refusing to comply and getting arrested?
Its a view I would not argue with, its a personal choice.
We have made the opposite choice. Its clear they are trying to make it as difficult as possible for unjabbed to leave countries of origin and fly to their desired destinated. We delight in proving their inadequacies, and enjoying ourselves at the same time.
We have yet to meet a single person in Florida from anywhere in Europe on our present trip. I guess there must be some, but they are a scarce breed. We are delighted to fly the flag of independent action, not supressed by dogma.
Refusing to travel is also playing into the hands of the enemy – that’s exactly what they want!
I don’t care what they want, though I doubt they want to shut down travel otherwise they would not be making it easier for the vaxxed to travel. I think they want to control everything and have lots of power without much accountability, like all politicians since forever. Nothing remarkable.
Travel has already been effectively shut down since March 2020. Making travel easier for the ‘vaxxed’ has just been a way to encourage people to take the jabs.
Have you flown anywhere in recent years? Australians are certainly having a hard time getting out of their own country, and back in.
My last trip to the UK was last December, and back out in January – not a pleasant experience with the Covid tests and paperwork.
I was at Stansted the other night – lots of people travelling. It’s a pain, yes, but a pain many are prepared to put up with. Australia is the outlier IMO, they are overcooking it. Yes it was partly about encouraging the vaxx and will be the same with the boosters, but I think shutting down mass travel is a step too far for them. We will simmer, controlled and tracked, like the population of China.
“Not vaxxed, won’t test, refuse to show any kind of health pass, won’t travel.”
Are we allowed to ask why you were at Stansted?
Meeting a friend. Dismal experience. An hour watching nappied people walk out of the arrivals area.
See my reply above, on this.
Childish not to go along with something you believe is very wrong?
Are the unvaxxed allowed on cross channel ferries?
Why not? But 10 days quarantine for them when they arrive to the UK, with the obligatory purchase of PCR tests for Days 2 and 8 from some slimy cowboy ‘entrepreneur’.
Does Fascist Australia really not have its prison hotels anymore? New Zealand still does, and I can’t see NZ stopping them anytime before 2023, if ever…
The imminent UK vaxx green pass system is much more effective at social control quarantine… and its due in a few weeks time.
Its always been about bio-health security the banks knew this years ago…
They fully expect the ‘others’ to clump together on the fringes of society… they are currently most of the chess board pieces ahead.
Hate to say it…
11 November?
‘Fully vaccinated travellers…’
‘Fully jabbed travellers…’
Given the current climate of ever-shifting claims, arguments and definitions, what does this even mean?
‘Ministers have…agreed to retain “several hundred” rooms in “quarantine” hotels in case restrictions have to be reimposed if a new variant emerges or there is a resurgence of COVID-19.’
Of course they have. This lunatic approach has very quickly become established orthodoxy.
There’s a depressing inevitability about all of this.
Some lite relief… sing along… it will make you feel better…
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jjeceveczCc
There also seems to be a not too depressing inevitability, that government members and some other officials will one day face trial on charges related to crimes against humanity.
Just like in China, eh?
One day…. the lawyers will save us… the house of cards will come crashing down… the lid will be blown of this….
Well some of the leaders in the Warsaw Pact countries came to a sticky end, and the Soviet Empire fell eventually. The Chinese are sadly much smarter though – they will most likely last a lot longer, and probably take us with them. But all empires fall eventually, just not in our lifetime.
I don’t think the USSR fell – all the attached countries are still under the control of Russia.
As for Germany – no change there since the 1930s.
The leadership of the USSR were removed though a similar lot came back. I think most countries that were part of USSR and Warsaw Pact are probably a bit better places to live now than under Stalin et al. At least they were until covid.
https://www.bbc.com/news/health-59077036
Headline reads Double vaccinated can still spread virus at homeI would have thought it was everywhere. Despite this they still expect you to take a jab or two or every 6 months
Most transmission throughout has been in the home. However, I would also add nosocomial transmission has been rife.
