I belong to a privileged generation. Not that I was raised in affluence; far from it. Born in 1958, to a mother who worked all her life as a weaver in the textile industry and a father employed as a maintenance mechanic at the local factory, I lived on a council estate for the first decade of my life. Money was tight, holidays were basic and infrequent, and treats – in the form of confectionary – were rare, usually restricted to a Turkish Delight chocolate bar each Sunday evening. Although I never realised it until I was 62, I was, however, part of a cohort who possessed something sacrosanct, something so very precious and – deplorably – something future generations may never enjoy again: individual freedom.
To be clear, the world I have lived in has been far from perfect. My era has been one incorporating fundamental inequalities and injustices, widespread poverty, discrimination and – particularly in my young-adult years – a recurring risk of physical assault. But despite this context, each of us took for granted a range of basic human rights: to meet with whomever we wished; to leave our homes whenever we chose; to eat whatever we wanted; to express opinions others might not agree with; to take risks, make mistakes and learn sometimes painful lessons; to wear whatever we wanted; to work to improve our career prospects and earn more money to enhance our lives and those of our families; and to decide what drugs and other medical interventions to accept. When cheap flights emerged in the 1970s and 80s, the whole world became wonderfully accessible.
My perception (probably a naïve one) of successive Labour and Conservative Governments was that, although often inept and guilty of policy errors, they broadly sought to improve the lives of their citizens and could at least be relied upon to protect us against external malignant forces. Furthermore, it seemed that the life-spans of our elected politicians were dependent upon keeping us – their constituents – satisfied by acting primarily in the interests of U.K. citizens.
But 30 months ago, this illusion was shattered.
I knew something was awry as early as February 2020. By March the same year my early-warning detector would not rest. While the media, politicians and the science ‘experts’ informed us – incessantly – that a uniquely lethal pathogen was spreading carnage across the world, and unprecedented and draconian restrictions on our day-to-day lives were essential to prevent Armageddon, I wasn’t buying it. I formed the view that a momentous event, unparalleled in my lifetime, was unfolding, but it was not primarily about a virus.
Why, at that point in time, did I recognise that something sinister was underway while almost everyone else I met seemed to be swallowing the dominant narrative? It is a difficult question to answer. Perhaps my time in the early 1980s as a psychiatric charge nurse in an NHS hospital, occasionally interfacing with the ‘infection control’ department, gave me insight into how this professional group operate. Although well-meaning, their advice regarding how to minimise the spread of contagion on a ward often seemed impractical, revealing an apparent inability to see the bigger picture. Or maybe my in-depth knowledge of risk assessment (gleaned in my doctoral thesis during my time as a clinical psychologist) had impressed upon me how woefully inaccurate we are in gauging the relative threat levels posed by various hazards inherent in our environment. What I did know for sure was that Big Pharma – arguably the most corrupt industry in the world – would exploit the emerging ‘crisis’ for its own ends. And how right I was.
The list of state-driven human rights abuses we have endured under the pretence of ‘keeping us safe’ and the (ominous) ‘greater good’ is long: prohibition of travel; confinement in our homes; social isolation; closure of businesses; denial of access to leisure activities; de-humanising mask mandates; directives (scrawled on floors and walls) dictating which way to walk; an arbitrary ‘stay two metres apart’ rule; exclusion from the weddings and funerals of our loved ones; the seclusion and neglect of our elderly; school shutdowns; children’s playgrounds sealed off with yellow and black tape; muzzled children and toddlers; students denied both face-to-face tuition and a ‘rites-of-passage’ social life; and coerced experimental ‘vaccines’ that turned out to be more harmful and less effective than initially claimed. Equally egregious were the strategies deployed to lever compliance with these restrictions, namely psychological manipulation (‘nudging’), pervasive censorship across the media and academic journals and the cancellation and vilification of anyone brave enough to speak out against the dominant Covid narrative. All-in-all, a state-driven assault on the core of our shared humanity.
As the state-orchestrated infringement of our basic human rights continued, I felt compelled to act in ways that were far outside of my comfort zone. The 61-year-old man who had never been on a protest march until summer 2020, and who had innocently assumed that most of society’s leaders were decent people who tried to do what was right, had changed. I found myself walking with tens of thousands of others along Regent Street, London, screaming “Freedom!”. I pushed “Back to Normal” leaflets through the letterboxes of hundreds of my neighbours. I stood on the corner of our local shopping street with a placard held aloft stating, “Say No To Vaccine Passports”.
