Moderna has asked the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to extend the emergency use of its Covid vaccine to American children aged 12 and over. The FDA approved the use of the Pfizer Covid vaccine in children a month ago on Thursday, and earlier this month the U.K.’s medicines regulator did the same for British children. The MailOnline has more.
When the [Moderna] vaccine was originally authorised for use by the FDA in December 2020, it was only for those aged 18 and older.
However, recent Phase Three clinical trial data showed no children who were given the immunisation fell ill with the virus within 14 days of their second dose, while four children given the placebo later tested positive.
According to Moderna, this is “consistent with a vaccine efficacy of 100%”.
It comes exactly four weeks after Pfizer received approval from the FDA to administer its vaccine to children between ages 12 and 15.
As of Thursday, more than seven million U.S. children between ages 12 and 17 have received at least one dose of the vaccine.
Still, only about one in three parents said they would immunise their children right away.
Although children can contract Covid and pass the disease on to others, they tend to not get very ill and make up about 0.1% of deaths.
“We are pleased to announce that we have submitted for an emergency use authorization for our Covid vaccine with the FDA for use in adolescents in the United States,” said Moderna CEO Stéphane Bancel in a statement.
“We are encouraged that the Moderna Covid vaccine was highly effective at preventing Covid and SARS-CoV-2 infection in adolescents.”…
Moderna’s study included 3,732 adolescents from ages 12 to 17 enrolled at sites across the U.S….
Side effects were mild or moderate with the most common being pain at the site of injection, similar to adults in the clinical trial last year.
Other common symptoms were fatigue, headache, muscle pain and chills, but no serious side effects were reported.
Worth reading in full.
To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.
Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.
It is notable that they didn’t supply any evidence on the ability of the vaccine to suppress transmission, given that that’s the only reason they have for vaccinating healthy children.
And who gives a toss about whether children transmit the virus now anyway? 80% of the population have antibodies against SARS-COV-2.
We must sincerely hope that antibody dependent enhancement (ADE) does not occur.
If it does, they’re going to need all the Coroner’s bags & victim storage & identification facilities which have been spotted in various public procurement databases.
Because there is no evidence that children are significant vectors.
More proof of this corrupt scam.
Are Jimmy Saville and Fred West on the board of this company?
They co-founded it.
Along with Joseph Fritzle.
To save you having to google the name, He was an Austrian Guy who imprisoned his daughter in the cellar for at least 20 years, repeatedly raped her and fathered at least one child with her.
We are all Fritzle Children now.
My partner posted somewhere yesterday that Matt Hancock has a picture of Harold Shipman next to his bed.
However, recent Phase Three clinical trial data showed no children who were given the immunisation fell ill with the virus within 14 days of their second dose, while four children given the placebo later tested positive.
Or written in a different (honest) way, NO children fell ill?
Exactly. And further to your question – how many of those who had the immunisation tested positive, or fell ill before 14 days had elapsed?
And even further..how many cycles were run on the PCR test for the vaccinated kids as opposed to the unvaccinated kids?
Re: Pfizer rollout for children:
On 17 May, HART member Dr Ros Jones sent a letter — signed by dozens of doctors and academics — to the MHRA to express their grave concerns. Two hours after the MHRA announced they had given temporary emergency use approval for the vaccine, they sent this reply to that letter. In it, they claim that no new adverse events were identified and they link to this recent New England Journal of Medicine paper. But it is only if you take the time to read the supplementary appendix that you discover that there were seven unspecified severe “events” and one life-threatening “event” reported in the vaccinated arm. Without clarification of these events, a proper analysis of safety cannot be made. Only 1,134 children were given the vaccine on this trial, far too small a number to be able to rule out uncommon but severe or life-threatening side effects – what else do we just not know yet?
https://www.hartgroup.org/child-vaccination-irresponsible/
Do these two fuckwits know that nothing happens at the eye of a storm?
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-57425730
Presumably they meant that they’d had the first half of the wave, and are now due to have the second half?
What a terrible article. It isn’t proper reporting, it’s a press release from touchy-feely-fascism head office. Every time I look at the BBC’s website I remember why I don’t look at it anymore.
CHILDREN ARE NOT AT RISK FROM CORONAVIRUS AND DO NOT NEED TO BE VACCINATED AGAINST IT.
