I Will Not be Tricked into Having Yet Another Jab so I Can Travel

We're publishing a guest post by travel writer Annabel Fenwick Elliott about the absurdity of Sajid Javid's proposal that people must have the Covid booster as a condition of being able to travel. Every six months?

6 min read

We’re publishing a guest post by travel writer Annabel Fenwick Elliott about the absurdity of insisting people have the booster as a condition of being able to travel, something Sajid Javid has said is on the cards. She reluctantly got vaccinated in order to carry on doing her job, but wasn’t prepared to get a booster every six months!

Just when I thought we were finally done with all the audacity, a fresh plate of it is served. Less than a year after the vaccine drive launched, being double-jabbed isn’t good enough anymore. Syringes at the ready, Health Secretary Sajid Javid is already making thinly-veiled threats about not “enjoying Christmas” again, unless “we all come together and play our part” in the booster regime.

On top of that, mere months after the half-hearted revival of travel, the validity of our Covid passes are under threat. Austria and Switzerland have joined Israel in limiting entry for those who aren’t willing to get another dose, and the UK’s official guidance was updated earlier this month to say the Government “is reviewing the implications and requirements of boosters for international travel certification” and “looking at whether and how booster vaccinations could be included in the NHS Covid Pass for travel”.

That sounds an awful lot to me like an all-but mandatory third helping of a substance that doesn’t prevent me from catching a virus, which isn’t even a danger to me, and won’t prevent me from spreading it to others. Ah well, you might say; in for a penny, in for a pound. What’s one more concession?

But equally, where does one draw the line, between doing silly things in order to be a more agreeable human, and all-out refusing to comply on principle? I’ve been asking myself this question since April 2020, back when lockdown was still something of a novelty, before the pile-up of non-virus-related casualties – lost jobs, ruined livelihoods, compromised educations; missed cancer diagnoses, suicides, worsening poverty in the developing world – had far eclipsed the number of Covid deaths.

By the time loo-roll-gate wasn’t funny anymore, and furlough was no longer looking like just a brief holiday from functional society, we’d established that this coronavirus was nasty, yes, but dangerous to only a small section of people. This should have been our cue to throw billions of pounds at protecting that vulnerable percentage; increasing hospital capacity (long overdue anyway), safe-guarding care homes and supporting those who needed to shield.

Instead, we wasted it, on a scale previously inconceivable, policing our entire population on where they could travel, when they could exercise and who they could hug. That line, between whimsical irrationality and perilous lunacy, became increasingly hard to distinguish. I complied with rules I never imagined I would, for longer than I ever thought I could.

Then, after almost a year of living like North Koreans, came the vaccines – our only ticket out of this. The final sacrifice we’d have to make to ‘keep everyone safe’ and go back to normal again. And so easy, just a prick of the skin! In any other circumstance, I would have gladly rolled up my sleeve. I’ve always marvelled at the invention of inoculations. I am unwaveringly pro-science and anti-hysteria. But by this stage I was in revolt.

After 20 months of ludicrous tap dancing – wearing a muzzle to walk from a door to a table, being banned post-travel from walking my dog in the countryside, needing to order a pie in order to have a pint – I didn’t trust a single diktat the Government had issued, even the few that made sense. I was all out of willingness to do silly things for the greater good, and for better or worse, that now included taking a needle to the arm.

The elderly and infirm – indeed, everyone who wanted one – had got theirs, and were thus all-but entirely protected from severe disease and death. I, with my 0.0218 % risk of being hospitalised with Covid, according to the Government’s own QCovid risk calculator tool, would rather take my chances, thanks. No offence to the jabs themselves, and the admirable speed at which they were rolled out; but if Matt Hancock had ordered me to start taking two Ibuprofen tablets a day for not having a headache I would refuse on the same principle.

