MP Andrew Bridgen has had the Conservative whip removed – meaning he is suspended from sitting as a Conservative MP and must sit without party affiliation – pending a “formal investigation” after causing “great offence” with remarks saying the Covid vaccines are “causing serious harms” and the vaccination campaign was “the biggest crime against humanity since the holocaust”.
According to Sky News, Tory Chief Whip Simon Hart said:
Andrew Bridgen has crossed a line, causing great offence in the process. As a nation we should be very proud of what has been achieved through the vaccine programme. The vaccine is the best defence against Covid that we have. Misinformation about the vaccine causes harm and costs lives. I am therefore removing the whip from Andrew Bridgen with immediate effect, pending a formal investigation.
His ‘offensive’ comment came in a tweet (now deleted) on Wednesday morning linking to a write-up by Israeli academic Dr. Josh Guetzkow of the recently released CDC adverse event analysis, where Bridgen approvingly quotes an unnamed “consultant cardiologist” who he said had told him: “This is the biggest crime against humanity since the holocaust.”
Mr. Bridgen, who has a science background, has become Parliament’s most vocal critic of the Covid vaccines. He thus made himself a big target for the pro-vaccine zealots who will have been looking for an excuse to punish and cancel him, and who have predictably leapt on the first ‘offensive’ thing they could find.
Dr. Guetzkow, the academic whose article Mr. Bridgen linked to in the tweet and who is Jewish and lives in Israel, defended him from allegations of anti-Semitism. He told the Daily Sceptic that “there is nothing at all anti-Semitic about his statement” and that “the hollow accusations against him only distract from genuine examples of anti-Semitism”. He said:
As a Jew living in Israel, I’m surprised by the accusations against Bridgen, because there is nothing at all anti-Semitic about his statement. This is a tempest in a teapot. The hollow accusations against him only distract from genuine examples of anti-Semitism and ultimately hinder attempts to draw attention to them, much like the boy who cried wolf.
John Mann, the Government’s independent anti-Semitism adviser, went straight to full-on cancel mode, saying: “There is no possibility that Bridgen can be allowed to stand at the next election. He cannot claim that he didn’t realise the level of offence that his remarks cause.”
Karen Pollock, Chief Executive of the Holocaust Educational Trust, said: “This comment is highly irresponsible, wholly inappropriate and an elected politician should know better.”
Matt Hancock, the disgraced lockdown Health Secretary, hit out at Mr. Bridgen’s “disgusting, antisemitic, anti-vax conspiracy theories” at Prime Minister’s Questions on Wednesday. He said the comments were “deeply offensive” and “have no place in this House or in our wider society”.
Prime Minister Rishi Sunak replied that he joined Mr Hancock in “completely condemning those types of comments in the strongest possible terms”.
“Obviously it is utterly unacceptable to make linkages and use language like that and I’m determined that the scourge of antisemitism is eradicated,” he told the Commons.
“It has absolutely no place in our society. I know the previous few years have been challenging for the Jewish community and I never want them to experience anything like that ever again.”
The Board of Deputies of British Jews tweeted: “For an MP to suggest that Covid vaccines are the biggest crime against humanity since the Holocaust is unconscionable. We will be writing to the Chair of the Conservative Party Nadhim Zahawi to express our deep concern and to ask for clarification as to what action will be taken.”
Reproduced below is Mr. Bridgen’s recent speech in the Commons where he raised many issues that other MPs shy away from or don’t want to know about.
Three months ago, one of the most eminent and trusted cardiologists, a man with an international reputation, Dr. Aseem Malhotra, published peer-reviewed research that concluded that there should be a complete cessation of the administration of the Covid mRNA vaccines for everyone because of clear and robust data of significant harms and little ongoing benefit. He described the roll-out of the BioNTech-Pfizer vaccine as “perhaps the greatest miscarriage of medical science, attack on democracy, damage to population health, and erosion of trust in medicine that we will witness in our lifetime”.
Interestingly, there has so far not been a single rebuttal of Dr. Malhotra’s findings in the scientific literature, despite their widespread circulation and the fact that they made international news.
Before I state the key evidence-based facts that make a clear case for complete suspension of these emergency use authorisation vaccines, it is important to appreciate the key psychological barrier that has prevented these facts from being acknowledged by policymakers and taken up by the U.K. mainstream media. That psychological phenomenon is wilful blindness. It is when human beings – including, in this case, institutions – turn a blind eye to the truth in order to feel safe, reduce anxiety, avoid conflict and protect their prestige and reputations. There are numerous examples of that in recent history, such as the BBC and Jimmy Savile, the Department of Health and Mid Staffs, Hollywood and Harvey Weinstein, and the medical establishment and the OxyContin scandal, which was portrayed in the mini-series “Dopesick”. It is crucial to understand that the longer wilful blindless to the truth continues, the more unnecessary harm it creates.
Here are the cold, hard facts about the mRNA vaccines and an explanation of the structural drivers that continue to be barriers to doctors and the public receiving independent information to make informed decisions about them. Since the rollout in the U.K. of the BioNTech-Pfizer mRNA vaccine, we have had almost half a million Yellow Card reports of adverse effects from the public. That is unprecedented. It is more than all the yellow card reports of the past 40 years combined. An extraordinary rate of side effects that are beyond mild have been reported in many countries across the world that have used the Pfizer vaccine, including, of course, the United States.
Those who feel that they have been damaged by the vaccine should of course have the full support of their elected Members of Parliament and the NHS. Only a couple of weeks ago, I was interviewed by a journalist from a major news outlet who said that he was being bombarded by calls from people who said that they were vaccine-harmed but unable to get the support they wanted from the NHS. He also said that he thought this would be the biggest scandal in medical history in this country. Disturbingly, he also said that he feared that if he were to mention that in the newsroom in which he worked, he would lose his job. We need to break this conspiracy of silence.
It is instructive to note that, according to pharmaco-vigilance analysis, the serious adverse effects reported by the public are thought to represent only 10% of the true rate of serious adverse events occurring within the population. The gold standard of understanding the benefit and harm of any drug is the randomised controlled trial. It was the randomised controlled trial conducted by Pfizer that led to U.K. and international regulators approving the BioNTech-Pfizer mRNA vaccine for administration in the first place.
Contrary to popular belief, that original trial of approximately 40,000 participants did not show any statistically significant reduction in death as a result of vaccination, but it did show a 95% relative risk reduction in the development of infection against the ancestral, more lethal strain of the virus. However, the absolute risk reduction for an individual was only 0.84%. In other words, from its own data, Pfizer revealed that we needed to vaccinate 119 people to prevent one infection. The World Health Organisation and the Academy of Medical Royal Colleges have previously stated and made it clear that it is an ethical responsibility that medical information is communicated to patients in absolute benefit and absolute risk terms, which is to protect the public from unnecessary anxiety and manipulation.
Very quickly, through mutations of the original strain – indeed, within a few months – Covid fortunately became far less lethal. It quickly became apparent that there was no protection against infection at all from the vaccine, and we were left with the hope that perhaps these vaccines would protect us from serious illness and death. So what does the most reliable data tell us about the best-case scenario of individual benefit from the vaccine against dying from COVID-19? Real-world data from the U.K. during the three-month wave of Omicron at the beginning of this year reveals that we would need to vaccinate 7,300 people over the age of 80 to prevent one death. The number needed to be vaccinated to prevent a death in any younger age group was absolutely enormous.
Of course, it is important that the Government justify why they are rolling out a vaccine to any cohort of people, particularly our children. He will recall that, in the Westminster Hall debate, we questioned the validity of vaccinating children who have minimal risk, if a risk at all, from the virus when there is a clear risk from the vaccine. I will again report on evidence from America later in my speech about those risks, particularly to young children.
