The German Government publicly acknowledged on Wednesday that the Covid vaccines cause serious side effects for one in every 5,000 doses.
A tweet from the Ministry of Health stated (via Google translate): “One in 5,000 people is affected by a serious side effect after a COVID19 #vaccination. If you suspect #sideeffects, get medical attention and report your symptoms to @PEI_Germany.” It later added a correction that the figure related to the reporting rate and to doses rather than individuals: “Correction: According to @PEI_Germany, the reporting rate for serious reactions is 0.2 reports per 1,000 vaccine doses.” Subsequently, the original tweet was deleted and a corrected version put up.
This is an unusual and welcome admission from a Government, and perhaps the beginning of governments properly acknowledging the scale of injuries caused by the novel Covid vaccines.
However, the one in 5,000 figure is certainly on the low side. The correction tweet clarified that it was a reporting rate of serious reactions, and it appears from the PEI website to refer to the rate of adverse event reports to the German equivalent of the Yellow Card and VAERS passive reporting systems. Assuming this is right, then we might expect an under-reporting factor of around 10, meaning the true number of serious side-effects may be 10 times higher.
The Germans are actually very good at monitoring vaccine safety. In addition to their passive reporting system, the German medicines regulator, the PEI, runs an active vaccine safety monitoring app called SafeVac 2.0. The data from this monitoring app were included in a Europe-wide report on vaccine safety published last month and showed that 0.3% of vaccine recipients in Germany reported at least one serious adverse reaction to the first dose of the vaccine. The report states:
Of the 520,076 participants from Germany who had received the first dose of a COVID-19 vaccine, 1,838 (0.3%) reported experiencing at least one serious adverse reaction. A total of 1,191 (0.2%) and 39 (0.2%) participants receiving BioNTech/Pfizer and Moderna respectively reported experiencing a serious adverse reaction while 608 (0.7%) receiving AstraZeneca reported a serious reaction.
These German figures are in line with the overall rates across Europe, according to the report: “Across the sites 0.2-0.3% reported at least one serious adverse reaction after receiving the first and/or the second dose.”
However, note that a rate of 0.3% is 15 times higher than the rate of 0.2 per 1,000 (i.e., 0.02%) quoted in the tweet. If the figure in the tweet comes, as I suspect, from a passive reporting system (which seems likely as the tweet directs readers to the PEI’s passive reporting portal), this would be an under-reporting factor of 15, which is about what we expected.
But why, then, is the German Government using the 0.02% figure instead of the 0.3% figure from its state-of-the-art vaccine safety monitoring tool when drawing attention to vaccine side effects? I’d like to think that question didn’t answer itself.
I should add that it wasn’t easy to find the SafeVac 2.0 data. I searched in vain for them on the PEI website; if they’re there then they are nowhere obvious. In the end I could only find them, via a general web search, embedded in the Europe-wide study cited above.
Worries about high rates of serious vaccine side effects have been raised before in Germany. In May, Professor Harald Matthes, a scientist leading a separate study into the safety of the vaccines, said that according to his data around 0.8% of vaccinated people in Germany were struggling with serious side-effects. This was in line with international evidence, he said, and much more needs to be done to help them.
The number is not surprising. It corresponds to what is known from other countries such as Sweden, Israel or Canada. Incidentally, even the manufacturers of the vaccines had already determined similar values in their studies… Most side effects, including severe ones, subside after three to six months, 80% heal. But unfortunately there are also some that last much longer.
In view of around half a million cases with serious side effects after Covid vaccinations in Germany, we doctors have to take action. We have to come to therapy offers, discuss them openly at congresses and in public without being considered anti-vaccination.
A board member of a large German insurance company also spoke out in February, saying that his company’s data showed serious vaccine injuries running at around 10 times the rate reported by the German Government.
Elsewhere, an Israeli Government survey found that 0.3% of vaccinated people reported being hospitalised as a result of their Covid vaccination, while a U.S. CDC survey found 0.9% of vaccinated people reported seeking medical care as a result of their vaccination.
