Why did senior U.S. Government Covid adviser Dr. Anthony Fauci and other leading scientists seek to quash any suggestion of a lab leak origin back in early 2020 and ensure it was written off as a conspiracy theory? That’s what many people are asking now that a lab leak is being seen, including by Dr. Fauci himself and President Joe Biden, as a possibility worth investigating.
In May 2020, Dr Fauci was unequivocal: “If you look at the evolution of the virus in bats and what’s out there now, [the scientific evidence] is very, very strongly leaning toward this could not have been artificially or deliberately manipulated… Everything about the stepwise evolution over time strongly indicates that [this virus] evolved in nature and then jumped species.” Yet now he has changed his tune. On May 11th he stated that he is “not confident” the virus developed naturally and he is “perfectly in favour of any investigation that looks into the origin of the virus”.
The controversy has escalated in the last couple of days after the publication of emails from February 2020 that show Dr. Fauci being told by Dr. Kristian Andersen, Director of Infectious Disease Genomics at the Scripps Research Institute, that SARS-CoV-2 features “look engineered“.
In the emails, obtained by BuzzFeed through Freedom of Information enquiries, Dr. Anderson wrote: “I should mention that after discussions earlier today, Eddie, Bob, Mike, and myself all find the genome inconsistent with expectations from evolutionary theory. But we have to look at this much more closely and there are still further analyses to be done, so those opinions could still change.”
It seems the opinions did change, as six weeks later Dr. Anderson was a lead signatory of a letter in Nature that declared: “The evidence shows that SARS-CoV-2 is not a purposefully manipulated virus.”
In the wake of the revelation about his February email, Dr. Anderson has doubled down and defended his Nature letter, tweeting: “As I have said many times, we seriously considered a lab leak a possibility. However, significant new data, extensive analyses, and many discussions led to the conclusions in our paper. What the email shows, is a clear example of the scientific process.”
But with the world increasingly convinced the lab leak hypothesis is a live possibility – and always was – it will be interesting to see how long Dr. Andersen can stick to his position that writing it off completely in March 2020 was “a clear example of the scientific process”. Veteran science journalist Nicholas Wade has already dismissed Anderson’s Nature letter as “another case of poor science”. It falsely assured readers “of something [the authors] could not know”, he writes, since “viruses can be manipulated in ways that leave no defining marks”.
Prior to the Nature letter, a letter in the Lancet in February 2020 from a group of virologists, organised by Dr Peter Daszak, had announced the “scientific consensus” that the media seemed to crave. It declared: “We stand together to strongly condemn conspiracy theories suggesting that COVID-19 does not have a natural origin… Scientists… overwhelmingly conclude that this coronavirus originated in wildlife. … Conspiracy theories do nothing but create fear, rumours, and prejudice that jeopardise our global collaboration in the fight against this virus.” However, it later came out that Dr Daszak’s organisation, EcoHealth Alliance, of which he is President, had funded coronavirus research at the Wuhan Institute of Virology. Despite this, the authors wrote: “We declare no competing interests.”
Far from being a “conspiracy theory” to be quickly denounced by false scientific consensus, there was evidence right from the start that a lab leak was a real possibility – most obviously, the fact that the outbreak began in Wuhan and virus lab leaks are common.
The Wuhan Institute of Virology is a world leader in “gain-of-function” research on coronaviruses, so the idea that an unusually contagious coronavirus already adapted to infect humans might be present in the labs there and able to escape was always plausible. Nicholas Wade explains:
Why would anyone want to create a novel virus of greater pathogenicity? Virologists argue they can get ahead of a potential pandemic by exploring just how close a given animal virus might be to making the jump to humans. These enhancements of viral capabilities are known blandly as gain-of-function experiments but are so obviously dangerous that from 2014 to 2017 the U.S. Government placed a moratorium on funding them.
With coronaviruses, there was particular interest in the spike proteins, which jut out all around the spherical surface of the virus and pretty much determine which species of animal it will target. In 2000, Dutch researchers, for instance, earned the gratitude of rodents everywhere by genetically engineering the spike protein of a mouse coronavirus so that it would attack only cats.