But eventually I caved, not to ‘protect others’ (because it bears repeating, all those who want to be protected are protected), but because my job as a travel writer would otherwise have been impossible and because I genuinely thought it would be the last of these long drawn-out box-ticking exercises. Also, so that I’d no longer need to have my nostrils so routinely violated by cotton swabs.

I was wrong on all fronts, of course. Most countries outside Europe still require a PCR test upon entry whether you’re vaccinated or not (which isn’t that mad considering the jabs don’t stop you spreading the virus), and if plans go ahead for our Covid passes to be repeatedly rendered obsolete (we’ll probably need boosters every six months, seems to be the general scientific consensus) then that’s it – there is no line, and there is no end.

Perhaps the most glaring fault in this potty plot to extinguish a disease that is already endemic also manifests itself as our leaders’ most audacious act of hypocrisy. Even if we could reach global herd immunity it would be impossible to achieve without inoculating almost everyone on the planet. Yet here we are in the West, dishing out third doses and declaring all that oppose them to be selfish, when vast swathes of the population in Africa haven’t even had their first.

My father, a lawyer based in Australia with a background in science and engineering, is about the most rational person I know, and the last person I’d expect to be an anti-vaxxer. But for the same reasons as many others (a total lack of trust in the way this pandemic has been handled) he’s taken an even firmer stance than I have, in refusing it altogether. It means he can’t step foot on a plane again. (Qantas, the nation’s flag carrier, has made it compulsory for all passengers to be double-jabbed.)

It is his position that if he holds out long enough, perhaps when we’re on our seventh round of boosters, the Government will give up on the mass-scale behavioural tricks and the Covid jab will be relegated to the status of the flu shot: a good idea for those who need it, there for anyone who wants it, but no longer the condition of leading a normal life. The way it should have been from the start, perhaps. I only hope he’s right.

Comments

This week across the site:

Email me alerts for this discussion
Notify of

To join in with the discussion please make a donation to the Daily Sceptic.

Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.

113 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Banjones
Banjones
4 years ago

An excellent article – and measured enough for me to pass on to friends and rellies who think that I’m an ”anti vaxxer”. So thanks for that.

(Sorry to be pedantic, but it’s ”SET foot”, by the way. Just another of those annoying things that people get wrong these days – when our nerves are enough on edge for it to seem to matter!)

Peter W
Peter W
4 years ago

Excellent! Sums up all my views and feelings.

RedhotScot
RedhotScot
4 years ago

This will end in the UK thanks to the usual, quiet, sullen, creeping, non compliant stubbornness of the British. For example, night clubs in Scotland were required to police double jabs on entry. Instead they put chairs/tables on the dance floor thereby invalidating the requirement, and defiantly advertised their premises, targeting the unvaccinated, as open to all. A tactic better than our own governments wildly expensive and lunatic approach of throwing billion, and the kitchen sink at the problem, whilst utterly ignoring that herd immunity can begin through the young who are barely affected by wuflu.

Remain symptomless for seven days after partying? OK, now you can visit granny.

The problem with governments is they are stupid and slow. If we recall speed cameras; during the Blair and Brown years those yellow VASCAR boxes littered the streets flashing anything that moved, until people got wise and, sometimes with the help of mobile apps, began slamming their brakes on as they reached them. The consequence? revenues fell far short of what was expected and squabbles broke out over who should change the film cartridges and maintain them, local authorities or police.

By the time Cameron was elected many were adorned with… Read more »

Boomer Bloke
Boomer Bloke
4 years ago

It’s called ‘moving the goalposts’. Johnston is a master. They have also dispensed with the original promise of the NHS ‘healthcare from cradle grave, free at the point of delivery’. You now can only get free healthcare when the NHS feel like delivering it, because ‘protect the NHS’

JB
JB
4 years ago

A couple of points; 1. Why is this a surprise as there’re was always going to be more and more conditions of compliance, 2. Her father has a background in science and engineering and he hasn’t had the jab. Doesnt this tell you something and yet she still says this like he should have had it, despite the acknowledgment that the therapy doesn’t stop transmission. My eyes are rolling.

bowlsman
bowlsman
4 years ago

Very well written and to the point. But as I’ve said before until the sheeple wake up this will never end. Thats all we have hope for.