Throughout 2020 and 2021, I struggled to find reasons for the irrational, masochistic Covid restrictions and the ubiquitous infringement of our basic human rights. My explanations evolved. Initially I clung to the ‘panic and incompetence’ rationale, that our governments had been spooked by the images coming out of China – remember the videos of people falling dead in the streets – and the mono-focused, blinkered and catastrophic prophecies of our so-called epidemiological experts. As the atrocities persisted, this explanation was rendered inadequate, and it morphed into an ‘opportunistic agendas’ account where activists – promoting green aspirations, digitalised IDs, social credit systems, a cashless society, universal income, a biosecurity state – had exploited the anxieties associated with the emergence of a novel respiratory virus. By 2021 these conclusions, in turn, seemed insufficient to explain the persistence of the horrors we were enduring and it – belatedly – became clear that globalist and ‘deep state’ powers were at work, striving to realise their inhuman aspirations. My further reading about the activities of World Economic Forum, the United Nations, the European Union, the World Health Organisation, the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, the Wellcome Trust, Anthony Fauci and Big Pharma, and others, confirmed this emerging conclusion.
As the Covid event fades from media attention (replaced by a focus on similarly dehumanising and totalitarian responses to environmental threats, the war in Ukraine and the imminent cost-of-living crisis) it is intriguing to reflect upon its residual effects.
I continue to mourn what I have lost, a process associated with a complex mix of fluctuating emotions. For two years, our Government, aided and abetted by state-funded scientists, denied us opportunities for fun and human connection, stymied our freedoms and orchestrated a systematic campaign to coerce us to both accept experimental ‘vaccines’ and to slavishly cover our faces with cloth or plastic. Consequently, I feel anger and disgust towards many of our politicians, epidemiological ‘experts’ and behavioural scientists who were complicit with this shameful period in our history. And I now distrust all sources of information, whether it be the media, the ‘scientific’ world or public health experts. Without an anchor for truth, I float – incredulous – in an ocean of mainstream-generated misinformation.
My 60-plus years of naivety have been shattered. I believe only those few who have shown selfless integrity throughout the Covid debacle. Also, I am now sceptical about much of the green agenda: state-funded scientists lied to us about Covid so why wouldn’t they show the same self-serving dishonesty about the climate?
Closer to home, it is clear my life has changed. I feel disappointment and irritation towards many people who I previously respected and liked, such as friends who colluded with the catastrophically damaging Covid restrictions because of fear, ignorance or a desire to avoid hassle and condemnation. Many relationships are now more distant. On the rare occasions we meet there is often an ‘elephant in the room’, and when the Covid issue is touched upon I typically feel frustrated that many do not want to consider the implications of what has been inflicted upon us.
I feel similarly towards mental health colleagues who, for years, I had stood alongside and respected, collectively fighting the tyranny of biological psychiatry (its human rights infringements, coercion, overuse of drugs and vilification of those who questioned them) but who failed to recognise a much bigger tyranny when it emerged in 2020. While a handful of this anti-psychiatry lobby did soon recognise the totalitarian threat inherent to the Covid response, most bought into the dominant narrative. Heated disagreements ensued with a few, followed by ongoing mutual resentment; for most we just avoid each other.
But the residual effects of the Covid debacle are not all negative. New friendships have emerged with people from across the political spectrum. Based on a mutual respect, enduring bonds have formed with fellow sceptics both locally (through the Community Assembly and the Stand in the Park initiatives) and nationally via joint endeavours in HART, Smile Free, and PANDA. And it was uplifting to recently discover – via a chance meeting in the local pub – that the family I had lived across the road from for the last seven years, yet had rarely spoken to, had always been as sceptical as me about the dominant Covid narrative.
Furthermore, I have noticed that my behaviour has changed in subtle ways. I now make more of an effort to smile and gain eye contact with – unmasked – strangers. Similarly, when greeting acquaintances, I’m more inclined to hug or shake hands as compared to pre-2020 levels of bodily contact. (Non of that fist-bump and elbow-touch nonsense for me.) It’s as if I’m striving to compensate for the human connection deficit that we’ve accrued over the last 30 months. Or perhaps I’m making a defiant metaphorical one-finger salute to any onlookers who still adhere to the risk-averse and dehumanising dominant Covid narrative?