This is, of course, not news to anyone here. But it’s going to be massive news to lots of people who rely only on the BBC, breakfast tv and the news on the hour on those crap syndicated commercial radio stations.
I know its comedy Gold. If you talk to the weak sheeple, they actually think the booster is a new improved miracle drug. ‘No, its exactly the same shit that didn’t work the first time they are pumping in to you; you thick f@ckers’. They are playing Russian roulette with their bodies, unfortunately, I have got to the point where I don’t care if they have a reaction. It isn’t like they haven’ been warned.
Same could be said for travel …
Meanwhile, in another island nation
https://halturnerradioshow.com/index.php/en/news-page/world/japan-drops-vax-rollout-goes-to-ivermectin-ends-covid-almost-overnight
Seems very good news; we can now wait for this to appear in the impartial (ha ha) mainstream press.
I’m waiting …
still waiting …
Wait no more, the quack site you quoted already links to mainstream articles about Japan’s success.
Is there any website that summarises the travel situation for unvaccinated Brits by country? (and /airline if applicable) No funny replies please.
https://www.kayak.co.uk/travel-restrictions
Three countries (Mexico, Costa Rica and Colombia) don’t require test or vaxx. All others have restrictions of one sort or another.
As I keep saying, if someone had forecast this world 2+ years ago then they would have been quite rightly sectioned!
Mexico is going to be the US acid test. They have a tight relationship and loads of unvaxed US citizens go back and forth by air. Neither State nor Homeland have yet produced their criteria for unvaxed entry after 8 November for countries like Mexico or Japan. Its all been WH press statements to date. I wonder if they will leave a ‘gap’ for entry.
If things get really bad here (yes I know they are already pretty bad) and look like staying that way long term I guess Mexico could be an option, and maybe then from there a covid sceptic US state. I wonder if you need to be vaxxed to get a green card?
If things get ‘really bad’ in the UK, do people think the Government are just going to let them hop on a plane and fly to Mexico?
What if Mexico doesn’t want you? Why should they take in immigrants from anywhere?
Take wellies for walking across the Rio Grande!
I don’t see why the government would be too bothered about people leaving the country, as long as they didn’t come back without conforming to whatever corona safety bollocks was currently in place.
Mexico may change their mind but I presume it would depend on how much money you have.
I was thinking of emigrating rather than a holiday. But I don’t know much about Mexico. TBH I would not feel overly safe anywhere. South Dakota would be a good bet I would say, though of course they have to resist the might of the evil US Federal Government.
France stops unjabbed getting on flights to leave the country without an exceptional reason for all countries outside their green list. This includes EU/EEA but not UK/USA or most countries in the world outside Europe. UK nationals are not stopped from returning to UK. That is why we went to Spain for a night before flying to Panama and then Florida. The UK could easily copy this.
Unless you want to join the throngs ‘illegally’ encouraged to cross the US southern border, it is difficult for a UK citizen/retiree to stay more than 6 months ( with extended visa) in the US. After 8 November it may be impossible for an unjabbed one.
We have found 3 potential routes.
1) our son in Denver marries a US citizen, after 3 years we can apply to retire here.
2)We invest about £600k in a US start-up in certain areas in the nation and don’t withdraw it for about 4 years. This allows you to come right away.
3) we become ‘illegal’ by just not getting on the return flight. Homeland probably won’t bother finding us. We get Florida driving licences ( $200 or so on the blackmarket) with a DL you can get on the voters list and you are home and dry as long as you don’t commit a crime. You can get State ID card and through that register for social security number against an address. Downside is, you can never leave the US. And if it goes wrong you would never get back in, and possibly incur financial penalties for life.
Florida is a swing state, so you will not know if its future is as CA2. Not sure if a ‘fly-over’ State such as SD would be best place to live long-term.
Panama has the best retiree entry plan available, it may be a better bet in the Americas.
Just search for ‘Norway Entry’ or some such to see the situation for each country. Still pretty much PCR tests and quarantines required. Unless you are ‘fully vaccinated’.
