This is the 27th of the round-ups of Covid vaccine safety reports and news compiled by a group of medical doctors who are monitoring developments but prefer to remain anonymous in the current climate (find the 26th one here). By no means is this part of an effort to generate alarm about the vaccines or dissuade anyone from getting inoculated. It should be read in conjunction with the Daily Sceptic‘s other posts on vaccines, which include both encouraging and not so encouraging developments. At the Daily Sceptic we report all the news about the vaccines whether positive or negative and give no one advice about whether they should or should not take them. Unlike with lockdowns, we are neither pro-vaccine nor anti-vaccine; we see our job as reporting the facts, not advocating for or against a particular policy. The vaccine technology is novel and the vaccines have not yet fully completed their trials, which is why they’re in use under temporary and not full market authorisation. This was done on account of the emergency situation and the trial data was largely encouraging on both efficacy and safety. For a summary of that data, see this preamble to the Government’s page on the Yellow Card reporting system. (Dr. Tess Lawrie in June wrote an open letter to Dr. June Raine, head of the MHRA, arguing that: “The MHRA now has more than enough evidence on the Yellow Card system to declare the COVID-19 vaccines unsafe for use in humans,” a claim that has been ‘fact checked’ here.) Boris Johnson said in October that being double vaccinated “doesn’t protect you against catching the disease, and it doesn’t protect you against passing it on”. We publish information and opinion to inform public debate and help readers reach their own conclusions about what is best for them, based on the available data.
- New data collected from Israel and Germany suggest Covid vaccine side-effects are significantly underreported, raising questions of whether the vaccines are the next big medical scandal.
- Ex-Pfizer Vice-President Dr. Mike Yeadon spoke on Fox News about the risks of Covid vaccines during pregnancy.
- The FDA and NIH in the U.S. are studying neurological reactions to the Covid vaccines.
- A study has found evidence of myocarditis in two teens following their second Covid vaccine.
- A systematic review of vaccine-induced thrombotic thrombocytopenia (VITT; blood clots) in individuals who received COVID-19 adenoviral-vector-based vaccines (such as AstraZeneca) has shown that young individuals, particularly females, may be more susceptible to VITT.
- A study has shown a potential mechanism by which the spike protein might impede adaptive immunity and increase side-effects of Covid vaccines.
- A website has compiled more than 1,000 journal and peer-reviewed articles on Covid vaccine injuries and adverse events.
- Dr. Clare Craig has calculated that if more than one child in 46 million dies from vaccination then the net impact of vaccination on mortality in children is negative.
- The Children’s Covid Vaccine Advisory Group (CCVAG) has written an open letter calling for an immediate halt to the roll-out to 5-11 year olds.
- Sweden has decided not to recommend Covid vaccination for 5-11 year olds.
- Conflicts of interest have been found relating to five out of 14 members of the U.K. Joint Committee for Vaccination and Immunisation (JCVI).
- Public Health Scotland is to stop publishing data on Covid deaths and hospitalisations by vaccination status due to concerns the data is being misrepresented by anti-vaccination campaigners.
- The U.K. Information Commissioner (ICO) has publicly reprimanded the Scottish Government for launching its Covid vaccine passport despite being warned the app broke data protection law.
- There have been 920 Covid vaccine injury claims (of a total value of £110m) filed relating to death or injury, but no payouts have been made as families are struggling to prove their cases.
- Watch Dr Been explain a new Swedish study which shows the Pfizer vaccine can become DNA in liver cells.
- Eudravigilance – the European version of the Yellow Card Reporting system – as of February 12th has reported 3,666,011 reactions with 39,997 fatalities.
- VAERS – the American version of the Yellow Card reporting system – as of February 18th reports a total of 1,134,984 reports of adverse events following Covid vaccines, including 24,402 deaths and 196,203 serious injuries.
- DAEN Australia – the equivalent of the Yellow Card reporting system – has logged (up to February 14th) 110,363 reports of adverse events, including 764 deaths.