The evidence is consistent, then: 0.3-0.9% of vaccinated people (the percentage partly depending on the number of doses) suffer a serious reaction to the vaccine that leads them to require medical care or hospitalisation.
These data should be much more widely publicised as part of obtaining informed consent. Everyone who receives a Covid vaccine should have been told in writing that the rate of serious side effects is around one in 300 doses (with variations for age and sex). Note that such a frequency is properly termed ‘uncommon’, rather than ‘rare’ as per the current labelling. This is an extremely high frequency for a vaccine of course, and raises serious questions about whether the vaccines should be approved at all, especially for younger age groups.
As it is, hardly anyone knows that these are the Government’s own data on serious vaccine reactions, and governments are making no obvious effort to tell them.
So, it’s one cheer for the German Government for actually doing something to raise awareness of serious vaccine side effects. But next time, maybe use the actual data, rather than a figure that’s 15 times smaller.
To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.
Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.
“Arctic zombie viruses in Siberia could spark terrifying new pandemic, scientists warn”
Try as I might, I can’t dream up a more convincing cheap Amazon science fiction series, presumably Russian with English subtitles. But I suppose it’s more interesting than “Disease X”
It’s already been done – Fortitude. Starts well, but then gets a bit silly. Worth watching though.
My wife and I are rewatching this again – and thoroughly enjoying it a second time round
‘Attack of the fifty foot Arctic zombie virus’
I can see the posters now!
“Villainous scientist melts some permafrost with a giant hairdryer and captures zombie virus in jar!”
An old concern dug-up for a new campaign in every sense.
Good old Guardian spreading fear again. A virus that hasn’t been discovered is now dominating the media. Disease X will be followed by Disease Y and Disease Z before going back to beginning of the alphabet like some sort of bizarre disease car registration process. Add in a smattering of ancient killer viruses that have been lurking in the permafrost quietly muttering to themselves ‘One day the vorld vill be ours!!” and you have the recipe for maximum fear. It’s the bogeyman under the bed of course, the Wolf in Little Red Riding Hood, Frankenstein, Dracula. It’s storybook stuff for kids. Childish playground scare tactics. Bin it (the Guardian) and bag it.
Monkeypox was a bit of a bust but, hey ho, let’s give it another whirl.
Marvellous take-down Aethelred
Covid Started As A Fraud
latest leaflet to print at home and deliver to neighbours or forward to politicians, media, friends online.
Australian Open
“Get vaccinated Mate!”
Then Novak serves an ace to win the match
Thursday morning Windsor Rd & Ascot Rd Maidenhead
It was brilliant to watch.
What’s really happening?
Putin: ‘Odesa is a Russian city.’
Hanno Pevkur, Estonia Minister of Defence: ‘Russia’s war in Ukraine has shown that, in addition to equipment, ammunition, and manpower, physical defensive installations on the border are also needed to defend Estonia from the first meter,”
Any connection, given that Odessa is on the way to Moldova, then Belarus to Kaliningrad….encircling the Baltic States?
No, no……of course not……..
The problem with making predictions about people’s intentions is that when they don’t come true one can always claim that they haven’t come to pass yet, but will.
Is your position that Putin intends to have Russia to invade other countries?
If so, are you able to make specific predictions? Which countries and by when?
Because on the flip side you might be completely wrong and the Russian leadership have no intention of invading any other country and it all really is about making sure Ukraine doesn’t join NATO and nothing else.
What’s the test that you’re willing to submit your views to?
These are not my predictions. Russia makes the predictions. I simply report them.
It is Putin that is saying Odesa is a Russian city
It is Putin’s own FSB that is saying: ‘While the 9th Directorate of the FSB’s Fifth Service Department for Operational Information prepared for the occupation of Ukraine from July 2021, the 11th Unit of the Department for Operational Information, responsible for Moldova, was assessing plans for the next round of operations under the direction of Major General Dmitry Milyutin. In November 2020, the FSB’s strategic objective in Moldova was to bring about ‘The full restoration of the strategic partnership between Moldova and the Russian Federation’
FSB Outline of Operational Aims and Means, 21 November 2021
It is Putin’s own the Directorate for Cross Border Cooperation strategy document that sets out Putin’s expansionist goals:
‘The Directorate for Cross-Border Cooperation was established five years ago. The rather innocuously named directorate’s actual task is to exert control over neighboring countries that Russia sees as part of its sphere of influence.
