• Login
  • Register
The Daily Sceptic
No Result
View All Result
  • Articles
  • About
  • Archive
    • ARCHIVE
    • NEWS ROUND-UPS
  • Podcasts
  • Newsletter
  • Premium
  • Donate
  • Log In
The Daily Sceptic
No Result
View All Result

NHS Forced to Spend Almost £65 Million to Make Ambulances Ulez Compliant

by Richard Eldred
19 November 2023 11:00 AM


The NHS has spent nearly £65 million to ensure hundreds of ambulances align with London Mayor Sadiq Khan’s Ulez scheme. The Mail has the story.

Under Ulez, drivers must pay £12.50 a day to drive in the capital if their vehicle fails to meet emissions standards.

It was expanded to cover the whole of Greater London in August.

Freedom of Information requests sent to NHS ambulance services in the South of England reveal the agreements made with Transport for London that exempt them from the expanded Ulez for a short period while their fleet is made compliant.

Each vehicle costs £140,000 to replace. The South East Coast Ambulance Service has until October 2025 to replace 279 vehicles. 

The London Ambulance Service said 27% of its frontline fleet is not compliant, so 255 vehicles need replacing.

The charge has also hit staff and patients travelling to hospitals in the zone in non-compliant vehicles.

Following the Uxbridge result, Labour leader Sir Keir Starmer said that Mr. Khan should “reflect” on Ulez due to the “impact it’s having on people”.

Tory chairman Richard Holden said: ”These revelations are shocking – even by Mayor Khan’s standards. 

“Taxing hardworking people to simply drive their cars was bad enough – but Mayor Khan hammering our NHS ambulance services with tens of millions of pounds of extra cost, just to do their job and get to patients to hospital is downright disgraceful.”

Worth reading in full.

Tags: Ambulance ServiceLondonNHSSadiq KhanTfLULEZ

Donate

We depend on your donations to keep this site going. Please give what you can.

Donate Today

Comment on this Article

You’ll need to set up an account to comment if you don’t already have one. We ask for a minimum donation of £5 if you'd like to make a comment or post in our Forums.

Sign Up
Previous Post

Why Were German Politicians So Eager to Vaccinate Children and Why Are They Lying About it Now?

Next Post

BBC ‘Hypocrisy’ Row as Reporter Racks up Air Miles to Criticise Global Emissions

Subscribe
Login
Notify of
Please log in to comment

To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.

Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.

15 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Bella Donna
Bella Donna
1 year ago

Every day this country becomes more and more absurd. What we need is to refuse to comply and that goes for the NHS too. Lets see how Londoners get on with no ambulances or tradesmen.

96
0
Smudger
Smudger
1 year ago
Reply to  Bella Donna

And what hypocrisy from Tory chairman Richard Holden – isn’t Mayor Khan zealously rolling out ULEZ to meet the Net Zero madness that his party imposed on the nation.

6
0
CircusSpot
CircusSpot
1 year ago

Any public service vehicle should be exempt and refuse to pay.

75
0
David101
David101
1 year ago
Reply to  CircusSpot

Exactly. What would happen, for instance, if a non-compliant emergency vehicle on call drove into ULEZ and the NHS refused to pay the consequent fine? In fact it may well be cheaper to do sod all about the current fleet and just rack up the charges or fines – cheaper than £65m!

Last edited 1 year ago by David101
45
0
soundofreason
soundofreason
1 year ago
Reply to  David101

This article is BS. If an ambulance costs £140,000 to replace then paying the £12.50 per day for a non-compliant vehicle it would take over 30 years to rack up the same cost. I do not believe ambulances have a service life of 30 years.

That said, emergency vehicles should remain exempt until they are replaced through obsolescence… Actually, screw the whole ULEZ scheme. It’s a disgrace.

Ah. Beaten to it by richardw53 below. https://dailysceptic.org/2023/11/19/nhs-forced-to-spend-almost-65-million-to-make-ambulances-ulez-compliant/#comment-918455

Last edited 1 year ago by soundofreason
27
0
varmint
varmint
1 year ago

Irony————The use of words to express the opposite of the literal meaning. ULEZ pretends to save people by impoverishing them and removing their perfectly good cars. It then forces the NHS to spend money on new ambulances instead of on them.

43
0
NeilParkin
NeilParkin
1 year ago

Many of the Public Sector (ie Council) vans I see have been replaced with electric over the last couple of years, despite them being twice the cost. Of course I suppose it to show us proles how we should be living our lives, but I guess the fleet costs have risen dramatically.

24
-1
huxleypiggles
huxleypiggles
1 year ago
Reply to  NeilParkin

And of course in order to make sure the public sector vehicle fleet is ULEZ compliant our taxes must rise to pay for all the upgrades. Smashing.

24
0
richardw53
richardw53
1 year ago

Would it not have been cheaper simply to pay the fines? Let’s be generous and say each ambulance costs only £125,000 to replace. That represents 10,000 daily ULEZ fines, or around 30 years worth. Longer than the life of an ambulance!