At the Wuhan Institute of Virology in China, virologists have been doing exactly these kinds of experiments. The programme is headed by Dr. Zheng-li Shi, known as Bat Lady in China because of her intense interest in bat viruses. Dr. Shi gathered many coronaviruses from the bats that live in caves in Yunnan in southern China. She then took the spike protein genes from various viruses and inserted them into the genomes of other viruses. The goal was to explore the natural ability of the various spike proteins to attack human cells. As with other gain-of-function studies, the idea was to explore the genetic pathways by which an animal virus might jump to humans, and thus help forestall an impending epidemic.
Richard Ebright, a Molecular Biologist at Rutgers University, says the WIV’s research was no secret: “It is clear that the Wuhan Institute of Virology was systematically constructing novel chimeric coronaviruses and was assessing their ability to infect human cells and human-ACE2-expressing mice.”
Wade continues:
“It is also clear,” Dr. Ebright says, “that, depending on the constant genomic contexts [i.e., the particular viral backbone] chosen for analysis, this work could have produced SARS-CoV-2 or a proximal progenitor of SARS-CoV-2.”
How do we know for sure that this is what Dr. Shi was doing? Because, by a strange twist in the story, she was funded by grants from the National Institutes of Health, the US equivalent of the Medical Research Council. These grant proposals, channelled through Dr Daszak, and a matter of public record, make clear that she was testing the ability of various spike proteins to infect humanised mice.
In an interview on December 9th 2019, just before the outbreak of the pandemic became generally known, Dr. Daszak talked in glowing terms of how researchers at the Wuhan Institute of Virology had been reprogramming the spike protein and generating chimeric coronaviruses capable of infecting humanised mice.
“Well I think… coronaviruses – you can manipulate them in the lab pretty easily,” he said. “Spike protein drives a lot of what happens with coronavirus, in zoonotic risk. So you can get the sequence, you can build the protein, and we work a lot with Ralph Baric at UNC to do this. Insert into the backbone of another virus and do some work in the lab.”
The idea that SARS-CoV-2 might have leaked from such a lab – one studying a number of viruses closely related to SARS-CoV-2 – hardly seems beyond the realm of possibility, particularly when you realise that this research was often being done at a biosafety level similar to that of a dentist’s surgery: “You have to wear a lab coat and gloves, do experiments under a hood, put up a biohazard warning, and that’s about it”, writes Wade.
There’s other evidence too. Despite extensive surveys of wild animals, the closest known relative of the virus is found in bats 1,500km away from Wuhan in southern China. Yet the local population there were not the first infected, and the outbreak emerged while the bats were hibernating.
The Huanan seafood market in Wuhan has been ruled out as the origin because many of the earliest identified cases had no connection to it.
There is no sign of SARS-CoV-2 going through a process of adaptation to humans, but it was straight away highly transmissible among humans.
There is also evidence in the virus’s genetic structure. Virologist Dr David Baltimore explains: “When I first saw the furin cleavage site in the viral sequence, with its arginine codons, I said to my wife it was the smoking gun for the origin of the virus. These features make a powerful challenge to the idea of a natural origin for SARS2.”
Dr Angus Dalgleish has argued that: “The laws of physics mean that you cannot have four positively charged amino acids in a row. The only way you can get this is if you artificially manufacture it.” Dr Dalgleish has also said Chinese scientists have been deliberately covering their tracks: “We think that there have been retro-engineered viruses created. They’ve changed the virus, then tried to make out it was in a sequence years ago.”
In some ways it is odd that the mainstream narrative turned so firmly and quickly against the lab-leak theory given that it fits with the idea of an unusually deadly virus. Indeed, it is disliked by many sceptics for that reason, some of whom favour explanations that involve the virus not escaping from a lab but circulating globally below the radar for months or even years before it was discovered in Wuhan. To support this they cite evidence of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies being detected in blood samples in Europe from September 2019 or even earlier. However, it appears that all of these early “cases” were asymptomatic, and they are much more likely to be false positive results of the antibody test than genuine SARS-CoV-2 in Europe in summer 2019.
