• Login
  • Register
The Daily Sceptic
No Result
View All Result
  • Articles
  • About
  • Archive
    • ARCHIVE
    • NEWS ROUND-UPS
  • Podcasts
  • Newsletter
  • Premium
  • Donate
  • Log In
The Daily Sceptic
No Result
View All Result

Journalism Professor Gives Tips on How to Trick Sceptics into Supporting Climate Alarmism

by Chris Morrison
27 June 2022 12:08 PM

Anyone who still holds to the old-fashioned idea that journalists should seek to inform their readers by being inquiring and independent (as well as a pain in the butt at times) will likely weep a little to read the recent thoughts of American journalism professor Renita Coleman. She recommends engaging with ‘climate sceptics’ by cutting out references to ‘climate change’ and ‘global warming’, and replacing them with ‘weather’. By these means, she suggests sceptics will seek out news about climate change, and they would be likely to “take steps to help mitigate its damage”.

The idea, of course, is idiotic. It is impossible to write a coherent story about the climate changing over a period, along with temperatures rising or falling, by confusing such trends with one-off weather events. But confusion seems to reign supreme in the academic world inhabited by Professor Coleman. “We need to think a little more nuanced, if you will, about what kinds of things we are doing to make people think we are trying to persuade them when we know we are not,” she adds. Can I leave this with readers to work out what she is saying – it beats me.

As does a sentence in her paper’s abstract that runs: “An experiment shows this frame works by reducing persuasion knowledge and increasing perceived behavioural control, resulting in science sceptics being significantly more likely to intend to take action, engage with the news, and agree with the story’s perspective.”

Nope, still can’t make head or tail, but reference to behavioural control and taking action, along with agreeing with the story so-called perspective, doesn’t inspire confidence. Coleman is a professor of journalism at the University of Texas at Austin. Before she went into academia, she is said to have had a 15-year career in journalism in North Carolina and Florida. How the copies of the Raleigh News and Observer and the Sarasota Herald-Tribune must have flown off the shelves, back in the day.

Professor Coleman wrote her recent paper with another journalism professor, Esther Thorson from Michigan State. The paper is behind a paywall, although detailed comments were published by NiemanLab, an operation backed by the Nieman Foundation whose stated mission is to promote and elevate the standard of journalism. In addition to the ‘weather’ change, the authors suggest that journalists “avoid mentioning who or what causes climate change”.

Again, old-school journalists might note that just one sentence knocks out two of the five investigatory ‘W’ questions that should be in every writer’s armoury – ‘Who? What? When? Where? Why?’, (I say old-school journalists, but this line of examination can be traced back to Aristotle’s Nicomachean Ethics). Of course it is assumed that human-caused climate change is a settled matter, not to be challenged or investigated in any way. Journalists are told to “focus heavily on solutions, or what the public can do to prepare or adapt to the impacts of climate change”.

In fact the paper proposes radical changes to the way climate change is reported. To date, most mainstream media has elected to spread misinformation, doom and alarm by using phrases such as ‘global heating’ and ‘climate breakdown’. The researchers found that changing language made a difference. “Removing any references to what causes climate change reduced perceptions that the news stories were trying to manipulate or persuade readers,” it was noted. Surely the Washington Post, BBC and Guardian do not try to manipulate their audiences. You could have knocked your correspondent down with a feather.

However, the climate science site Watts Up With That? sees problems for the new approach. Leaving out trigger words like ‘climate change’ and ‘global warming’ might lead to less engagement among climate alarmists. WUWT proposes a possible solution – maybe journalists need to publish two different versions of the same story. Or can they aim to engage different audiences on different weeks, it asks.

But it concludes: “Here’s a radical thought – perhaps journalists could ease back on the trigger words and other attempts to manipulate the emotions of their audience, and just try presenting the facts.”

Chris Morrison is the Daily Sceptic’s Environment Editor

Tags: Climate AlarmismClimate changeClimate JournalismPropaganda

Donate

We depend on your donations to keep this site going. Please give what you can.

Donate Today

Comment on this Article

You’ll need to set up an account to comment if you don’t already have one. We ask for a minimum donation of £5 if you'd like to make a comment or post in our Forums.

