Over 2,000 medical and healthcare professionals signed an open letter to NHS Chief Executives of England, Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland urging them to lift the requirement for staff, patients and visitors to routinely wear a face covering while on their premises. The letter, organised by Smile Free – a campaign group opposed to mask mandates – was sent on June 6th 2022. To date, responses have been received from Scotland and Wales, each attempting to justify, in very similar ways, their persistence with routine masking of professionals and service users.
Smile Free believed that the NHS bosses’ attempts to defend their pro-mask position contained several major flaws, and duly detailed these in further correspondence. The response to the Chief Executive of NHS Scotland is reproduced in full below. (A similar, slightly shorter version was sent to the Chief Executive of NHS Wales.)
Syed Kerbalai (Chief Nursing Officer, Healthcare Associated Infection & Anti-Microbial Resistance Policy Unit).
Dear Mr Kerbalai
Thank you for your letter dated July 14th 2022, responding to our expressed concerns about the persistence of mass masking in healthcare settings. We appreciate you taking the time to reply.
We welcome your recognition that staff members can use their “professional judgement” and remove masks to reduce a patient’s distress and enhance communication. And we also support your expressed concern for the wellbeing of staff who experience emotional or physical discomfort as a direct result of wearing a face covering. In addition, it is reassuring to note your endorsement of the principle that no patients should be refused treatment – nor visitors refused access to loved ones – should they choose not to wear one.
We would, however, wish to highlight some fundamental flaws in your attempts to justify the persistence of widespread masking in your healthcare settings.
First, there is an underlying assumption throughout your response that masks are effective in reducing viral transmission. The evidence for this premise is – at best – weak and contradictory. The science reviews you refer to are skewed towards the recommendations of state-funded public health bodies, with insufficient weight given to more independent researchers who have conducted randomised controlled trials in real-life settings (for example here and here) and comprehensive evidence reviews (here and here) that all conclude that masking healthy people achieves no appreciable reduction in viral transmission. Furthermore, two literature reviews of the impact of surgical masks in hospital settings (here and here) indicate that even these higher quality face coverings did not protect either patient or health professional from infection.
Second, the risk of those without symptoms passing the SARS-CoV-2 virus to other people does not justify masking healthy people. So called ‘asymptomatic transmission’ is rare, and pre-symptomatic transmission – although a little more common – is unlikely to make a significant contribution to the propagation of a pandemic.
Third, it is likely that your directives regarding how to promote the wearing of face coverings – expressed as “politely encouraged”, “strongly encouraged”, “highlight the benefits” and “recommended” – will habitually morph into the harassment of those people opting not to follow this advice. Consequently, there is a risk of alienating a vulnerable subset of the general public (the people you are commissioned to serve), thereby discouraging them from both seeking medical help and visiting hospitalised loved ones.
Fourth, and most importantly, you disregard the wide range of significant harms associated with masking healthy people, instead displaying a blinkered mono-focus on the risks associated with the SARS-CoV-2 virus. Apart from passing references to “glasses steaming up” and staff sometimes feeling “hot and uncomfortable”, there is no acknowledgement of the many recognised negative consequences – physical, social and psychological – of masking (see here for an overview of the evidence).
At Smile Free, we routinely hear anecdotal reports of how (often vulnerable) people suffer as a direct consequence of the expectation to wear a mask in healthcare setting. What defence would NHS Scotland offer when faced with complaints – and threats of litigation – from:
1. The family of an elderly lady who died shortly after fracturing her femur in a fall after being pressured to wear a mask in a hospital outpatient department?
2. A hard-of-hearing man who accidentally overdosed on prescribed medication, a mask having rendered his doctor’s instructions inaudible?
3. Relatives of an inpatient who died directly as a result of miscommunication between two masked health professionals?
4. The father of a young woman, a victim of historical sexual and physical abuse, who was re-traumatised by the obligation to wear a mask for an outpatient appointment resulting in her subsequently taking her own life?
5. A long-standing patient with respiratory difficulties who contracts pneumonia as a consequence of repeated masking when attending for appointments?
6. A lady whose historical problem of recurrent panic attacks is re-activated by the somatic sensations of a mask over her mouth, leading to a prolonged admission to psychiatric hospital?