RTSC
RTSC
4 years ago

Correct. There is no line and there is no end ……. as the Refusniks have been shouting for the past year.

Welcome, belatedly, to the side which has attempted to defend YOUR Civil and Human Rights throughout.

mm99
mm99
4 years ago

I see also Jordon Peterson is losing his marbles in Canada over their galloping fascism.

Maybe things are coming into focus….?

crisisgarden
crisisgarden
4 years ago

‘Yet here we are in the West, dishing out third doses and declaring all that oppose them to be selfish, when vast swathes of the population in Africa haven’t even had their first.’
Absolutely detest this commonly heard (from morons) sentiment. The ‘vast swathes’ of African populations who haven’t had toxic genetic corporate bullshit injected into them are the lucky ones. May they long be deprived of their doses and may every handwringing liberal ‘selfishly’ have as many as their circulatory systems can handle. I support her (somewhat overdue) sentiments but can’t forgive this, even if she’s only borrowing the argument for the sake of convenience. It’s white saviour inside virtue signalling wrapped in complete drivel.

RedhotScot
RedhotScot
4 years ago
Reply to  crisisgarden

Many Africans haven’t been jabbed because they don’t need them; because people aren’t getting sick. This is being gradually credited to Ivermectin being freely available over the counter which many take routinely for entirely different reasons.

MatthewS
MatthewS
4 years ago

Seen this writer in the Telegraph a bunch of times and, admittedly, been frustrated by some of what she has written.

It is a great relief to see her write something that I find far more sensible and real. Wonderful to see her cross to “the other side”. Not overly surprised that it is written for Dailysceptic and not Daily Telegraph.

Thanks for writing it.

maggie may
maggie may
4 years ago
Reply to  MatthewS

Yes, i was thinking i doubt if this will appear in the DT!

LonePatriot
LonePatriot
4 years ago

Our healthcare system is about to experience a tsunami! Potential side effects of jabs include chronic inflammation, because the vaccine continuously stimulates the immune system to produce antibodies. Other concerns include the possible integration of plasmid DNA into the body’s host genome, resulting in mutations, problems with DNA replication, triggering of autoimmune responses, and activation of cancer-causing genes. Alternative COVID cures EXIST. Ivermectin is one of them. While Ivermectin is very effective curing COVID symptoms, it has also been shown to eliminate certain cancers. Do not get the poison jab. Get your Ivermectin today while you still can! https://ivmpharmacy.com

Anti_socialist
Anti_socialist
4 years ago

I like that picture

brachiopod
brachiopod
4 years ago

You, as a journalist, should watch this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ufy2AweXRkc&t=54s which compares Pfizer’s new antiviral that blocks replication of SARS-CoV-2 with ivermectin that does exactly the same thing, but also blocks the virus in 5 other ways at the same time.

You should be mad at the people who forced you and millions of others to wait a year for ‘the vaccine’ when for 9 months they knew ivermectin would have prevented infection, serious illness and death, and infecting others.

You really need to get together with your fellow journalists and ask “why?”

I have tried to get traction on this since late spring last year resulting in the Guardian blocking my attempts to put ivermectin before a wider audience.

What has happened is pre-meditated murder. Be angry, be very angry.

I hope that your father is right, but it will get bloody before it happens, and the people who ran the policies that killed and injured will be held to account.

Anti_socialist
Anti_socialist
4 years ago
Reply to  brachiopod

Denial of effective medical treatment, eg. Ivermectin, for covid in favour of big pharma profit, is man slaughter in my book.