In other words, the benefits of the vaccine are close to non-existent. Beyond the alarming Yellow Card reports, the strongest evidence of harm comes from the gold standard, highest possible quality level of data. A re-analysis of Pfizer and Moderna’s own randomised controlled trials using the mRNA technology, published in the peer-reviewed journal Vaccine, revealed a rate of serious adverse events of one in 800 individuals vaccinated. These are events that result in hospitalisation or disability, or that are life changing. Most disturbing of all, however, is that those original trials suggested someone was far more likely to suffer a serious side effect from the vaccine than to be hospitalised with the ancestral, more lethal strain of the virus. These findings are a smoking gun suggesting the vaccine should likely never have been approved in the first place.
In the past, vaccines have been completely withdrawn from use for a much lower incidence of serious harm. For example, the swine flu vaccine was withdrawn in 1976 for causing Guillain-Barré syndrome in only one in 100,000 adults, and in 1999 the rotavirus vaccine was withdrawn for causing a form of bowel obstruction in children affecting one in 10,000. With the covid mRNA vaccine, we are talking of a serious adverse event rate of at least one in 800, because that was the rate determined in the two months when Pfizer actually followed the patients following their vaccination. Unfortunately, some of those serious events, such as heart attack, stroke and pulmonary embolism will result in death, which is devastating for individuals and the families they leave behind. Many of these events may take longer than eight weeks post vaccination to show themselves.
An Israeli paper published in Nature’s scientific reports showed a 25% increase in heart attack and cardiac arrest in 16 to 39-year-olds in Israel. Another report from Israel looked at levels of myocarditis and pericarditis in people who had had covid and those who had not. It was a study of, I think, 1.2 million who had not had Covid and 740,000 who had had it. The incidence of myocarditis and pericarditis was identical in both groups. This would tell the House that whatever is causing the increase in heart problems now, it is not due to having been infected with COVID-19.
It was accepted by a peer-reviewed medical journal that one of the country’s most respected and decorated general practitioners, the honorary vice-president of the British Medical Association and the Labour party’s doctor of the year, Dr. Kailash Chand, likely suffered a cardiac arrest and was tragically killed by the Pfizer vaccine six months after his second dose, through a mechanism that rapidly accelerates heart disease. In fact, in the U.K. we have had an extra 14,000 out-of-hospital cardiac arrests in 2021, compared with 2020, following the vaccine rollout. Many of these will undoubtedly be because of the vaccine, and the consequences of this mRNA jab are clearly serious and common.
Ministers may understandably wish to defer the responsibility for a decision such as withdrawing vaccines from the population to regulators such as the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency, or in America the Food and Drug Administration. Historically, when undertaking the approval of any drug, the regulators ultimately end up relying on the summary results from the drug companies in their sponsored trials, where the raw data is kept commercially confidential. Furthermore, the MHRA has a huge financial conflict of interest, receiving 86% of its funding from the pharmaceutical industry it is supposed to regulate. In effect, we have the poacher paying the gamekeeper.
In a recent investigation by the BMJ into the financial conflicts of interest of the drug regulators, the sociologist Donald Light said: “It’s the opposite of having a trustworthy organisation independently and rigorously assessing medicines. They’re not rigorous, they’re not independent, they are selective, and they withhold data.”
He went on to say that doctors and patients “must appreciate how deeply and extensively drug regulators can’t be trusted so long as they are captured by industry funding”.
Similarly, another investigation revealed that members of the Joint Committee on Vaccination and Immunisation had huge financial links to the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation running into billions of pounds. Ministers, the media and the public know that the foundation is heavily invested in pharmaceutical industry stocks.
Unfortunately, the catastrophic mistake over the approval, and the coercion associated with this emergency-use authorisation medical intervention, are not an anomaly, and in many ways this could have been predicted by the structural failures that allowed it to occur in the first place. Those shortcomings are rooted in the increasingly unchecked visible and invisible power of multinational corporations – in this case, Big Pharma. We can start by acknowledging that the drug industry has a fiduciary obligation to produce profit for its shareholders, but it has no fiduciary obligation to provide the right medicines for patients.
The real scandal is that those with a responsibility to patients and with scientific integrity – namely, doctors, academic institutions and medical journals – collude with the industry for financial gain. Big Pharma exerts its power by capturing the political environment through lobbying and the knowledge environment through funding university research and influencing medical education, preference shaping through capture of the media, financing think-tanks and so on. In other words, the public relations machinery of Big Pharma excels in subterfuge and engages in smearing and de-platforming those who call out its manipulations. No doubt it will be very busy this evening.
It is no surprise, when there is so much control by an entity that has been described as ‘psychopathic’ for its profit-making conduct, that one analysis suggests that third most common cause of death globally after heart disease and cancer is the side-effects of prescribed medications, which were mostly avoidable. Because of those systemic failures, doctors often receive biased information, deliberately manipulated by the pharmaceutical industry, which exaggerates the benefits and the safety of their drugs. Furthermore, the former editor of the BMJ, Richard Smith, claims that research misconduct is rife and is not effectively being tackled in the U.K. institutions, stating: “Something is rotten in… British medicine and has been for a long time.”
It has also been brought to my attention by a whistleblower from a very reliable source that one of these institutions is covering up clear data that reveals that the mRNA vaccine increases inflammation of the heart arteries. It is covering this up for fear that it may lose funding from the pharmaceutical industry. The lead of that cardiology research department has a prominent leadership role with the British Heart Foundation, and I am disappointed to say that he has sent out non-disclosure agreements to his research team to ensure that this important data never sees the light of day. That is an absolute disgrace. Systemic failure in an over-medicated population also contributes to huge waste of British taxpayers’ money and increasing strain on the NHS.
We need an inquiry into the influence of Big Pharma on medications and our NHS. That is been called for many occasions and by some very influential people, including prominent physicians such as the former president of the Royal College of Physicians and personal doctor to our late Queen, Sir Richard Thompson. On separate occasions in the last few years those calls have been supported and covered in the Daily Mail, the Guardian and, most recently, the i newspaper.
We are fighting not just for principles of ethical, evidence-based medical practices, but for our democracy. The future health of the British public depends on us tackling head-on the cause of this problem and finding meaningful solutions. In 2015 a commentary by Richard Houghton, Editor-in-Chief of the Lancet, suggested that possibly half of the published medical literature “may simply be untrue”. He wrote that “science has taken a turn toward darkness”, and asked who is going to take the first step to clean up the system.
That first step could start this evening with this debate. It starts here, with the Vaccine Minister and the Government ensuring in the first instance an immediate and complete suspension of any more Covid vaccines with their use of mRNA technology. Silence on this issue is more contagious than the virus itself, and now so should courage be. I would implore all the scientists, medics, nurses and those in the media who know the truth about the harm these vaccines are causing to our people to speak out.
We have already sacrificed far too many of our citizens on the altar of ignorance and unfettered corporate greed. Last week the MHRA authorised those experimental vaccines for use in children as young as six months. In a Westminster Hall debate some weeks ago, I quoted a report by the Journal of the American Medical Association studying the effect of the COVID-19 mRNA vaccination on children under five years of age. It showed that one in [500] had an adverse event that resulted in hospitalisation, and symptoms that lasted longer than 90 days.
As the data clearly shows to anyone who wants to look at it, the mRNA vaccines are not safe, not effective and not necessary. I implore the Government to halt their use immediately. As I have demonstrated and as the data clearly shows, the Government’s current policy on the mRNA vaccines is on the wrong side of medical ethics, it is on the wrong side of scientific data, and ultimately it will be on the wrong side of history.
To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.
Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.
Absolute disgrace. And this is what the crappy BBC has to say about it;
“Andrew Bridgen has been suspended as a Tory MP for spreading misinformation about Covid vaccination.
It comes after the North West Leicestershire MP posted tweets that compared vaccines to the Holocaust.
Tory chief whip Simon Hart said the comments had “crossed a line” and caused great offence.