Is the mainstream anti-lab-leak movement an indication of the influence of China behind the scenes? Or is it an outgrowth of the vested interests of virologists defending their discipline and its favoured research projects and trying to avoid blame? Ethan Siegel’s latest piece in Forbes seems to indicate the latter, arguing that: “Seriously considering this shocking, ill-founded accusation serves to further undermine the autonomy and academic freedom of researchers around the world who work in highly specialised fields.” Shocking, ill-founded accusation? It’s not personal, Ethan, it’s just following the evidence.
Here’s a recap of key events and reports which may help to piece together the origin of the virus:
- On September 12th 2019 the main WIV database of sequences and samples was taken offline without warning or explanation and all requests to restore access to it have been refused. All 16 WIV virus databases were subsequently removed.
- A high-security part of the WIV appears to have had an emergency shutdown on October 7th 2019 for 18 days.
- WIV researcher Huang Yanling disappeared in late 2019 and the WIV falsely claimed she had not worked at the institute since 2015. The U.S. has suggested she may be “patient zero”.
- A leaked Chinese report looked back at hospital records and suggested the first patients infected with COVID-19 were being admitted to Wuhan hospitals in October.
- A U.S. military intelligence dossier which came to light in April 2020 documented a runaway epidemic in the Hubei region (of which Wuhan is the capital) in November (though the Pentagon has denied the existence of this dossier). Regional newspaper reports also suggest Covid was already circulating in Hubei in mid-November.
- In the U.K., the first official fatal infection was caught in England in December 2019, while the team behind Imperial College’s REACT study has reconstructed the infection curve in England from antibody data (so no PCR tests involved) and found infections occurring throughout December 2019 and also back into November (see below). (The new virus may not have taken off fully until the spring because of competing with the dominant flu strain, at which point it replaced it.)
Will everybody learn from this misplaced exercise in censorship and suppression? Or is it much more likely that they will carry on as before and not see the harm done by trying to impose a false scientific consensus and silence dissenters through fear and denial of platform?
To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.
Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.
GONE IN 60 SECONDS – COVID vaccines DEPLETE oxygen from red blood cells – Dr. Richard Fleming
Medical Bombshell: Pfizer Vax Attacks Human Blood Creating Clots Under Microscope (banned.video)
Under the microscope.
Ah, from Alex Jones, the most trusted source.
Have you ever noticed that you don’t bleed out after cutting your finger? Yeah, it’s called clotting. Shocking, I know.
Fuckwit
Too kind.
If you do “know”, you will be happy to acknowledge that the clotting also happens around the intra cellular site of the induced spike protein – and if your body’s immune response – antibodies – does not deal with the initial reaction to the jab, the spike protein is then produced which inexorably leads to …an inflammatory result; and pathologists have confirmed it is the inflammatory response from the production of the spike protein that causes the damage to cells, leading to illness and death for some people .
From my limited knowledge of physiology, your cut finger is assisted ably by Factor 8 in the blood – what your immune system does to counter the spike protein is a little different, is it not?
You gloss over that the video is produced by Dr Richard Fleming, nothing to do with “Alex Jones” and what he shows under the microscope is supported by histological samples taken from cadavers by Pathologists in the US – ref. Mayo Clinic samples shown by Dr Ryan Cole – and Europe.
You don’t sound as if you’re the sharpest knife in the drawer…
https://www.ijbs.com/v17p0062.pdf
I have been looking for a paper on this, as I remember early on there were reports that Sars-Cov-19 has a direct effect on the ability of haemoglobin to carry oxygen, and the rapid bleaching of the red blood cells under Dr Fleming’s microscope reminded me of this.
So the low oxygen levels are not only because of microclots in the lungs, but the virus has a direct effect on blood chemistry and the haem molecule.
To me it looks as if the haemoglobin in the red blood cells is destroyed, as if it were just deoxygenated the colour would remain but the red would turn blueish, not white as we see here.