RedhotScot
RedhotScot
4 years ago
Reply to  Anti_socialist

No one in government will ever be convicted of anything over this because they will cower behind ‘the science’, claiming they were acting on best advice. The fact that much of the advice was appalling (Ferguson) they’ll further hide by claiming they’re not scientists and can’t challenge ‘the data’.

If we imagine they remain unaware of Human Rights, the Nuremberg code and crimes against humanity, we are deluding ourselves. Their legal advisors will have paved the way for them to avoid any culpability.

RedhotScot
RedhotScot
4 years ago
Reply to  brachiopod

I have one problem with that video, and John Campbell; whilst John is at pains to point out on every video, including this one, he isn’t recommending any intervention, all his material is for information purposes.

Meanwhile he happily, and persistently insisted that everyone should get one or other of the jabs.

I trust him no more than I trust our government. I’m prepared to wager he’s well funded for his ‘expertise’.

BTW he’s a Nurse, not a Medical Doctor.

Sootbobsweep
Sootbobsweep
4 years ago

Couldn’t agree more.

JayBee
JayBee
4 years ago

Faust agrees with the Devil to get “vaccinated” so he can go on holiday hassle free.
                     

IMG_20211110_195031_271.jpg
Fair Isle
Fair Isle
4 years ago

Stand your ground people. Don’t buckle under the oppressive trickery that is used by governing bodies. If you don’t want a jab, don’t have it. We are living through a real life tyranny and history will judge these times accordingly, long after Johnson and sage members have collected their pensions and living a comfortable life. Please see this for what it is and understand that our health is of no importance to these elected sociopathic criminals. This totalitarian regime must end otherwise society as we know it is lost forever and we are merely property of the state. Non conformity has never been more imperative than it is now.

Anti_socialist
Anti_socialist
4 years ago

Socialism kills.

tom171uk
tom171uk
4 years ago
Reply to  Anti_socialist

Statism kills too.

nbritt58
nbritt58
4 years ago

I was sceptical about the jabs from the start. The technology is experimental, the trials were incomplete, emergency approval rushed through even though there are alternative treatments available, full indemnity for the manufacturers against injury, high numbers of adverse reactions, media censorship of anybody questioning their safety or efficacy, and coercion and threats employed to make us take them. You’d need to have total anosmia to not sniff a very big rat.

Jane G
Jane G
4 years ago

Well done, dad.

peyrole
peyrole
4 years ago

Nope, its about control, control, control.
Its not about what they say its about!

iane
iane
4 years ago

Where does one draw the line, you ask!? Right at point zero – surely all adults know that yielding to a bully NEVER ends!

karenishly
karenishly
4 years ago

I feel exactly the same and I hope others open their eyes and ask more questions. This madness must not continue.

Mark
Mark
4 years ago

But equally, where does one draw the line, between doing silly things in order to be a more agreeable human, and all-out refusing to comply on principle?

I think the past 18 months have pretty thoroughly supported my own view on that – the place to draw the line between doing silly things to comply with authoritarian dictats and refusing to comply on principle is as close to the latter as possible.

we’d established that this coronavirus was nasty, yes, but dangerous to only a small section of people. This should have been our cue to throw billions of pounds at protecting that vulnerable percentage; increasing hospital capacity (long overdue anyway), safe-guarding care homes and supporting those who needed to shield.”

Yes, we could have done all those things to try to comfort the bedwetters, and maybe politically it would have been necessary to do so. But none of them would probably have been cost effective. In reality even those who are “vulnerable” are not much more vulnerable than they are to a nasty flu anyway.

Best would have been to treat it as a flu and as far as possible keep calm and carry on.

helenf
helenf
4 years ago
Reply to  Mark

Perhaps she wouldn’t refer to being injected with the experimental shit (masquerading as a vaccine) as doing a “silly thing” if she’d been one of the unlucky ones to be hospitalised with blood clots, or become blind or deaf, or had heart inflammation, or Guillain barre syndrome, or died.