While we continue to drown in a sea of propaganda, censorship and coercion, who knows what the future might hold?
One thing is for sure: We must never forget what the political leaders and public health specialists inflicted upon us. Whether the reason was weakness, groupthink, conflict of interest or unadulterated corruption, the miscreants must all be held to account and pay a price for terrorising the people they are meant to serve. This assertion is not fuelled by a primitive desire for retribution – well, not primarily – but by an expectation that, if the guilty are not named and shamed, the same totalitarian impositions will be repeated again and again.
The conviction sheet is a long one. It includes political leaders at home (Boris Johnson, Keir Starmer, Nicola Sturgeon, Mark Drayford) and abroad (including Justin Trudeau, Emmanuel Macron, Joe Biden and Jacinda Ardern); Bill Gates and his various funding agencies; SAGE scientists who danced to the tune of their academic and political paymasters; the behavioural science ‘nudgers’ at the helm of the worldwide psychological manipulation strategy; the professional organisations that have manifestly colluded with the state-driven tyranny (including the British Medical Association and the British Psychological Society); the conflicted drug regulators (such as the MHRA); the powerful, profit-driven pharmaceutical companies, deploying their financial clout to influence health policy decisions; and the mainstream media, who have slavishly peddled the dominant Covid narrative while dismissing alternative viewpoints.
To successfully expose the wrongdoings of such powerful individuals and institutions is a big ask. Realistically, only bottom-up resistance and protests from millions of ordinary people could achieve this aim, and in this regard there are reasons for optimism. Truth will – eventually – reveal itself. Despite the ongoing censorship and manipulation, public dissent to the attempted imposition of a biosecurity state is becoming increasingly visible. Masking in the community is – at the time of writing – practised only by an eccentric minority. The net harms of Covid restrictions are more widely recognised. Ordinary citizens increasingly claim they will not be locked down and separated from their loved ones ever again. And – perhaps more importantly – the ‘safe and effective’ vaccine narrative is crumbling, as indicated by more and more people rejecting the jabs.
If we do not wish to live in a ‘transhuman’ society devoid of personal freedoms, where our day-to-day decisions – where we go, what we say, what we eat, how we spend our money, what drugs we ingest – are determined by the state’s version of the ‘greater good’, we must all continue to show visible dissent to the globalists’ new world order.
Together, I believe we can defeat the biggest threat to Western values witnessed in my lifetime. And even if we don’t succeed, history will show that at least we tried.
Dr. Gary Sidley is a retired NHS Consultant Clinical Psychologist and co-founder of the Smile Free campaign. He blogs at Coronababble, where this post first appeared.
To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.
Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.
It’s time to wrap it all up and return to some kind of normality. Mind you it is going to take some major deprogramming of members of the covid cult and for years to come I suspect.
Many are living psychotics, sadly.
They need counselling to accept reality.
Coping with being wrong, lied to, abused, medically raped, living with a psychopath state, will be very uncomfortable for millions.
Horrific summing up, but nevertheless entirely accurate.
Many will never be able to ‘handle the truth’. And we shall have to keep silence for their benefit.
Will we have to keep silent? Every time I’ve tried to explain any aspect of this calmly and logically I’ve been met with idiocy, insult and unwarranted abuse.
Now reality is poking through the clouds clearly, anyone who still subscribes to the nonsense and expresses it to me will be met with loud dismissal and personal verbal attack for helping to perpetuate the hysteria for so long.
Its not nice I know but after 2 years of being hectored by self-righteous morons deluded in their own opinions as fact, I have reached that point.
There is little point in trying to convince the ‘convinced’. As I said, most people cannot handle the enormity of the truth.
My point was rather that we have all come across hysterical or fragile people who have been abused by the powers that be: maybe a relative, even a close family member. They cannot understand what is going on, or feel such pain that they do not wish to. They are in trauma.
To prevent them having a nervous breakdown, we must be silent. This does not mean we should never preach the truth. It means there is a time and a place for arguing, and a time for not arguing. The state has done this to them – not us. We do not have to risk our lives, or ‘destroy’ the weak, because of the state’s malevolence.
