Last week a video went viral of West Yorkshire Police arresting a 16 year-old autistic girl for comparing a WPC to her “lesbian nana”. After widespread derision on social media, the constabulary later issued a statement saying the girl had been arrested “on suspicion of a homophobic public order offence”. Harry Miller, ex-policeman and founder of Fair Cop, tweeted: “This was a home invasion by an organised crime gang called West Yorkshire Police.” I had a nasty experience of my own on Saturday August 12th – not so traumatising, but nonetheless disturbing.
The incident occurred at a busy junction in Bexhill-on-Sea, where the ‘No to Northeye’ campaign has brought the community together in opposition to the Home Office’s plan to open a huge camp for 1,200 illegal migrants. But while the public overwhelmingly supports us, the authorities are not on our side. On Saturday, we experienced an unpleasant attitude from the two police officers present.
This was in stark contrast to previous rallies. We have praised officers for their good-natured and efficient policing, including stopping traffic as we marched through town. But on this occasion there was a group of about 15 counter-protestors, standing behind railings across from the roundabout we were on, waving insulting placards such as “Bexhill against racism” and “Don’t be racist dicks”. They appeared to be given more favourable treatment than us by the police.
I was standing with a placard, chatting to fellow members of our group, and facing away from the counter-protestors. We were receiving enthusiastic support from motorists, with a cacophony of horns (few tooted for the rival group). Three of the counter-protestors came over to the roundabout to engage with people on our side. Reasoned dialogue, however, is impossible with woke zealots. When I heard one of our ladies getting cross, I asked the two officers standing by why these counter-protestors were being allowed to cause aggravation.
The older officer took umbrage at me telling him how to do his job, although I had not been rude in any way. Ominously, he said: “I want a word with you afterwards.” I asked what it was about, and he pointed at my placard. This was homemade by a female member (it shouldn’t be relevant, but she is of Asian ethnicity), saying “Women’s Safety”. Quite a reasonable message, I felt, given the concerns of my wife and daughters. I was told that a woman passing by had complained that this was “offensive”.
When I asked the officer how the message of women’s safety could be construed as offensive, he explained that it suggests that all migrants are rapists. On asking whether I should put the placard down, I was told, “It’s your call.” But either the placard is lawful or not, I said. The officer replied that it was not him that found it offensive, but a member of the public. However, if he didn’t believe any law was being broken, why was he pursuing this?
I pointed to the “Don’t be racist dicks” banner across the road and asked why the officers did not see that as a problem. Nobody had complained, he said. So I said that I found it offensive. he didn’t like that.
Then more counter-protestors came over. I again suggested that the officers should keep the groups apart. Angrily, the older officer asked: “Under what law do you think I can tell these people not to stand in a public space?” With emphasis, he turned his body camera on. I calmly stated that I wasn’t suggesting they were breaking the law, but it would be sensible of the officers to simply keep the peace. I then returned to my place by the roadside. Illogically, the officer had raised the issue of my banner, even though it wasn’t illegal, but refused to do anything to stop the rival protestors harassing us because it wasn’t against the law.
Moments later, the lady who had made the placard relieved me of it, saying, “Let me hold this instead of you.” She warned me that she had overheard the officers talking about arresting me. What? I had not come anywhere near to committing a crime. But I understood the situation. I was being targeted, possibly because I had spoken at previous rallies and played a prominent role in the campaign. I was not willing to succumb to a ‘show arrest’.
In this atmosphere of intimidation, aware that the officers were watching me, I opted to leave. I later heard that the women’s safety placard was boldly on show after my departure, its inscriber bellowing out the message, unhindered. A heavy rain shower had chased the counter-protestors off in their minibus, with the police officers reverting to their usual friendlier attitude afterwards.
It seems to me that this was politicised policing with an ‘on’ and ‘off’ switch. But whatever the motive or orders, I’d say to the officers involved, if you think women’s safety is offensive, you’re in the wrong job.
Dr. Niall McCrae is a registered nurse who was on the editorial board member of Journal of Advanced Nursing.
To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.
Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.
Michael Gove – Mr Scotch Egg. Something of the night about that bloke.
I always think of something slightly green and yellow hacked up and spat out when I hear the name Gove….
Shortly before masks were made mandatory he said they wouldn’t be
And Zahawi said vaccine passports are….”not the British way”, before introducing them in Nightclubs. He also told a woman concerned about an adverse reaction she had to “get the booster”….He is an utter scumbag!
