177361
  • Log in
The Daily Sceptic
No Result
View All Result
  • Articles
  • About
  • Archive
    • ARCHIVE
    • NEWS ROUND-UPS
  • Forum
  • Donate
  • Newsletter
The Daily Sceptic
No Result
View All Result

The Two Changes MHRA Should Make so That Medicines Are Actually Safe

by Nick Hunt
8 July 2023 11:00 AM

I am one of the authors of the Perseus Report. In the House of Commons last week we presented the report to the Covid Vaccine Damage All-Party Parliamentary Group (APPG) at the invitation of Sir Christopher Chope MP.  While we were waiting to go in, I was asked, “If you were in charge of the MHRA, what one thing would you change to stop the Covid vaccine debacle happening again?”

Good question. The Perseus Report documented a whole range of MHRA’s regulatory failures, so what to pick? I thought I’d share my answer – you never know, someone in a position of power over MHRA might actually read this!

Actually, I gave myself the liberty of picking two, not one. Because I think that, together, they would at least provide a safety net which currently doesn’t exist.

First, for every medicine at the point of licensing, MHRA should be required to predetermine the rate of tolerable fatal and serious adverse events (SAEs) for that particular medicine. Other safety-critical sectors do it. If the actual rate of SAEs in practice exceeds that threshold, use of that medicine has to be suspended pending detailed review. Again, that’s how other safety-critical sectors do it. What’s MHRA’s excuse?

The MHRA will say it’s difficult – we don’t know how many administrations of each medicine there are. Well, set up a process so that you do know – it’s important.

Then its officials may say that it can be dangerous to stop certain medicines once someone is taking them. So, continue existing prescriptions (with the informed consent of the patient) but suspend new prescriptions.

They may say, “We’ll never get the manufacturer to agree a figure”.  Who cares what the manufacturer thinks – you’re the watchdog (oops, I forgot, you’re an ‘enabler’ now).

They might say, “But that will possibly mean repeated stop-starts, and public confidence will suffer”. Au contraire, MHRA. If I read it correctly, the Covid vaccine saga has already significantly reduced the confidence of a large proportion of the public and they’d actually be relieved that MHRA had finally got a grip.

But, MHRA people may say, the NHS would end up with stocks of unusable drugs.  Oh dear – is that more important than continuing with unsafe drugs? Get a refund from the manufacturer.

Then they’d say, aha, it’s not just about risk, there’s benefit to consider, too. Okay, so have a predetermined benefit-risk ratio for each medicine – either instead of, or as well as, the tolerable rate of SAEs. Indeed, MHRA is fond of saying “the benefit outweighs the risk” – well then, define it quantitatively at the point of licensing. Then when potential problems emerge, we all know where we are instead of MHRA just insisting that the benefit outweighs the risk without actually quantifying it.

They’ll probably think of of other reasons I haven’t thought of but I’m confident there’ll be answers to all of them. All I know is that it’s shocking that the MHRA (and other regulators) been allowed to get away on this issue for so long.

The second essential change I’d make is to introduce personal delegations of safety to individuals in MHRA. People who are suitably qualified, experienced and trained should have personal responsibility for signing off a medicine as safe and retaining responsibility for decisions if and when problems arise in practice. In contrast, people in MHRA assess medicines for licensing in groups and they decide in groups what action to take in response to subsequent problems. No-one takes personal responsibility. When problems do occur, I picture them all looking at each other and saying, “Oh dear, perhaps we should wait for a bit more data”. “Yes, good idea, let’s commission some research.” In my job, I had a personal letter of safety delegation. I signed the licence declaring explosive items safe for the Armed Forces to use. I felt like I would end up in court if I got it wrong. I once had to ground a fleet of one aircraft type. I had to introduce limitations on use pending investigation. I had to raise the red card with one weapon system when the Generals shouted me down: “We’re in the middle of a war”. I invited them to take responsibility (in writing) for continuing. They declined.

Safety management isn’t rocket science. In all honesty, it’s beyond me why these two features, which are considered best practice in all other safety-critical sectors, aren’t already in use in medicine safety.