Before August 2021, this so-called “cooperation” department oversaw Russian-occupied parts of Georgia. It was then repurposed to focus on Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Belarus, Moldova, and Ukraine.
The department is headed by Alexey Filatov, who reports directly to the deputy chief of Vladimir Putin’s administration, Dmitri Kozak……Filatov’s team presented the document planning out the absorption of Belarus to Kozak in the fall of 2021.’
Belarus has already been absorbed into the ‘Union State’
Those pieces of evidence demonstrate nothing.
The US considers the entire Western Hemisphere it’s sphere of influence. They even have a name for it. The Monroe Doctrine. But that doesn’t mean they invade the countries.
And countries draw up all sorts of contingency plans. Again the US produces plenty of these. And make sabre rattling noises about invading Iran etc. which even still remains pretty unlikely.
So, as I expected you aren’t willing to submit your hypothesis that Russia intends to invade other countries to any sort of a test.
Much easier just to sit back and claim it hasn’t happened yet, but it will, sometime, in the undetermined future.
This is no hypothesis. The ‘Union State’ has already happened. The only question is how big will it become?
‘Russia’s goals with regards to Belarus are the same as with Ukraine,” Only in Belarus, it relies on coercion rather than war. Its end goal is still wholesale incorporation.”
‘According to the document, issued in fall 2021, the end goal is the formation of a so-called Union State of Russia and Belarus by no later than 2030.
Everything involved in the merger of the two countries has been considered, including the “harmonization” of Belarusian laws with those of the Russian Federation; a “coordinated foreign and defense policy” and “trade and economic cooperation … on the basis of the priority” of Russian interests; and “ensuring the predominant influence of the Russian Federation in the socio-political, trade-economic, scientific-educational and cultural-information spheres.’
Lukashenko (May 2023): “no one minds Kazakhstan and other countries having the same close relations that we have with the Russian Federation. It’s very simple. Join the Union State of Belarus and Russia. That’s all: there will be nuclear weapons for everyone.”
Monroe Doctrine (1823)
(1) The United States would not interfere in European affairs;
(2) The United States recognized and would not interfere with existing colonies in the Americas;
(3) The Western Hemisphere was closed to future colonization;
(4) If a European power tried to interfere with any nation in the Americas, that would be viewed as a hostile act against the United States.
So based on the logic you apply, you expect the invasion of all those countries by the US at any time. Because according to you the mere act of Russia declaring a sphere of influence demonstrates its intention to invade.
Until evidence proves otherwise, I now assume the Monro account is a bot.
Oh no, am I trying to reason with ChatGPT?
That’s my opinion as the responses do remind me of ChatGPT.
Well, in that case, you should be doing a great deal better:
‘A new study suggests it may be absurdly easy to convince ChatGPT that it’s in the wrong.’
Can ChatGPT Defend its Belief in Truth?, Ohio State University Dec 2023
https://dailysceptic.org/2024/01/20/concerning-safety-signals-revealed-by-hidden-pfizer-vaccine-report/#comment-930726
Not based on logic, based on evidence.
‘Russia and Belarus agreed to 28 integration programs in their 2021-2023 Union State agreement. At a press conference after his talks with Putin on Feb. 17 2023, Lukashenko claimed that the two countries had completed ”about 80%” of the programs focused on deepening economic integration, including ”key tasks in the tax and customs spheres.”
The ‘Union State’ already exists. The only question is: how big will it become?
What evidence do you have that the U.S. is going to invade nations within the Americas? None whatsoever, so a bit of a silly point to make.
After the Ukraine War, Putin hasn’t got enough resources to encircle his back garden, never mind the Baltic States. Which is handy because NATO hasn’t got the forces to help defend them anyway.
