129827
  • Log in
The Daily Sceptic
No Result
View All Result
  • Articles
  • About
  • Archive
    • ARCHIVE
    • NEWS ROUND-UPS
  • Forum
  • Donate
  • Newsletter
The Daily Sceptic
No Result
View All Result

The Hidden Harms of the Online Safety Bill

by Jonathan Barr
18 August 2022 10:28 AM

Former Supreme Court Judge Lord Jonathan Sumption has written a splendid piece for the Spectator, explaining exactly what’s wrong with the Online Safety Bill and its creation of a new category of speech which is ‘legal but harmful’. Here are the opening paragraphs.

Weighing in at 218 pages, with 197 sections and 15 schedules, the Online Safety Bill is a clunking attempt to regulate content on the internet. Its internal contradictions and exceptions, its complex paper chase of definitions, its weasel language suggesting more than it says, all positively invite misunderstanding. Parts of it are so obscure that its promoters and critics cannot even agree on what it does.

Nadine Dorries, the Culture Secretary, says that it is all about protecting children and vulnerable adults. She claims it does nothing to limit free speech. Technically, she is right: her bill does not directly censor the internet. It instead seeks to impose on media companies an opaque and intrusive culture of self-censorship – which will have the same effect.

As things stand, the law distinguishes between online publishers (like The Spectator) that generate content and can be held responsible for it; and online intermediaries (Google, Facebook, etc) that merely provide online facilities and have no significant editorial function. Mere intermediaries have no obligation to monitor content and are only required to take down illegal material of which they are aware.

The Online Safety Bill will change all this. The basic idea is that editorial responsibility for material generated by internet users will be imposed on all online platforms: social media and search engines. They will have a duty to ‘mitigate and manage the risks of harm to individuals’ arising from internet use.

A small proportion of the material available on the internet is truly nasty stuff. There is a strong case for carefully targeted rules requiring the moderation or removal of the worst examples. The difficulty is to devise a way of doing this without accidentally suppressing swaths of other material. So the material targeted must be precisely defined and identifiable. This is where the Online Safety Bill falls down. …

The real vice of the bill is that its provisions are not limited to material capable of being defined and identified. It creates a new category of speech which is legal but ‘harmful’. The range of material covered is almost infinite, the only limitation being that it must be liable to cause ‘harm’ to some people. Unfortunately, that is not much of a limitation. Harm is defined in the bill in circular language of stratospheric vagueness. It means any ‘physical or psychological harm’. As if that were not general enough, ‘harm’ also extends to anything that may increase the likelihood of someone acting in a way that is harmful to themselves, either because they have encountered it on the internet or because someone has told them about it.

Worth reading in full.

Tags: Legal But HarmfulLord Jonathan SumptionOnline Safety Bill

Donate

We depend on your donations to keep this site going. Please give what you can.

Donate Today

Comment on this Article

You’ll need to set up an account to comment if you don’t already have one. We ask for a minimum donation of £5 if you'd like to make a comment or post in our Forums.

Sign Up
Previous Post

Can Nuclear Energy Save Europe?

Next Post

‘Net Zero’ Groupthink Got Us Into This Mess

Subscribe
Login
Notify of
Please log in to comment

Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.

10 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

NEWSLETTER

View today’s newsletter

To receive our latest news in the form of a daily email, enter your details here:

 

DONATE

PODCAST

Nick Dixon and Toby Young Talk About Trump’s Arrest, the Police’s Preference for Wokery Over Free Speech and the Glorious Implosion of the SNP

by Will Jones
21 March 2023
2

LISTED ARTICLES

  • Most Read
  • Most Commented
  • Editors Picks

40% of Brits Still Wearing Masks and Taking Covid Tests as Experts Call for New Mask Mandate Amid Rise in Infections

23 March 2023
by Will Jones

News Round-Up

23 March 2023
by Will Jones

“Next Time a Prime Minister Intends to Abridge the Liberty of Millions, They May Remember the Scenes of the Boris Trial and Pause”

22 March 2023
by Will Jones

On the Third Anniversary of the First Lockdown, Help Us Convince People to Say ‘Never Again’

23 March 2023
by Toby Young

IPCC’s Increasingly Shrill Climate Armageddon Fantasies Gain Little Traction in Media

23 March 2023
by Chris Morrison

News Round-Up

47

40% of Brits Still Wearing Masks and Taking Covid Tests as Experts Call for New Mask Mandate Amid Rise in Infections

45

On the Third Anniversary of the First Lockdown, Help Us Convince People to Say ‘Never Again’

30

“Next Time a Prime Minister Intends to Abridge the Liberty of Millions, They May Remember the Scenes of the Boris Trial and Pause”

36

The WHO’s Proposals for Future Pandemics Are Almost Everything Bill Gates Demanded

52
sheepsinmasks.jpg

Is There No Cure For Maskaholics?

23 March 2023
by Jeffrey H. Anderson

When Anders Tegnell Stood Alone

23 March 2023
by Will Jones

IPCC’s Increasingly Shrill Climate Armageddon Fantasies Gain Little Traction in Media

23 March 2023
by Chris Morrison

When Will They Ever Learn?

22 March 2023
by Thorsteinn Siglaugsson

The Gary Lineker ‘Crisis’ is a Distraction From the Real Problem with the BBC

22 March 2023
by Dr David McGrogan

POSTS BY DATE

August 2022
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031  
« Jul   Sep »

SOCIAL LINKS

Free Speech Union
  • Home
  • About us
  • Donate
  • Privacy Policy

Facebook

Twitter

Instagram

RSS

Subscribe to our newsletter

© Skeptics Ltd.

No Result
View All Result
  • Articles
  • About
  • Archive
    • ARCHIVE
    • NEWS ROUND-UPS
  • Forum
  • Donate
  • Newsletter

© Skeptics Ltd.

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Create New Account!

Please note: To be able to comment on our articles you'll need to be a registered donor

Already have an account?
Please click here to login Log In

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
wpDiscuz
You are going to send email to

Move Comment