• Login
  • Register
The Daily Sceptic
No Result
View All Result
  • Articles
  • About
  • Archive
    • ARCHIVE
    • NEWS ROUND-UPS
  • Podcasts
  • Newsletter
  • Premium
  • Donate
  • Log In
The Daily Sceptic
No Result
View All Result

Countering Censorship With Free Speech and Facts

by Dr Carl Heneghan and Dr Tom Jefferson
25 May 2023 9:00 AM

At the centre of democracy is free speech. But everywhere you look it is under attack. There has been a surge in concerns about the creeping censorship that fills the airwaves and the increasing suppression on various media platforms.

Our work has been targeted by those who aim to silence and limit our right to free speech. Therefore, we consider it vital to understand the tactics of censorship to exercise your right to freedom of expression and contribute to the fight for free speech.

The Instant Emotional Outburst  

This usually is an abusive attack that uses swear words (‘you stupid asshole‘) or seeks to defame you somehow: you’re a murderer, you have blood on your hands. It typically is an instantaneous reaction that seeks to shut down the debate immediately. Everyone should know you’re such a bad person, and therefore equally, your opinions are …..

We find this strategy impossible to engage with and should be ignored.     

The Labelling Technique 

This will pigeonhole you as an ‘anti’ something, a ‘phobic’ or an ‘-ist’. It may paint you as a Right-winger or a Left-winger. The aim is to put you in your place: you’re someone with a fixed ideology and, consequently, a terrible person. Therefore, your views aren’t worth engaging with. This is a common tactic as it doesn’t address the message you portray but instead attacks you, the messenger. 

It’s a tactic that academics often use: Jeremy Farrar used it in his book. Somehow there are “serious scientists”, and therefore there are those that lack the ability to be serious.

As a strategy, it is impossible to deal with and is a certain ender of debate. However, when this happens, it generally means you are on the right track, so don’t be fazed by these disturbing actions; it shows the attacker has lost his way and cannot formulate a coherent argument; he has run out of options. 

The Takedown 

Increasingly this is the tactic of social media sites. Driven by certain positions that suit the status quo or the government of the day, you’ll be removed from social media sites such as Twitter or Facebook. Or your message will come with a warning.

Often underpinned by fact-checking sites, this strategy requires action to overcome any ban. We think it is necessary to regulate such sites if they act like news outlets. While the latter have editorial controls, the former should be clear about the process of what it should and shouldn’t allow and how it deals with disputes.  

We also learned some politicians favour this tactic. For example, the Lockdown Files based on Leaked WhatsApp messages showed that attacks were partly orchestrated by Matt Hancock, who harnessed the full power of the state to silence ‘dissenters’. As far as Hancock was concerned, anyone who fundamentally disagreed with his approach was mad and dangerous and needed to be shut down.

One of the answers is to create multiple channels for your outlets, and increasingly, we’re finding Substack a valuable outlet for explainers about the problems. 

The Undermining Publication.

While the emotional outburst, the labelling and the takedown undermine your credibility, a fourth approach is to produce a website or a publication that seeks to destroy your reputation. 

In January 2021, a website called ‘Anti-Virus: The Covid-19 FAQ’ was created by a group unknown to us, including a sitting MP. Its sole purpose was to debunk messages that disagreed with mainstream Government policies — the website list “myths” about Covid and names “sceptics”, including us. If you click on names, you will be introduced to a series of capital charges against us. We were no longer evidence-based if we questioned the evidence for policies such as the Rule of Six.

The website was “dedicated to debunking common Covid Sceptic arguments and highlighting the track record of some of the most influential and consistently-wrong Covid Sceptics”.

However, the truth will emerge over the long term, and the proponents of such sites will end up wishing they had never embarked on such a foolhardy strategy. 

But beware of being called out for making an error. Undertaking research is fraught with dangers; mistakes are common and can occur at all stages, even at the point of publication. An overzealous editor can change one word, and the whole meaning of your text can go out the window. Of course, mistakes made should be acknowledged and corrected. But beware of the censorship zealots who will seek to taint all your work going forward as error-strewn.