He said Mr Bridgen would lose the party whip – meaning he will sit as an independent – while a formal investigation takes place.
“As a nation we should be very proud of what has been achieved through the vaccine programme,” Mr Hart added.
“The vaccine is the best defence against Covid that we have. Misinformation about the vaccine causes harm and costs lives.”
Mr Bridgen is currently serving a five-day suspension from Parliament for breaching parliamentary rules on registering financial interests.”
Andrew, if you’re reading this, know that we are all behind you 100% and are eternally grateful for your courage. You make everyone around you ( bar a select few ) look like corrupt and pathetic wet-blankets. Never stop spreading the truth and challenging the false narrative. I think you’re the dog’s bollocks.
Completely and totally with you Mogs.
I think this is bloody brilliant news. There will have to be a hearing and then the Conservative Party are going to be confronted with the rather inconvenient fact he is demonstrably, provably right. I expect the senior cardiologists and oncologists we know well will arm him with a fantastic submission and the results of the hearing will have to be public.
An optimist, I presume. If all goes as (doutblessly) planned, vaccines won’t ever be mentioned during the hearing, there’ll just be a cacophony of voices from representatives of complicit organizations shouting Antisemitism! Antisemtism! Antisemtism! Exterminate! Exterminate! Exertminate! as already exemplified by the talking heads who commented on this so far. And this despite there’s simply nothing antisemitic, nor even something which could be construed as antisemitic, in the asseration that other crimes against humanity have occured since the holocaust (all this quote – not even a statement – boils down to), as they certainly have.
This is Life-of-Brian-justice in the real world: Everybody heard that he said Jehova!
Are they actually going to try and prove him wrong then, or just that he offended “vaccine” zealots (and possibly a few Jewish people)?
Nice thought but I know what these bastards are like. Many a slip twixt cup….
Hear hear, Mogs. I’m hoping against hope that this is the Tory party & govt shooting a double barrelled shotgun into their collective feet. My concern is, I’ve no idea if he’s a good constituency MP or not (mine is totally cr*p yet seems entirely bullet-proofed against his constant ineptitude) but I’m sure TPTB will lean heavily on his constituency to get him deselected/sacked or whatever. While a lucrative career in alt media will then beckon, we still need voices in parliament raising concern, even if only to an empty House. Some of the public, at least, are listening.
Agree.
They are starting to panic !! Scum !!
Hear hear! Hear hear!! Hear hear!!! a thousand million times.
History will show
Formal investigation? Does that mean we can go along and listen? Or can we submit evidence?
Anyone know more about it?
We need a lot more Andrew Bridgens to replace all those silent cowards in Parliament and the other ones like my MP who prop up this corruption.
Great news.
Even the MSM have to report this. Some senior government people are perhaps having twitchy bottoms.
Well done Mr Bridgen, that certainly raises your status and puts the whole “vaccine” issue in to the spotlight.
Ad hominem will not suffice in this instance. Fishy and Chunt need facts and there are none.
Well done and Good Luck Mr Bridgen.
(It would of course help if a few more MP’s could find their missing balls).
Au contraire, Hux.
There are plenty of facts – the same number of excess deaths in highly vaxxed countries as there were in spring 2020 – despite all the measures intended to save us, despite the fabulous, life-saving vaxx. The pandemic has been declared over, so what is the explanation for these facts? Increasingly they are trying to explain away the excess deaths as ‘undiagnosed’ corona. First you can have and die from corona without symptoms as long as you had a test, now you don’t even need the test as a diagnosis – unexplained death = corona because $cience.
Cardiac events left right and centre, another fact. Turbo cancers, another fact.
The only thing for which facts are entirely lacking is that any of the measures that were taken helped in any way against corona. The only facts available with regard to the measures is that they caused civil unrest, a loss of trust in authorities and doctors, enormous economic devastation and an increase in other diseases due to immunity debt.
Apologies Jane.
I should have made clear that in order to undermine Andrew Bridgen’s case Fishy and Chunt would need facts and there are non available which undermine his position.
I knew that, I was being sarky
Indeed, there are no facts to undermine Bridgen’s case, only glaring, in-your-face facts to the contrary.
Ok.
You just know that the whole of the ‘freedom movement’ are gonna want him to appear on their podcasts and/or pin him down to get his take on all this don’t you? He may be suspended but that’s just freed him up to say exactly what he thinks, no holds barred. Our Mr Bridgen will have the last laugh, I’ve no doubt. He’s showing the bent schmucks up for what they are. Let’s go Andrew, the floor is yours!
That’s it exactly Mogs.
The gloves are off. Andrew Bridgen can now say what he damn well pleases. Somebody in the Tory hierarchy has dropped a bollock, probably operating freelance.
I don’t think Billy will be pleased.
Yep, good take.
And there’s now plenty of people who want to listen to the things he has to say.
He was on the Delingpod a few weeks ago and it’s well worth a listen. As someone who voted for some of the measures previously James grills him fairly well. It’s a good listen.
I’ve just cancelled my Tele sub over this article and given the money to TDS instead.
Good man and welcome aboard.
Thanks – Though I’ve been here everyday in the shadows (and occasionally the light) since April 2020
The continued success of DS relies on its posters so the more the better. Quality maintained of course
What defines a ‘quality’ Daily Sceptic poster?
Well, by and large the quality nowadays is good to great and as the trolls are no longer infecting the discourse this is a much more pleasant forum in which to comment.
Giving well-reasoned, heartfelt comments and engaging constructively both with those who agree and disagree with him. Of course it helps if he displays a healthy scepticism of some of the more dubious things we are told by government and msm (including the Times muppets who have failed to instruct their journalist Oliver Wright to repeat his 2014 sentiments in the Independent about big pharma corruption).
I note the first article in the Telegraph about this allowed no comments. Now that comments are being allowed the overwhelming majority is in support of Mr. Bridgen.
.
However the comments are now closed.
Great news.
Even the MSM have to report this.
Yes, that’s a good take on this.
I emailed my pathetic MP, Chris Loder after Bridgen made his speech in Parliament. The useless specimen hadn’t, of course, been in the Chamber to hear it.
He’s ignored me. There none so blind as those who refuse to see.
I think they do see, but can’t acknowledge the truth, for whatever reason.
Same here with the East Devon MP
Yes emailed my useless MP as well (he’s a socialist so even more useless and dangerous than normal). I had a reply from one of his lackeys (Elizabeth she/her) saying Mr Yasin had “other” commitments that night. Words fail.
Exactly so, but the sight and sound of the ‘establishment’ opening their mouths to change their feet suggests to me that they have never had any balls to find, let alone a backbone. And this is why the public inquiry will result in a whitewash.
It is absolutely astonishing to me that there are still figures in authority who refuse to accept that they will be held accountable. The harms and deaths are stacking up, it cannot be hidden now and it will only get worse.
The need to believe in the vaxx as the saviour from the stupid and foolhardy lockdowns speaks for itself. Two years in, after the vaxxes have failed time and again, it is ludicrous to still seek to use them. Just quietly discontinuing use would have been cowardly enough (as this will not help those already harmed and those that may yet be harmed without further research into how to reverse ongoing damage from the poison). But to actively encourage their use in anyone, let alone in groups for whom it is now scientifically beyond dispute that they cause more harm than good is now beyond gross negligence and should rightly be viewed as criminal negligence.
We have moved from the realm of ass-covering to outright malfeasance. There will no longer be any hiding behind “we woz told by the scientists/experts/WHO/EMA/FDA”. Do these fools not follow comments on social media? Other than a few paid shills, vaxx zealots and people living in utter denial, no one has any faith in either the poison or the authorities and experts anymore. The longer the authorities and experts insist on pretending everything is all right, despite the overwhelming evidence to the contrary, the greater the anger.
Wrong side of history, yes. Far worse for them, at some point they will be on the wrong side of a baying mob.
