98248
  • Log in
The Daily Sceptic
No Result
View All Result
  • Articles
  • About
  • Archive
    • ARCHIVE
    • NEWS ROUND-UPS
  • Forum
  • Donate
  • Newsletter
The Daily Sceptic
No Result
View All Result

One in Three who Isolated Were Never Contagious, Study on PCR Threshold Data Suggests

by Will Jones
5 February 2022 10:31 PM

Up to a third of people who tested positive for Covid by PCR test were not contagious and did not need to self-isolate, a new study led by Oxford scientists suggests. The Telegraph has the story.

Up to a third of people who tested positive for coronavirus by Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) tests were not contagious and did not need to self-isolate, a new study suggests.

Research led by academics from the University of Oxford found that many laboratories are setting the positivity bar very low, meaning they are picking up people who are “a danger to no one”.

PCR tests work by cycling swab samples through different temperatures to trigger replication, which releases a chemical showing that the virus is present. 

The fewer cycles that are needed to detect the chemical, the greater the viral load and the more likely someone is infected. 

There is no definitive cycle threshold level for positivity. However, a review by the University of Oxford found that 30 was a good cut-off, because the virus was unlikely to replicate after that – particularly in asymptomatic people. Other groups have suggested around 32 to 33.

However, Freedom of Information requests made by members of the public and compiled by the University of Oxford show that NHS trusts are using vastly different cut-off thresholds, with little regulation from the Government. Some are as low as 25, while others are as high as 45.

The figures also show that between 23% and 37% of people who were told they were positive had a cycle threshold value above 30. For one in 20, it was higher than 40. 

Dr Tom Jefferson, co-author and an epidemiologist at the Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine at the University of Oxford, said: “We found that about one-third of people who isolated probably didn’t need to. 

“PCR positivity means that you can tell people to isolate and ruin their lives basically, even though in a large proportion of these cases, they are not infectious.

“It’s absolute chaos. The whole regulation of these tests seems to be shambolic.” …

Prof Carl Heneghan, director of the Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine at the University of Oxford, said: “It’s deeply worrying. When you have more virus circulating in the community, the potential for contamination is greater. Studies have shown that people can be easily contaminated with a viral fragment. 

“The problem is the panic of the pandemic meant that we developed policies at a speed we’ve never seen before and we haven’t looked at them to find out which are evidence-based. 

“Accurately knowing who is infectious is incredibly important for people going about their daily lives, the economy, our social lives and our wellbeing. The impact on the economy is now coming home, and it is clear that we cannot afford to keep isolating people.

“It’s also clear that members of the public were worried about this and submitting sensible Freedom of Information requests, but were met with contradictory responses attempting to explain a system which is shambolic in terms of governance and regulation.”

The study will be published on the website of Collateral Global, a charity committed to researching the impact of Covid measures.

Worth reading in full, and find the study here.

Tags: InfectionOxford UniversityPCR TestsTransmission

Donate

We depend on your donations to keep this site going. Please give what you can.

Donate Today

Comment on this Article

You’ll need to set up an account to comment if you don’t already have one. We ask for a minimum donation of £5 if you'd like to make a comment or post in our Forums.

Sign Up
Previous Post

80% of Serious Covid Cases Are Fully Vaccinated – Israel Hospital Director

Next Post

News Round-Up

Subscribe
Login
Notify of
Please log in to comment

Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.

41 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

NEWSLETTER

View today’s newsletter

To receive our latest news in the form of a daily email, enter your details here:

DONATE

PODCAST

Nick Dixon and Toby Young Talk About the Davos Elites’ Prolific Use of Prostitutes, Clarkson’s Fightback and the Government’s Bizarre Plan to Ban Discouraging Teens From Becoming Trans

by Will Jones
24 January 2023
1

LISTED ARTICLES

  • Most Read
  • Most Commented
  • Editors Picks

Pro-Mask Crusader Trish Greenhalgh Plumbs New Depths of Distortion

27 January 2023
by Dr Gary Sidley

News Round-Up

28 January 2023
by Toby Young

The Billionaires Coming For Your Gas Boiler

28 January 2023
by Toby Young

The Pfizer Exec Story is No Hoax

27 January 2023
by Thorsteinn Siglaugsson

Was Refusing the Vaccine Really Just a “Coin Flip?”

28 January 2023
by Nick Dixon

Was Refusing the Vaccine Really Just a “Coin Flip?”

41

Pro-Mask Crusader Trish Greenhalgh Plumbs New Depths of Distortion

45

The Pfizer Exec Story is No Hoax

47

News Round-Up

24

The Billionaires Coming For Your Gas Boiler

15

In Praise of Boris Johnson’s Stance on Ukraine

28 January 2023
by Noah Carl

MHRA Caught Not Doing Its Promised Vaccine Safety Monitoring (Again)

28 January 2023
by Nick Denim

Pro-Mask Crusader Trish Greenhalgh Plumbs New Depths of Distortion

27 January 2023
by Dr Gary Sidley

Lockdowns Responsible for Thousands of Alcohol Deaths – ONS

27 January 2023
by Dr Carl Heneghan and Dr Tom Jefferson

Deaths Running 26% Above Pre-Pandemic Levels – and the Vaccines Remain a Leading Suspect

27 January 2023
by Will Jones

POSTS BY DATE

February 2022
M T W T F S S
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
28  
« Jan   Mar »

SOCIAL LINKS

Free Speech Union
  • Home
  • About us
  • Donate
  • Privacy Policy

Facebook

Twitter

Instagram

RSS

Subscribe to our newsletter

© Skeptics Ltd.

No Result
View All Result
  • Articles
  • About
  • Archive
    • ARCHIVE
    • NEWS ROUND-UPS
  • Forum
  • Donate
  • Newsletter

© Skeptics Ltd.

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Create New Account!

Please note: To be able to comment on our articles you'll need to be a registered donor

Already have an account?
Please click here to login Log In

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
wpDiscuz
You are going to send email to

Move Comment