What kind of person down ticked the comment?
What kind? A very strange kind. Denial is, and is going to be for ever, the order of the day.
Err no it is far more important for the truth to come out and right now. People are being harmed every single minute of every day and especially children. People need to get a grip of themselves, get help if needed and get over their psychological problems.
otherwise the harms not only continue but could get worse.
I am constantly worried about the harms that have been done to the ones I love and would do anything I could to prevent them being harmed further.
sometimes that means I have to point out to them that they have been conned, everyone has been conned.
By their face nappies we shall know them.
Indeed. Many will never ditch their masks.
It’s makeup for hypochondriacs.
Its incredible to see some people still behaving like paranoid hypochondriacs – its become like a religious cult – on the whole most are not wearing them where I live but I still see some wearing their masks outside in the open as well as in shops, the most insane ones I see are still wearing them alone in their cars and I’ve even seen a few wearing masks while cycling and jogging – many of the masks I see are really quite filthy and I’m sure are causing more harm than good.
My Aunt and Uncle still backed away from me yesterday even though they are drugged to the eyeballs and had masks on. Very sad.
Unfortunately one of the things that is holding up the Great Awakening is that the hypnotised have invested almost their entire capital of self-regard in being smarter than the “anti-vaxxers”. To admit that they were wrong is such an existential threat to their entire sense of self worth that many just cannot do it.
I strongly suspect that is what lies behind much of the “make their life shit” fascism – they are desperate on a spiritual level that we become like them because if we don’t they fear we will prove to be better than them and tell them so and they cannot live with that.
it was no surprise to see Andrew Neill spouting that guff the other day – I used to work for him and a more perfect representation of the term “midwit” would be hard to find.
The idiots that took all three shots are desperate to remove the control group who haven’t, just as much as the government is. What’s going to happen is they’ll invent a new strain to blame all the Pfizer injuries on. But a significant portion of people won’t have had Pfizer and at that stage it will be undeniable
Some are so angry with themselves they are lashing out at us partly in frustration and partly because they want to drag us down with them.
There are echoes of communatarianism/communism here.
People who advocate in favour of this ideology cannot bear to see others doing better than them so wish to make everyone (apart from the elite) as poor as them. This is what they really mean by ‘equality’. Evil people.
Agree Cornubian… methinks it’s a wise time to revisit this quote:
“It is an objective, indisputable fact: never in the history of the world has there been a global push to administer an experimental medicine to all of humanity, billions of us, at the same time.
I want you to stop and reflect on that.
Imagine the hubris it required both to carry out this plan and to propagandize the World to carry it out…If a world leader is willing to take such gambles with all of humanity, what else are they prepared to do?…
My present point is simple: experimental vaccines – billions of people – at the same time. It utterly boggles the mind that so many otherwise reasonable people have been influenced to think this is a good idea…”
[Larry Sanger, founder of Wikipedia]
It’s time to also remind ourselves about getting more creative at successfully destroying the cabals agenda to crush us all down under a totalitarian grid – jailing us permanently via 5g powered bio-security IDs, 24/7 social credit scores… and digital time-coded currencies. Here’s some more inspirational thinking:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iG9CE55wbtY
Excuse me. I took all 3 shots but agree ithe covid fuss is hysteria. I take a flu innoculation also because I prefer to avoid flu if I can. My decision to take the vaccines was based upon my belief that they would be more beneficial then bad. If anyone disagrees then I respect that but they are not idiots.
One difference – the flu jab is well known with limited adverse reactions – just the usual ADE effect of making the symptoms worse in those taking the drug compared to those not taking it. The covid drugs are totally experimental, undergoing a Phase III clinical trial to work out the side effect types and frequency with purely voluntary admission into the trial protocol – as noted in the drug suppliers administration procedures. You of course had all this explained to you when you signed up to the clinical trial – as required by the administration protocol? Or not, I suspect.
In a just world we would be honoured, not reviled.
Their prejudice and gullibility got them here to total defeat.
It has been the fate of the best people throughout history to be misunderstood, misrepresented, hated, and vilified.
Of course, being misunderstood, misrepresented, hated, and vilified doesn’t necessarily mean that you are one of the best people, but it does mean you are in good company.