Of the tiny number of children who died in 2020 having had a positive COVID test, ALL were already suffering from serious illness.
https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/all-children-who-died-of-covid-19-were-already-seriously-ill-jlxr8mkxq
Where’s the f***ing emergency? I must have missed it. These people are nothing short of child abusers.
Crap from our “carers”
https://www.birminghammail.co.uk/news/midlands-news/heartlands-hospital-covid-ward-worker-20780531
So vaccinated have to fall ill, unvaccinated only need to *test positive*. Do they think we aren’t wise to these weasel words by now?
“100% effectiveness”. Dream on – that figure would mean incredibly low absolute differences between vaccinated and unvaccinated. Work it out.
ARR????? Oh – surprise! Not quoted!
The corruption progresses.
Indeed, with vaccine clinical trials, it’s required (by the regulators) to show & discuss both the Absolute Risk Reduction (ARR) & the Relative Risk Reduction (RRR).
Any vaccine for which only the RRR features is (a) deliberately misleading and (b) an advertisement for pharma.
As Dr Sucharit Bakhdi points out, when there’s an ARR of less than 1%, the appropriate vaccine action is none at all & use safe and effective treatments when needed.
If you cannot isolate a virus, how can you make a working vaccine
Hunting for Viruses with Dr Andy Kaufman Odysee Exclusive
Much though I respect Andy, and he may even turn out to be spot on, here’s the problem. It’s literally impossible to prove a negative.
We’ve even discussed this. I’ve pointed out that there is so much evidence of foul play that we don’t need to & cannot succeed in this line of enquiry.
What is your take on the “shedding” or transmission of spike proteins from vaccinated to unvaccinated people? It seems more scientists are thinking it might be possible. I originally thought it sounded like nonsense until it happened to me – twice. Second time I was bedbound with temperature and one of the worst headaches I have ever had. Now worried I have some residual effects.
I think it’s not real. The reason is to do with quantities.
Consider this as if it was, say, cyanide.
The source, if they are to give off enough cyanide to hurt someone else, will themselves be subjected to extraordinarily high quantities of cyanide that we’d know this – that sources who are able to injure others would always be among the sickest post vaccination people.
Replace cyanide with spike protein & the same applies.
latest daily all cause mortality out
https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/992620/Weekly_Flu_and_COVID-19_report_w23.pdf
page 58
its plummeting
for all the bollox about the new wave
https://coronavirus.data.gov.uk/details/healthcare
it still doesn’t exist
and most of these are people testing +ve when they are in for a broken leg or whatever
“Side effects were mild or moderate with the most common being pain at the site of injection, similar to adults in the clinical trial last year.
Other common symptoms were fatigue, headache, muscle pain and chills, but no serious side effects were reported. ”
So the chances of children being ill with covid? Neglible but they can have a sore arm, have flu like symptoms from a vaccine they don’t need?
It’s child abuse you fucking bastards.
Why is Toby promoting the Moderna vaccine? Seems to me he has been bought off.
Yes, regret to say I’m certain he’s been got at. I’ve pitched him at least one outline for LS,, but he either declined or replied with one word answers. Sad.
All the freedom action is in the US, which is why I’ll go there if I can make it happen.
The experiment to vaccinate children is horrific- there are several lobbying groups to try to get common sense. There are data showing damage to heart muscle etc in Children- of course this may be associated but these children are not at risk. Is Boris going to inject his offspring ?
He’d have to find them first
Dr Bhakti professor Emeritus explains what he thinks of vaccinations and children (from 5 days ago).
https://youtu.be/0IBv3A8-ShI
A top person is Sucharit Bakhdi & I’m in touch with him & others daily.
All Covid19 vaccines are way too dangerous compared with the normally scheduled vaccines.
They should all be withdrawn.
No new Covid19 vaccine which is native spike protein based should be granted emergency use authorisation because the conditions required to make that legal do not obtain.
Specifically there are several safe & highly effective treatments.
Hydroxychloroquine, zinc, ivermectin, azithromycin, budesonide.
Mike – could you clarify your third sentence please?
https://twitter.com/justin_hart/status/1402995263128489989Thread on myocarditis reporting etc.
Just round up all the CEOs of Big Pharma companies put them on trial and those that are found guilty either sling in gaol or put them up against s wall and put them and us out of their diabolical misery.