• Login
  • Register
The Daily Sceptic
No Result
View All Result
  • Articles
  • About
  • Archive
    • ARCHIVE
    • NEWS ROUND-UPS
  • Podcasts
  • Newsletter
  • Premium
  • Donate
  • Log In
The Daily Sceptic
No Result
View All Result

I Was Cancelled by Laurence Fox Just Minutes Before he Got Cancelled

by Ian Rons
28 September 2023 5:00 PM

The knives are out for Laurence Fox and GB News, which makes what I have to say all the more difficult because I don’t want to give the impression I think he should be ‘cancelled’. For the record: Fox can be snarky and boorish, but I don’t think he should lose his job at GB News. He has an audience who clearly adore him, even if they might concede he’s been a bit of a pillock at times. An ‘interview without coffee’, and an acknowledgement that he should have dialled it down a bit, would seem to be sufficient.

But the problem is that when it comes to free speech, Laurence Fox is, in my opinion, a bit of a hypocrite. My reasons are as follows.

Back in May, I wrote a piece condemning Laurence’s friend Calvin Robinson and his prayer for peace, which I felt was merely an opportunity to demonise Ukraine. Instead of ‘turning the other cheek’ or issuing a coherent response, Calvin took a bizarre pop at the FSU; but then in a strange and misguided attempt at solidarity, Laurence Fox pulled out of Toby Young and Isabel Oakeshott’s Lockdown Files Live event. That’s water under the bridge, but it’s why I threw down the gauntlet to Laurence (and, separately, Calvin and James Delingpole) for a debate on the topic of Ukraine. James and Calvin both instantly declared me an uppity non-entity, entirely unworthy of sharing a platform with their majesties, but Laurence appeared to accept the challenge.

Skip forward a few months, and after some difficulty pinning Laurence down, the venue was set for Reclaim Party HQ this Wednesday, September 27th at 10.30am. So I took the train down to London and saw the Kyiv City Ballet (which I’m sure is very good if you like that kind of thing), before toddling off to my sister’s place for an impromptu Ulez strategy meeting. Then, at 8.52pm, Laurence’s PA informed me that he was cancelling due to vague “unforeseen circumstances”. He couldn’t quite manage a personal phone call or text. Note, this was before he’d made his inflammatory remarks about Ava Evans, let alone been suspended by GB News, so that can’t be an excuse.

This was very irritating, given I’d spent several days researching and preparing for the debate, including a two-hour tutorial with a friend, also of this parish, while at the same time giving Toby increasingly vague timelines for when I’d finish the IT work I was meant to be doing for the FSU. Given what had happened in the week prior, with a former member of the 14th Waffen Grenadier SS Division getting a round of applause from the Canadian Parliament during Zelenskyy’s visit, and a possible case of a war crime by a Ukrainian drone operator – both of which Laurence had tweeted about, and which I think some of the below-the-line commenters here would have enjoyed seeing me having to tackle – I had my work cut out for me, and I confess I was quite on edge. I’m a bit of an introvert, and have never wanted to put myself forward for public speaking before.

It was therefore quite a relief when Laurence cancelled, but extremely annoying nevertheless. Just a few minutes later, he was on GB News doing his best to cancel himself, too. And if we count his throwing of Dan Wootton under the cancel bus, that’s three in the space of 24 hours. In tweeting as in life, Lozza is nothing if not prolific, but I couldn’t help but think yesterday’s tweets about the preciousness of free speech and his attack on Mark Dolan as a “cos play freedom fighter” rang a little hollow (if not self-parodic), since whatever “unforeseen circumstances” had prevented him from debating me clearly hadn’t stopped him from a vigorous round of morning tweeting.

Freedom of speech is indeed precious, but talk is also cheap.

Tags: Calvin RobinsonCancel CultureGB NewsLaurence FoxUkraine

Donate

We depend on your donations to keep this site going. Please give what you can.

Donate Today

Comment on this Article

You’ll need to set up an account to comment if you don’t already have one. We ask for a minimum donation of £5 if you'd like to make a comment or post in our Forums.

Sign Up
Previous Post

MHRA Finally Admits it Failed to Test the Safety of Mass Manufactured Covid Vaccine Batches

Next Post

The Rise of the Groupthink Podcast

Subscribe
Login
Notify of
Please log in to comment

To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.

Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.

62 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
TheyLiveAndWeLockdown
TheyLiveAndWeLockdown
3 years ago

https://biblehub.com/luke/15-7.htm

3
0
Milo
Milo
3 years ago

I have already posted this but it bears repeating as it appears to have been missed.

The lockdown restrictions played a direct result in the deaths of two very vulnerable small children that the public know of (there may be others), because they were forced to live with their abusers, and their extended family who were concerned about them being abused were not allowed to visit them, indeed, I think they were actually warned off visiting by police officers because the visits would breach the lockdown rules. Workers from the social care sector were also unable to visit these children, and had they been attending school the abuse might have been detectable and these children might still be alive.

All this, while the PM and his staff held numerous parties in Downing St and other government buildings.

No idea how the inquiry would resolve this one, but I would like to see them at least be required to try.

52
0
Moist Von Lipwig
Moist Von Lipwig
3 years ago
Reply to  Milo

Yes, JRM, judging by his absurd pronouncements, is hoping the public won’t conclude that ‘partygate’ could have been avoided by not imposing lockdown in the first place.

4
0
rtj1211
rtj1211
3 years ago
Reply to  Moist Von Lipwig

Hedge Funds did absolutely fine during Lockdown. I doubt JRM would want the net wealth transfers from the poor to the rich to be quantitated as part of this Enquiry.

It would make for truly shameful reading.

1
-1
annicx
annicx
3 years ago
Reply to  rtj1211

What does that have to do with anything? Were they supposed to lose money deliberately? how would that have helped anyone?

0
0
Moist Von Lipwig
Moist Von Lipwig
3 years ago
Reply to  annicx

Yes, they were supposed to lose money, by implication, according to him.

0
0
Moist Von Lipwig
Moist Von Lipwig
3 years ago
Reply to  rtj1211

Of what relevance is that?

0
0
Jabby Mcstiff
Jabby Mcstiff
3 years ago

I have seen a drastic decline in the well being of people of all ages over the last few years especially the very old and very young. Huge cognitive decline in older people and a destruction of the emotional well-being of children. That’s what happens when all you care about is saving your own ass. Vera Britten wrote in Testament of Youth that one of the more subtle effects of war was to desensitise the soul to beauty. Calm simple fleeting evanescent joys that could be no more. This deadening tendency is in full operation now and can only accelerate. Like they say, all it takes for evil to flourish is for good people to do nothing.

38
0
rtj1211
rtj1211
3 years ago
Reply to  Jabby Mcstiff

Actually all that often happens to good people trying to confront evil is the total desensitisation of their souls to beauty. They have no idea how to fight psychopaths at their own game, you see….

It’s why most people are slow to anger, but when they rise, they make sure they don’t have to rise again for a very long time.

5
0
186NO
186NO
3 years ago
Reply to  rtj1211

Agreed

1
0
NeilofWatford
NeilofWatford
3 years ago

Why would they?
You can bet your house on the fact that right now, behind the scenes, the same people who inflicted this freedom grab on us are working to skew the inquiry.
I’ve taken a great deal of interest in how these people stole the US Presidential Election in 2020. The cover up from media, politicians, judges, lawyers, big corporations and NGOs has taken place on an industrial and breathtaking scale.
Dig in for the fight of your life and don’t take a backward step.

35
0
civilliberties
civilliberties
3 years ago
Reply to  NeilofWatford

“I’ve taken a great deal of interest in how these people stole the US Presidential Election in 2020”

Quite someting after two yrs the ny times finally says the hunter biden laptop is real.

19
0
realarthurdent
realarthurdent
3 years ago
Reply to  civilliberties

Joe Biden has evidently outlived his usefulness.

13
0
MrTea
MrTea
3 years ago
Reply to  realarthurdent

Rumour has it that the cabbagey piss smell is too much even for the Democrats.

2
0
John Dee
John Dee
3 years ago
Reply to  civilliberties

“When the hunter became the hunted…”

6
0
RedhotScot
RedhotScot
3 years ago
Reply to  civilliberties

Sadly, it’s utterly meaningless as the FBI have had the laptop for almost two years now and done nothing with it. There was also at least one copy made of the HD, by the repair shop owner as far as I’m aware, so where is it?

Will the critical details on the laptop go the way of Hilary’s emails? Or is there actually anything of concern on the laptop.