- Children (Under 18) Adverse Events UK – up to February 16th, the MHRA reports a total of 3,405 adverse event reports, comprising 3,111 Pfizer, 254 AstraZeneca, 21 Moderna and 19 unspecified from 3,214,400 children vaccinated. This includes 61 reported cases with Pfizer and one with Moderna of myocarditis/pericarditis, suggesting a current risk of 13 cases per million first doses and 11 per million second doses for this age group.
- Booster Doses – 45,910 adverse events have been reported across all vaccines up to February 16th from 37,911,067 people vaccinated, suggesting a reporting rate of one adverse event per 826 doses.
Summary of Adverse Events in the U.K.
According to an updated report published on February 16th, the MHRA Yellow Card reporting system has recorded a total of 1,461,822 events based on 446,382 reports. The total number of fatalities reported is 2,022.
- Pfizer (26 million first doses, 23.2 million second doses, 29 million third doses) now has one Yellow Card in 157 people vaccinated. Deaths: one in 36,111 people vaccinated (720).
- AstraZeneca (24.9 million first doses, 24.2 million second doses, 54,000 third doses) has one Yellow Card in 102 people vaccinated. Deaths: one in 20,327 people vaccinated (1,225).
- Moderna (1.6 million first doses, 1.4 million second doses, 8.9 million third doses) has one Yellow Card in 45 people vaccinated. Deaths: one in 41,026 people vaccinated (39).
Overall, one in every 118 people vaccinated (0.85%) have experienced a Yellow Card adverse event. The MHRA has previously estimated that the Yellow Card reporting rate may be approximately 10% of actual figures. Note that sometimes in Yellow Card reporting, the numbers of adverse events (including fatalities) will be lower than the previous week. The Yellow Card system is a passive reporting system, so in theory this should not happen as all reports should be cumulative. However, the MHRA says it analyses the data prior to publication, with deaths and pregnancy conditions being notably investigated. It does not state criteria by which reports would be removed and to date has not clarified why these data vary. It is therefore unclear how many reported adverse events have been removed from the reports since reporting began in February 2021.
- Blood Disorders = 27,103
- Pulmonary Embolism & Deep Vein Thrombosis = 4,050
- Anaphylaxis = 1,611
- Acute Cardiac = 26,750
- Pericarditis/Myocarditis = 1,970
- Eye Disorders = 24,164
- Blindness = 508
- Deafness = 769
- Spontaneous Abortions = 771 miscarriages
- Nervous System Disorders = 281,402
- Headaches & Migraines = 138,571
- Gastrointestinal Disorders = 133,185
- Strokes and CNS haemorrhages = 3,128
- Vertigo & Tinnitus = 11,736
- Seizures = 3,393
- Paralysis = 1,475
- Paraesthesia & Dysaesthesia (chronic burning sensation, pricking nerve pain) = 28,532
- Infections = 34,149
- Skin Disorders = 99,455
- Respiratory Disorders = 54,941
- Renal & Urinary Disorders = 4,404
- Psychiatric Disorders = 30,689
- Reproductive/Breast Disorders = 56,320
- Immune System Disorders = 6,276
Further analysis can be found via the U.K. Freedom Project.
To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.
Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.
Oh Will, you are a card, persisting with this vaccine ‘safety’ update. You do make me laugh.
I know, right? Eternally Experimental Drug Danger Update
I don’t think it’s for people here – but for the people to whom we transmit it (if you’ll excuse the expression).
Every week I choose at least one update and send the link to people who send it to people.
I do not see anything funny. Laugh? If I had taken this stuff, I would cry.
‘This was done on account of the emergency situation ‘
An emergency fabricated by a corrupt government who used said emergency as an excuse to launch a campaign of terror on the population in order to get them to submit to a highly toxic injection.