The complaints

An insidious approach that seeks to get your boss and your organisation to shut you up. The complainant hasn’t got the means or the argument to take you on directly. Instead, he or she goes behind your back, puts you and your family under pressure, and, in some circumstances, threatens your livelihood. In doing so, he accepts his inability to debate and discuss the issues directly. 

However, sometimes they will also make a big deal over the investigation. Your work is tainted because the organisation deems you worthy of an investigation. The vast majority of complaints are disagreements, but organisations seem ill-equipped to tell the difference between a valid complaint and someone employing the tactics of censorship and suppression. 

Editorial Bias

We have increasingly seen several journals and news outlets take a particular stance and only report or accept articles based on their ideological views. Unfortunately, nothing can be done to counter this problem; however, it is worth understanding those outlets that take such fixed views. Beware of those that seek to slander you editorially. 

We’ve been surprised by some of the medical journals’ one-sided approaches – including the commissioning of biased and Teflon editorials and the deviation from usual editorial processes that seek to undermine the research output. Teflon is when the uncomfortable message cannot stick to you, the editor, because you are hiding behind an editorial undermining the research you do not like. In fact, with Teflon, nothing sticks.

Some editors cannot withstand the pressure of the social media posse, who circle their prey like vultures. The worst thing an editor can do is give in to these bullies: unelected, relentless and often overnight experts. Give in once to the posse, and you may perish, or even worse, you might find your work retracted. Be ready for the onslaught and prepare well. In your fightback, take the emotion out of your responses and turn to the evidence. 

But beware of those editors who choose peer reviewers to support their one-sided views using anonymous attacks to suppress research outputs that don’t meet their predetermined opinions. Ultimately though, it will be to their discredit as they should be built on impartiality and fairness: it’s fair to say that journals have had a lousy pandemic. However, there’s little to do here but move on to the next journal; there’s plenty of them. 

Comments Cartel

This is a brilliant tactic. It consists of an organised onslaught on a piece of published research work. You can see this in the comments to A122. The underlying message is that the research is unsound because so many people post negative comments; hence, science is democratic, and the Noes have it, which is nonsense. We recommend databasing the addresses of the senders if they exist and checking the text for style patterns, as most of the comments are repetitions passed along from one member of the cartel to the next.

It’s worth reminding yourself of some laws that protect you if you decide to speak out.

The 1986 Education Act (No.2) states: “Persons concerned in the Government of any establishment… shall take such steps as are reasonably practicable to ensure that freedom of speech within the law is secured for members, students and employees of the establishment and for visiting speakers.” The 1988 Education Reform Act references the right of U.K. academics “to question and test received wisdom and to put forward new ideas and controversial or unpopular opinions without placing themselves in jeopardy of losing their jobs or the privileges they may have at their institution”. The European Convention on Human Rights Article 10 states that “protection extends to the expression of views that may shock, disturb or offend the deeply held beliefs of others”. UNESCO’s 1997 Recommendation concerning the Status of Higher-Education Teaching Personnel states that institutions should be accountable for effectively supporting academic freedom and fundamental human rights.

It comes down to this: no single idea or belief should be privileged. Everyone has the right to freedom of expression. If we elicit an emotional response or find that folk disagree or are disappointed by our answers, we have done our job. However, emotions that lead to the tactics of suppression and censorship fail to engage critically with the issues of the day. 

Reflecting uncertainty is a central tenet of free speech. However, the current pursuit of truth is a path filled with hazards. Learning to approach matters of debate critically and with confidence will ensure our democratic values remain intact.

Dr. Carl Heneghan is the Oxford Professor of Evidence Based Medicine and Dr. Tom Jefferson is an epidemiologist based in Rome who works with Professor Heneghan on the Cochrane Collaboration. This article was first published on their Substack blog, Trust The Evidence, which you can subscribe to here.

Tags: CensorshipCOVID-19Face MasksFree SpeechThe Science

Donate

We depend on your donations to keep this site going. Please give what you can.

Donate Today

Comment on this Article

You’ll need to set up an account to comment if you don’t already have one. We ask for a minimum donation of £5 if you'd like to make a comment or post in our Forums.

