Noah Carl’s recent article in the Daily Sceptic “Vaccinating the Elderly Saved Lives” and Will Jones’s piece “Excess Non-Covid Deaths Surge to 30,000 Since April as Deaths in Week Before Christmas Hit 20% Above Average” both highlighted the failure of the ONS or the medical authorities to update the dataset, last published July 6th 2022, that shows deaths by vaccine status. In addition, we’ve had both Neville Hodgkinson and Amanuensis referencing the ONS dataset that includes deaths from January 1st 2021 to May 31st 2022 by vaccine status. Finally, a recent Substack post by El Gato Malo analysed these same U.K. data on all-cause deaths by vaccine status.
But do these data tell us what we think they tell us? We thought Daily Sceptic readers might find it useful to see the data presented as interactive charts so you can see for yourself. Here are the links to each age-group specific chart: 18-39, 40-49, 50-59, 60-69, 70-79, 80-89, 90+. By clicking on the legend line colour by vaccine status you remove it from the chart, making the chart less busy for ease of comparing the various groups. This article pulls out some of the more interesting points from the data but we would recommend you exploring the charts yourself – once you’ve read the article!
Our view is that the data will confirm whatever prejudice you have. If you want to show that vaccination is pointless the charts can do that, conversely, if you want validation that vaccination saved the nation, well, they can do that too. Let us illustrate.
The ONS data show us:
Monthly age-standardised mortality rates by vaccination status by age group for all cause deaths, deaths involving COVID-19 and deaths not involving COVID-19, per 100,000 person-years, England, deaths occurring between January 1st 2021 and May 31st 2022.
Comparing the red line (deaths of unvaccinated) with the blue line (deaths of people at least 21 days after their booster) we can see that the two lines are in lockstep. Conclusion? Vaccination was pointless.
Hold your horses! Look at figure 2. Exactly the same dataset for 18-39 year-olds, but this time comparing all-cause mortality of the unvaccinated with those dying at least 21 days after their first vaccination. The death rate in the vaccinated shoots up from 68 in February 2021 to 115 in April. While in the unvaccinated the fatality rate drops from 70 in January 2021 to 38 in May. From comparable rates in January and February, the vaccinated appear to be dying at three times the rate by April and May. Conclusion? The vaccines kill you!
However, as can be seen in Figure 3, if we look at the relative fatality rate of the unvaccinated with those who died at least 21 days after their second vaccination we see that by December 2021, the fatality rate of the unvaccinated was up to 69, while the rate for the double vaccinated plummeted to 29. Conclusion? The vaccines save lives.
Are these huge swings in fatality rate unique to the 18-39 age-cohort? No. Figure 4 is a rather busy chart showing fatality rates for the 80-89 year-olds. Again, we get these huge swings. The unvaccinated’s fatality rate plummets from February 2021 five-fold in three months, while for those with just one shot of vaccine it increases five-fold! However, those having had a second shot (the light green line) stays below the unvaccinated’s rate until October 2021, when it increases four-fold.
Perhaps, though, the most telling line is the dark blue one showing the fatality rate of people at least 21 days after their booster. By May 2022 it was no better than the fatality rate of the unvaccinated.
Now, let us add two caveats that you should bear in mind when looking at these charts:
- The volatility in the numbers isn’t much down to Covid. Nor, is it much down to vaccines. Covid, even at its peak, only accounted for a relatively small proportion of deaths. Likewise, even if the most apocalyptic soothsayers of vaccine deaths were correct, as overall deaths aren’t up multiple times then the huge swings can’t be ascribed to vaccines either. Rather, it’s down to the condition of the people of vaccinated.
- Those of you who take a keen interest in the data will recall the ongoing debate about how many people are unvaccinated. The table in Figure 5 comes from a piece by one of us (NR) published in the Daily Sceptic back in June 2022, though for people wanting greater authority on this matter can I suggest you look at Professor Norman Fenton’s extensive work on this issue. The point is that the ONS has knowingly, though consistently, understated the unvaccinated amongst us. Alternative population data from ‘NIMS’ put the U.K. population far higher – too high, according to the ONS. No one knows what the U.K. population is and so no one knows how many people are unvaccinated. The ONS data should be treated as a ‘worst case’ scenario. So, looking at the red line in each of these charts you can be sure that it’s overstating the fatality rate of the unvaccinated.
Coming back to the ONS data, Figure 6 summarises the relative fatality rate of the unvaccinated with the boosted at the end of May 2022. The percentage figures in red show the age cohorts where vaccination seems to have reduced fatalities.
Take your pick. If you’re under 50 or over 90 it would appear that the unvaccinated are less likely to die than the ‘boosted’. If you’re aged 50 to 89 then you would appear to be safer if you’ve had a pile of vaccinations. However, how can this be? If Covid accounts for, say 5% of deaths across these age groups and these months, even if vaccines were 100% effective, we’d only expect to see a 5% variance in all-cause mortality. How could a Covid vaccine produce a swing five or 10 times greater than the background rate of Covid deaths?
We suspect the answer is that the all-cause mortality tells us something about the profile of people being vaccinated but next-to-nothing about the efficacy of the vaccines themselves. One final chart to illustrate our point using data for the 70-79 age-cohort where we can see fatality rates swing 10-fold between various groups.