If you’re a Christian, it means that you’re in God’s company. It also means that you should forgive the vilifiers. That’s a tall order, but it’s what we have to try to do. I’n not good at it. Other, better Christians are better.
what is the saying?
A prophet is not without honour in his own country
No, unfortunately “ A prophet is not without honour, save in his own country,” (Mark 6.4) is the saying. or ‘Truly I tell you, no prophet is accepted in the prophet’s home town.’ (Luke 4.24) or And they took offense at him. But Jesus said to them, “Prophets are not without honor except in their own country and in their own house. (Matthew 13,57.)
We have seen that observation play out only too accurately. Indeed I notice that it sometimes is taken more seriously in this country to quote Americans, Canadians or others (Australians, if there are any!) than the British re covid19 and injections.
..
An anagram of smug is mugs…
a lot of the current cons and scams are built on that superiority complex.
The EU for example
.
The covid cult will be dead in 4-6 years. Depends on how harsh the winters are.
I presume you’re suggesting that Covid will be displaced on people’s worry list by sky-high heating bills, because while octogenarians are the group most likely to die of Covid, they don’t make up most of the “covid cult” membership.
What will happen in the countries where the cult has come to encompass the entire population (ie China and Taiwan)?
I’m doing my best, but it is hard going trying to help people to see the light…
Oh the…
So natural immunity is a thing.
Instead of promoting natural immunity they want to use it as another commodity in more vaccines?
Do you change your diet to avoid scurvy or get a scurvy vaccine?
Ultimate proof of their cynicism.
Who’d have thunk?
but instead of regarding NI as an end itself, they want to use it as a means to an end – which could still have disastrous consequences if they stuff it up the way the current crop of vaccine developers have done
Great article Will, thanks.
Im shocked, shocked I tell you, that this study is only just coming to light after 16 months.
Has it been missed or was it suppressed?
Its come out now to push for a new range of ‘better designed’ injections. Imperial are drug pushers. Its what they are paid $320,000,000 by Gates to do.
Get back to me when I can, as per 2019, fly to and from Spain by just showing my paper UK passport at each end.
There must be thousands of British citizens worried about their properties abroad. Get to them now and find they’ve been taken over by squatters. Or worse. Stolen by the local authorities. Two years gone by for the mould to grow, and the gutters to become filled with leaves. And the smoke alarm battery needs replacing…
This ‘capturing’ of people by making travel difficult, is one of the things that alerted me to the fact that this was about control of people, and not about ‘a virus’.
Only making travel difficult for legal citizens. It seems crossing the channel has never been easier.
I’m thinking of investing in a dinghy – see how far it will take me
I was alert to the fact it wasn’t about public health in February 2020, when I thought to myself:
“These daily death counts, which are suddenly and for the first time in history being broadcast to every Tom, Dick and Harry’s smartphones – are they anything above normal for this time of year in this country?”
After one minute of simple research and another thirty seconds of simple arithmetic, the simple answer was “No. Not really. A bad seasonal flu, but certainly not the worst.”
But when I highlighted these simple facts to my colleagues over those interminable video calls, they repeatedly denounced me as a brainwashed conspiracy theorist, peddling “dangerous misinformation”. Interesting, as I have never had a television, rarely (if ever) listen to the radio, and watch Youtube only for subjects specific to my several hobbies. A less brainwashed person you could not find. I hadn’t even heard of “QAnon”, until one of my colleagues told me I must be a member of that organisation.
I remember Hector Drummond had an excellent analysis around April 2020 which made that abundantly clear. “The Virus That Turned Up Late” or something to that effect.
It stands out in my mind as regards to my own realisation.
Another on The Burning Platform website in Feb 2020 which discussed the Diamond Princess numbers, PCR and natural immunity was another.
All they did was generate questions from me which were never fully answered by the powers that be, as the article atl shows. It was all a grand Propaganda machine at work.
I was looking forward to using a proper British passport after leaving the EU. Looks like I may have a long wait.
So true.
Or when unvaxxed who haven’t had covid (or ever done a test or been hospitalised) are invited for a free blood test to check for immunity to give automatic freedom from this totalitarian farrago and potential for study of a clean control group.
And I’ll tell them to fuck right off.
data harvesting you mean?