I’m not convinced even Hunter Biden would be stupid enough to hand a laptop over for repair with pornographic and potentially illegal photographs on it, or intimate details of illegal dealings with a foreign power implicating his father.

If the Biden’s and the FBI are as corrupt as people maintain, wouldn’t it have been more prudent to have the laptop repaired by someone from the FBI on the quiet?

7
0
DJ Dod
DJ Dod
3 years ago
Reply to  RedhotScot

I don’t think Hunter Biden is stupid, but I’m not sure that he was sober enough to worry about what was on the laptop when he dropped it off.

I’d recommend reading ‘Laptop from Hell’, by Miranda Devine, if you haven’t already.

Corruption seems to be a way of life for the Bidens. 10% for the Big Guy!

4
0
MrTea
MrTea
3 years ago
Reply to  RedhotScot

‘I’m not convinced even Hunter Biden would be stupid enough’

He is a crack head, they aren’t renound for their wisdom.

1
0
RedhotScot
RedhotScot
3 years ago
Reply to  MrTea

Know many crackheads do you?

0
-1
Cecil B
Cecil B
3 years ago

Repeat after me

THERE WAS NO PANDEMIC

32
0
Julian
Julian
3 years ago
Reply to  Cecil B

Yes, exactly this. Important as the harms to children are, it’s not where we should be starting. The starting point is that characterising COVID as an unprecedented emergency was utter nonsense, on its face. Once that is recognised, the whole house of cards collapses. Arguing about the detail is just a rabbit hole from which we will never emerge with the truth.

28
0
Alter Ego
Alter Ego
3 years ago
Reply to  Julian

Absolutely. Their excuse and their justification must be exposed and removed.

Otherwise all we will hear is, “Most regrettable of course – but because of the pandemic …”

11
0
huxleypiggles
huxleypiggles
3 years ago
Reply to  Alter Ego

“Lessons will be learned.”

5
0
John Dee
John Dee
3 years ago
Reply to  Cecil B

It was decidedly more a pan(dem)ic.

8
0
civilliberties
civilliberties
3 years ago

the states motto “we protect children until it doesn’t suit us”

this is why its laughable when the state says it wants protect children from harms yet subjects them to nearly two yrs which could be described as phycological torture, if the UN described Assanges solitary confinement as akin to “torture” then the messaging from the media, forced mask wearing and confinement to homes with potentially an abusive parent etc could be also described as such.

17
0
RedhotScot
RedhotScot
3 years ago
Reply to  civilliberties

It just contributes to a growing community of people who no longer have any trust in our government.

10
0
Hopeless - "TN,BN"
Hopeless - "TN,BN"
3 years ago

Yet again, anyone who has eyes, ears and a brain is going to be treated like a mug, with this preloaded, predestined and prearranged result inquiry. None of the real and important questions will be tabled, let alone discussed, with the effects on young people (not just children) being but one. Johnson will come out smelling of roses instead of horse manure, and the hangers-on like Whitty, Vallance, Ferguson and the rest of their gang will doubtless be lauded to the skies. I wouldn’t even be surprised to see a coat of whitewash on Hancock.

In short, the Establishment will close ranks, in hope of evasion, preferments, honours, money etc., whilst the public will, as usual, be treated like idiots or fractious children. It is corrupt beyond all imagining.

28
0
RedhotScot
RedhotScot
3 years ago
Reply to  Hopeless - "TN,BN"

I think the first question that should be asked, and answered is, who, specifically, gave the instruction to ignore the WHO’s pre pandemic planning advice that lockdowns are not an effective response.

By that thread the whole jumper begins to unravel.

Last edited 3 years ago by RedhotScot
15
0
MrTea
MrTea
3 years ago
Reply to  RedhotScot

As far as I’m aware SAGE were not advsing in favour of lockdowns until after Boris imposed one. So if the fat Turk was not being told to impose a lockdown by ‘The Science’ why did he do it?

5
0
RedhotScot
RedhotScot
3 years ago
Reply to  MrTea

All that needs to be evidentially established.

4
0
186NO
186NO
3 years ago
Reply to  MrTea

Ever heard of a bloke named Ferguson?

