• Login
  • Register
The Daily Sceptic
No Result
View All Result
  • Articles
  • About
  • Archive
    • ARCHIVE
    • NEWS ROUND-UPS
  • Podcasts
  • Newsletter
  • Premium
  • Donate
  • Log In
The Daily Sceptic
No Result
View All Result

Yet Another Attempt to Hide the Inconvenient Climate Data

by Chris Morrison
19 April 2023 7:00 AM

The newly-released 2022 Disasters in numbers report from CRED (Centre for Research on the Epidemiology of Disasters) is even more dishonest than its 2021 report, claims retired Associate Professor of Physics Dr. Ralph Alexander. The most egregious statements are said to involve the death toll from weather-related disasters. According to CRED’s own emergency events database EM-DAT, mortality is 98% lower today than a century earlier. But a ”more careful examination” of mortality statistics is said to indicate this percentage may be misleading. “Misinterpreting statistics could be harmful if it supports a discourse minimising the importance of climate change,” it notes.

The massive 98% fall over 100 years in weather-related disaster deaths – widely quoted, but inconvenient  in promoting climate fears – is shown in figure A below.

But figure B tells a different story. CRED removes the 50 largest disaster events, and then claims deaths show a “positive trend” over the last century. As a results of these manipulations, CRED feels able to note that, “it is impossible to draw conclusions about the underlying causes of the century-long trend in disaster mortality based on EM-DAT numbers alone.” Dr. Alexander has a different take on the matter. “Such subterfuge is both dishonest and statistically flawed… the only way to present any trend honestly is to include all the data.”  A fundamental tenet of the scientific method, he continued, is that you cannot ignore any piece of evidence that doesn’t fit your narrative, simply because it is inconvenient.

CRED is based at the University of Louvain in Belgium and its annual disasters report is published with America’s largest foreign aid organisation, the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID). The work of CRED is widely used, and its EM-DAT service is said to provide “objective evidence-based information”. It is noted that this can be used to assess the vulnerabilities of communities to disasters, “thus assisting policymakers in setting priorities”.

On the report’s front page a total of 30,704 deaths are linked to “climate in action” – an odd linkage since the report includes 1,626 fatalities arising from earthquakes and six from volcanic activity, which are hardly from ‘climate’. The 2022 figure was three times higher than in 2021, but below the 2002-2021 average of 60,955 deaths. But, observes Dr. Alexander, the report goes on to state that the 2002-2021 average is influenced by a “few mega disasters”. A “more useful” comparison, suggests CRED, is that the 2022 toll is almost twice the 2002-2021 median of 16,011 deaths. Of course picking the median, the number in the middle of all the data, reeks of cherry-picking. But Dr. Alexander prefers to widen his criticism by noting that yearly death tolls are unrelated independent events in the language of statistics, “so assigning any statistical significance to the 30,704 deaths in 2022 being lower than the long-term average, or higher than the long-term median, is invalid. CRED’s attempt to fit its data to a narrative emphasising ‘the importance of climate action’ falls flat”.

Publicising Dr. Alexander’s work, the Global Warming Policy Foundation (GWPF) said CRED’s latest disasters report features “crudely manipulated data”. GWPF director Dr. Benny Peiser claimed that Dr. Alexander had shown that the authors of Disaster in numbers had bent over backwards to provide support for the narrative of climate doom, “when the data and trends of weather-related disasters are pointing in the opposite direction”. All the parties involved, he continued, “should be ashamed of what is appearing in their name. This publication is fatally flawed and should be withdrawn”.

CRED does valuable work in compiling data on worldwide disasters. But Dr. Alexander’s trenchant criticisms highlight the malign influence cast by a political narrative promoting the collectivist Net Zero agenda. It seems that every scrap of statistical data must be aligned to promote the idea that humans are destroying the climate by burning fossil fuel.

Last year, the former science under-secretary in the Obama administration, Steven Koonin published a book about climate titled Unsettled, in which he noted that scientific institutions “seem more concerned with making the science fit the narrative, than ensuring the narrative fits the science”. Furthermore, “the general lack of knowledge of what science actually says, the drama of extreme weather events… all work against balanced coverage in the popular media”. The culprit for all this “misinformation in the service of persuasion” is not some secret cabal, “but rather a self-reinforcing alignment of perspectives and interests”.

Chris Morrison is the Daily Sceptic’s Environment Editor.

Tags: Climate AlarmismClimate changeCRED ReportExtreme weatherNet ZeroPropagandaThe Science

Donate

We depend on your donations to keep this site going. Please give what you can.

Donate Today

Comment on this Article

You’ll need to set up an account to comment if you don’t already have one. We ask for a minimum donation of £5 if you'd like to make a comment or post in our Forums.

Sign Up
Previous Post

News Round-Up

Next Post

My NHS Employer Wouldn’t Recognise My Mask Exemption and Made My Life Misery

Subscribe
Login
Notify of
Please log in to comment

To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.

Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.

16 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Shimpling Chadacre
Shimpling Chadacre
2 years ago

We need a new word for these people, because they aren’t “scientists”. Shameless, lying propagandists, although more accurate, is too long and doesn’t roll off the tongue.

100
0
Bill Hickling
Bill Hickling
2 years ago
Reply to  Shimpling Chadacre

Avoiding the Anglo Saxon slang you mean?

15
0
DevonBlueBoy
DevonBlueBoy
2 years ago
Reply to  Shimpling Chadacre

How about “Lying, venal bar stewards”?

6
0
For a fist full of roubles
For a fist full of roubles
2 years ago

An inCREDible misuse of statistics that totally disCREDits these so-called scientists.
For example in the ’20s some 4.75M deaths are ignored out of 5M to arrive at this piece of propaganda.

45
0
varmint
varmint
2 years ago

Torture the data for long enough and it confess to anything. I don’t think any type of data in history has been persecuted and tortured more than climate and temperature data has been. ————- Manipulating data allows you to see what isn’t there. The idea that any extreme weather event can be linked to human caused global warming is NOT supported by the evidence. For much of the general public who see every bit of bad weather from anywhere in the world beamed into their living rooms 24 hours a day via cable TV, it probably feels true that humans are altering the climate and that is a perception they may have. But that is all it is —-a “perception”. In the real world there is no increase in the frequency or intensity of any type of weather event.

45
0
sskinner
sskinner
2 years ago
Reply to  varmint

“A bad system will beat a good person every time” – Edward Deming

“If there is something very slightly wrong in our definition of the theories, then the full mathematical rigor may convert these errors into ridiculous conclusions.” R. Feynman

“Whenever there is fear, you will get wrong figures.” – Edward Deming

16
0
varmint
varmint
2 years ago
Reply to  sskinner

thanks

3
0
Benthic
Benthic
2 years ago

What a disappointment science has become. As Koonin puts it, ‘making the science fit the narrative as opposed to the narrative fitting the science’ I would call that anti-science in the climate ponzi scheme.

NASA is looking to put the first women and ‘person of colour’ on the Moon. Just foxtrot oscar!

The icing on the cake is this covid debacle. In all probability science caused this mess through a lab leak, and then science thinks they can solve the problem with the so called vaccines, that turned out well.

Today’s scientists are not fit to lick the boots of their predecessors.

46
0
varmint
varmint
2 years ago
Reply to  Benthic

“Science” is the genuine search for truth no matter where it leads. But what we have now in these politicised issues is “Official Science”, that is the science wheeled out in support of public policy, since most people are reluctant to challenge science or scientists, and when things go wrong politicians can claim they were merely following the science.

31
0
7941MHKB
7941MHKB
2 years ago
Reply to  varmint

Correct, Varmint.
Although, to be nit pickky, it isn’t just ‘science’ that they follow. It is ‘The Science’ or, for emphasis, ‘THE SETTLED Science’.

Making them the very willing victim of the most egregious charlatans that our Civil Servants can find.

Think Boris and his annointed chums Pantsdown Ferguson and CCP Michie, just for a start.

25
0
Benthic
Benthic
2 years ago
Reply to  varmint

The Science ™.

11
0
DickieA
DickieA
2 years ago
Reply to  varmint

Very true. I studied climatology at university back in the early eighties. At the time, the data was showing that we were heading towards another ice age…. I guess they use different historical climate data these days / sarc.

I still take a great interest in climatology and do not accept the theory that greenhouse gas emissions caused by man’s activities are the primary cause of changes in climate. When attempting to discuss this with the indoctrinated people who get their information from MSM and Social Media, a popular retort is “so you know better than all the scientists?”.

Changing mindsets is a real struggle and I don’t see it getting any easier..

35
0
varmint
varmint
2 years ago
Reply to  DickieA

Yes I hear that a lot——–“So you think you know better than the scientists”? ———But when you ask people “What scientists are you referring to? They usually cannot name any. But what they also fail to understand is that most of this isn’t science. It is computer modelling. ——-Models are NOT science. It only needs one of the parameters in the model to be out a little and the final output from the model will be way out, which is ofcourse why all of the climate models do not match what is happening in the real world and why models and observations are drifting further and further apart as each year goes by.

13
0
RW
RW
2 years ago

The idea of removing obvious outliers before calculating averages is principally sound. But not in this case, because the claim is that such outliers aren’t outliers anymore but instead occurring ever more frequently. A statement like When ignoring all actual extreme weather events, we find that the death toll of extreme weather events has increased makes no sense. The second graphic is thus more something like Massive population growth resulted in a massive growth of people dying for unremarkable reasons. That’s certainly true. But not something supporting the claim of imminent doom unless …

16
0
Dinger64
Dinger64
2 years ago

The inconvenient truth is that the world is experiencing one of its most stable era’s of geologically recorded history ever! We should be honoured to live in such a temperate time not slagging it off!

