“Web or phone medical appointments ‘disastrous’ for some patients” – “Remote medical consultations have been ‘disastrous’ for some patients, according to a review, with 93% of clinicians saying that the quality of diagnoses was worse as a result,” reports the Times.
“The slippery slope: Covidian sludge” – “In many areas of the United States there are no mask requirements now, many tens of thousands are merrily packed into arenas, dining indoors… However, often in that same city Uber drivers require customers to wear masks, take photos of themselves wearing masks and upload it onto the Uber App before their next ride,” Omar Khan writes on the political and societal factors that have made lockdown restrictions a reality in Uncommon Wisdom.
“Exposed: the plague of fake medical trials putting lives in danger” – “According to bombshell allegations from a group of highly respected experts, the medical world is rife with research fraud. Their investigations suggest up to one in five medical studies published each year could contain invented or plagiarised results,” reports MailOnline.
“(New normal) winter is Coming” – “The vast majority of the Western world has been transformed into a pseudo-medical dystopia,” C.J. Hopkins foresees a repressive winter on the horizon in OffGuardian.
“Did Covid first emerge at the Wuhan Institute of Virology?” – The net around the Wuhan Institute of Virology continues to tighten. A letter from Lawrence Tabak, Principal Deputy Director of the National Institutes of Health in the U.S., has shed more light on the grant which the institute made to the EcoHealth Alliance for work at the Wuhan Institute,” writes Ross Clark in the Spectator.
“The dark side of working from home” – We are blurring the line between our working and private lives, Para Mullin argues that working from home is a danger to both our privacy and family life in Spiked.
“Eco-alarmism: grassroots or astroturf?” – Climate alarmist ideology is an elite movement, promoted and bankrolled by societal institutions in league with the state looking to exploit the hysteria to seize more power, argues Alexander Adams in Bournbrook Magazine.
“The BBC’s prophet of doom belongs in a pulpit” – Roger Harrabin, the BBC’s environment analyst, doesn’t even attempt to suggest his claims about the state of the planet are disputable, writes Charles Moore in the Telegraph.
“The great climate change fallacy” – The hysterical headlines are based on an unlikely scenario, Tom Chivers examines the dodgy models used to prop up climate alarmist rhetoric in UnHerd.
“I want to save the planet but I resent being told how to” – “The parade of 400 private jets parked up at Scottish airports as world leaders, royalty and billionaires gushed out more carbon within a 24 hour period than most of us will in a lifetime in order to arrive at Cop26 and preach that we must all change our lives forever,” Dan Wotton writes on the explicit hypocrisy of those attending COP26 in MailOnline.
“Imprisoning Twitter trolls is a dangerous game” – It may feel morally righteous, but it’s entirely subjective, Noah Carl writes on the arbitrary and partisan nature of criminalising online speech in UnHerd.
“The real harm in the Online Harms Bill” – The conflation of ‘speech’ with ‘harm’ would create a net that would ensnare all political dissident and argument, writes Sam Ashworth-Hayes in the Spectator.
“‘White privilege’ should not be taught in schools” – Toby speaks to TalkRadio on why ‘white privilege’ should not be taught as truth in the classroom: “The fact is, white working-class boys are amongst the lowest achieving in Britain.”
Toby Young from the Free Speech Union says "white privilege" should not be taught in schools.
You’ll need to set up an account to comment if you don’t already have one. We ask for a minimum donation of £5 if you'd like to make a comment or post in our Forums.
To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.
Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.