2
0
DevonBlueBoy
DevonBlueBoy
3 years ago
Reply to  RedhotScot

Even before that the lessons from Exercise Cygnet were swept under the carpet by the then Minister of Health – Hunt the Cnut

2
0
Jabby Mcstiff
Jabby Mcstiff
3 years ago

I don’t have a problem with naivete. We are all profoundly more naive than we imagine. But seriously. How can anyone with any awareness assume that a public enquiry is going to yield results that run contrary to the narrative. You only have to look at previous examples of such enquiries and we all know the framework in which this matter will be discussed. They don’t even pretend to have intellectual credibility anymore. That’s the point. They have decided that at this moment the corporations must assert direct rule openly: the going direct reset. Far more significant than the ‘great reset’.Just consider the power dynamics that are prevailing and you will have a complete understanding of where we are now.

14
0
Cecil B
Cecil B
3 years ago

Q Why did 20,000 flu deaths disappear?

A Because they stopped lying about flu and started lying about something else

24
0
Jabby Mcstiff
Jabby Mcstiff
3 years ago

There was subliminal messaging from the get-go: shut the fuck up yes we all know its fake but we all know that it is necessary too. I saw that straight away. And as the financial crisis saw no signs of resolution it was necessary to deepen the narrative.

10
0
Uncle Monty
Uncle Monty
3 years ago

I am the proud owner of that Bob Moran cartoon. I daresay it will become the go to source in GCSE History textbooks in 50
years time when the truth of the ‘pandemic’ finally emerges.

Last edited 3 years ago by Uncle Monty
19
0
Jabby Mcstiff
Jabby Mcstiff
3 years ago

Just sit back and watch the investors move from big pharma to the military industrial complex. Every step of the way they are stealing your labour and shoving it into their own pockets. How much more do you need for you to understand that you are living in slavery.

14
0
Cecil B
Cecil B
3 years ago

Why self isolation is not going to end anytime time soon in Wales
There is money to be made

Summary

The self-isolation support scheme is for workers who cannot work from home and must self-isolate. It is also for parents and carers with children who are self-isolating.
You must be working (employed or self-employed) to get the payment and need to claim within 21 days of your last day of self-isolation.
It should not affect any benefits you get.
Eligibility
You must have one of the following:

  • reported a positive lateral flow test (LFT) within 24 hours of the result
  • received a positive PCR test result
  • been advised by NHS Wales Test, Trace, Protect (TTP) to self-isolate.

If you receive notification to self-isolate via the NHS COVID-19 app, unless TTP advise you to self-isolate you will not be eligible.
Before the self-isolation period, you must also be:

  • employed or self-employed
  • unable to work from home, and will lose income as a result of self-isolation
  • receiving a payment of the following benefits:
  • Universal Credit
  • Working Tax Credit
  • Income-based Employment and Support Allowance
  • Income-based Jobseeker’s Allowance
  • Income Support
  • Housing Benefit
  • Pension Credit and/or

If you are not receiving one of the benefits you may still be eligible if it is determined you are facing financial hardship as a result of the loss of your income whilst self-isolating. An example of where an award could be made is where an individual has a net income of less than £500 a week
If your child has been told to self-isolateA parent or carer can also apply for a payment if their child has been formally told to self-isolate. You cannot get the payment if your child has been told to self-isolate by the NHS COVID-19 app.
To get the payment, they must attend school, further education or childcare (up to and including Year 11 or up to age 25 if they have complex needs) and have been formally told to self-isolate by NHS Wales Test, Trace, Protect service.
How to apply
Local authorities are receiving a lot of applications and this may mean your claim is delayed. To minimise delays ensure you provide all the information required to support your claim.

You can apply online through your local authority.
If you’re self-isolating because you’ve been identified as a contact by the NHS COVID-19 app, you’ll first need to register your details with the NHS Wales Test, Trace, Protect service before applying for a payment through your local authority website. Please note that if you are fully vaccinated you are not required to self-isolate as a contact unless instructed by TTP. Find out more information about how to apply through the COVID-19 app, on NHS COVID-19 app support.

2
0
TheGreenAcres
TheGreenAcres
3 years ago

What they did to children was indefensible, so no surprises they will seek to avoid scrutinising it.

9
0
Star
Star
3 years ago

That cartoon is rubbish. It should be parents who teach their children to read. Schools use “phonics”, also known as the best way to induce dyslexia. Strangely, many adults nowadays read very slowly, especially if they can’t move a finger along the written line.

