142769
  • Log in
The Daily Sceptic
No Result
View All Result
  • Articles
  • About
  • Archive
    • ARCHIVE
    • NEWS ROUND-UPS
  • Forum
  • Donate
  • Newsletter
The Daily Sceptic
No Result
View All Result

U.K. Supreme Court in Firing Line for Ludicrous Ruling Giving Protestors “Lawful Excuse” to Block Roads

by Will Jones
13 November 2022 6:40 PM

Supreme Court judges have been blamed for giving the green light to eco-zealots to cause mayhem on Britain’s roads as Just Stop Oil are understood to be exploiting an extraordinary 2021 legal ruling that protests can be a “lawful excuse” to block roads. The Mail has the story.

The ruling followed the prosecution of four anti-arms trade protesters who blocked a road leading to the ExCel Centre while it hosted an arms fair in September 2017.

In June 2021 the Supreme Court, established by Tony Blair’s Labour Government, reversed a High Court decision and overturned the protesters’ convictions.

It ruled that protesters can have a “lawful excuse” defence under the European Convention of Human Rights against the offence of obstructing a highway, even where they have used “deliberately physically obstructive conduct”.

The so-called “Ziegler” ruling, named after Nora Ziegler, one of the protesters, was hailed at the time by campaign group Extinction Rebellion. 

It is understood that protesters are briefed about the ruling before they block motorways and trunk roads in a bid to cause traffic chaos.

Former Tory leader Iain Duncan Smith told the Mail: “Clearly it’s an absurd judgment. They have a right to protest but they don’t have a right to cause such chaos that people are hurt and can’t get to hospitals. Whose rights are more important? The right of a protester or the right of somebody to go about their business? It’s time that this was resolved and resolved damn quickly by the courts. The Supreme Court now has got to start behaving in a way that represents the balance of rights.”

Surely the Government just needs to pass a law that states, for the avoidance of doubt, that protests may never be a lawful excuse to obstruct a highway. Since Parliament is sovereign, such a law would have to take precedence over any prior legal rulings interpreting general principles in a statement of human rights. It’s no good the Government blaming the courts when it has the power to pass laws that bind the courts.

Instead of such a simple remedial measure we have the new Public Order Bill, which, as Claire Fox explains in the Spectator, is introducing Serious Disruption Protection Orders (i.e., ‘protest-banning orders’) that cover an extraordinary range of offences.

These can be doled out to anyone who has been on more than one protest over the last five years. This includes any type of protest, not just XR-related activities. If issued with an SDPO, you can be banned from going to a particular place, associating with particular people, encouraging someone else to go on a demo or using the internet in a particular way. You can be punished by the state for retweeting an advert for a protest. You can also be issued with an electronic tag for up to 12 months, using GPS data technology that allows the police to monitor your whereabouts 24 hours a day. This extreme level of surveillance risks being used against innocent individuals who have not committed a crime.

All completely over the top, and made all the worse for coming from a Government and legislature that has spent the last three years imposing extreme restrictions on the population and responding so aggressively to protests against them.

Fox adds that the new Bill also, in Clause 9, criminalises “seeking to influence, advising or persuading, attempting to advise or persuade, or otherwise expressing an opinion” in the vicinity of medical facilities. The initial target is anti-abortion protestors, who for some reason are deemed to have fewer protest rights than others. But clearly it could be applied to any medical matter, such as gender reassignment treatment and vaccines. Yet more clamping down on peaceful protest, more constricting of the freedoms we once took for granted.

It’s not complicated. We want normal protests to be allowed, and violence, criminal damage and road-blocking to be banned. How do the politicians and courts manage to make something so simple appear so complicated?

Tags: Eco-ProtestorsExtinction RebellionJust Stop OilProtestsSupreme CourtWoke Gobbledegook

Donate

We depend on your donations to keep this site going. Please give what you can.

Donate Today

Comment on this Article

You’ll need to set up an account to comment if you don’t already have one. We ask for a minimum donation of £5 if you'd like to make a comment or post in our Forums.

Sign Up
Previous Post

Why is the USA Still Insisting Visitors Are Vaccinated When Every Other Country Has Ended Its Travel Restrictions?

Next Post

British Universities Told to “Decolonise” Mathematics by Downgrading Status of Rational Knowledge

Subscribe
Login
Notify of
Please log in to comment

Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.

21 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

NEWSLETTER

View today’s newsletter

To receive our latest news in the form of a daily email, enter your details here:

 

DONATE

PODCAST

Nick Dixon and Toby Young Talk About the Government’s Plan to Reduce Immigration, Elon Musk’s Message to Advertisers and Keir Starmer’s New Hero

by Toby Young
5 December 2023
3

LISTED ARTICLES

  • Most Read
  • Most Commented
  • Editors Picks

Private Eye Used to Be a Thorn in the Side of the Establishment. Now It Has Become a Weapon to Attack the Establishment’s Enemies

10 December 2023
by Gareth Roberts

News Round-Up

11 December 2023
by Richard Eldred

U.K. “In Danger of Becoming a Two Nation” State After Covid Lockdowns

10 December 2023
by Richard Eldred

The Covid Inquiry Is a Shameless Cover-Up

11 December 2023
by Richard Eldred

RAF Intelligence Officers Joined in “Spying” on Covid Lockdown Critics

10 December 2023
by Richard Eldred

Private Eye Used to Be a Thorn in the Side of the Establishment. Now It Has Become a Weapon to Attack the Establishment’s Enemies

30

The Covid Inquiry Is a Shameless Cover-Up

26

News Round-Up

19

U.K. “In Danger of Becoming a Two Nation” State After Covid Lockdowns

18

“Unite or Die” – Rishi Sunak’s Christmas Message to His Troops

30

In Defence of Steve’s Kirsch’s Analysis of the Leaked New Zealand Vaccine Data

11 December 2023
by Nick Bowler

Did the Oil Price Cap Work?

11 December 2023
by Noah Carl

Private Eye Used to Be a Thorn in the Side of the Establishment. Now It Has Become a Weapon to Attack the Establishment’s Enemies

10 December 2023
by Gareth Roberts

With Neil Ferguson’s Abysmal Record of Failed Predictions, Boris Was Right Not to Trust Him

10 December 2023
by Prof Carl Heneghan and Dr Tom Jefferson

The Media’s New Pastime: Spreading Alarm About Normal Winter Viruses

10 December 2023
by Eugyppius

POSTS BY DATE

November 2022
M T W T F S S
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
282930  
« Oct   Dec »

SOCIAL LINKS

Free Speech Union
  • Home
  • About us
  • Donate
  • Privacy Policy

Facebook

Twitter

Instagram

RSS

Subscribe to our newsletter

© Skeptics Ltd.

No Result
View All Result
  • Articles
  • About
  • Archive
    • ARCHIVE
    • NEWS ROUND-UPS
  • Forum
  • Donate
  • Newsletter

© Skeptics Ltd.

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Create New Account!

Please note: To be able to comment on our articles you'll need to be a registered donor

Already have an account?
Please click here to login Log In

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
wpDiscuz
You are going to send email to

Move Comment