The WHO's proposed pandemic treaty promotes what can fairly be described as a fascist and neo-colonialist approach to healthcare and governance and must be rejected, says ex-WHO officer Dr. David Bell.
The Biden administration is preparing to sign up the United States to a legally binding accord with the WHO that would give the WHO the lawful authority to dictate America’s policies during a pandemic.
The proposed new powers for the WHO give it the right to impose global lockdowns and vaccine mandates and must be rejected by all democratic nations, writes Dr. David Bell.
The proposed WHO pandemic treaty undermines our sovereignty and democracy. In the absence of a democratic mandate, the British public would expect parliament to actively preserve our authority to self-govern.
The EU has set out its commitment to the continued use of lockdowns, mask mandates, vaccine passports and other restrictions this winter, and also to the creation of a "legally binding" global pandemic treaty.
Just because a globalist happens, on occasion, to be Jewish, doesn't make it suddenly anti-Semitic to use the word, argues Ian Price.
While the WHO works in the spotlight, the pandemic industry has been growing for over a decade and its expansion accelerates unabated. Follow the money and you find no plans and no incentive for a return to normal.
Former UN Assistant Secretary-General Ramesh Thakur has warned of a massive expansion of the international pandemic bureaucracy and the powers of the WHO to press countries towards authoritarian public health measures.
The new WHO pandemic treaty continues to move forward, but the last thing we need is the WHO putting the world on permanent alert and pushing for 'precautionary' lockdowns every time a bat sneezes or a lab leaks.
Many are concerned that the US amendments to the WHO pandemic treaty will transfer sovereignty over public health policy to an unelected and unaccountable global organisation. How worried should we be?