Last edited 3 years ago by Star
3
-7
DevonBlueBoy
DevonBlueBoy
3 years ago
Reply to  Star

And that’s why it’s a bad idea to let parents teach their children. Parents know what they know and don’t know what they don’t know and haven’t received any training in pedagogics. Some while back I was a Community Governor at a local senior school and was the head of the disciplinary unit. A pupil was due to be excluded and her Father accompanied her to the final hearing. When the exclusion was confirmed his response was “It don’t matter, I’ll learn her” QED?

0
0
Jabby Mcstiff
Jabby Mcstiff
3 years ago

It won’t be hidden. A twenty point drop in IQ isn’t really something that can be hidden. They will mainain that it was necessary to flatten the curve. Whether we like it or not the baby boomer generation holds the reins of power and they are neither the brightest or the most astute or the most compassionate.There is no way to pay these children back because their psychospiritual development has been damaged forever.

10
-1
Catee
Catee
3 years ago

I’m sorry Will but none of the measures taken with regard to lockdowns, masks etc were proportionate in protecting the most vulnerable.

10
0
JohnK
JohnK
3 years ago
Reply to  Catee

They were, in reality, inappropriate. They were used to create an impression of “something being done”; not much more than that, at the best.

1
0
dearieme
dearieme
3 years ago

“It was right that our pandemic responses focused on protecting those most vulnerable to Covid.”

Golly, a blatant lie.

12
0
dearieme
dearieme
3 years ago

it’s good to see new voices joining the calls for the harms of lockdowns to be properly addressed

There did seem a severe shortage of scientists and medics speaking up when it might have done some good. Lack of backbone I assume?

8
0
rtj1211
rtj1211
3 years ago
Reply to  dearieme

Lack of a family pile big enough to ensure a comfortable existence after their career was trashed, perhaps?

1
0
JohnK
JohnK
3 years ago
Reply to  dearieme

Looking after their jobs in the future, perhaps.

0
0
realarthurdent
realarthurdent
3 years ago

We don’t want a Public Inquiry.

We want to find out what happened and why.

14
0
rtj1211
rtj1211
3 years ago
Reply to  realarthurdent

We do want a Public Enquiry.

We just want its Terms and Reference framed by the Public, the Enquiry co-ordinated by a skeptical, independent member of the General Public and witnesses required to testify under oath, with zero ability of any Government Department, including MI5 and MI6, GCHQ and the 77th Brigade, to use any excuse whatsoever to cover up one single fact.

We would also like the Inquiry to have the power to seize assets from those whose decisions were so financially calamitous to the honest majority that it is they who should shoulder the primary burden of debt repayment.

You know, people like the BMGF, Pfizer, Moderna, Chris Whitty, Jonathan Van Tam, Patrick Vallance, SAGE, Boris Johnson, Matthew Hancock, the entire management of the BBC, ITV, Channel 4, Sky News, all the management teams and owners of every major national newspaper, with particular regard to Piers Morgan.

3
0
MrTea
MrTea
3 years ago

There is zero chance of anything honest and meaningful being disclosed.
All the powerful people have massive vested interests in hiding the truth, not least so they can do it all again.

7
0
scaredmama
scaredmama
3 years ago

What we need is a real life Sam Vimes to walk into the government and arrest them. They need to be brought to trial for what they have done to our children.

5
0
rtj1211
rtj1211
3 years ago
Reply to  scaredmama

Maybe simpler to form an equivalent to the IRA targeting Covid criminals?

2
-1
DevonBlueBoy
DevonBlueBoy
3 years ago
Reply to  scaredmama

A real life Jack Reacher might be more effective

0
0
tom171uk
tom171uk
3 years ago

The outrageous and often puerile behaviour of the police during the pandemic should also be scrutinised. But it won’t.

9
0
rtj1211
rtj1211
3 years ago

The whole point of rigging the terms of reference of Public Enquiries is so that Governments and officials who need to be punished escape scott-free.

The time is now when the General Public determine the Terms of Reference for Public Enquiries, since it is they who have to pay for them.

Stop this criminal fraud of London upper middle class troughers scamming millions to produce whitewashes.