38
0
NeilParkin
NeilParkin
1 year ago
Reply to  richardw53

Emergency vehicles under blue light, don’t pay speeding fines, so why should this be any different. Not to waive these charges is immoral.

23
0
soundofreason
soundofreason
1 year ago
Reply to  NeilParkin

The whole ULEZ scheme is immoral.

Ultra: Beyond due limit. Extreme. Extremist. Beyond what is ordinary, proper or moderate.

From https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/ultra

19
0
David101
David101
1 year ago

So, let me get this straight: Hundreds of perfectly serviceable emergency vehicles, designed to save human lives, are now destined for the scrap heap in the name of a pie-in-the-sky fantasy that it will somehow make lives better for Londoners, because they are not “compliant”?
Not only are the NHS and the ambulance service, in acquiescing to this absurdly expensive programme, spending tens of millions of taxpayers money in weakening the service, they’re also throwing vast sums of money in assets down the toilet!

Surely nobody is going to vote this lunatic back into power. How dare he gamble with people’s lives in this way! Every penny spent in a direction other than improving services directly, like the scandalous “Diversity Equity and Inclusion” squandering of funds and now this ditching perfectly good ambulances, in both the short and long term makes people more likely to die. Simple as that.

47
-1
GroundhogDayAgain
GroundhogDayAgain
1 year ago
Reply to  David101

It’s surely greener not to replace vehicles every time the regulations change. My 20 year old Honda’s going strong and I’m not planning to replace it soon.

But I’m also not going to drive it into London any time soon, so perversely Khan partly wins. He’s still a git though.

17
0
GroundhogDayAgain
GroundhogDayAgain
1 year ago

£65 million of our taxes spent to satisfy Khan’s anti-human lust for power.

FIFY

22
0
johnbuk
johnbuk
1 year ago

Hey, come on everyone, it’s no good some poor patient being picked up by the ambulance only to die on the way to hospital breathing in pure poison from the exhaust pipe! The “addendum statement” to the original Imperial College report was quite clear how dangerous these vehicles are to mankind and how wonderful the ULEZ policy was in improving everyone’s lifespan by decades.
Give the Mayor a break!
The sooner everyone in London is required to wear full deep sea diving gear the better life will be.

0
0

NEWSLETTER

View today’s newsletter

To receive our latest news in the form of a daily email, enter your details here:

DONATE

PODCAST

In Episode 35 of the Sceptic: Andrew Doyle on Labour’s Grooming Gang Shame, Andrew Orlowski on the India-UK Trade Deal and Canada’s Ignored Covid Vaccine Injuries

by Richard Eldred
9 May 2025
1

LISTED ARTICLES

  • Trending
  • Comments
  • Latest

BBC Quietly Edits Question Time After Wrongly ‘Correcting’ Richard Tice on Key Net Zero Claim

9 May 2025

News Round-Up

9 May 2025

Electric Car Bursts into Flames on Driveway and Engulfs £550,000 Family Home

9 May 2025

What Does David Lammy Mean by a State?

9 May 2025

“I Was a Super Fit Cyclist Until I Had the Moderna Covid Vaccine. What Happened Next Left Me Wishing I Was Dead”

9 May 2025

News Round-Up

27

BBC Quietly Edits Question Time After Wrongly ‘Correcting’ Richard Tice on Key Net Zero Claim

22

Electric Car Bursts into Flames on Driveway and Engulfs £550,000 Family Home

20

The Sugar Tax Sums Up Our Descent into Technocratic Dystopia

26

What Does David Lammy Mean by a State?

13

News Round-Up

10 May 2025

BBC Quietly Edits Question Time After Wrongly ‘Correcting’ Richard Tice on Key Net Zero Claim

9 May 2025

Electric Car Bursts into Flames on Driveway and Engulfs £550,000 Family Home

9 May 2025

“I Was a Super Fit Cyclist Until I Had the Moderna Covid Vaccine. What Happened Next Left Me Wishing I Was Dead”

9 May 2025

Nature Paper Claims to Pin Liability for ‘Climate Damages’ on Oil Companies

9 May 2025

POSTS BY DATE

November 2023
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930  
« Oct   Dec »

SOCIAL LINKS

Free Speech Union
  • Home
  • About us
  • Donate
  • Privacy Policy

Facebook

  • X

Instagram

RSS

Subscribe to our newsletter

© Skeptics Ltd.

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password? Sign Up

Create New Account!

Fill the forms below to register

All fields are required. Log In

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
wpDiscuz
No Result
View All Result
  • Articles
  • About
  • Archive
    • ARCHIVE
    • NEWS ROUND-UPS
  • Podcasts
  • Newsletter
  • Premium
  • Donate
  • Log In

© Skeptics Ltd.

You are going to send email to

Move Comment
Perfecty
Do you wish to receive notifications of new articles?
Notifications preferences