Can you imagine if this was Russia or N Korea or even South Africa thirty years ago or maybe even Zimbabwe under Mugabe or Libya under Gaddafi … there would outright condemnation from all corners of the earth – but this is Australia today – this a so-called liberal democracy that has gone completely rogue – this is a country that has lost the plot completely and gone full-on totalitarianism.
While the rest of the Global Tools look on
Anyone planning a trip to Andrews State, Australia?
https://aus.pcn-channel.com/daniel-andrews-not-just-drunk-on-power-but-abusing-it/
“Ministers have, however, agreed to retain “several hundred” rooms in “quarantine” hotels in case restrictions have to be reimposed if a new variant emerges or there is a resurgence of COVID-19.”
What massive misunderstanding of the behaviour of a virus – after 20 months!
It’s nothing to do with the behaviour of a virus but everything to do with the behaviour of humans. SAGE have done very well with their psychological operation.
Everyone under control now.
So whats the point in descriminating against the unvaccinated if the vaccinated are just as likely to spread the virus as the unvaccinated?
Its like we’re living in some crazy version of the Mad Hatters Tea Party.
The ‘unvaccinated’ are not contributing to the coffers of the pharma giants, and that means everyone else on the lucrative gravy train is missing out. So, of course, they must be punished. They are very naughty children.
Plus they’ll keep contributing as their immune systems require top ups once they go subscription, otherwise they’ll have less than their unjabbed peers.
Yip, that is how I feel. Truth is lies and lies is truth, I’m sure I read that in a George Orwell book somewhere.
Of the 3711 mostly >60 year-old passengers on the Diamond Princess, only 712 were confirmed cases and 13 deaths, all in the elderly cohort. This on a cruise ship with the freely circulating SARS-COV-2 virus for a week before discovery. At this point, in February 2020, governments knew SARS-2 was no more dangerous than flu. Everything following this was a crime against humanity, and the worst one ever committed.
What? They’re not insisting on PCR tests anymore? Would have saved me a fortune!
Doesn’t that only apply to the “fully” “vaccinated”?
PCR tests for Day 2 and Day 8 for the ‘unvaccinated’ plus 10 days ‘quarantine’. LFT test required for the ‘vaccinated’. This is for entry to England.
And most other places
I have no sympathy for those who blindly follow a rule that imprisons them or costs them unnecessary money, all the time hundreds of illegal immigrants are being welcomed into this country without any precautions whatsoever and given homes, food etc at the taxpayer’s expense. We must have some incredibly stupid people in the UK who have more money than sense.
“We must have some incredibly stupid people in the UK who have more money than sense.”
This about sums it up:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VSPXzShsFT8
What about the unjabbed????
Bells round their necks to warn they are coming?
There is no rational basis for any discrimination against unvaccinated people anywhere for international travel, venues, or access to restaurants, cafes, sports, and other facilities. We know that vaxxed and unvaxxed alike catch and transmit the virus with equal facility. Discrimination against unvaccinated people is a bigoted unjustified highly destructive Crime Against Humanity, and we the Free People of Planet Earth guarantee that the perpetrators and principal collaborators of these discriminatory policies will definitely and inevitably be hunted down worldwide by heavily armed uniformed military and police, arrested, and brought to trial, in every jurisdiction worldwide – and if found guilty, they will receive sentences, including execution by hanging, as established by the Nuremberg Trials precedent.
You’re right, but the “heavily armed uniformed military and police” are getting their salaries from the other side.
The cabinet ministers surely see the charade taking place. How much longer will it be before one of them goes postal and spills the beans? The facts ignored, so much of our taxpayer money wasted, and gov’t mandates killing people. Who will be first to sing?
Not much incentive for them to sing. Who would back them? They’d be vilified and hounded, as will anyone with power who steps out of line. Every powerful institution on the planet is up to their necks in this.
Oh great! These contaminated and carcinogenic LFT nose swabs will kill these poor travelers off according to the earlier articles on Daily Sceptic and Trial Site. This is not a relaxation of the rules, but a death warrant.