7. A coroner’s report of the death of a young child from a non-Covid illness after the parents were too scared to attend hospital (partly as a result of the fear perpetuation associated with widespread masking)?In the above scenarios it is questionable whether professional leads, and those in senior management roles, could rely on a defence of, “We were following protocols”.
In light of the above, together with the concerns raised in our original letter, we respectfully request that you reconsider your decision to persist with recommending masks for all staff, patients and visitors and – instead – allow people a genuine choice as to whether or not to cover their faces in healthcare settings.
Yours sincerely
Dr. Gary Sidley (Retired NHS Consultant Clinical Psychologist) on behalf of Smile Free
It is encouraging that, over recent months, the dominant ‘masks-work’ and ‘masks-do-no-harm’ narratives are – seemingly – beginning to crack. The large majority of sports-events attendees, shoppers, pub-goers and diners are now mask free, the richness and complexity of their facial expressions routinely available to their fellow humans. With few exceptions, the requirements to wear a face covering on transports systems, including airlines, have been ditched. Some of our MP are, belatedly, waking up to the futility (and harms) of the mask craze, a cross-party group of MPs recently writing a letter to Liz Truss and Rishi Sunak urging them to “rule out future mask mandates”. And even in Scotland – a country characterised by strict enforcement of COVID-19 restrictions – care home staff and visitors are no longer being advised to wear face coverings all the time, the latest guidance importantly acknowledging the “rights and choices of those within the social care sector”, while also explicitly recognising that masks can have harmful effects “on health and mental wellbeing” and create “communication barriers”.
Regrettably, the main outliers to this gradual return to non-mask sanity are healthcare premises.
Although a significant number of NHS Trusts appear to have relaxed their mask requirements, many are persisting with the expectation that staff, patients and visitors should cover up. The current position is often confusing, with ‘guidance’, ‘policy’ and ‘legal requirements’ typically being in conflict. Healthcare professionals who contest the imposition of face coverings in the workplace are performing an important role in the ongoing mission to rid our society of mask mandates, yet they can often find themselves in a bewildering situation, unclear about their rights and options. (In such situations, the support and guidance offered by the Workers of England Union can be helpful, as illustrated by this webinar.)
As we move through the autumn and into the winter, the prevalence of respiratory viruses will significantly increase and it is inevitable that the pro-mask fanatics will, once again, be screaming for the imposition of mandates. In order to neutralise these irrational voices, it is vital that the embers of the ‘masks-are-an-effective-and-harmless-way-of-controlling-a-respiratory-virus’ myth are fully extinguished within our healthcare settings. If not, the ineffective and harmful practice of masking heathy people will re-ignite. The stakes are high.
Dr. Gary Sidley is a retired NHS Consultant Clinical Psychologist and co-founder of the Smile Free campaign.
To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.
Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.
This is a crucial battle.
As long as doctors and nurses keep wearing these rags and requiring others to do so, the myth that they are useful will persist.
if we ever want to be rid of masks permanently, they need to disappear especially from healthcare settings.
What we never seem to hear about either is if the staff are just as Nazi/cult-like in the psychiatric hospitals, because I can only imagine what sort of negative impact that would have on in-patients. Then there’s the children’s hospitals/wards and the unnecessary distress or problems this perpetual face-covering by all staff and visitors would result in. It’s unfair and cruel to inflict this on kids and people who aren’t in their right minds in particular, and i include the many elderly suffering from dementia in this category too. These two classes of people are especially dependant on and influenced by non-verbal communication.
Indeed. If they argue about it, it might be worth pointing out that the belief in them in this context is for the birds, and they’ll lose their reputation if they try it on.
Looking on the bright side, a few days ago I went to the dentists, which I go to a couple of times a year, and it all looked more normal. There was one of the receptionists who was wearing one, but her mate sitting close by did not. I was dealt with by the one that did not. None of the other patients I saw used one, either. The dentist himself did not wear any surgical mask, as he was only doing a routine check up, and an attempt to sell extras (which is normal at my place!), and there were no posters on display about C19.
The only place where I came across the issue was on their online survey form, the use of which they encouraged before turning up for the appointment, which had a few questions about symptoms with yes/no tick boxes. Nothing was said at the surgery.
Spread the word, and make masks history
https://www.conservativewoman.co.uk/spread-the-word-and-make-masks-history/
TCW
In a cashless society, no one can hear the penny drop.