PROOF JABS CAUSE HEART ATTACKS AND STROKES
https://odysee.com/@spacebusters:c9/Heart-Attacks-Strokes-Media:c
How many more heart attacks do we need to witness in 20-60 year olds to trigger a concern?
Just skipping through that update we can deduce that society is completely broken.
Anything I missed?
Given that Putin is supposed to be another WEF young leader graduate the whole Ukraine balls is likely a massive distraction.
As previously mentioned, Herr Klaus tried to bring Frau Merkel & The Putinator into the WEF, but They spurned his advances.
Given that:
a) He’s too old.
b) He’s banned Soros from Russia.
c) He’s majorly disrupting the cabal plans in Ukraine. – Putin being part of the in crowd is highly unlikely.
I think that just about encapsulates it, BeBop.
That the majority of the population believe the message and demonise those that try to awaken them.
The key to the proverbial entire operation is that so many people and organizations have “signed on.” There’s far too many powerful people and interests that would be tarred and feathered if the truth somehow ever came out. All the key players have a massive incentive to keep the truth from the public … So we have this going for us as a society.
Daily Skeptic readers keep screaming, “Hey, the Emperor has no clothes!” But apparently we don’t matter. Now, if by some miracle, The New York Times and “Sixty Minutes” did their jobs and said this, things might change … but this isn’t going to happen.
Look, it’s time to ignore the MSM and take responsibility to effect change ourselves. WE have to file the lawsuits, WE have to put the politicians and doctors in prison, WE have to remove the licenses of pharma/biotech companies to operate, WE have to put the BBC in ‘special measures’, WE have to ensure that EVERY clause of the Coronavirus Act is repealed, not just some of them.
It’s up to the people who showed leadership by actually maintaining critical faculties to take on the responsibilities that the criminals have abrogated taking.
You might have missed this…
https://dailyexpose.uk/2022/02/25/spartacus-is-back-again-covid-19-a-web-of-corruption/
A lengthy, highly detailed, forensic read. Eye-opening throughout, particularly when you get to the bit headlined “What do DARPA want with our brains?” Enjoy.
It’s not safe?
or effective?
Don’t think so. Good summary.
And the worst of it is, it sets a very bad precedent. Look at the woeful lack of safety testing this product was allowed to be subjected to before being brought to market and shoved in the arms of the whole of the global population – thereby treating them as lab rats and subjecting their health to some kind of unseemly Russian roulette.
Because they “got away with it” this time around, it means that unless brought to book for it, then the next “vaccine” that the WHO [if they get the control they seek] decides everyone has to have can also be the subject of similar lax safety testing, which means an eternity of jabs, the effects of which won’t be fully known in the people who are required to have them – or forced to have them in a worst case scenario.
Will, would it be possible for you to investigate the potential embryogenesis issue identified by Jessica Rose and Igor Chudov?:
https://jessicar.substack.com/p/it-does-incorporate-into-human-dna?s=r
https://igorchudov.substack.com/p/allegations-of-genetic-harm-to-newborn?s=r
Also, Igor is trying to get a study funded to verify whether the genes that cause premature ovary failure or cancer have been transcribed into sperm or new born DNA:
https://igorchudov.substack.com/p/steve-kirsch-germ-line-mutation-allegations?s=r
It would be great if DS could raise awareness of it. We are trying to see if Steve Kirsch might be interested in funding it otherwise we could try crowdfunding it. I can’t think of anything more important than finding out whether next generation’s fertility has been messed with by DNA manipulation.
Thanks so much for everything you’re doing.
Re: Mr. Kirsch’s heroic efforts, I’d note that he is currently trying to find ONE college in America that will host a real debate between skeptics of the authorized narratives and defenders of the Status Quo mitigation policies.
His own alma mater (MIT) turned down his request to hold a debate there. And Kirsch donated $2.5 million to his alma mater, which named an auditorium after him!
FWIW, I contacted friends who work at my alma mater and asked if they would consider hosting such a debate. They wouldn’t have to endorse Kirsch’s views, they would have to just endorse “free debate” on college campuses. Stop the presses! The first responses I received hint that maybe my alma mater would seriously consider Kirsch’s offer.