Seconded Jane.
Very well said!
Simon Hart, the UK should be ashamed of what it’s been a part of in unleashing an unwarranted global ‘vaccine solution’ against a disease it was known from the beginning wasn’t a serious threat to most people.
See my email to Patrick Vallance and Chris Whitty, sent on 6 April 2021:
Sir Patrick Vallance and Professor Whitty
The reaction to the SARS-CoV-2 virus is the most reckless and grossly irresponsible ‘public health’ response in history.
There must be independent and objective retrospective critical analysis of what has taken place over the past year, particularly considering Neil Ferguson et al’s Imperial College Report 9, which has impacted upon lockdowns all around the world, and the influence of SAGE.
From the beginning it was recognised the virus wasn’t a serious threat to most people. So who decided on a global vaccination response?
This is important to consider now because the entire global population is being set up to be vaccinated with fast-tracked experimental Covid-19 vaccine products, with three doses already in the pipeline this year, and with at least annual revaccination planned in future, i.e. Covid revaccination for life. And this is for a virus which isn’t a serious threat to most people.
Obviously the Covid-19 vaccine products do not provide sterilising immunity. The Covid-19 vaccine products apparently do not prevent infection or transmission.
With most people not at serious risk with the virus, it’s diabolical to interfere with people’s effective natural defences against the virus, with the aim of making them dependent upon Covid vaccine products, i.e. making them dependent upon the vaccine industry, and those who control it, for life.
It’s staggering that already more than 30 million people have had a first dose of Covid-19 vaccine in the UK, and are facing a second dose, plus a third dose/booster in the autumn. Do these people realise they are guinea pigs in a massive vaccine trial? Did they give their informed consent to participate in this experiment? Do they know the vaccine manufacturers have been protected from liability?
And now children and young people are in the frame, they are being lined up for lifelong Covid vaccination, even though Covid-19 poses little risk to them. The plan is to start vaccinating babies, lining up people to be repeatedly revaccinated from cradle to grave. How on earth has this been allowed to happen? How could ethics committees approve protocols for vaccine trials including participants who are not at serious risk of the virus?
This is an unprecedented medical intervention on a global scale, why has it not been open to public consultation? Mass populations are being vaccinated with fast-tracked experimental vaccine products, when we have no idea of the long-term cumulative consequences, on top of the ever-increasing vaccine load already on vaccination schedules, including annual flu vaccines.
This has to be stopped. The Covid-19 vaccine products must not be pressed upon people who are not at serious risk of the virus. People must be allowed to freely make their own evaluation of risks and benefits.
SARS-CoV-2 is a virus which isn’t a serious threat to most people – mass global vaccination with repeated Covid19 vaccination throughout life is not justifiable. Why was there not more effort put into finding effective treatments, and promoting promising preventatives such as vitamin D to counter deficiency?
The current push for coercive Covid-19 vaccination is wrong, and has been facilitated by the vaccine industry which has colonised public health policy, along with other very influential parties such as the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, and the BMGF-founded Gavi Alliance. The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, Gavi, and vaccine producing countries such as the UK, US and Germany, are the major financial contributors to the World Health Organisation. The WHO appears to be operating as a front for the vaccine industry, i.e. wielding its influence for the benefit of vested interests.
Again, the reaction to SARS-CoV-2 is the most reckless and grossly irresponsible ‘public health’ response in history.
There must be an urgent review of the current Covid-19 vaccine rollout. People not at serious risk of the virus must be warned about the danger they face in being coerced to having Covid vaccination for life, in effect stealing their own effective natural response to the virus, and making them reliant upon the vaccine industry and those who control it.
I request your response on this matter. The grossly disproportionate and ill-targeted actions undertaken in the UK in response to SARS-CoV-2 are having repercussions around the world.
Sincerely
Elizabeth Hart
Independent person investigating the over-use of vaccine products and conflicts of interest in vaccination policy
Amazing. Did you get a response?
No…
I suspect that’s preferable to the weasely nonsense you would have received if they’d bothered!
There’s no transparency and accountability…
The situation is dire in Australia, where millions have been mandated to submit to the jabs to maintain their livelihoods – No Jab, No Job – and to participate in civil society – No Jab, No Life.
Many of the mandates have been dropped now, but millions have been jabbed, and massive damage to personal autonomy and bodily integrity has been done, and mandates still remain for some.
Voluntary informed consent has been trashed, this is a shocking situation in supposed liberal democracies,
At least it’s on record that they were told. And at least you have the consolation of knowing that you did what you could.
Bit like me writing o my GP’s surgery about stabbing children. Didn’t get any reply of course. (And probably means I’m on a DNR now.)
That’s right TJN, it’s ‘on the record’.
Lots more here: https://vaccinationispolitical.net/
Just like your letter to the GP’s surgery, we have to keep calling them out.
I sent many emails to Whitty et al starting in May 2020 and never had a reply. I sent a hard copy letter to Hancock and never had a reply. It was in this site that I read that one reader had had a response to a direct email sent to Neil Ferguson indicating why – all emails from outsiders were diverted to junk folders.
i said long ago, and continue to say, that for the vast majority of the population infection with SARS-CoV-2 doesn’t really matter. What does matter is if you develop the nasty multi system illness that is the bit that should be called Covid-19. So you can forget vaccination if you concentrate on treating the serious cases. I set out how to do this, also in May 2020. Although I was right I was not listened to. I estimate that from May 2020 until, finally, my unheard suggestions were implemented after an entirely unnecessary trial, some 25000 people might have died. As for having a record of my messages see my blog (https://bamjiinrye.wordpress.com). Up to 175000 words and counting.
As for Mr Bridgen the use of the H word appears to have been the trigger for his suspension, although he was actually quoting someone else… cue fake outrage.
Excellent letter. Quote from it:
This has to be stopped.
Trouble is, it wasn’t. We as sceptics failed. Any victory now is a pyrrhic victory. The great majority of the population have this shit inside them, and now have to wait on the consequences. Maybe they’ll be serious, maybe nothing. They’ll just have to wait – for weeks, months, years, decades.
The main thing now TJN is to stop the shots, stop the mandates.
Presuming you’re in the UK I don’t think you had widespread jab mandates there?
But in Australia there have been jab mandates across the country, used to coerce people to submit to the jabs.
I can’t believe what has happened in this country. And many of the fearful have been willing to go along with it because they were told a tissue of fear-mongering lies about Covid.
For me, things will never be the same again, I’m disgusted about what has happened here, absolutely red-pilled.
The medical ‘profession’ in particular is a disgrace, that they could so wholeheartedly go along with mandated medical interventions, which they were subject to themselves!
Apparently they have little or no understanding of their obligation to obtain informed consent before a medical intervention, including vaccination.
How can you give voluntary informed consent under a mandate?!
I’ve written so many letters to doctors’ professional organisations on this matter, and they’ve just ignored them, they’re despicable.
I hated my GPs and experiences with the NHS these last 2 decades. On the one hand it’s nice to have some company. Our NHS is a disgrace and has been for a very long time.
Every time they try and give me a pill or drug I question the necessity and they look at me like I’m crazy. I point out that something in my lifestyle has likely caused the issue, shouldn’t we start there for diagnosis and repair? Their reply this last time “well do you want this pill or not?”
Yes, it’s all about the ‘magic pills’ isn’t it, hooking more and more people onto more and more medical products.
The medical industrial complex has taken over our lives.
The default position now seems to be people are permanently sick or at risk of sickness, and can’t function without medical products.
It starts now in the womb, with pregnant women being Covid, flu and pertussis jabbed, and babies being jabbed with a plethora of vaccines.
This is the real emergency, the non-stop assault from the pharmaceutical industry, making people sick.
To all Doctors,…First, do no harm..too late I’m afraid , your actions will be remembered
…While their mouths were being stuffed with gold.
Wilful ignorance will be of no use to them.
