• Login
  • Register
The Daily Sceptic
No Result
View All Result
  • Articles
  • About
  • Archive
    • ARCHIVE
    • NEWS ROUND-UPS
  • Podcasts
  • Newsletter
  • Premium
  • Donate
  • Log In
The Daily Sceptic
No Result
View All Result

Now is the Time to Oppose the WHO’s Globalist Pandemic Treaty

by Adam Cross
10 March 2023 9:00 AM

On February 1st this year, the World Health Organisation released the first draft of its much heralded pandemic response treaty. The draft treaty, snappily titled the ‘Convention or Agreement on Pandemic Prevention, Preparedness and Response’, is proposed as a solution to what the WHO calls the “catastrophic failure of the international community in showing solidarity and equity” during the “coronavirus pandemic”.

A supposed lack of solidarity amongst national governments will not be the “catastrophic failure” uppermost of many readers’ minds when thinking back on Government health policy over the last three years. Despite this, the WHO’s draft treaty proposes preventing a recurrence of this alleged failure by substantially enhancing the powers of the WHO relative to those of national health authorities.  

It does this despite initially affirming “the principle of sovereignty of States Parties in addressing public health matters” in its opening recital, and despite recognising the principle of state sovereignty as one of the guiding principles of the treaty in article 4. Yet notwithstanding these reassuring nods to the notion of state sovereignty, the WHO’s real attitude towards state autonomy can be gauged by a quick glance at the rest of the recitals and provisions in the agreement. 

In setting out the WHO’s interpretation of the factual background to this draft agreement, many of the other recitals focus on the purported practical inability of individual sovereign states to respond adequately to the unique health challenges of the modern world. Hence other recitals note that “a pandemic situation is extraordinary in nature, requiring States Parties to prioritise effective and enhanced cooperation”; that “the international spread of disease is a global threat with serious consequences… that calls for the widest possible international cooperation”; and that “the threat of pandemics is a reality and that pandemics have catastrophic health, social, economic and political consequences”. These recitals strongly imply that state sovereignty can be of limited importance in the face of such extraordinarily grave threats. 

Similarly, while recognition of state sovereignty is given as one of the guiding principles of the agreement, it is somewhat overshadowed by the raft of other guiding principles, which include abstract things like “equity”, “solidarity” and the “right to health”. Indeed, article 4 goes on to ominously assert that “previous pandemics have demonstrated that no one is safe until everyone is safe”, strongly suggesting that adherence to the principle of national sovereignty during a pandemic is not just an outdated approach to take, but a positively selfish one.

The draft agreement therefore goes on to assign considerable power to the WHO to influence and shape the responses of national health authorities to any future pandemic. The breadth of ambition of the agreement is made clear in article 5, which applies the agreement in a far-reaching way to “pandemic prevention, preparedness, response and health systems recovery at national, regional and international levels”. 

Subsequent articles go on to prescribe the policies to be followed by States Parties to the agreement in each of these areas. As examples of what is intended, articles 6 and 7 set out steps to be followed to improve logistics and the workings of the global supply chain for quicker dispersal of what are euphemistically termed “pandemic-related products” (read pharmaceuticals), after which article 8 of the agreement addresses “regulatory strengthening”. Sadly, the regulatory strengthening envisaged in this agreement is not the strengthening of the accountability of national health regulators to the public, but rather the strengthening of those regulators’ accountability to the inter-governmental blob. Article 8 therefore requires signatory states to “strengthen the capacity and performance of national regulatory authorities and increase the harmonisation of regulatory requirements at the international and regional level”. In layman’s terms, more funding and powers for the regulators, yet concurrently less independent decision-making from them as well. 

Subsequent articles further limit the discretion of national health authorities in responding to future WHO designated pandemics. Article 11 requires signatory states to “adopt policies and strategies… consistent with… the International Health Regulations” (themselves the target of amendment by the WHO), while article 15 stresses “the need to coordinate, collaborate and cooperate, in the spirit of international solidarity” with the various bodies active in the international healthcare space in the formulation of policies and guidelines. There are references to “establishing appropriate governance arrangements”, presumably well away from potentially meddlesome interference by elected representatives. These governance arrangements are to be complete with “mechanisms that ensure global, regional and national policy decisions are science and evidence-based”. Think blanket mask and vaccine mandates.

Signatory states will also have to take part in “multi-country or regional tabletop exercises every two years” to prepare them for the next pandemic, presumably to ensure that all health authorities remain fully briefed on the acceptable line to take in the event of any such new pandemic being declared, and to deter any of the signatory states from being tempted to go off-script as Sweden did in 2020. 

Last but not least, a plethora of comfortable sinecures will be created for the international administrative class, by way of the creation of a governing body for the agreement under article 20, a consultative body for input into decision making by amorphous inter-governmental stakeholders under article 21, and a secretariat under article 24. 