And after Poland, Germany was not satisfied.
Germany wasn’t satisfied with Poland, so Russia isn’t satisfied with Ukraine.
Classic logical fallacy. SIgh.
It is not a logical fallacy to listen to what Russia itself tells us.
It is, however, a historical fallacy not to listen.
Nope. It isn’t a logical fallacy to listen to what Russia tells us.
It’s also something I haven’t claimed.
Setting up your own argument, attributing it to someone else and then attacking that argument IS a logical fallacy, know as the straw man argument.
So that’s two logical fallacies.
Why not just make a clear time-bound prediction against which we can all test your assertion that Russia is intent on invading other countries?
Not only are you not listening, you are not even reading.
It is a historical fallacy not to listen to what Russia itself tells us.
‘To some observers, the strategy confirms what has long been obvious and, at times, openly acknowledged, by both Moscow and Minsk. Rainer Saks, the former head of Estonia’s Foreign Intelligence Service,…(said) that “in the grand scheme of things, this document is no different from what you might think Russia wants from Belarus. Of course, Russia will take control of Belarus….’
Within a ten year, or longer, timeframe, he most certainly does.
You will have noted that we are now ten years on from Putin’s first invasion of Ukraine.
He’s 71. Do you imagine him to be immortal.
How old is Biden?
What does that have to do with the price of fish..?
If Biden is 81 and running the U.S. why should Putin not still be running the ‘Union State’ when he is 81, in ten years time?
But you are correct, illegal Russian fishing has, through over fishing, dramatically increased the price of fish.
The bot picked up on “fish” and responded in the context of Russia.
‘The full tonto.’
A response produced in the context of my Ben Wallace quote in relation to Russia on the earlier comments. Is this what the search returned?
“What does it mean to go ‘full tonto’?”
https://www.spectator.co.uk/article/what-does-it-mean-to-go-full-tonto/
Well done, Tonto….or not really…..
Over the last year of fighting in Ukraine I think Russia as showed itself up as being rather weak and in no position to be invading any other countries! With western help, Ukraine is already more than putin can chew!
Meanwhile, 27 civilians killed from Ukrainian shelling of Donetsk market:
Russia says at least 27 killed in blast at Donetsk marketAuthorities in Russian-occupied Donetsk accuse Ukraine of shelling a market on outskirts of city.
https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2024/1/21/russia-says-at-least-25-killed-in-blast-at-donetsk-market
‘The Donetsk regional military administration, meanwhile, said one person was killed and another was wounded as a result of shelling by Russian troops of Kurakhovo on January 21.
Vadym Filashkin accused the Russian troops of aiming at residential buildings, adding that a 31-year-old man died at the scene.’
Well, it WAS part of the Soviet Union when I was there in 1968…
Indeed, as were Latvia, Estonia, Lithuania and Moldova…….
‘…..the Presidential Directorate for Cross-Border Cooperation, a subdivision of Putin’s Presidential Administration, was established five years ago. The rather innocuously named directorate’s actual task is to exert control over neighbouring countries that Russia sees as in its sphere of influence: Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Belarus, Ukraine and Moldova.’
‘Russia’s domestic, foreign and military intelligence services — the FSB, SVR, GRU, respectively — in addition to the General Staff of the Armed Forces, all actively contributed to the Union State plan. The resulting document was presented to Kozak (Deputy Chief of Putin’s presidential administration) in the fall of 2021.’
Why is it necessary to take Odessa in order to encircle the Baltic States?
Why was it necessary to capture Naples via landings at Salerno 1943 in order to defeat Germany, or to mount an amphibious assault on Inchon 1950?
The number articles which express shock and surprise at the turn of events over Hamas and anti-western and anti-semetism does not surprise me but it still shocks me. The ignorance and naievety of those in and close to office has been apparent but it still comes as a shock.
We have known for years there was little E in PPE but it turns out there was little P or P either. Their parents, just a few years ago, should have taught them common sense and survival skills. We’re going to need them.