They should maybe a little bit worried.
Clearly mandates haven’t been as bad in the UK. Strangely, this is in part owing to a few ‘NHS Heroes’ – the ones who refused the stab, on pain of bein sacked – enough of them to force the government to back down. Had the NHS fallen, then other sectors would have been next.
Agree. Together did a most crucial job at the right time. Because I could see just that, I was there at DS10 when the signatures were delivered.
There were also some Conservative backbench MPs who made it clear mandates would not be acceptable.
I think he was suspended for the holocaust comparison (which he was quoting the expert as saying, not his own words) .
They tried that same trick here in NL – no comparisons with the holy holocaust allowed.
I appreciate it is a sensitive issue for many people and comparisons are made too easily. But in this case the comparison is fair enough in the sense that many of the tactics used by the nazis to turn people against the Jews and allow the holocaust to occur, have been used in the past few years against people protesting lockdowns, then against the vaxx hesitant and then they went full-on nazi against the unvaxxed.
Having had it drummed into me all my life to ‘never forget’, it is ironic and frustrating to see that very concept set aside when it applies more than ever before.
Hear, hear.
Precisely. I’ve been making this point over and over (as a Jew!)
There was no holocaust comparison in the quote. All that was said is This was a bigger crime to mankind than any of the others which happened since the Holocaust. That’s a comparison with stuff like the trials of Serbian war leaders.
Fanatics don’t do grammar.
And most younger ones can’t do it anymore anyway.
But as Delingpole et al pointed out a year and more ago, when surveying the vitriol poured out at the undstabbed you only had to substitute ‘unvaccinated’ for ‘Jew’ and you were right back in 1930s Germany.
That’s too painful for most people to comprehend right now, but sooner or later they are going to be forced to.
Didn’t some fascist lunatic extremist seriously suggest that the non-vaccinated should have to wear a yellow badge at one point?
I seem to remember that was in a school.
He said “since the holocaust”
That to me means it is definitely not included!
Fair point, and an important one.
The comp is with Stalin&co, Nagasaki, Vietnam, Thalidomide etc..
The Big H. is actually further cemented on its pedestal by that reference.
But they know that.
As Mr. Hart’s omission of any such reference shows.
Cancelling the whip is dangerous for the Tories. By doing so they have doubled down on the Covid policies they followed. If Labour can make any space between its position and them the Tories will bear the entire responsibility for the damage caused, both medical and economic.
That is the oddest thing of all. That most opposition parties in a lot of countries have failed to pick up this ball and run with it.
There were some opposition parties here in NL that protested from the start, there was even dissent within the coalition parties.
But the Republicans in the US were late to the game and still haven’t taken a strong enough stand, Labour has completely and utterly missed out on a great opportunity for political gain. Morons.
How long before they finally realise which way the wind is blowing, delete all their social media hating on the unvaxxed and praising the vaxx, and say they were always for freedom of choice and wanted the safety signals relating to the vaxx investigated from day 1? Only a matter of time.
Political parties seem to be under the control of the same puppet masters.
Same here in Australia. The so-called Liberal Party was in power federally throughout most of the Covid debacle – the Morrison government – with the Labor Albanese government taking over after the election in May last year, and its continuing the Covid narrative.
Labor and Liberal state governments were all in lockstep too.
This has all been coordinated, with traitorous governments setting up people to be jabbed at their command, with the apparent plan to catch people in a digital ID net/social credit system, under the guise of vaccine passports,
A coup has taken place and many are still clueless…but more are waking up…
What happens next?
This is nothing to do with party politics. In any case we are now a One Party state.
I agree, but I don’t think labour can make any space from the tories as they completely agreed with all things covid that the gov came up with!
They will all lose, just watch voter turnout at the next election, that will show them what they’ve done
Voter turn-out is irrelevant. The lead politicians are installed by the WEF. Fishy and Chunt are puppets.
I can’t help thinking that the government et al are sticking their fingers in their ears and appearing mute because any admission of harm is an admission of culpability.
That ship has sailed. They must now take a stand – they either recognise the harm done and wish to rectify it or they knowingly agree with the harm and are happy to keep perpetuating it. There is no middle road anymore, no room for “wir haben es nicht gewusst”.
True, some think if you say sorry you admit guilt!
It is interesting that Bridgen was in serious trouble with the bureaucrat appointed to check MPs declarations. As far as has been reported it was for delay on a single matter. A Labour MP with many such failures was recently given a clear run by the same bureaucrat just before she stepped down from office.
Is that odd?
Will she get a peerage as Bridgen suspects?
So not only is there a wilful blindness over vaccine harms (genuine and citable), there’s a wilful blindness over accountability and consequences for those who push an experimental medicine without informing the public of the potential dangers.
Keep digging that grave – it’ll be harder to free yourself from the inevitable.
If we needed any more proof that opinions against the narrative will not be tolerated, then here it is. There are now more excess deaths recorded than since the start of the ‘pandemic’. And yet our beloved MPs don’t want to discuss this in Parliament. When someone bravely puts their head above the parapets, they are silenced. Why are there many reports of people dying suddenly? Is it climate change? Is it high energy bills? Or could it be the experimental ‘vaccine’????
I really hope and pray that Andrew Bridgen’s suspension is a catalyst for even greater scrutiny as to whether these ‘vaccines’ have caused harm and whether the political establishment is in the pockets of Big Pharma.
I agree with what you say, but think it is about more than simply advancing the position of Big Pharma, though that is one outcome.
Answer- it is!
This has to be one of the darker days in UK parliamentary history.
Suspended for essentially stating reality or at the very very least a very defensible version of it.
You know things are bad when our system does not allow our elected representatives to make statements that quite well backed up by facts.
He has not been suspended from the House of Commons, which would have been a very dark step indeed. He has merely had the Conservative Party whip removed, which has been done many times in the past when the Chief Whip thinks an MP may have strayed from the Conservative Party hymn-sheet.
They found another reason to suspend him from the Commons, over some lobbying issue. 5 day suspension.
Yes, I do get that.
I can understand that parties require that their members line up properly on matters of policy. They need the support of members to drive through policy.
But to me that this isn’t a question of policy. Jabs aren’t made safe or unsafe by political will.To me it strikes me as a misuse of a mechanism of the system. Then again, that’s a pretty common problem now. It feels like we’re living in times where ends justify pretty much any means.
What is the tory party hymn sheet? Just seems to be jumbled up blurry mess of none policies to me
Follow the money of course, that’s where the policies come from these days.
It is what they decide it is. They want to come across as a coherent and united party.
The strange thing here is that usually the opposition parties would be lining up to point out errors of policy by the governing party, so governing party backbench MPs such as Andrew Bridgen do not usually have the dilemma of having to point out (for ethical reasons) errors of policy by his own party.
Let’s hope this gives Mr Bridgen an opportunity to repeat his message about these dangerous mRNA jabs.
What has he got to lose?
The MSM have the knives out today. They are misquoting him by saying he compared the situation to the Holocaust. He did not. His words make it clear that although it is in his view a crime against humanity, it was not as bad as the Holocaust but in second place to it.
In Australia, when the jab mandates were at their height, the unjabbed were discriminated against and cancelled out of society. Depending on the state or territory, for a period, the unjabbed were forbidden to attend entertainment, hospitality, hairdressers, sports clubs, shopping – they were shut out of civil society. Most egregiously, many people were threatened with losing their livelihoods if they refused to submit to the jabs – No Jab, No Job, so many succumbed and took the shots, while others gave up their jobs.
How bad is this?! Yes, I think it’s reasonable to make comparisons with Nazi Germany, because the unjabbed were ostracised, cancelled out of society.
It seems many here now have blanked this out, but then so many are jabbed. It remains to be seen if they will continue to submit to future jab demands.