Even though the world is getting crazier each day, you can keep sane by doing Yellow Boards By The Road
Tuesday 20th September 11am to 12pm
Yellow Boards
Junction A329 London Road & Oak Avenue
Near Oakingham Belle Pub
Wokingham RG40 1LH
Thursday 22nd September 11am to 12pm
Yellow Boards
Junction A30 London Rd &
A325 Portsmouth Road
Camberley GU15 3UZ
Stand in the Park Sundays 10.30am to 11.30am – make friends & keep sane
Wokingham
Howard Palmer Gardens Sturges Rd RG40 2HD
Bracknell
South Hill Park, Rear Lawn, RG12 7PA
Telegram http://t.me/astandintheparkbracknell
Masks sit at the core of the command and control strategy. It is absolutely key that we refuse to wear these things, regardless of setting – and doing so encourages others to do the same.
The mask is a change to our social attitude to others; it signals that I do not trust you, that I fear you, that the default social position is that you are a danger to me. It rips up millennium’s of social understanding, and by doing so has enabled a simple, but highly effective, control mechanism. There is little that is more important than the refusal to wear the mask.
Some very important points. Fundamentally, the message behind masks is that the other is – first and foremost – a host of extremely dangerous germs and that everyday human interactions like talking, laughing and smiling at others must be banned or regulated because they’re just too risky. I’m feeling a bit sorry for Susan Michie and Trisha the Impronouncable that they’re living in such a world. But they’ve chosen to. I didn’t and nobdoy else should.
It is becoming more apparent that the NHS is primarily run for the benefit of their employees.
It always has been.
In New South Wales current legislation enforces wearing of masks by anyone entering a public or private health facility unless the person is a patient, or unless an exemption applies.
This suggests that all those working in these facilities are required to wear masks. Clever virus that can distinguish between a doctor or nurse who need to be protected by a mask,or who are dangerous Covid vectors, and patients who are “safe”.
I have never worn a mask at my workplace, though unfortunately I am only aware of a couple of others who do the same.
In the course of my old career I occasionally visited Care homes if a resident required my attention.
In a rather posh one – part of a successful chain – I had to take a swerve to avoid stepping in a large, perfectly-formed poo resting complacently on the expensive new carpet, in a busy area of the building.
I wasn’t the only one who noticed it because I saw several residents delicately side-stepping round it before one of the senior staff met me and directed me to my client; we both pretended the thing wasn’t there and hurried away from it (I’m sure as soon as she had got me safely out of the way she would have summoned a cleaner – it was that sort of place)
Just shows how something glaringly obvious can be studiedly ignored if it’s presence is too embarrassing to acknowledge. Like the uselessness of masks (and boosters).
Professionals in health settings have staked their reputation on the appearance of doing all that is possible to prevent transmission of this single virus, irrespective of whether it works. As we have seen with government, course-correction, if it happens at all, will occur quietly and with no acknowledgement of error.
We must be thankful that with the help of Smile Free, we have come this far in the UK; there will be small pockets of resistance (isn’t that what we Sceptics have been, albeit on the ‘other’ side?) in some local authorities, but one by one they will come to their senses.
Having said that, we need to be firm with the bu*g*rs if and when respiratory viruses start to proliferate in a few weeks.
The so-called flu year starts with the beginning of October. Technically, it is still summer, yet unusually cold. Some German sources are already predicting snowfall in a few weeks. Winter will be fun.
Pure theatre. I love recognising the fearful wrinkled faces under the dirty muzzles😁
I have two questions, which puzzle me?
Do doctors and nurses really believe that masks protect them and patients?
Do they enjoy wearing them all day?
If neither, why do we not hear more protests. I would genuinely like to find out why such face rags are so popular.
I wondered something similar a few days ago when I went to my local pharmacy. All the staff were masked, presumably not through choice but because they’re told they have to mask up, but there were no signs requesting/suggesting that customers wear a mask. Being a very small shop they still had a rule that only 2 customers were allowed in at any one time, although until recently it 3 at any one time, although it would be possible to have 5 people in the shop and still stay 2 metres apart (as if that makes any difference). This rule was not being enforced and at times there were 3 customers in the shop.
It all seemed very odd and more about box ticking just to show they were doing something to satisfy health and safety regs.