The challenge though is to find defenders of the COVID narrative who would participate in said debate – which almost certainly won’t happen … which makes Kirsch’s point that these people do not really believe in real science or genuine debate.
I think Kirsch would be pretty satisfied just giving a talk at any prestigious university at this stage.
I sponsored this building for 2.5 million and all i got for it was this ban
poxy t-shirtMy alma mater is probably not considered prestigious, but it’s a fine university. My “pitch” to my alma mater is accepting Kirsch’s invitation – and then hosting what I think would be a debate with global interest – is this could put my college on the map, and perhaps create unprecedented publicity and free advertising for the school.
It would show that not every college in America supports censorship of those with differing views. Really, my alma mater could shame MIT, Stanford and Harvard by “allowing” free intellectual exchanges – on a topic that’s kind of important.
Sounds like good advertising for when the wheels fall off the Covizealots bus – be at the college where independent thought took place etc.
That was part of my “pitch” as well – my alma mater (Troy University) needs to be “on the right side of history.”
Has the UK government ever tried to explain why they pushed a novel treatment on the British population when established vaccine technologies already existed? When you are planning to medicate the whole country, surely that, of all moments, is a time to be cautious.
Gulp. All of these (buried or often-censored) factoids should be Page-1 news IMO.
This headline particularly jumped out at me: “Dr. Clare Craig has calculated that if more than one child in 46 million dies from vaccination then the net impact of vaccination on mortality in children is negative.”
Re-stated: If the risk of vaccine injuries is greater than 1-in-46 million, children should NOT be vaccinated. Somehow I think more than 1 child in every 46 million has died as a result of being vaccinated.
Also, the first blurb says data from Israel and Germany suggest that vaccines may be “the next big medical scandal.” How about “The Mother of All Medical Scandals?” … a “scandal” that our watchdog press will apparently never investigate or expose. (Riddle me this: If the mainstream press doesn’t cover any shocking news, can it really be considered a “scandal?”)
… Another “scandal” is all the scandals that have been covered up … by journalists and editors. Who is going to report on this scandal?
Re-stated: The greatest (and most significant) scandal of them all is that the “watchdog press” no longer exposes real scandals.
And not only do “watchdog journalists” not expose real scandals, they help perpetuate them. On the vaccine issue, what if some journalists for a big news organization presented overwhelming proof that the vaccines not only don’t work, but they are actually killing thousands of people, including children and teenagers.
Would the publishers quit accepting advertising revenue from all these public health agencies who are placing “Get Vaccinated Today” advertisements? Would they return the money they had previously accepted?
The truth is some of these journalists (ALL of them aren’t this obtuse) already know this, but they know they can’t report this (or commission any real investigation). So shouldn’t they also be defendants in any hypothetical future “crimes-against-humanity” trial?
Not only do they not cover it they portray no jab believer’s as conspiracy theory not jobs. The media are as balls deep in this as the politicians and the so called “scientists”. It’s going to take a very brave journalist to blow the lid.
I agree. And it almost certainly won’t be a mainstream journalist (a journalist who works for a big journalism company). If this happens, it will be an “independent” journalist (aka freelancer) working for himself.
As a freelance journalist myself, I can report that researching topics and writing articles is only half the battle. Then you have to find one news organization that accepts freelance submissions who will actually publish your article. You hope it’s a site with a decent-sized audience, but it rarely is.
That’s another way these companies censor content – they will not publish freelance pieces that don’t fit the narrative.
I imagine there are plenty of talented journalists at mainstream news organizations who privately know that stories A, B and C should be investigated and written. But they also know – intuitively without even asking – that these story topics are off limits.
I’d actually love to hear from some journalist “whistleblowers” who reported all the stories they wanted to write that were nixed by their bosses.