28
0
GMO
GMO
2 years ago

The climate change industry is very lucrative and some do not want their jobs and grants to stop, so they perpetuate the idea of a ‘Climate Change Crisis’.

1
0

NEWSLETTER

View today’s newsletter

To receive our latest news in the form of a daily email, enter your details here:

DONATE

PODCAST

The Sceptic | Episode 45: Jack Hadfield on the Anti-Asylum Protests, Alan Miller on the Tyranny of Digital ID and James Graham on the Net Zero Pension Threat

by Richard Eldred
25 July 2025
0

LISTED ARTICLES

  • Most Read
  • Most Commented
  • Editor’s Picks

Gradually, Then Suddenly: The Death Throes of a Regime

25 July 2025
by Dr David McGrogan

News Round-Up

25 July 2025
by Richard Eldred

Covid Vaccines Saved Far Fewer Lives Than Claimed by WHO, Major New Study Finds

25 July 2025
by Will Jones

Half of Public Think Islam is Incompatible with British Values

25 July 2025
by Will Jones

Wind Power Price Soars 11% as Government’s Promise to Cut Bills by £300 Fails to Materialise

25 July 2025
by Ben Pile

Gradually, Then Suddenly: The Death Throes of a Regime

26

White Britons Are Right to Resist Becoming a Minority

50

Covid Vaccines Saved Far Fewer Lives Than Claimed by WHO, Major New Study Finds

17

Half of Public Think Islam is Incompatible with British Values

17

Starmer’s Palestine Action Ban Could Be Breaking International Law, Says UN

14

The Frightening Cost of Net Zero

26 July 2025
by Paul Homewood

Gradually, Then Suddenly: The Death Throes of a Regime

25 July 2025
by Dr David McGrogan

Wind Power Price Soars 11% as Government’s Promise to Cut Bills by £300 Fails to Materialise

25 July 2025
by Ben Pile

Report on Black Maternity Experiences Blames “Racism” Without Evidence

24 July 2025
by Dr Roger Watson

White Britons Are Right to Resist Becoming a Minority

24 July 2025
by Charlie Cole

POSTS BY DATE

April 2023
M T W T F S S
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
« Mar   May »

SOCIAL LINKS

Free Speech Union

NEWSLETTER

View today’s newsletter

To receive our latest news in the form of a daily email, enter your details here:

POSTS BY DATE

April 2023
M T W T F S S
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
« Mar   May »

DONATE

LISTED ARTICLES

  • Most Read
  • Most Commented
  • Editor’s Picks

Gradually, Then Suddenly: The Death Throes of a Regime

25 July 2025
by Dr David McGrogan

News Round-Up

25 July 2025
by Richard Eldred

Covid Vaccines Saved Far Fewer Lives Than Claimed by WHO, Major New Study Finds

25 July 2025
by Will Jones

Half of Public Think Islam is Incompatible with British Values

25 July 2025
by Will Jones

Wind Power Price Soars 11% as Government’s Promise to Cut Bills by £300 Fails to Materialise

25 July 2025
by Ben Pile

Gradually, Then Suddenly: The Death Throes of a Regime

26

White Britons Are Right to Resist Becoming a Minority

50

Covid Vaccines Saved Far Fewer Lives Than Claimed by WHO, Major New Study Finds

17

Half of Public Think Islam is Incompatible with British Values

17

Starmer’s Palestine Action Ban Could Be Breaking International Law, Says UN

14

The Frightening Cost of Net Zero

26 July 2025
by Paul Homewood

Gradually, Then Suddenly: The Death Throes of a Regime

25 July 2025
by Dr David McGrogan

Wind Power Price Soars 11% as Government’s Promise to Cut Bills by £300 Fails to Materialise

25 July 2025
by Ben Pile

Report on Black Maternity Experiences Blames “Racism” Without Evidence

24 July 2025
by Dr Roger Watson

White Britons Are Right to Resist Becoming a Minority

24 July 2025
by Charlie Cole

SOCIAL LINKS

Free Speech Union
  • Home
  • About us
  • Donate
  • Privacy Policy

Facebook

  • X

Instagram

RSS

Subscribe to our newsletter

© Skeptics Ltd.

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password? Sign Up

Create New Account!

Fill the forms below to register

All fields are required. Log In

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
No Result
View All Result
  • Articles
  • About
  • Archive
    • ARCHIVE
    • NEWS ROUND-UPS
  • Podcasts
  • Newsletter
  • Premium
  • Donate
  • Log In

© Skeptics Ltd.

wpDiscuz
You are going to send email to

Move Comment
Perfecty
Do you wish to receive notifications of new articles?
Notifications preferences