There’s a chart, somewhere on this site, showing all the big ships, by name, weight, number of passengers and number of crew, that couldn’t unload their passengers when Covid kicked off. One column shows the number of people on each ship that did test positive when they were finally allowed to disembark. From memory not one ship had more than ~28% infected – inspite of all on board being subjected to to the same aircon and a higher than average age and weight profile for the passengers. To me that suggested then, all those months ago, that Covid wasn’t for everyone.
Can anyone find that chart / spreadsheet?
I learned late too that if you see it, bookmark it.
Feels a bit like the church eventually acknowledging that the earth rotates around the sun and not vice versa.
Father Copernicus always knew. The Djokovic of the 16th century.
Ah, good old Copernicus, developer of the medieval prototype tin foil hat – copper knickers.
Could it perhaps have something to do with the $79m grant awarded to Imperial College by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation in March 2020?
$320 million to date.
Will Neil Ferguson’s modelling team update its assumptions? It’s too late for that. These people have been shown to be thoroughly incompetent. They must be held to account along with those who employed them.
They must surely be held to account, but not for incompetence. They knew what they were doing.
I’m preparing to hear a lot of “we just couldn’t have known…”, “the information at the time…” over the next months and years. Like the Germans who were all so terribly shocked by what had been done to the Jews and swore they had no idea.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neil_Ferguson_(epidemiologist)#Personal_life
Funny that nothing is mentioned about him getting that other man’s wife to travel across London during a ‘pandemic’ for a shag. Can anyone add to the Wikipedia article?
Lest we forget:
https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/11586872/husband-professor-neil-ferguson-lover-seeing-woman/
Neil arranged for him and his mistress to “break his own lockdown rules”, simply so he could have a convenient reason to resign which wasn’t his f*cked up disease transmission modelling.
And then he’s back at his job a few months later, like a turd which creeps back up the u-bend.
Nope. Ferguson was on both SAGE and NERVTAG at the time. SAGE is the interface between the mad modellers aka NERVTAG and the politicians. Kicking him off SAGE served the purpose of appearing to treat his indescretion seriously to satisfy public outrage and maintain public perception that the lockdown was justified.
You’re kinda agreeing with me, just presenting the other side of the same coin.
He shouldn’t have a “team”. I wouldn’t put Pantsdown Ferguson in charge of a junior football team, let alone a team of researchers.
They’d get a prize for most own goals.
>These people have been shown to be thoroughly incompetent
Reliably wrong. They were picked because they’ll produce the scariest figures, not for accuracy of predictions.
Mystic Meg would be embarrassed at how wrong they’ve been about EVERYTHING. vCJD on.
Pantsdown had shown himself over and over again to be thoroughly incompetent before he started his terror modelling. But he was wrong in ways that the Fascists found useful.
I fully expected Tin Lizzie to give him a knighthood this time round. I suppose there’s still time. Arise, Sir Useful Idiot.
She will doubtless give him the accolade using a syringe.
Cue for the WHO to change the definition of ‘immunity’ yet again?
You’re said to be immune to a disease when you’re up-to-date on all WHO-recommended vaccinations for it.
Immunity prevents neither infection nor transmission nor serious disease nor death.
[This was meant to appear in a much smaller font but the framework this site uses is too dumb for that …
]
“When I use a word,’ Humpty Dumpty said in rather a scornful tone, ‘it means just what I choose it to mean — neither more nor less.’
’The question is,’ said Alice, ‘whether you can make words mean so many different things.’
’The question is,’ said Humpty Dumpty, ‘which is to be master — that’s all.”
― Lewis Carroll, Through the Looking Glass
Don’t let them be the master.
I suspect that Imperial College have been wanting to change their name for a while now for historical reasons….soon it might be necessary to dissociate themselves from previous mistakes
Yes, Imperial does have a whiff of colonialism in it.
Imperial single malt Scottish whisky is one of the better ones!
Woke College would no doubt be preferred.
White Supremecist Medical Imperialism College would be appropriate.
The drugs they have supported are too expensive to be bought by poor countries, particularly when they come with a price of legal immunity for the drug pushers. Covid only really took off when it finally hit the west. MARS with its higher initial CFR of 30% disappeared as if by magic as it did not hit the west, and Zika was a damp squib.