Sign Up
Previous Post

An Interview with Matt Ridley

Next Post

Red Pill vs Blue Pill; ‘Conspiracy’ vs ‘Common Sense’; Delingpole vs Young

Subscribe
Login
Notify of
Please log in to comment

To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.

Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.

6 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

NEWSLETTER

View today’s newsletter

To receive our latest news in the form of a daily email, enter your details here:

DONATE

PODCAST

The Sceptic | Episode 40: Rob Bates on Stopping Britain Becoming Majority-Minority, Tilak Doshi on Trump vs Green Blob and Mario Trabucco on Osborne’s Elgin Marbles Betrayal

by Richard Eldred
13 June 2025
1

LISTED ARTICLES

  • Most Read
  • Most Commented
  • Editor’s Picks

Big Brother Lives Next Door

16 June 2025
by Matthew Corrigan

Why Is Doctor Who So Gay? Because so Are His Current Creators

16 June 2025
by Steven Tucker

How Covid Killed the Rule of Law

16 June 2025
by Nick McBride

Establishment in Denial Over Ethnicity of Grooming Gangs, Report Finds

16 June 2025
by Will Jones

News Round-Up

17 June 2025
by Richard Eldred

Establishment in Denial Over Ethnicity of Grooming Gangs, Report Finds

41

The Link Between Asylum Seekers and New Rape Gang Cases Will Fuel Public Anger

20

How Nuclear Power Might Save The Day

16

Big Brother Lives Next Door

14

How Covid Killed the Rule of Law

18

Allowing Sectarian Groups of Civil Servants to Shape Government Policy is an Affront to Democracy

17 June 2025
by David Shipley

The Link Between Asylum Seekers and New Rape Gang Cases Will Fuel Public Anger

17 June 2025
by Laurie Wastell

Big Brother Lives Next Door

16 June 2025
by Matthew Corrigan

Please Give Generously to Keep the Daily Sceptic Afloat

16 June 2025
by Toby Young

How Covid Killed the Rule of Law

16 June 2025
by Nick McBride

POSTS BY DATE

June 2022
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930  
« May   Jul »

SOCIAL LINKS

Free Speech Union

NEWSLETTER

View today’s newsletter

To receive our latest news in the form of a daily email, enter your details here:

POSTS BY DATE

June 2022
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930  
« May   Jul »

DONATE

LISTED ARTICLES

  • Most Read
  • Most Commented
  • Editor’s Picks

Big Brother Lives Next Door

16 June 2025
by Matthew Corrigan

Why Is Doctor Who So Gay? Because so Are His Current Creators

16 June 2025
by Steven Tucker

How Covid Killed the Rule of Law

16 June 2025
by Nick McBride

Establishment in Denial Over Ethnicity of Grooming Gangs, Report Finds

16 June 2025
by Will Jones

News Round-Up

17 June 2025
by Richard Eldred

Establishment in Denial Over Ethnicity of Grooming Gangs, Report Finds

41

The Link Between Asylum Seekers and New Rape Gang Cases Will Fuel Public Anger

20

How Nuclear Power Might Save The Day

16

Big Brother Lives Next Door

14

How Covid Killed the Rule of Law

18

Allowing Sectarian Groups of Civil Servants to Shape Government Policy is an Affront to Democracy

17 June 2025
by David Shipley

The Link Between Asylum Seekers and New Rape Gang Cases Will Fuel Public Anger

17 June 2025
by Laurie Wastell

Big Brother Lives Next Door

16 June 2025
by Matthew Corrigan

Please Give Generously to Keep the Daily Sceptic Afloat

16 June 2025
by Toby Young

How Covid Killed the Rule of Law

16 June 2025
by Nick McBride

SOCIAL LINKS

Free Speech Union
  • Home
  • About us
  • Donate
  • Privacy Policy

Facebook

  • X

Instagram

RSS

Subscribe to our newsletter

© Skeptics Ltd.

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password? Sign Up

Create New Account!

Fill the forms below to register

All fields are required. Log In

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
No Result
View All Result
  • Articles
  • About
  • Archive
    • ARCHIVE
    • NEWS ROUND-UPS
  • Podcasts
  • Newsletter
  • Premium
  • Donate
  • Log In

© Skeptics Ltd.

wpDiscuz
You are going to send email to

Move Comment