He is is good company.
It’s called The Spectator.
Add to the carbon tax which is applied to businesses and passed on to consumers.
These taxes are Pigou Taxes designed to change behaviour.
Use less of everything.
I tend to think that taxation should be limited to a series of mechanisms that enable the cost of providing non-excludable services that make sense for a state to provide – defending our borders for instance (lol). I don’t know when they started to be a social control mechanism. Sadly that now seems to be accepted as legitimate.
It won’t change until we have a government that forces people to take responsibility for their lives and not expect the government to mollycoddle them.
I hope things will swing back to that, just maybe not in our lifetimes.
I think life is ultimately better for people if they try to be as self sufficient as possible.
Whoever wrote the headline must be guessing. In the real world, it’s likely that the trade will change things to mitigate the extra costs in various ways, ranging from smaller containers (inflationary for the consumers), or at the other end of the scale, larger ones might be more efficient (higher off the shelf costs, but lower unit prices for the customer). If they’re clever they might take the opportunity to increase the profit margin at the same time across the store. After all, selling a kilo of carrots in a plastic bag for 10p at Morrisons the otter day wasn’t a charity donation!
However it’s handled it won’t be good for consumers or for the economy. If firms absorb the cost it will affect their profits which will hurt people who have shares in those firms, a lot of those shares will be owned by pension funds, or firms will employ fewer people or pay them less or cut corners in some other way. That’s socialism for you!
This tax is not intended to be good for consumers or the economy which is precisely why Kneel is introducing it. Furthermore, as this is being introduced at the start of the year I suspect it is in effect a marker outlaying what is to come through the rest of the year. Kneel and his bosses are not messing about, they fully intend to bankrupt the country in 2025. People need to wake up. This government is openly committing treason against the population and they will not give up until they are made to. Sadly, I do not believe peaceful discussion will suffice, we are long past that point. It is us or them.
But they want to get us to Stakeholder Capitalism by 2030, part (or most) of the Great Reset. When most people who think of the Reset (those that don’t think it’s all a conspiracy) they think Agenda 2030 on steroids. Green everything, but forget the Stakeholder aspect.
Vobes did a good interview in Stakeholder Capitalism
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QspdOcEwa3s
Sadly most people have bought into these ideas. It’s quite common for people to think of “evil” and “capitalist” in the same sentence.
However it works out it is economically illiterate and morally reprehensible.
I used to get shopping bags for free, which would be used as rubbish bags. Then, when they introduced the bag tax, I happily paid because I found the bags useful, but they decided my bags were killing sea life (even though I live in the middle of the country), so they stopped selling them and now I have to pay for bin liners, so still throw away a plastic bag, only now the money goes to the supermarket rather than charity, as it did for the plastic bag charge. Now I will have to put my raw meat and unwrapped fruit and vegetables into the supermarket trolley, where, no doubt, some delightful child will have been stood with their grimy shoes prior to me using the trolley. The food will have a much shorter shelf life, creating more waste. Surely public health and waste reduction must take priority over this lunacy.
Public Health is not a consideration of Kneel and Co, well except in as much as it can be ruined – physical and mental.
The sooner a householder dies, the sooner another immigrant scumbag can be given a home.
Jim Dale on TV now sat under an air conditioning unit. Wanker
Oh and if that electrical item with an opening and closing flap underneath it that looks like every air conditioning unit in every office I have worked in, is not by some chance an air conditioning unit but is some clever heat exchanger and energy saver, I humbly apologise for maligning Mr Dale and reducing any high esteem that people may have held him in before my comment.
Glad I am watching the football and not that ignorant twat, Dim Dale.
And there was Rachel from Accounts bleating nonsense about her actions having pushed up inflation and along comes something else to keep it rising steadily. It may seem wrong but I am now hoping to see the UK in recession to cause the Student Union government to melt down.
These inflationary pressures don’t just force up prices but they lead to food being produced with cheaper and cheaper costs and this is more serious in some ways. For one thing it is hidden and it is also likely to lead to food becoming less healthy and nutritious. And the quality wasn’t too good to begin with. Maybe they won’t have four people fighting over a bag of flour. They will just adulterate and cheapen it to such an extent that all four plebs still feel satisfied even as their life essence is being drained away.
Old films will remind them how far their society has fallen, unless they ban them too.
The Uni-Party: deliberately making poor people even poorer ….. at the behest of, and to suit, the mega-wealthy.