Aussie corporate media is beginning to force feed the lab leak theory.
but we have been saying that on here for almost 20 months – why are they only coming to this now??? like it new news or something
It’s like the house of cards of nonsense – 100% susceptibles, 1-2% IFR, indiscriminate, no effective treatment etc. used to justify an emergency use order for an experimental class of treatment for which pharma companies can make billions has all finally fallen away.
I look forward to the ICC trials in the Hague
Imagine what research is being done now that’ll be published in 18 month’s time…
Other studies that are being published at a snail’s pace are Neil Ferguson’s work on the vaccines’ negative effectiveness (I don’t know where that’s gone) and the results of the coronavit trial (it is now six months since the trial ended).
Does anyone with half a brain truly care? Imperial’s “brand” has been tarnished for too long now.
Imperial are the regimes goto source for dodgy dossiers. Just as long as Gates keeps brown enveloping them hundreds of millions they dont have to worry about image..
King’s College does the dodgy political dossiers. Get to make a buck somehow in these difficult times.
I well remember the foot and mouth outbreak when Imperial’s input caused the slaughter of millions of sheep unnecessarily. Is this a repeat?
We will have to wait and see – the F&M animals were killed off quickly en masse. The modern sheep will drop off one by one.
Isn’t this what Sunetra Gupta was telling us right at the start of the hysteria?
Yes.
I can’t for the life of me understand why it has taken IC so long to report on it’s findings either.
It’s almost as if there was, is and will continue to be a drive to get everybody jabbed instead.
It almost makes me wonder if the real agenda is indeed digital ID.
But I have to discount that possibility because it appears only on social media and Mr. Witty and other BBC scientists say that the vaccine is completely safe (not just safe) but completely 100% safe, for everybody,- and that 90% of ICU patients have never been near any vaccine.
And that you are selfish (Gove), selfish and an idiot (The War criminal), and or that you have been brainwashed by the mumbo jumbo on Twitter etc if you don’t do your duty and be jabbed..
Digital ID is being introduced from 6th April this year. It needs to be resisted.
Receipts please
Imperial receives millions from those with an “interest” in not publishing such information. A simple search shows this.
When was the Diamond Princess outbreak, I knew this then…
Expert tells grandma what she already knew.
HA HA!
https://ninetymilesfromtyranny.blogspot.com/2022/01/us-military-in-japan-with-98.html
I thought Japan had gone the Ivermectin route after a disastrous ‘vaccination’ outcome.
“Sooner or later everyone sits down to a banquet of consequences”
Robert Louis Stevenson.
The last two year’s has shown me that the majority of my fellow countrymen are critical thought cretins, with a large helping of neo-fascist thrown in for good measure. The unquestioning obedience to a malevolenty contrived insidious narrative by the many has been a revelation. A terrible reckoning awaits!
The majority respond to emotion over reason and prefer ideas of protection over freedom.
They’ve been trained to respond like children.
they’ve been content to hand their brain over to their smartphone – which was always the desired intention
Time to oil up the guillotine.
Nothing less than a craven an abject apology for having got much of their work wrong, a retraction of their constant drive to influence public policy on the back of their errors, a public shaming and pronouncement from their superiors and handlers that they are discredited and will never be consulted seriously again or work in their field will do I’m afraid.
By force if necessary.
In a Danish newspaper
“ANOTHER example: vaccines are consistently referred to as our ‘super weapons’. And our hospitals are called ‘super hospitals’. Nevertheless, these super hospitals are evidently under maximum pressure, even though almost the entire population is armed with a super weapon. Even children have been vaccinated on an enormous scale, which has not been done in our neighbouring countries”
We failed – Ekstra Bladet
.
They didn’t fail, they “merely” succeeded at something totally different from what they said they were doing.
The only relevant pic I could find
Imperial College find most people can bat off any coronavirus…due to existing immunity. So….vaccine companies say they can possibly imitate this immunity, so that most people can then bat off the same diseases they are already batting off.
Brilliant.
“most people can bat off any coronavirus”
I see what you did there. Please sir, may I have more soup?
What the actual fuck!!!! Esteemed epidemiologists made this point right at the outset. Nobel Laureates even, Michael Levitt, made the same point back in March 2020. I even recall Mike Yeadon incandescent with rage over the imperial model assumption was that every one was equally susceptible- he was spitting feathers. Looks like all the marginalised, traduced, bullied, ridiculed scientists were right all along – as we knew they were. What a shit show and how subtlety the narrative is now changing and the fuckers who belittled us from the start will now claim the credit. Tragic.