Until Nick retired a few years ago, he was a Senior Civil Servant in the Ministry of Defence responsible for the safety and effectiveness of ammunition used by the Armed Forces. He is co-author of the Perseus Group report on U.K. drugs regulator the MHRA.

Stop Press: The Perseus Group Twitter account @perseusgroup_ and Nick’s account @nickhunt5 were both blocked yesterday by the MHRA @MHRAgovuk. Was it something they said?

Tags: Christopher ChopeCovid Vaccine Damage APPGCOVID-19MHRASafetySide effectsVaccine

Donate

We depend on your donations to keep this site going. Please give what you can.

Donate Today

Comment on this Article

You’ll need to set up an account to comment if you don’t already have one. We ask for a minimum donation of £5 if you'd like to make a comment or post in our Forums.

Sign Up
Previous Post

Refusing to Fund Your Partner’s Gender Transition is Domestic Abuse, Says Crown Prosecution Service

Next Post

Sadiq Khan Has “No Choice” But to Extend Ulez, Says Backtracking Keir Starmer

Subscribe
Login
Notify of
Please log in to comment

Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.

13 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

NEWSLETTER

View today’s newsletter

To receive our latest news in the form of a daily email, enter your details here:

 

DONATE

PODCAST

Nick Dixon and Toby Young Talk About the Fall of Russell Brand, the BBC’s Trans Rights Activism and Graham Linehan Topping the Bestseller List

by Will Jones
19 September 2023
10

LISTED ARTICLES

  • Most Read
  • Most Commented
  • Editors Picks

Lucy Letby Must Be Allowed an Appeal

11 September 2023
by Dr David Livermore

Canadian Parliament Gives Standing Ovation to Man Who Served in Waffen SS

24 September 2023
by Noah Carl

Heart Failure Deaths in 2023 Up 26% on Pre-Pandemic Levels, Data Show

24 September 2023
by Nick Rendell

News Round-Up

24 September 2023
by Will Jones

Football Focus in Peril as Viewing Figures Plummet Following Replacement of Dan Walker With Alex Scott

23 September 2023
by Will Jones

News Round-Up

78

U.K. Health Security Agency Head: We’ll Behave More Like Sweden When the Next Pandemic Hits

38

Heart Failure Deaths in 2023 Up 26% on Pre-Pandemic Levels, Data Show

36

Members of England Ladies’ Angling Team Refuse to Compete in World Championships After Team Picks Trans ‘Woman’ Who Used to Be a Rugby Player

34

MPs Who Believe ‘Women Have a Penis’ Will Be Named and Shamed Ahead of General Election

25

Canadian Parliament Gives Standing Ovation to Man Who Served in Waffen SS

24 September 2023
by Noah Carl

Heart Failure Deaths in 2023 Up 26% on Pre-Pandemic Levels, Data Show

24 September 2023
by Nick Rendell

German Whistleblower Finds DNA Contamination Up To 354 Times Recommended Limit in BioNTech-Pfizer Vaccine

23 September 2023
by Robert Kogon

Decades of Mismanagement Are Dooming Britain to Decline

22 September 2023
by Dr Angus Dalgleish

The Measles Scaremongering Doesn’t Stand Up to Scrutiny

22 September 2023
by Dr Ros Jones

POSTS BY DATE

July 2023
M T W T F S S
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31  
« Jun   Aug »

SOCIAL LINKS

Free Speech Union
  • Home
  • About us
  • Donate
  • Privacy Policy

Facebook

Twitter

Instagram

RSS

Subscribe to our newsletter

© Skeptics Ltd.

No Result
View All Result
  • Articles
  • About
  • Archive
    • ARCHIVE
    • NEWS ROUND-UPS
  • Forum
  • Donate
  • Newsletter

© Skeptics Ltd.

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Create New Account!

Please note: To be able to comment on our articles you'll need to be a registered donor

Already have an account?
Please click here to login Log In

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
wpDiscuz
You are going to send email to

Move Comment