That’s all well and good but isn’t the original article discussing the idea that the vaccine is causing low oxygen levels, not the virus?
The jabs and Covid itself often overlap in effects, since the spike protein acts as a pathogen in both cases.
If haem is destroyed that would explain part of the extreme tiredness often felt in Covid then.
Wow… this makes so much sense. More than a couple of friends have commented how they’ve been feeling out of breath but otherwise seem fine.
Let’s not wet ourselves here. I know the Daily Sceptic is simply reporting the ‘figures,’ but be wise not to use this as an argument for anything, because once we grant that the number of ‘cases’ is relevant with regard to restrictions and lockdowns, then if/when ‘cases’ go up again the other side has got you by the short and curlies.
‘Cases’ is not rational measure.
Daily Sceptic always uses the regimes deceptive and misleading terminology as if it were factually true and scientifically accurate. I hope people are sceptical enough to see through this.
The fact that Toby and his monkeys lie the lie “cases” instead of “claimed positive test results from a 45 cycle, non-specific PCR test not suitable for diagnostic purposes” tells you everything you need to know about this site.
it could be worse
Yes, that’s rather the point of controlled opposition.
Don’t be so damned rude.
Polite lies are still lies. If you don’t like to see plain truths, you’ve very welcome to hide under your blankie.
Someone has to counter their arguments – this is an excellent piece as usual by Will.
I’m still trying to figure out how an illness caused by an unknown pathogen is tested positive by equipment (PCR) that was never designed to identify something called covid19. They might as well be making up figures to fit the chosen text book graph curves as and when required.
Yes, you keep on trying, and maybe some day you will figure it out (although I don’t have high hopes in your special case).
Fuckwit
Try getting off the bottom rung of the debate ladder counter the argument not the person.
It was never designed to identify the whole gene sequence of SARS COV2 either, or whether the “molecules” identified were viral or not or inert or active; the process of reversing a strand of RNA to DNA, and then amplified (CT rate) many times over , beyond the limit where the “result”, determined by software and not anything else, is then deemed to be SARS COV2 and supposed to be cultured in a petrie dish to “prove” whatever “it” is is live. Snag is that the standard of biosecurity of the test labs necessary for any meaningful swab assessment result has been found to be grossly wanting in more than one case, and CT rates employed over a certain threshold deem the result unreliable. You can check out this inconvenient fact via many places on the internet, not least of which is the Government’s own web site which explains that any RT-PCR test cannot be taken as positive without further assessment. Very inconveniently I have never seen how many “further assessments” have been carried out to underpin the data for “positive cases” upon which this Government’s whole strategy is based…world class it ain’t
Spot on. Cases = casedemic.
It astounds me that the regime can still witter on about further “waves”. We must have reached herd immunity months and months ago. How can people still accept this rubbish?
Nearly everyone in the UK has coronovirus residue in them.Supposed ‘cases’ do not refer to people who are actually ill oreven infectious. ‘Case numbers’ can be raised or lowered at will simply by altering the cycle threshold or raising/lowering numbers of PCR procedures undertaken. Given all this, the actual R rate is unmeasurable, so can be any figure plucked out of the air.
Yes, I always ask: of the people who test positive, how many go on to have any symptoms whatsoever. One would think that that was something that really should be measured, but if it has, I’ve never seen the figures (so I presume it has not been measured).
And me – been making same point for months now – but then those figures wouldn’t push out a fear based jabbing programme or support the destruction of the economy by lockdowns.
“R” rate? Now that is medieval hocus pocus.
And the number of leaves falling on any given day proves that climate change is happening every single year.
25 minutes long video of a flight just a month ago (Oct 5th 2021) JFK New York to Helsinki, but you can slide through to any interesting bits – to show that face masks are being used at airports and on planes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cOyAdKP6p6U
And Helsinki to Chicago, just one week ago – more face masks:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=txMaib8IEkk
Please! Don’t imitate the Covidiots. A week’s variation in a mythical modelling figure means absolutely nothing.