I don’t think people fully realise what has happened in Australia, what a disgusting period this is in our history, how we were betrayed by politicians, ‘health officers’, the scientific and medical establishment, the mainstream media, and the corporatocracy which is controlling our lives.
And yet it’s strange and slightly reassuring to note that I could if I wanted to enter Australia right now as an unjabbed person, whilst still being forbidden to enter Indonesia, Japan, and the USA, amongst others. Not that I’d want to; Australia’s Covid ‘response’ was as you say one of the most criminal in the world. As a former resident of Australia, I don’t think I will ever go back after seeing that..
Yes, it’s been a horrible experience, another example being the treatment of Novak Djokovic last year, when he was deported on the whim of the then Immigration Minister in the Morrison government, Alex Hawke, who personally banned Djokovic as he might be a ‘bad example’ as he was unjabbed,
Critical thinking people who refused to consent to the worse than useless injections were ostracised and cancelled out of society, absolutely blatant discrimination, while those who submitted to the ‘leaky vaccines’ were privileged to participate in society.
It will be a stain forever on Australia.
As for the countries that still ban the unjabbed, consider the US which demands two jabs – just goes to show what a farce this is, when two jabs ‘wore out’ months ago. They just want the two jabs to show that people were compliant.
This is such a scandal, the biggest crime of all time!
Way past time to bring the perpetrators to account,,,
Biden keeps extending the fake ”emergency” so that he can keep doling out his EUA countermeasures. Well, as we know Biden’s only the puppet. The orders are coming from his boss, the HHS secretary.
Yes, it’s mind-boggling isn’t it…the US…the UK…Australia…New Zealand…Canada…the Five Eyes Countries are major players in this manufactured catastrophe.
Have you seen this?
https://rumble.com/v24fn7i-livestream-1230pm-est-the-globalists-in-plain-sight-with-sasha-latypova-kat.html
Thanks Elizabeth. Not seen this one but I have seen other vids where they talk about the same stuff. Also the substacks of both, especially Katherine, are gold. It’s no ”vaccine” it’s a prototype medical countermeasure. Now how many people would have rolled up their sleeves so eagerly had they known that minor detail…?
HHS is pulling the strings for the entire US goverment? Lol. That’s a new one. Thank you.
Don’t take my word for it. Watch the link Elizabeth provided. Basically any video or substack of Sasha Latypova and Katherine Watt will inform you of the situation and all of the legalities. Katherine is a paralegal and has done an awesome job in uncovering and translating the fine details in this area. Her substack is a goldmine of evidence pertaining to this literal military operation.
Indeed. To me it reads like a failed/stalled coup. Regardless of what anyone says, there was very obviously a plot to change the relationship between people and power. An attempt to bring about a world in which things such as travel and freedom of choice were granted rather than assumed. We know roughly who was involved in this plot. It is a sad fact that these people are still walking freely amongst us. We should, as a species not just punish but make an example of these people. The depravity of individuals such as Gates, Fauci etc should be studied by school children for generations to come; they represent the depths to which humans can stoop.
As you say: “It is a sad fact that these people are still walking freely amongst us.”
Time for accountability for this biggest crime in history, which has impacted on the entire world.
The fascistic positions taken in Australia, New Zealand and Canada were unbelievable, given they had previously been seen as bastions of liberalism.
But did the project fail or has it just stalled? That’s really the question. I’m inclined to think that it simply collapsed under the weight of its own bullshit. I find it hard to imagine the world’s population being so easily duped again.
From what I’ve read, Canada seems to be going even further down the rabbit hole with proposed (or actual by now possibly) laws on euthanasia that have a loose interpretation and application – literally a licence to kill.
And just look at the crazy high excess mortality Australia is experiencing now. 17%? 20%? Anyway, it’s bad.
Yes the jabs are so ”safe and effective” that more Aussies are dying in 2022 than in 2020, sans magic bullet jabs! They must think we all came down with the last shower. 
Yes, there’s lots of concern about adverse events, but for me, I really want to focus on the fact these were unnecessary medical interventions, that so many people who weren’t at serious risk of Covid-19 were bullied into jeopardising their natural immune response with these worse than useless shots.
This is a genuine crime against humanity, forcing
people to submit to medical interventions that were unnecessary and could cause harm.
And children for crying out loud, who were at no risk with Covid! According to government statistics, around two million children are double-jabbed in Australia.
Why?! Why on earth were children interfered with via these injections? What information was provided to their parents to induce them to have these shots?
Children and most others weren’t at risk of hospitalisation or death with Covid, why has their natural immune response been put at risk with the Covid jabs?!
Will people ever realise what a gross act of exploitation and betrayal has taken place?
Yes it was self-evidently ridiculous from the outset but only a small minority could see it. We learned much about human psychology in during those years, didn’t we?
20%? That sounds crazy bad! Are people in Aus talking about this? Surely at least some people must realise what is going on.
Igor covered this in a recent substack;
“Excess mortality in Australia runs at 17% of their usual mortality. This statistic is understated because the Australian Bureau of Statistics includes 2021 as part of the 2022 “baseline,” despite 2021 also being marked by a significant amount of excess deaths that occurred due to their vaccination drive. Thus, the true number of excess deaths in Australia is about 20%. The chart only goes until 18th of September – so it will not catch the spike of deaths we discussed in the first half of the article.”
https://igorchudov.substack.com/p/a-summer-of-illness-and-excess-death
Just out of interest, what is the worst other crime against humanity since the holocaust? Pol Pot? Chairman Mow? Infanticide?
Doesn’t “….. since the holocaust”, specifically exclude the holocaust? Consequently, he may be comparing it to Mao’s Great Leap Forward, or the Rwandan massacre, or Pol Pot’s Year Zero, but he isn’t comparing it to the holocaust.
He was also quoting an eminent cardiologist.
Of course you are correct but you wouldn’t expect the average politician to show that level of intelligence or honesty even
The guy’s had a target on his back since he first piped up about his concerns publicly. They’ll do whatever it takes, including bending the facts and playing dirty. But what I’d really like to see now is the other few MPs ( and you really could count them on one hand ), Chope et al, coming to Bridgen’s defense and having his back. It’s times like this when you know who your real friends are and who will either stab you in the back or desert you.
I wish Mark Steyn was all better and back to work. Bet he’d have something to say about this.
And this is democracy is it? I’m f%/#@g digusted with the state of British politics, they can all go and rot in hell , I’ll never vote again for any of them, lying cheating gits the lot of em
Andrew Brigden for PM!
Having just read the comments from the various organisations about this I can only say that any lingering doubt I had about our political parties’ lack of understanding of science and reality is now gone. They are idiots and with few exceptions are unable to understand the harms they have unleashed upon the country and indeed the world.
From now on I will be actively looking for ways to vote that undermine them all and taking whatever action I can to spread the word about the terminal stupidity of his colleagues.
I have sent Andrew a message of support, I hope he’s not feeling too trodden on today.
Now it’s time for the few decent mp’s to grow some..and side with us for a change
Andrew, please join reform and drop these idiots in the so called tory party or you will be dragged down with them,.. god I’m so livid!!!
Looking at the people now attacking Mr Bridgen, it looks like a managed take down of him. Vile MPs and weak media. Not a good combination.
Not sure who is being “offended” by Andrew Bridgen’s comments. Clearly, some of the lawmakers are rattled, but they have good reason to be given they are the ones who could end up in the dock one day facing charges over their role in this scam. Their shrieks of indignation sound ever more shrill and desperate, a kind of Sicilian defence that involves excessive attacks on the dissenter to detract from their own sins. The only thing that shocks me about this latest incident is the degree of denial and detachment from reality of those who are desperate to shut down the debate about the safety and effectiveness of the jabs.