Its simply due to the source of large amounts of Imperial’s income. Very few research depts are in any way independant. He who pays the piper….
I suspect those nice juicy tuition fees paid by Chinese students may also have helped to corrupt western universities.
Yeadon was absolutely right to point out pre existing immunity, asymptomatic spread and death counting as some of the key pillars of the fraud. At the very least, those is positions of influence should have been guided by a sense that if there was so much counter evidence, to ignore it would be a huge risk given the consequences.
However, they were guided top down by forces we need to remove from power structures. It will take years. Their influence is clear in the delay on releasing this study, to aid the psychological warfare being waged on the general public. Releasing in good time would have simply lent credence to the likes of Yeadon in the mainstream arena. The vaccines needed time, and time they got. By hook or by line of endless crooks.
This is actually criminal. People have died by lockdowns and ignorance of early treatment protocols around the world. Those who have published this study must be made to defend their timelines with certifiable evidence to show no outside influences. That would require political pressure.
someone could start a petition to get it debated at least
And the Bernician can add it to his private prosecution or Yeadon et al can add it to their ICC case along the lines of the supression of this study’s results (because that is what it looks like) forced more people into the vaccination queues (and attendant harms) than would have been the case if NI testing had been offered at the earlies possible opportunity
We had a new respiratory virus which could be classed as a national emergency.
We junked the existing flu pandemic plan because Big Pharma told us that they could stop it in its tracks.
We closed down our entire economy while entrepreneurs rushed to develop, manufacture and distribute a poorly tested vaccine that did not work.
Now we are going to quietly back out of the room, take all the money, and pretend that none of this ever happened….
They can pretend all they like, this is not going under the carpet!
Punishment for crimes against humanity must be the maximum severity available
Medical clinics and hospitals in USA are denying life-saving Ivermectin medicine even with court orders. Big Pharma doing all that they can to push the vaxx and inoculate us while effective and cheap COVID cures exist. There turns out to be censorship that we have never seen before for those who are looking for these treatments. We say over and over again that indepenedent researchers found Ivermectin safe and very effective for these Flu-Corona symptoms. Getting Ivermectin is easy https://ivmpharmacy.com
What took so long was the realisation that this work would show up the poster boy of Imperial’s mathematical modelling team to be a total charlatan
Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla was interviewed on Bloomberg yesterday.
With a wry smile he claimed natural immunity from previous infection was similarly effective against SARS-Cov-2 as his vaccine, but affectiveness wanes after only 3-4 months, as opposed to his vaccine which wanes after 6 months.
‘Vaccine salesman CEO of Pfizer Albert Bourla cherry picks self-funded vaccine efficacy studies, propagating misinformation’ isn’t a salient headline, though it would generate a lot of clicks.
Albert Bourla is Greek.
Timeo Danaos et dona ferentes.
Pfizer CEO Bourla on Acuitas Deal, mRNA Tech, Djokovic
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A-nNY38rhHc
Er? is there really something new here???
Rewind to circa 1768 and a Dr Edward Jenner, some trouble with smallpox I believe. It had been noticed that milk maids did not get serious smallpox and Jenner suspected their previous infections of Cowpox helped. He then experimented on a young lad by infecting with Cowpox pus – followed up by the (very unethical) real thing, Smallpox. It worked, the boy did not get Smallpox, the rest is history. This experiment also demonstrated the existence of cross immunity – Cowpox to Smallpox. All of our numerous “Ologists” appear to have forgotten this fact although the term ‘Vaccination’ derives from the Latin meaning COWS !!!!±!
Ferguson was an attendee at WHO pandemic meetings. The UK team was disproportionately large. For example, Germany sent 1 person, the UK 13 representatives and the US 16. No other country sent more than 6 representatives. It seems reasonable to assume that the US and UK teams led WHO policy.
The UK team included N Fergusson, N Gay, P Grove, R Kirby, J Newstead, J Nguyen van Tam, N Phin, A Reynolds, C Russell, H Shirley-Quirk, S Strickland, J Watson and H Zhao.
Cross-referencing with the UKs NERVTAG, SAGE and higher political levels is left as an exercise for the reader.