RedhotScot
RedhotScot
4 years ago
Reply to  helenf

This heralds the change of attitude of those who compliantly stepped up to take the ‘non-vaccination’ because they ‘didn’t want to lose their job’, ‘it was government advice’, ‘it was safe and effective’, ‘they wanted to go on holiday’, ‘to protect granny’.

They’ll now be making their excuses to the unjabbed, hoping to be absolved of their stupidity, bigotry and vindictiveness.

They’ll be thrashing and wailing that they ‘didn’t understand’, ‘they expected two jabs to be enough’, ‘they were protecting others’, ‘they trusted “the science”‘ etc.

Frankly, I won’t be letting them off the hook for the way they condemned those who did our due diligence, or even exercised common sense, and didn’t take the jabs because we heeded the fundamental principle of drug use; never take an experimental substance; never take a substance that does not have long term safety trial data.

Revenge is a dish best served cold.

huxleypiggles
huxleypiggles
4 years ago
Reply to  Mark

Nothing to do with health. The intention is to kill.

JayBee
JayBee
4 years ago

I am sorry, but I can neither see what’s great about this article, nor her behaviour in that matter sofar.
Commiseration is a more apt response.
She should have listened to her father/us, whom I laud.
Anyone with an IQ above room temperature knew exactly what was upcoming in that matter, and unless she has been on the marches, made donations to our causes and lawsuits and vigorously voiced her opposition to vaxx passports with friends, colleagues and, preferably, readers, my sympathy is pretty much non-existent.
Having said that, I’ll of course abscond her and welcome her to the club.
Although I think she’ll cave in again.

kate
kate
4 years ago

https://www.bitchute.com/video/ZZRCzK6BfaVW/

COVID JABS ARE PREMEDITATED FIRST DEGREE MURDER, SAYS DR. ZELENKO

No I'm Spartacus!
No I'm Spartacus!
4 years ago

It can’t be too much longer before they start referring to ‘the booster jab’ as ‘booster jab 1’.

crisisgarden
crisisgarden
4 years ago

It’s a subscription model so everyone’s number will be different. It’ll just be ‘up to date / valid human being’

RedhotScot
RedhotScot
4 years ago
Reply to  crisisgarden

The human equivalent of ‘use-by’ dates.

Teamsaint
Teamsaint
4 years ago

The author has been all too onboard with the programme until now, so we should treat her words with caution.
but opponents of the tyranny will need all the help they can get, I guess…..

bucky99
bucky99
4 years ago
Reply to  Teamsaint

in fairness she’s been anti nonsense Gov measures for a long while – has plenty of articles in the Telegraph pointing out the futility of the “rules”

smithey
smithey
4 years ago

This is exactly what I predicted would happen when ‘vaccine passports’ were first mooted. This is just going to go on and on 4th booster, 5th booster, 6th booster then onto experimental shots for flu, colds cancer the list is endless.

TheyLiveAndWeLockdown
TheyLiveAndWeLockdown
4 years ago

Booster lasts 6 months
Booster lasts 5 months
Booster lasts 4 months
Booster lasts 3 months
Booster lasts 2 months
Booster lasts 1 month
Change to social Credit system means only non-serfs can travel

timsk
timsk
4 years ago

Excellent article Annabel – thank you. The sentiments you express are ones which – I very much hope – reflect the views of millions of people around the globe.

I’d like to think that everyone has a limit on how many jabs they will ‘take for the team’ or – like Annabel, to enable them to travel. For lots of us here it’s none (because we’ve never bought into the myth of the team), for my wife it’s one (nasty adverse reaction), for others two. Once the third booster is over with, I fully expect the take up rate of subsequent jabs to tank – that’s almost inevitable, IMO. My concern is that the powers that be will, doubtless, have realised this too and are already planning their next move – and the one after that – to keep us all firmly under their totalitarian thumb.

Thank you for reading. Please help us keep the Daily Sceptic going by becoming a donor.