Not worth reading in summary – full of speculative shit about ‘infections’ etc. Let alone ‘in full’.
It does mean something: Case numbers reliably going down whenever enforced testing of pupils goes away instead of going up as the same pupils now spend more time mixing with the general population than they did before means testing in schools is pure bullshit.
These aren’t “case” numbers. If you have to be told that you’re dying from a lethal disease when you have no symptoms, you aren’t a “case”.
These are case numbers because they’re called cases. This is even technically correct as they are cases of positive test results. That’s just not what the Covidians have made the general population believe which is basically Someone’s going to get very sick and die because of this!
The purpose of my text was to point this out: Somehow, despite cases were said to be surging in schoolchildren before the halfterm break, nothing happened and cases are again falling now. Without any measures introduced and without any ill consequences except the usual noises from the usual suspects.
IMHO, it’s better to point this out than waste time with terminology debates which are guaranteed to bypass a lot of people as they simply don’t use language that precisely, they just repeat the terms they’ve learnt, and make the person engaging in the terminology debate look like a really overzealous stickler who’s a bit strange.
In more general terms: We can’t force them to fight on our chosen battlefield, hence, we’ll have to beat them on their’s.
‘These are case numbers because they’re called cases. This is even technically correct as they are cases of positive test results.’
Which again assumes the positive in ‘positive test results’. It’s one step back. You’re still granting their terminology, which, despite your protestations below, concedes ground that need not be conceded. Once you concede fundamentals concerning language/terminology, you’re on their ground, and they can manipulate you accordingly. Your next paragraph will provide an appropriate example:
‘Somehow, despite cases were said to be surging in schoolchildren before the halfterm break, nothing happened and cases are again falling now.’
What if the other side falls back on testing, and asserts that the number of those being tested has fallen (and let’s say they’re right), and quickly demands that testing be stepped up once again? You know, just like our side has been bemoaning the mass testing of citizens (about which they are not wrong, but as I hope you can see, concedes ground when we should be cutting the other side off at its ankles), which, given the nature of PCR testing, has grossly exaggerated things.
This right here ought to alert you to the very merry-go-around on which you chose to board.
‘…it’s better to point this out than waste time with terminology debates which are guaranteed to bypass a lot of people as they simply don’t use language that precisely, they just repeat the terms they’ve learnt…’
By arguing on the their terms you are bypassing those you’re trying to reach. I understand your heart, but by stepping into their established arena you are by definition bound by their terms, and those you’re trying to reach are, by and large, already sold on these terms, have been indoctrinated to believe the Founders and the Government aporoved Good Citizens, and view you as a heretic.
‘In more general terms: We can’t force them to fight on our chosen battlefield, hence, we’ll have to beat them on their’s.’
This is ironic, my friend, since they’ve clearly been successful in forcing you to fight on their chosen battlefield.
The key, I think, is to approach this somewhat presuppositionally. Get to the root of what the other side is thinking and challenge their foundational assumptions. We’re already up against a severely indoctrinated opposition. Reaching these people is already difficult. The best hope we have is with honest, solid arguments. Those with ears to hear and their mental faculties intact will be more likely to hear a truthful message than a compromised message.
I didn’t rape you. Stop saying that I raped you. It was just monoconsensual sex, and it only happened once. Don’t nitpick over the technicalities, just look at the headline number.
I think pretty much every here knows that they really aren’t case numbers in the traditional understanding of the term but the fact they are going down is good news even if a percentage of the numbers are sketchy.
Banging your head against a brick wall. Please don’t stop, it needs to be done, but they just don’t get it.
Actually it does mean something: the figures always show that the modellers always significantly overestimate future trends.
It means DS is running out of content.
Fuckwit
The problem is mainly a failure to sufficiently re-frame content from unreliable sources that use loose language.
I see “Daily Mail” and approach with caution.
Well considering the recent article about how many people are reading the DS compared to other news stories, I would say they are doing something right. Never before have I read so much news daily.