This is the Governments ‘All In, All Together’ advertisement…it was in The Guardian and The Telegraph to my knowledge just yesterday…..
Living with Covid-19: how to stay safe as the rules changeAs the few remaining Covid restrictions are lifted, it’s still important to act responsibly and protect the health of those around us.
Despite the rules changing, vaccines and boosters remain our best defence against Covid-19, significantly reducing the risk of serious illness from the virus. Research shows that unvaccinated people are more likely to be hospitalised with the virus than those who have had both doses of the vaccine and a booster. Being vaccinated also means there’s a much smaller chance of developing long Covid, too.
and on and on……the lies and misinformation continue unabated….
https://www.theguardian.com/all-in-all-together/2022/mar/04/living-with-covid-19-how-to-stay-safe-as-the-rules-change
The vaccine narrative is slowly changing …
I really don’t know how the Powers that Be – even with the cooperation of mainstream “journalists” – can prevent data on “excess deaths” from reaching most in the public … forever. But maybe they can. They’ll certainly try. They’ve kept it out of the mainstream headlines so far.
If it is the case that “we are still learning about them” then there was NEVER ANY JUSTIFICATION FOR MANDATING THEM FOR CARE WORKERS OR NHS STAFF. IF ANYTHING THEN IT SHOULD ONLY HAVE EVER BEEN A MATTER OF PERSONAL CHOICE.
My caps lock is off now, but having read this [well shared Calvin Robinson!] I am more angry than I can say. So angry I am in danger of being permanently banned by DS if I was to say what I really think.
Does anyone know the cause of death of the great Shane Warne?
Heart attack.
He was doubled jabbed, wasn’t he? Just another coincidence.
He had also ‘had’ covid so no doubt they will say it was the after effects of covid that caused the heart attack, nothing to do with the jabs.
Given that the double & triple jabbed are more likely to get Covid & be hospitalised from it that needs to be thrown back in their face.
but they have offered his family a state funeral for him.
so that’s all right then.
nothing to see here.
Just a coinky dink
Not just Warney (age 52) but wickie/batsman Rod Marsh (of ‘c. Marsh b Lillee’ fame), aged 74, have both died from heart attack. We know Warne had been jabbed, and he had boasted about it, saying that the best way to ‘live with Covid’ is get vaccinated (he had also piled on to Novak Djokovic, saying the tennis ace should be deported from Australia for declining the vaxx). Marsh, too, may well have been jabbed (with something like 95% of the Australian population, terrified out of their minds over the virus by government propaganda). So, one, possibly two, more murders by Big Pharma and the government of Australia.
As some sports show commentators have earlier remarked, there seems to be a remarkably larger number of deaths of old (and not so old) retired Australian sporting stars in all sporting codes this last twelve months. Old sports heroes die of natural causes, of course, but the baseline seems to be well exceeded during the vaxx year.
Robert Malone is asking for help to crowd source the review of the recently released Pfiser documents. Any medicos out there who can help?
https://gettr.com/post/py64pr1e41
These are the figures from yesterday’s Yellow Card Reports. I put the Acrobat files and other bits and pieces on Telegram here.
…
Any discussion on Vaxx safety needs to include this:
https://brandnewtube.com/watch/dr-malone-and-dr-mccullough-condemn-the-cdc-quot-this-is-scientific-fraud-quot_Omh2CE6FnU5HKXn.html
And this
https://www.authorea.com/users/455597/articles/552937-innate-immune-suppression-by-sars-cov-2-mrna-vaccinations-the-role-of-g-quadruplexes-exosomes-and-micrornas
And this is just the start…
“I lost a bit of sense of taste for a few days, but after three or four days I was fine. I have apparently got the holy grail. I have been double vaccinated and I have had Covid, so I am meant to be absolutely fine now.” – Shane Warne
https://www.hindustantimes.com/cricket/shane-warne-when-australian-great-revealed-that-he-was-put-on-ventilator-during-battle-with-covid19-101646405690379.html
We lost him because he was lied to by people who knew how he could have taken care of himself but instead lead him to believe in something that they knew then, and we know now, had dangerous side effects.