“[…] They are the ones who could end up in the dock […]”. Au contraire. Lawmakers wind up in the dock only if their regime is replaced by a substantially different one, perhaps after conquest by external forces, whereupon the conqueror sets up the necessary show trial. At best, in the UK, Labour might be elected but they are not substantially different in respect of free speech and lockdown policy. Perhaps someone can suggest different countries in which the lawmakers might conceivably be in the the dock regarding their vaccine/lockdown policies? Is the US in with a chance on that?
“Clearly, some of the lawmakers are rattled, but they have good reason to be”
As I pointed out earlier I tend to think the Chief Whip might have acted unilaterally in which case he is in for one helluva bollocking. However, if this is a failure from the top there will now be a massive scramble to cook up another wholly unrelated crisis in order to draw fire and quash this.
Bring it on, Mr Bridgen. The floor is now yours.
We are all cheering for you.
I’m cheering from all the way over here!
Hear, hear.
I’ll tell you what, this action against one of the only mps to speak up about this situation feels personal!
One of the few to stick up for the vast majority of the British public who I’m sure would vote for an independent public enquiry ,and they strike him down for it!
It’s like an attack on my own logical, sceptical and common sense mind! Do you feel this too?
It goes to show that you can’t bribe or coerce every lawmaker, even if you have the unending wealth of the corporate criminals behind this. Which is slightly reassuring.
It’s personal to anybody who believes truthfulness is an honourable and desirable thing. For liars, and it seems most MPs are, it’s just another day in the office
That ,unfortunately,is so true and such a sad indictment on modern British politics. There was a time when even sceptical old me thought that mps where ,at heart, trying to do the right thing but not any more! the ones that do have any real morals are few and far between
At the very least, it is to be hoped that MPs will now pay some attention to Dr Malhotra’s paper and its references:
‘….in November 2021, I was made aware of a peer-reviewed abstract published in Circulation, with concerning findings. In over 500 middle-aged patients under regular follow up, using a predictive score model based on inflammatory markers that are strongly correlated with risk of heart attack, the mRNA vaccine was associated with significantly increasing the risk of a coronary event within five years from 11% pre-mRNA vaccine to 25% 2–10 weeks post mRNA vaccine. An early and relevant criticism of the validity of the findings was that there was no control group, but nevertheless, even if partially correct, that would mean that there would be a large acceleration in progression of coronary artery disease, and more importantly heart attack risk, within months of taking the jab. I wondered whether my father’s Pfizer vaccination, which he received six months earlier, could have contributed to his unexplained premature death and so I began to critically appraise the data.’
particularly its conclusions:
‘Given these observations, and reappraisal of the randomised controlled trial data of mRNA products, it seems difficult to argue that the vaccine roll-out has been net beneficial in all age groups. While a case can be made that the vaccines may have saved some lives in the elderly or otherwise vulnerable groups, that case seems tenuous at best in other sections of the population, and when the possible short-, medium- and unknown longer-term harms are considered (especially for multiple injections, robust safety data for which simply does not exist), the roll-out into the entire population seems, at best, a reckless gamble. It’s important to acknowledge that the risks of adverse events from the vaccine remain constant, whereas the benefits reduce over time…’
https://insulinresistance.org/index.php/jir/article/view/71/221
Who knows, but that might even lead one or two MPs to dig a little further and this is what they will find:
‘The lack of adequate transparency about COVID-19 vaccine trials and their regulation cannot be dismissed as unfortunate, stubborn problems emblematic of the present culture in biomedicine. In a time of increasing public scrutiny, transparency of regulatory decision making leading to the approval of drug treatments and vaccines for COVID-19 is important to ensure patient and stakeholder trust. It is a scientific, moral and ethical imperative that access to complete trial data of these global public health interventions is urgently granted to patients, researchers and other key stakeholders.’
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/353786599_Transparency_of_COVID-19_vaccine_trials_decisions_without_data
Is the game really afoot, at last…….?
Can’t add much to the great comments, but this story was reported in the Telegraph this morning and by this afternoon the comments were closed! (They don’t like it up ‘em!)!!LOL!
Most of the comments were positive in relation to Brigden …some had over 200 likes which I can’t say I’ve seen before….I think this is what Joel Smalley meant when he said the newspapers were getting ‘squeaky bum’ when the articles they present are at such odds with their paying customers comments….
I’ve noticed that the Telegraph isn’t allowing comments on all sorts of stuff..I really think they know what the reactions will be!
As someone who is most decidedly not anti-Semitic, quite the opposite usually, can someone explain why absolutely nothing can even be compared to the holocaust?
If the vaccines end up killing and injuring millions, it won’t be the same but it will be a fair comparison won’t it?….
Have you noticed that, as the evidential outcomes of the vaccination programmes are beginning to emerge, increasing numbers of those most judgemental, who advocated silencing any questioning of the programmes, are now calling for an ‘amnesty’ from any judgement, any criticism, any consequences being visited upon those who might have got it wrong?
Meanwhile, here they are, trying to cancel Bridgen.
Odd that, innit?
.
I’m afraid this comes as no surprise. Andrew was skating on thin ice, so far as the almighty cover-up is concerned. Of course people will believe that lies they are now telling about him, and wholeheartedly believe the narrative, but this is not about a mass realisation. Its about converting one person at a time. Anyone who can see that ‘something isn’t right’ and is curious will find the dots and join them up. The real question is who has the authority and the balls to put this in court. Where is our Nuremburg.?
When you can’t refute the message, attack the messenger, distract the audience to make it about the messenger not the message, discredit the messenger thereby discrediting the message.
Ad hominem – favoured trick of the liar and cheat.
So his comments have no place in society but harmful injections are ok ! God help us !!
Quelle surprise.
He’s been Corbynised.
God Bless Andrew Bridgen and similar.
He clearly didn’t compare what has happened to the Holocaust.
But if we were to make that comparison, shouldn’t we be comparing what has happened since March 2020 to what happened during the first 34 months of NSDAP government in Germany?
Excellent point.
That’s the point, isn’t it – he quoted ‘…since the holocaust’, thus explicitly recognising the tragedy that the holocaust was. He didn’t say/quote ‘…than the holocaust’ which would imply making the holocaust less than the current genocide (although time will tell). Simon Hart, Sunak et al really do need to brush up on their GCSE use of language.
‘Matt Hancock, the disgraced lockdown Health Secretary, hit out at Mr. Bridgen’s “disgusting, antisemitic, anti-vax conspiracy theories” at Prime Minister’s Questions on Wednesday. He said the comments were “deeply offensive” and “have no place in this House or in our wider society”. ‘
And what did that disgraced man say about “vaccine” sceptics in his disgraceful Daily Mail column again? Vile man.
As for the figures, if we say four billion (and counting) had this medication, and a relatively conservative estimate of the mortality rate of one in 5,000 (though others have suggested one in 800 or one in 400 – it partly depends how you count it of course). You could easily be getting into millions, and we’ll assume that at least some of the people pushing this knew what Dr. Mike Yeadon does. I suggest a credible case could be made for the position of the “consultant cardiologist”. So Mr Bridgen has basically been suspended for offending “vaccine” zealots. But not that disgraced man for similar remarks about “vaccine” sceptics. Anyway, another reason not to vote for that party as it is now (and one imagines that John Bercow could have had some fun getting political over this if still speaker).
It is a shrewd decision because in three months time he will be hailed as a prophet I can say that with certianty. Thankfully I’m glad that there is at least one politician who hasn’t succumbed to retardation. Yes I know that he voted for care workers to be forced to take the shot and I do not forgive him for that but he has explained himself in that regard.
You won’t have to rely on the likes of Bridgen in terms of disabilty and death. I told a few people not to take it but they took it anyway. That is all you can do. I guarantee you that the truth is going to come out in the next few months. and I can tell you exactly what the media will say – they will make out that they were lied to and then try to make out like they were against it all along. You have to let it go we failed as a species and many of us are going to die. We failed long before Covid but this brings it home.