Sign Up
Previous Post

Why the Government is Right to Scrap Visas For Dependants of Foreign Postgraduates

Next Post

France Bans Short-Haul Flights to Tackle Climate Change

Subscribe
Login
Notify of
Please log in to comment

To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.

Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.

16 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
bOrgkilLaH1of7
bOrgkilLaH1of7
3 years ago

First they came for the anti-lockdown protesters, and I did not speak out – because I was not a lockdown protester…

Then they came for the unvaccinated, and I did not speak out – because I was vaccinated…

Then they came for booster refuseniks, and I did not speak out – because I was a booster shot taker…

Then they came for me – and there was no one left to speak for me.

Untitled-3 (3).jpg
51
-2
Lockdown Sceptic
Lockdown Sceptic
3 years ago
Reply to  bOrgkilLaH1of7

SOUTHWEST CAVES! Cancels Plan to Put Unvaxxed on Unpaid Leave!!!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P4EV_dOFGA8

https://s.w.org/images/core/emoji/13.1.0/svg/1f388.svgFriday 22nd October 11am https://s.w.org/images/core/emoji/13.1.0/svg/1f388.svg
Yellow Boards Event – Stand by the Road
Tesco Superstore
17 County Ln, Warfield, Bracknell RG42 3JP

https://s.w.org/images/core/emoji/13.1.0/svg/1f388.svgSaturday 30th October 2pm https://s.w.org/images/core/emoji/13.1.0/svg/1f388.svg
SPECIAL STAND IN THE PARK WINDSOR with Yellow Boards 
Alexander Park (near Bandstand) Stand in the Park
Barry Rd/Goswell Rd 
Windsor SL4 1QY
Meet in the Park 2pm followed by walk to 
Stand in the Town Centre By the Castle
About 2 hours in total.

https://s.w.org/images/core/emoji/13.1.0/svg/2764.svg Stand in the Park https://s.w.org/images/core/emoji/13.1.0/svg/2764.svgMake friends – keep sane – talk freedom and have a laugh
Wokingham Stand in the Park Howard Palmer Gardens RG40 2HD Sundays 10am
behind the Cockpit Path car park in the centre of the town 

         Telegram http://t.me/astandintheparkbracknell

13
-2
Lockdown Sceptic
Lockdown Sceptic
3 years ago
Reply to  bOrgkilLaH1of7

I met this lady outside Parliament yesterday. She is only the side of good. We all know who is only the side of evil

SOUTHWEST CAVES! Cancels Plan to Put Unvaxxed on Unpaid Leave!!!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P4EV_dOFGA8

Friday 22nd October 11am
Yellow Boards Event – Stand by the Road
Tesco Superstore
17 County Ln, Warfield, Bracknell RG42 3JP

Saturday 30th October 2pm
SPECIAL STAND IN THE PARK WINDSOR with Yellow Boards 
Alexander Park (near Bandstand) Stand in the Park
Barry Rd/Goswell Rd 
Windsor SL4 1QY
Meet in the Park 2pm followed by walk to 
Stand in the Town Centre By the Castle
About 2 hours in total.

Stand in the Park
Make friends – keep sane – talk freedom and have a laugh
Wokingham Stand in the Park Howard Palmer Gardens RG40 2HD Sundays 10am
behind the Cockpit Path car park in the centre of the town 

         Telegram http://t.me/astandintheparkbracknell

Last edited 3 years ago by Lockdown Sceptic
19
-3
TC
TC
3 years ago

Good cause.
Help someone who stands firm.
Pledge made.

31
-1
James Kreis
James Kreis
3 years ago

“Evil triumphs when good men and women do nothing”.

She is one of a number of selfless heros who deserve our praise and support.

37
-1
Paul B
Paul B
3 years ago
Reply to  James Kreis

Who’s the quote by?

1
0
eastender53
eastender53
3 years ago
Reply to  Paul B

It’s a popular misquote, probably an adaptstion of this from Edmund Burke.

“When bad men combine, the good must associate; else they will fall, one by one, an unpitied sacrifice in a contemptible struggle.”