“‘I was so naive to think the UN would help us uncover Hamas’s rape atrocities’”
This topic was what made me think that Alexander Mercouris, on the Duran, was being uncharacteristically naive at the start of the Gaza conflict. He suggested that Israel’s “proper” course of action would have been to hold fire and call on the UN to declare Hamas a terrorist group guilty of war crimes, thus gaining international support for action against them.
And that’s fine, if international organisations like the UN operated on principles of legal impartiality rather than political intrigue. In fact we get Western blocs, Muslim blocs, Eastern blocs all acting on self interest, and controlling the smaller states by threats and bribes. Nobody can possibly tell, even after investigation, who bombed the Ukraine nuclear facility. We will never know, even after investigation, whether there was a lab leak at Wuhan.
And so on. If I were an Israeli victim of October 7, with no links to Mossad, world banking or pathological hatred of Palestinians, I would not expect much impartiality from the United Nations.
The Duran is a Russian propaganda site run out of oligarch friendly Cyprus.
And Duran Duran is twice as bad! (Sorry, couldn’t help it!
)
Harsh but fair, could explain a lot.
The October 7th rape allegations have not been investigated because there is no one that will stand up to police investigations in Israel.
Screams without proof: questions for NYT about shoddy ‘Hamas mass rape’ reporthttps://thegrayzone.com/2024/01/10/questions-nyt-hamas-rape-report/
Once again this is a hasbara fabrication used by Israel to give cover for its ongoing massacre at a rate of 110 children a day.
Antisemitism is on the rise for a reason as Israel uses it as a shield so often that it’s worn thin. Even the US student allegations appear to be an operation led by Zionists:
Registered Israeli foreign agent driving contrived campus antisemitism crisis
https://thegrayzone.com/2023/12/17/registered-israeli-foreign-agent-campus-antisemitism/
Would it not be simpler for you to just post ‘More crazy stuff on thegrayzone, Al Jazeera (etc etc.) today’?
What do you find to be “crazy” Nigel?
Not going to entertain you, sorry.
So just fling accusations with no arguments?
Yep, sounds about right.
Its pretty normal for rabid zionists who can’t defend themselves and stand up to scrutiny to act like little babies.
Says ‘Brave Sir Robin’ hiding in anonymity who might as well be a bot for the value added.
Delusional Nigel living in the sweet ecstasy of ignorance willing to ignore the deaths and maiming of thousands of children incapable of justifying his beliefs.
Al Jazeera is a Qatari propaganda site. The Grayzone is rabidly antisemitic and supports all the worst authoritarian regimes.
Isn’t Max Blumenthal Jewish?
“Boarding schools allow trans pupils to sleep in dorms of their preferred gender”
Teenage boy: “I’m a girl, I want sleep with the other girls”
What could possibly go wrong?
Happy New Year to everyone BTL. (Recovering a seasonal bug so struggled to follow or contribute recently.)
Listened to Ivor Cummins and Dr Malik “everything of importance” discussion, interestingly it’s allowed on YT
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3pU8cEU725M&ab_channel=IvorCummins
Key takeaways for me were
Ivor does good summary of Jacob Nordengard’s thesis on the Rockerfeller role in what’s going on.
Both clear that there was no pandemic or need for early treatments (but quiet about the killer protocols and no discussion of how the apparent pandemic was simulated).
Both unwilling to discuss the “no virus” position or question modern virology/genetic sequencing. (Not surprisingly they also shy away from discussions about whether the earth is flat and other ideas they deem unscientific.)
Ivor says that what’s allowed to be said in the MSM has shifted. Discussion of the Covid jabs, origins and lockdowns are now allowed. They keep us distracted. Challenge to the climate scam is off limits.
Interesting discussions (bleating?) about the threats they’ve faced (and support behind the scenes). Although I share people here’s concerns about the unquestioning position TY and others “on our side” take on some issues I do understand that it’s a difficult balancing act.
The problem we all face is not getting distracted and to do our best to focus on what really matters – the fact that TPTB are trying to enslave us all.
What a busy bunch we are this morning !