I am getting truly angered with the shoddy, shoot from the hip politics of today and the failure of many to understand the simplest english language. The phrase “biggest since” means “not as big as what preceded but bigger that everything else after”. How is that antisemitic? The very cancelling of the “biggest since phrase” means “nothing after can be smaller” as the largest such smaller thing would be the biggest since. That’s basic mathematics. Ridiculous. Language matters. Accusing someone of “antisemitism” is a massive charge.Here those doing the charging are ignorant of the basic english language either really or deliberately. Bridgen has not been antisemitic whatever the reality of the relative issues with the Pfizer jab.
The more the mainstream back this cause the biiger their demise. Honestly if you look at American mainstream news for example, they are turning rapidly against the vaccine. Believe me if the NYT and Washington Post turn against it the BBC will have a hard time keeping up the pretence. Honestly I know it sounds optimistic but I guarantee you that in two months time we will be in a very different situation and the BBC will be discredited forever.
Some former Health Secretary’s should learn to keep their mouths shut
Stand in the Park
Sundays 10.30am to 11.30am
Make friends & keep sane
Elms Field
Wokingham RG40 2FE
(near Everyman Cinema and play area)
We no longer have a democracy nor legal or human rights.
Andrew Bridgen is being attacked for expressing his political/philosophical beliefs – which is unlawful discrimination under the Equality Act 2010.
To the extent it inhibits his freedom of expression in Parliament it is a breach of privilege. So much for the Mother of all Parliaments.
The House of Lords confirmed that freedom of speech is an English common law right [no need for ECHR or Human Rights Act].
It includes not merely the right to exercise free speech but the right of everyone to know.
Per Lord Steyn in Reynolds v Times Newspapers Ltd [2001] 2 AC 127.
However, the right to freedom of expression under the HRA is directly actionable. It is a personal right. [HRA s7].
Unfortunately it will not help my writing to my MP who attacked Andrew Bridgen publicly today.
Fascism rules.
And the only people standing up for democratic rights are a few on the right.
Sadly, Starmer’s mob believe in the rule of the mob to shut us all up. And the Wiberals wobble and say nothing as democracy dies before our eyes.
With respect he has not been banned from Parliament. He can continue to speak in the House but not as a Tory.
I did not say he has. But it is a move designed to inhibit his freedom of speech in parliament and that is a breach of privilege.
These people do not care that they undermine democracy or that British people and children die needlessly from a disease Fauci not only paid the Chinese to develop but gave them the technology to do it. In so doing he gave the Chinese the ability to develop biologicial weapons of a kind they did not have the technology to develop and which could be used against the West in future.
Welcome to ChEngland. President Xi for our next Prime Minister. Hurrah!
Shutting people up was another feature of the Holocaust. Many were shut up permanently.
What can we do to help Andrew?
A few days ago on GB News Andrew Bridgen asked people who wanted to help to write to their MPs.
So pick your main points well – there are plenty here to choose from and write remembering to confirm you are a constituent.
And if you get no response write again. And again. And again.
Well done to Andrew Bridgen for putting the issues firmly onto the political map.
If you want to cut the head off the serpent there is no doubt whatsoever that corruption in Whitehall enables all of this.
In the 1980s, Whitehall civil servants were first allowed to develop contacts to and ties with commerce and industry. It was predictable then that would lead to an increase in corruption and it has. It has had 40 years to develop to where it is now.
Direct experience of corrupt practices in Government agencies and some statutory bodies is that corruption can only take place at the grace and favour or direction of the most senior civil servants. Whilst I am sure they will all disagree with this view, to me it is the only consistent coherent and indeed inevitable explanation. Even our security services are tainted.
Thatcher’s favourite sitcom “Yes Minister” was in truth a comedy about Whitehall corruption in the proper sense of the word.
Most troubling is the silence about it from politicians – especially the majority of UK MPs – who never address it.
And of course the left are happy to have democracy undermined so keep silent to control us all when they get power.
A public example of the web of Whitehall corruption is the recent Greensill scandal. Greensill was reportedly first brought in by the cabinet secretary at the time. The government’s chief commercial officer began working as an adviser to Greensill Capital in 2015 – while still employed in the civil service. He was given official approval to do this. And then in 2016, after leaving office, David Cameron became an adviser to Greensill Capital. He was given share options reportedly worth tens of millions of pounds. Clearly, if it was not for the actions of the civil servants, Cameron would not have been exposed to a person and company which he presumably believed from his civil servants was beyond reproach. His subsequent actions were however still unwise.
There are many other examples the public never gets to learn about.
There is reason to believe manipulation from Whitehall is far more common than anyone realises and is across the board and includes at least several statutory bodies.
Former Whitehall civil servants appointed as executive day-to-day management to run some agencies and statutory bodies can oil the wheels of and ease the way for manipulation.
How is it the Statistics Authority is able to publish false statistics like the Covid death statistics? It is only possible if sanctioned at the highest levels in Whitehall in my view.
It is unlikely the UK is alone in this. A recent example is Dr Fauci of the USA, made public in Robert F Kennedy Jnr’s book The Real Anthony Fauci. It is now in a documentary film. The book had sold over 1.1 million copies by early last year and had 22,144 Amazon ratings [more now no doubt] giving it 4.8 out of 5 stars.
Why is the UK NHS costing 40% of GDP when historical scientific knowledge tells us our generations should be the healthiest to have trodden the earth?
And why are there so many chronic illnesses with only palliative treatments and not cures?
Thank you Whitehall.
They ought to remove the whip from un-elected Sunak and the jungle tosser Hancock. Bridgen speaks for millions as against their mates in the Fake news.
Had an email ruck with the Daily Telegraph yesterday over this story. The readers, of which I’d say 95% are in support of Bridgen, were having their comments deleted in droves by the moderators.
During the email game of ping pong I challenged them as to why so many posts were being removed, even though they were not outside the DTs rules.
They eventually confirmed that it was down to an individual’s viewpoint – in other words, whether they liked what it said or not.
The Stoning Of Andrew Bridgen
https://youtu.be/bDe9msExUK8
So this is the Tory party now fighting against free speech. I have had two anti Covid jabs and a booster at no time before I had them was I told about the potential cardiac side effects and this is against medical principles. I have a dear friend who died from an unexpected heart attack after having 3 MRNA injections and although it can’t be proven I suspect that may have contributed to what happened. Matt Le Tissier was one of the outspoken people I first encountered drawing attention to the number of young sports people having heart problems after MRNA injections and he was also effectively shut down. Is big pharma running the world and controlling politicians now? Andrew Bridgen may have quoted something from a cardiac specialist which is a bit exagerated, but it was not denying the holocaust, only indentifying it as an extreme wrong, to use as a comparison. I really can’t see how there is any way that is ant-Jewish and those who say it is should turn their wrongly directed sensitivity down a bit. What has happened here is another reason to eliminate anyone’s voting intentions away from the Tories. Andrew Bridgen is someone I would vote for because he considers people above keeping the creeps in his party happy, but he would need to change his party affiliation perhaps to Reform where I’m sure he would be welcome.
I read this article with utter disbelief, a sitting politician being sanctioned for asking questions in the house. We are in a true dictatorship. I started to read the comments, of which I support and agree and will continue to read after I have posted this. On this issue I am 100% behind Andrew Bridgen, and 100% against the rest.
To be on the safe side perhaps we should all condition ourselves to use a different comparison? “A bigger crime against humanity than the communist Pogroms” perhaps?
As for Simon Hart (Sunak supporter, ‘whip’ was his quid pro quo for supporting him in the recent coup) well he recently got his constituency office tagged with “Torries Out”(sic) which lead him to gloat over having CCTV footage of the perpetrator he then blethered on about how we have our chance at democracy at the next GE.
I don’t think anyone has bothered to point out to him that a small minority (the MP’s)
forced out a democratically elected leader and installed the runner up without further recourse to democracy recently.