It makes a good point though. If we do nothing, evil will prevail.

3
0
Teddy Edward
Teddy Edward
3 years ago

Looks fake as fuck!

3
-38
TruthHurts2077
TruthHurts2077
3 years ago
Reply to  Teddy Edward

Debbie Hicks is 33 in numerology. Could be a freemason.

2
-22
Nearhorburian
Nearhorburian
3 years ago
Reply to  Teddy Edward

Absolutely.

There’s no way at least three police officers would be involved in arresting her when there’s so much violent crime happening, and the idea that British Bobbies would wear masks to hide their identities is laughable.

20
0
Phil Shannon
Phil Shannon
3 years ago
Reply to  Nearhorburian

Only three rozzers!? Your British cops aren’t trying hard enough. See Victoria’s finest showing how it should be done. And there’s plenty more where that came from in the Victorian franchise of the Little Covid Shop of Lockdown Horrors

victoria-police-covid-beach.jpg
7
0
Mr Taxpayer
Mr Taxpayer
3 years ago

She should have glued herself to the M25.

19
0
Julian
Julian
3 years ago

Glad to see DS making a contribution to this

20
-2
Think Harder
Think Harder
3 years ago

Out of interest. How did she keep getting arrested at protests, was she pushing herself forward or was she being targeted?

8
-1
Think Harder
Think Harder
3 years ago

These controversial crowd funding things need an anonymous way to contribute. At some point in the future they will grab all the data and hunt us down. I’d suggest using Bitcoin and not requiring identifying details. That should make it a lot harder to come after people.

8
-1
milesahead
milesahead
3 years ago
Reply to  Think Harder

If they win, they’ll be hunting us down, anyway.

12
-1
NeilofWatford
NeilofWatford
3 years ago

Done!
Keep up the great work folks.
Also, let’s all boycott any and every event or venue that demands the NHS app or a test result.

14
-1
Anti_socialist
Anti_socialist
3 years ago

Why is it Lawyers never do anything for free?

I have to say I didn’t agree with her hospital filming stunt.

1
-21
tom171uk
tom171uk
3 years ago
Reply to  Anti_socialist

To be fair, some do. (Not many)

3
0
Anti_socialist
Anti_socialist
3 years ago
Reply to  Anti_socialist

At least 2 Hypocrites liked her stunt. You claim its an intrusion & discrimination if some asks your excuse for not wearing a mask, but think nothing of abusing sick people’s privacy wondering around hospitals with a camera.

She literally filmed herself braking the law, then published the evidence on social media. Save your money, she’s got no defence & no chance.

1
-27
Aleajactaest
Aleajactaest
3 years ago
Reply to  Anti_socialist

Looks like the 77th can’t find people who can spell.

13
-1
tom171uk
tom171uk
3 years ago

Clearly we are becoming a police state. She is heading for a show trial.

15
0
BillRiceJr
BillRiceJr
3 years ago

I’d like to learn more about her “crime” of filming an empty hospital ward.

I thought about going to my local hospital in the first lockdowns and trying to do the same thing, but I didn’t have the guts. She did.

Many of these hospitals were as empty as they have ever been in the fist six or so months of the lockdowns.

Even today, it would be interesting to see who is really being treated, what ages and what medial conditions they are being treated for.

It’s quite convenient that the hospitals have been off limits to journalists or citizen journalists for almost all of this pandemic.

27
0
Nessimmersion
Nessimmersion
3 years ago
Reply to  BillRiceJr

The hospitals that we have all paid tax for over the years so should be entitled to walk round at any time.

12
-1
Careful Reader
Careful Reader
3 years ago

Pledge made.

9
0
TheBluePill
TheBluePill
3 years ago

Pledge made. The amount pledged has doubled today, thanks DS for raising this.