The grey line appears to show the single vaccinated starting to die at an alarmingly high rate, possibly as those well enough to get jabbed a second time move into a different category leaving the vulnerable and close to death behind. Later on, from about October 2021, we see the light green line shoot up; again, this may be as those well enough to receive a booster leave the vulnerable behind. Alternatively, it may be owing to misclassification issues around vaccinated deaths, as Professor Norman Fenton has discussed.
If the ONS does ever issue an update to the May data, as it has said it intends to (we’ll believe it when we see it), our advice is: treat all conclusions and analysis with caution, as they may just be reinforcing the prejudices of the author.
To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.
Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.
Oh, I do enjoy a successful “go woke, go broke.”
Perhaps if some of the smart arses running these big corporations had bothered to talk to their customers these cock-ups would be avoided. On second thoughts, nah, carry on chaps, I’ll be glad to see the back of Anhauser- Busch.
After the Gillette fiasco you’d think companies would have learnt a lesson but no they are stuffed with frightfully clever people who know what’s best.
Suck it up guys.
It is difficult to keep a track of the woke products these days. You certainly don’t want to be daft and purge your cupboards of stuff whose woke ads appear on TV, but there are certainly products I will never buy again from certain big companies. Nike, Bud, Unilever, to name but a few. ———-I am only one person but if these posturing companies do some market research, they will find that their wokery will severely hit their till receipts. This idea that they are not just in the business of making profit and that they should also be awake to alleged social injustice will meet reality head on and infact is already doing so.
I agree. I never buy Gillette products now. Interestingly they now tend to fill the shelves in pound shops. They didn’t before their stupidity. Marvellous.
Actually what’s the deal with Gillette? Don’t think I’m aware of any controversy there.
Search “Gillette woke controversy 2019.”
Yep! Gillette make great razors. Haven’t used them since that commercial!
I forget the timeline Mogs – five years maybe, but Gillette ran an ad campaign which wholly inverted:
“The best a man can get,”
…and went on to rubbish men, masculinity, maleness, etc. I believe the campaign lost the company over $8 billion and they have not recovered from it – now filling poundshop shelves in the UK
https://youtu.be/Jx_uJi1ByQA
Ah yes, I remember the slogan. Good to know and a reminder that ‘people power’ is actually a thing and effective across the board.
It seems they cannot claim ‘Gillette competence’
(OK, I’ll get my coat and be off!)
LOL, god loves a trier!
Very good MA!
Agreed. Ben and Jerries is also on my list.
No mercy.
Don’t give your money to those who hate you.
I’ve added Budweiser to Paypal, John Lewis, Netflix, Nike and Sainsbury, none of whom will ever receive another penny from me,
Yep. PayPal got the boot when they went for DS and Toby. Gillette see above / below. Never used Netflix. Don’t care for being logo’d so I have never owned any Nike. Sainsbury’s are on the naughty step.
You can add Heineken to the list for this woeful pro-vax advert https://youtu.be/akxfPV-A_C0. Do check out the comments section though – very heartening.
Bloody hell. That Heineken ad is appalling. Staggering.
When were the ‘good ol days’ of Budweiser? It always tasted like carbonated ball sweat.
PS
I don’t doubt your comparison, and I’d prefer not to know, how you know.
If I’m not mistaken, AB pay a royalty to Ceske Budvar for use of the name “Budweiser” – for them it’s all about pretending
Off-topic but an excellent article looking at the rise of censorship in the context of current events;
”PEOPLE who cannot argue the facts have two fall-backs: smears and censorship. The official Covid response perfectly encapsulated that.
Emboldened by their success at censoring and ridiculing the truth over the past three years, our politicians and media are now trying to gag all dissenting voice on most matters.
Take the ruling class’s treatment of Robert Kennedy Jr.
Before Covid, we would have been treated to fawning media coverage on how President John F Kennedy’s nephew was set to challenge Joe Biden for the Democratic nomination.
Instead, the media has dismissed the announcement due to the fact Kennedy is a so-called “anti-vaxxer”.
Worse, the Democrats announced this week that the attorney will not be allowed to face off against the senile incumbent in debates. They know that Biden would have his failing health publicly confirmed should he appear in unscripted TV appearances.
A similar thing is happening in the Republican Party too, where former president Donald Trump is campaigning to stop any debates in its “primaries” or leadership contest.
Trump, who introduced ruinous lockdowns and is batting for the “wrong side” in America’s toxic culture wars (he has been defending Disney and Bud Light in their transgender battles with fellow Republicans), is clearly terrified of having to face open opposition and defend his actions during Covid.”
https://uncut.substack.com/p/you-will-be-silenced
I’m sure it’s not over yet. With electric vehicle sales slumping, we await Ford’s attempt to woo the woke tradesman with an eTrans-It/They van!
Love it
A man pretending to be a woman advertising piss pretending to be beer seems appropriate
Not that I follow this ”I’m a lady” dude but I’ve seen pictures of him without all the slap on, stubble grown in and he looks just like a regular, albeit very skinny, guy. Oh and that Nike ad he did he was obviously using ‘chicken fillets’ because the guy has literally zero bust in real life. I thought he was on hormones and had surgery but obviously not. Just a cross-dressing influencer who’s having the last laugh by raking it in while getting more and more exposure.
https://www.tiktok.com/@dylanmulvaney/video/7147147215532739883
I was more offended by the Nike advert. That was undoubtedly much more anti-women yet has been barely mentioned since.
The biggest problem they have is calling Budweiser a “beer”. The fizzy gnat’s pi55 that uses that name deserves all the opprobium it receives.