Although I do think that the team have forgotten the lesson that they published here last year – don’t fight with more facts & figures when the other side is based on emotion and the moral high ground.
These aren’t figures from a model??
I really couldn’t give a shit about how many covid cases there have been. It’s pushing me off that you have to hear about it every day!
Yes the psychological torture continues aided and abetted by the ‘bought and paid for’ MSM.
When did this start happening? Our great leader, Depifffel the Johnson, told us the vaccines don’t stop infection or transmission, was this misinformation? Will the online harms bill arrest him for the psychological distress this has caused me?
Experts said the statistics suggested that the latest wave, triggered when schools went back from summer
Wave of positive test results in healthy pupils who escaped the scamdemic machinery over the summer holidays, that is. Pupils don’t magically catch COVID in schools, they were catching from the peers and others during the holidays but nobody noticed. Also, the infected pupils are now among us, so, cases should certainly not be falling. On its own, COVID always grows exponentially until the health system collapses. After almost two years of that not happening, everybody knows this!
Someone with a working brain at the Mail, somewhere at least?
Whether or not you believe in “cases” or not, is it the metric they use to scare people with predictions of its future value, so when their metric doesn’t play ball with their narrative it is good.
Sorry “vaccine immunity”?! That’s on oxymoron in this case!
I’m amazed the figure is 1 in 50 considering the supposedly small percentage of the adult population who remain unvaccinated, they mustball be getting it every other month.
I hate that 1 in 50 balls. Means 49 out of every 50 don’t have Covid. Last Christmas when they kept on about the 1 in whatever it would make me want to scream at the TV and say if one in every two people had covid it actually means about 35 million people do not have covid.
The number of daily Covid cases continues to fall in England, BECAUSE (not despite) Boris ignoring calls to re-impose Covid restrictions.
Looking at figures from across the world this pattern is now very clear, ignore covid and it will get under control, over-react tyrannically and the disease will always outsmart you.
Yes, whatever the cases/testing hyperbole, quite a lot of people – anecdotally – got it symptomatically in summer (my own NI was updated, I believe), a good time to get it over with.
I also believe my own NI was likewise updated in the summer. Am doing my level best to hold on to my NI for as long as I can.
I’m sure someone else has already posted this, but why over a week since overhauling Maps, is Google still insisting that Wales is in a national lockdown? Here’s a screenshot from just now:
https://www.msn.com/en-gb/money/other/google-maps-thinks-wales-is-still-in-lockdown-and-we-all-have-to-stay-at-home/ar-AAQbDBt
Maybe because the restrictions like vaccination passports that still obtain in Wales feel an awful lot like lockdown.
I heard a rent-a-GOBbels yesterday explaining that the decreasing ‘cases’ were a result of people voluntarily following SAGE advice and socially distancing and masking despite government inaction. There are so many unprovable double negatives in that statement that I almost thought ‘Genius’. Not what I found myself saying, I’m pleased to say.
“socially distancing and masking” Just been to an activity in a local secondary school sports hall – busy with parents and kids. This time last year most of the parents were masked up, this year none were. Small glimmer of hope. I think there are a lot of people out there (probably most of them vaxxed) who are ready to forget about covid.
Absolutely brilliant. If this happens again, immediately point out that this means government action wasn’t necessary.
Hmmm. Let me run through yesterday. Packed commuter train into London. All available office desks taken. Central Line to Epping, long wait for a train = rammed tube. Meal in a restaurant. Trip to the football. Commuter train home afterwards packed. Social distancing – zero. Masks. Yep defo on the Central Line not many anywhere else. Yeah clearly everyone following the advice. I am going to make the sunrise tomorrow and then the moon. That’s my gift to humanity. Prove me wrong !
Of all the drugs that should undergo rigorous testing procedures this should be at the top. Whether or not this occurs is left to be seen, but following with what we’ve seen so far I’ll remain skeptical.