11
0

NEWSLETTER

View today’s newsletter

To receive our latest news in the form of a daily email, enter your details here:

DONATE

PODCAST

The Sceptic | Episode 46: Ofcom’s Ill-Fated Imperialism, One Year of Two-Tier Keir and Phoney Green Jobs

by Richard Eldred
1 August 2025
3

LISTED ARTICLES

  • Most Read
  • Most Commented
  • Editor’s Picks

News Round-Up

7 August 2025
by Toby Young

‘Vigilante’ Force to Begin Patrols in Crime-Hit Bournemouth

7 August 2025
by Will Jones

Homelessness Minister Threw Out Her Tenants – Then Increased Rent by £700 a Month

7 August 2025
by Will Jones

Ten Awful Covid Studies Funded by Taxpayers

7 August 2025
by Charlotte Gill

The Return of the Unfashionable Gods

7 August 2025
by Michael Rainsborough

News Round-Up

46

Spanish Town Bans Muslim Religious Festivals After Nearby Town Was Rocked by Riots

35

How Have We Ended Up Paying For Everything While Doing All the Work Ourselves?

38

‘Vigilante’ Force to Begin Patrols in Crime-Hit Bournemouth

23

Ten Awful Covid Studies Funded by Taxpayers

20

The Return of the Unfashionable Gods

7 August 2025
by Michael Rainsborough

Even Lib Dems Back Brexit Now

7 August 2025
by Gully Foyle

Coral on Great Barrier Reef at Fifth Highest Level Since Records Began – but Mainstream Media Still Spin ‘Tipping Point’ Narrative

7 August 2025
by Chris Morrison

Ten Awful Covid Studies Funded by Taxpayers

7 August 2025
by Charlotte Gill

How Have We Ended Up Paying For Everything While Doing All the Work Ourselves?

6 August 2025
by Guy de la Bédoyère

POSTS BY DATE

May 2023
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031  
« Apr   Jun »

SOCIAL LINKS

Free Speech Union

NEWSLETTER

View today’s newsletter

To receive our latest news in the form of a daily email, enter your details here:

POSTS BY DATE

May 2023
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031  
« Apr   Jun »

DONATE

LISTED ARTICLES

  • Most Read
  • Most Commented
  • Editor’s Picks

News Round-Up

7 August 2025
by Toby Young

‘Vigilante’ Force to Begin Patrols in Crime-Hit Bournemouth

7 August 2025
by Will Jones

Homelessness Minister Threw Out Her Tenants – Then Increased Rent by £700 a Month

7 August 2025
by Will Jones

Ten Awful Covid Studies Funded by Taxpayers

7 August 2025
by Charlotte Gill

The Return of the Unfashionable Gods

7 August 2025
by Michael Rainsborough

News Round-Up

46

Spanish Town Bans Muslim Religious Festivals After Nearby Town Was Rocked by Riots

35

How Have We Ended Up Paying For Everything While Doing All the Work Ourselves?

38

‘Vigilante’ Force to Begin Patrols in Crime-Hit Bournemouth

23

Ten Awful Covid Studies Funded by Taxpayers

20

The Return of the Unfashionable Gods

7 August 2025
by Michael Rainsborough

Even Lib Dems Back Brexit Now

7 August 2025
by Gully Foyle

Coral on Great Barrier Reef at Fifth Highest Level Since Records Began – but Mainstream Media Still Spin ‘Tipping Point’ Narrative

7 August 2025
by Chris Morrison

Ten Awful Covid Studies Funded by Taxpayers

7 August 2025
by Charlotte Gill

How Have We Ended Up Paying For Everything While Doing All the Work Ourselves?

6 August 2025
by Guy de la Bédoyère

SOCIAL LINKS

Free Speech Union
  • Home
  • About us
  • Donate
  • Privacy Policy

Facebook

  • X

Instagram

RSS

Subscribe to our newsletter

© Skeptics Ltd.

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password? Sign Up

Create New Account!

Fill the forms below to register

All fields are required. Log In

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
No Result
View All Result
  • Articles
  • About
  • Archive
    • ARCHIVE
    • NEWS ROUND-UPS
  • Podcasts
  • Newsletter
  • Premium
  • Donate
  • Log In

© Skeptics Ltd.

wpDiscuz
You are going to send email to

Move Comment
Perfecty
Do you wish to receive notifications of new articles?
Notifications preferences