Oh dear. Just how is it possible to be so deluded when there is so much information so freely available?
The holy grail? No mate, what you have got is a death sentence.
”Unlike with lockdowns, we are neither pro-vaccine nor anti-vaccine”
Why not?
Let’s be charitable. The evidence is clear on lockdowns, but for the jabs not so much. On that basis, staying neutral is understandable.
Thanks for the robust roundup of horrors that fake war has been keeping from people’s attention. Pfizer data dump part 1 and graphene blah blah.
My 75 year old aunt texted me last night to tell me she and my uncle tested positive for Covid. I drove to their house at 12:30 AM and dropped off Ivermectin pills, HCQ, zinc, and Quercetin. She told me today her fever came down and that I may have saved her life. Uncle is feeling great. This is considered a negative outcome by the cabal. They would prefer my family dead. Their evil is no longer a theory and very much a reality. You can get your ivm by visiting https://ivmpharmacy.com
Another eye watering read.
What needs to be separated out are the effects that are:
a) directly attributable to the vaccines themselves
b) attributable to the immune system response, e.g. Guillain Barre, thrombocytopenia, myocarditis
c) possibly attributable to confounders such as latent viruses and hormones
Testosterone is implicated in the development of myocarditis for example, with oestrogen appearing to be protective.
Is the headline oxymoronic? It might depend on one’s understanding of the term, of course, but a year on, I’m glad I said “no” to the offer of using it.
This item on YT: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FPPnyzvO7J4&list=WL&index=109 fits in well with the available records, by the look of it.
It’s a discussion between Dr. John Campbell and Prof. Robert Clancy down under. About 1 hr 5 mins.
The first few minutes are an explanation of the biological mechanics of how our immune systems work. Although the disease under consideration is Covid-19, one would think that it is used for similar viruses – e.g. 229E and the other coronaviruses.
From about 15 min in, they move on to the topic of treatment and mitigation techniques, in effect, including the “vaccination” method. From about 18 R admits that it does not actually work all that well after a while, almost along the idea of the product in use becoming less effective. The more you take it in, the less useful it is, as it were.
A bit of a pejorative laugh from R around 20 minutes about alternative treatments, which tells it’s own story.
From about 25 on, R explains why the novel vaccines against mucosal infections differ from those that deal with the likes of measles. It tends to suggest that the current policy is not a clever idea, overall. It looks like excessive use of it could make things worse, even if there were not direct injury risks.
Around 28 R explains why it is normal for those who have used the novel “vaccine” to still transmit the infection to others, even if they have benefited from it’s use. No benefit to third parties at all, from his perspective. So, any policy based on the concept of having to have used such products is built on ignorance at best. Or at worst, built on a lie.
R’s comments on postmortems around 41:20 were interesting. Kind of suggests that they haven’t got a clue about the real risks at present.
It was published on 23/1/2022, and many have seen it already (25K on 3/3), but it was useful anyway.
Why does nobody talk about the “burden” on healthcare of the millions of people needing medical care post jab? People are on 3 jabs now, many of whom felt poorly enough to take a day off work or seek medical advice. What are the actual costs of this? When considering for the vast majority, they’ll go on to get the virus anyway and will have been required to isolate for the same length of time as the unvaccinated. Surely the vaccine is simply increasing work absence and the burden on healthcare. The vaccinated are the problem.
interesting read
https://www.theepochtimes.com/pfizers-covid-19-vaccine-goes-into-liver-cells-and-is-converted-to-dna-study_4307594.html
and study here
https://www.mdpi.com/1467-3045/44/3/73/htm#B39-cimb-44-00073
Dr. Andrew Hill, The Man Who Killed Millions?
https://theconservativetreehouse.com/blog/2022/03/04/dr-andrew-hill-the-man-who-killed-millions/