To think that British regulators have approved this drug already …
A Possible Side Effect of Merck’s Oral COVID-19 Drug should alarm the Public
A rush for molnupiravir’s approval could lead to disaster.
https://moderndiscontent.substack.com/p/the-possible-side-effect-of-mercks
Yes, here we go again. Have we learnt nothing from the rush to ‘vaccinate’ whilst ignoring the sometimes life-threatening side effects.
I see it as a double pronged attack – if people won’t have jabs and you can’t get them that way, then unjabbed they might get covid and you can treat them with this pill, with what seems to be a big risk that they could develop cancer – and hence get them that way. Won’t contribute to any kind of social ID but would contribute to a depopulation drive if that is what they are after.
Clever no? offer it as a ‘game changer’ to kill of the ‘pandemic’ with one hand [great PR] and still harm unwitting recipients at the same time.
The trend is downwards but this headline is daft. Had they done the comparison yesterday the drop would have been 6%. Had they done it on Monday it would have been an increase of 10%.
Fuckwit
Stop shouting at the mirror
Well in general I think taking part in the fantasy world of the “covid pandemic” by talking about “cases” is a losing game, but you could see it as playing the enemy at their own game – cherry picking stats and distorting the truth.
Beyond that, if the doomsayers were to be believed, “cases” would never have gone down after July 19th – we were heading for certain disaster.
Yes, this article should have taken the opportunity to re-iterate that. Although locally cases have never been so high since I started tracking them a year ago. Nobody is getting ill or dying though. The vaxxers will trumpet this as a clear success but don’t tend to response when you ask “So how come deaths also failed before we had a vaccine before March”? More likely the delta variant was true to form and was more infectious but less deadly plus the highly susceptible already had it combined with natural immunity. But no, the silver bullet was/is the vaccine. Logical thinking is sadly lacking.
I’m more interested in the fact “cases” are rising in countries with vax passes and mask wearing and less testing than the U.K.
Know your rights
https://in-this-together.com/inalienable-rights/
Look at the comments below the article.
In one comment is a link to a site which posts a sort of “covid timeline”. IF [and it is a big if] what is written in that time-line is to be believed, then World Bank Funding was sought for the world wide pandemic and it is guaranteed from 2
April 2020 until March 2025.
So, another 3 years of this to run then.
What’s going on? I think we know!
Hmmm… what could it be?
Although to be fair, that top-left one about treating people in hallways occurs every year. Tried to find (but failed) the graphic with stories from the Guardian showing headlines like “Patients dying in corridors” going back 10 years.
The clearest correlation and most likely causation drawn from these comps is more masks = more cases…
Which is what anyone with an IQ above room temperature derived at through using simple logic in Spring 20 already.
Is the room temperature measured in degrees Fahrenheit or in Continental perversions? Either way, you have made your point.
Anyone see the disgusting misrepresentation on the BBC this evening?
They’re now using the infection estimate as their measure of Covid. Not the falling case numbers. They literally make it up as they go along to stoke up the fear.
I give up with the bbc.
Must say I haven’t watched or listened to the BBC or any other news channel since this whole s**tshow kicked off. They’re all just government propaganda machines &, as you say, make it up as they go along. Just wish the whole of the country would do the same- that would end it all tomorrow.
I have up on the BBC about six months ago. Actively avoid them now.
I very much enjoy their letters about how an inspector is imminently to arrive. Is costing them a lot of postage.
I think I had a “visit” from one of their goons the other day. Naturally, I didn’t answer the door.
The ongoing COVID-19 nonsense here in the United States exists solely and exclusively because our governments have failed to use the correct treatment. They used so-called “vaccines” when Japan has just proven, in less than ONE MONTH, that Ivermectin can wipe out the disease. IVM was awarded the Nobel prize for medicine in 2015. One of the 3 most important drugs in human history: Aspirin, Penicillin, and Ivermectin. Get your Ivermectin today while you still can! https://health.p0l.org
I’d love to know the truth about Ivermectin and other things like Vitamin D and Zinc.
Error
What’s 34,000 as a percentage of seventy (70) million?
0.00049%
But they’re not ”cases”, are they?