4
0
Marialta
Marialta
3 years ago

Children with special needs like my grandson who has cerebral palsy were dramatically affected by lockdown policies. Nurseries were supposed to stay open to provide for the ‘vulnerable’ children but our nursery manager decided otherwise claiming she had too few staff “because of Covid”. I blame the Nudge Unit that terrified these managers and brought out the worst in them. Every week we would ring asking when can he come back? It was a version of “ computer say no” and I’ve come across other private institutions like care homes with managers like this that ultimately are ‘jobsworths’and don’t try to find a solution.

2
0
DevonBlueBoy
DevonBlueBoy
3 years ago

And where were all these worthies when the totally unnecessary restrictions on kids were being implemented? Keeping their heads down and preserving their salary and benefits packages. Cowardly brastards.

2
0
jsampson1945
jsampson1945
3 years ago

Alternative public enquiry – by the public? It might be of some use rather than the establishment being judge and jury in its own case.

2
0
annicx
annicx
3 years ago

I think we’re being overly optimistic about the contents of this letter. Whilst it’s welcome that they are asking about the effects on children, they seem to accept that we had to lockdown and are more concerned about the earlier opening of hospitality venues. They need to take this one up with the pathetic teachers who refused to return when ordered to. Still no one ‘at the top’ seems to think there was anything actually wrong with locking down healthy people which is extremely worrying.

0
0
Grumman
Grumman
3 years ago

Not enough. It should include why we are vaccinating children from 5 and upwards, when it is clear from the manufacturers that the vaccines were for use on people 16 years and over, not 5years. The inquiry should investigate why the JCVI allowed this.

1
0

NEWSLETTER

View today’s newsletter

To receive our latest news in the form of a daily email, enter your details here:

DONATE

PODCAST

Episode 36 of the Sceptic: Karl Williams on Starmer’s Phoney Immigration Crackdown, Dan Hitchens on the Assisted Suicide Bill and Tom Jones on Reform’s Local Council Challenge

by Richard Eldred
16 May 2025
0

LISTED ARTICLES

  • Most Read
  • Most Commented
  • Editor’s Picks

Chinese ‘Kill Switches’ Found in US Solar Farms

15 May 2025
by Will Jones

News Round-Up

16 May 2025
by Richard Eldred

Spy Agency Report on the Alleged “Extremism” of AfD Turns Out to Be So Stupid That it Destroys all Momentum for Banning the Party

16 May 2025
by Eugyppius

The Folly of Solar – a Dot on the Horizon Versus a Blight on the Land

16 May 2025
by Ben Pile

Civil Servants Threaten to Strike Over Trans Ban in Women’s Lavatories

16 May 2025
by Will Jones

The Folly of Solar – a Dot on the Horizon Versus a Blight on the Land

29

Civil Servants Threaten to Strike Over Trans Ban in Women’s Lavatories

26

Spy Agency Report on the Alleged “Extremism” of AfD Turns Out to Be So Stupid That it Destroys all Momentum for Banning the Party

19

News Round-Up

18

Chinese ‘Kill Switches’ Found in US Solar Farms

27

Trump’s Lesson in Remedial Education

16 May 2025
by Dr James Allan

Spy Agency Report on the Alleged “Extremism” of AfD Turns Out to Be So Stupid That it Destroys all Momentum for Banning the Party

16 May 2025
by Eugyppius

The Folly of Solar – a Dot on the Horizon Versus a Blight on the Land

16 May 2025
by Ben Pile

Renaud Camus on the Destruction of Western Education

15 May 2025
by Dr Nicholas Tate

‘Why Can’t We Talk About This?’

15 May 2025
by Richard Eldred

POSTS BY DATE

September 2023
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
252627282930  
« Aug   Oct »

SOCIAL LINKS

Free Speech Union
  • Home
  • About us
  • Donate
  • Privacy Policy

Facebook

  • X

Instagram

RSS

Subscribe to our newsletter

© Skeptics Ltd.

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password? Sign Up

Create New Account!

Fill the forms below to register

All fields are required. Log In

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
No Result
View All Result
  • Articles
  • About
  • Archive
    • ARCHIVE
    • NEWS ROUND-UPS
  • Podcasts
  • Newsletter
  • Premium
  • Donate
  • Log In

© Skeptics Ltd.

wpDiscuz
You are going to send email to

Move Comment
Perfecty
Do you wish to receive notifications of new articles?
Notifications preferences