Conspicuously lacking in the agreement is any reference to democracy, elected legislatures, or the necessity of regulators and health authorities being accountable to national electorates. Instead, the treaty represents a brazen attempt to further move health policy away from regional or national governments and into the hands of a rarefied class of globalist administrators. 

It should be stressed that the current text is only a draft, and that it may be subject to amendments following discussion between the WHO and member states. Further, even if the U.K. does sign this agreement, it will likely require ratification by Parliament under the Constitutional Reform and Governance Act 2010, and will also require implementation via domestic legislation before it will have any domestic legal effect in the U.K. Sustained pressure now on ministers and MPs might just influence any U.K. Government proposals to amend the treaty at draft stage, or alternatively such pressure might conceivably prevent the U.K. Government from signing an unacceptably worded agreement in the first place. Either way, now is the time for action to prevent the crystallisation at international level of the very policies and approaches many of us have railed against at national level for the last three years.

Adam Cross (a pseudonym) is a U.K. qualified barrister specialising in international trade law, with both public and private sector experience.

Tags: COVID-19DemocracyGlobalismLockdownMandatory VaccinesMask MandatesPandemic treatyVaccineVaccine PassportsWHO

Donate

We depend on your donations to keep this site going. Please give what you can.

Donate Today

Comment on this Article

You’ll need to set up an account to comment if you don’t already have one. We ask for a minimum donation of £5 if you'd like to make a comment or post in our Forums.

Sign Up
Previous Post

Report Behind Climate Change Act Overestimated Weather and Climate Damage by $1 Trillion

Next Post

ONS Admits Vaccine Effectiveness Data Are Flawed

Subscribe
Login
Notify of
Please log in to comment

To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.

Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.

50 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

NEWSLETTER

View today’s newsletter

To receive our latest news in the form of a daily email, enter your details here:

DONATE

PODCAST

The Sceptic | Episode 43: William Yarwood on Labour’s Welfare Farce, Niall Gooch on Catholicism vs Lib Dems & Tilak Doshi on Trump’s Climate Science Fightback

by Richard Eldred
4 July 2025
0

LISTED ARTICLES

  • Most Read
  • Most Commented
  • Editor’s Picks

News Round-Up

4 July 2025
by Richard Eldred

The UK’s Crisis Point is Fast Approaching

3 July 2025
by Dr David McGrogan

Met Office Caught Deliberately Choosing an Unrealistic Scenario to Predict Climate Doomsday

4 July 2025
by Will Jones

Aberdeen’s Ditching of ESG Proves the Green Finance Revolution is Dead

4 July 2025
by Tilak Doshi

French Police Puncture Migrant Boats at Sea for First Time

4 July 2025
by Will Jones

Jeremy Corbyn “Launches New Hard-Left Party” to Oppose Gaza “Genocide”

39

French Police Puncture Migrant Boats at Sea for First Time

28

The UK’s Crisis Point is Fast Approaching

47

News Round-Up

21

Ofcom Still Isn’t Sure What a Woman is – But it’s Sure There’s Going to be a Climate Apocalypse

15

Aberdeen’s Ditching of ESG Proves the Green Finance Revolution is Dead

4 July 2025
by Tilak Doshi

The UK’s Crisis Point is Fast Approaching

3 July 2025
by Dr David McGrogan

Does Mass Immigration Cause Homelessness?

3 July 2025
by Noah Carl

Manchester Art Gallery’s New Hyper-Woke Exhibition Shows it Has Lost its Way

3 July 2025
by Dr Roger Watson

The Emergence of the National Dealth Service

3 July 2025
by James Alexander

POSTS BY DATE

March 2023
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031  
« Feb   Apr »

SOCIAL LINKS

Free Speech Union

NEWSLETTER

View today’s newsletter

To receive our latest news in the form of a daily email, enter your details here:

POSTS BY DATE

March 2023
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031  
« Feb   Apr »

DONATE

LISTED ARTICLES

  • Most Read
  • Most Commented
  • Editor’s Picks

News Round-Up

4 July 2025
by Richard Eldred

The UK’s Crisis Point is Fast Approaching

3 July 2025
by Dr David McGrogan

Met Office Caught Deliberately Choosing an Unrealistic Scenario to Predict Climate Doomsday

4 July 2025
by Will Jones

Aberdeen’s Ditching of ESG Proves the Green Finance Revolution is Dead

4 July 2025
by Tilak Doshi

French Police Puncture Migrant Boats at Sea for First Time

4 July 2025
by Will Jones

Jeremy Corbyn “Launches New Hard-Left Party” to Oppose Gaza “Genocide”

39

French Police Puncture Migrant Boats at Sea for First Time

28

The UK’s Crisis Point is Fast Approaching

47

News Round-Up

21

Ofcom Still Isn’t Sure What a Woman is – But it’s Sure There’s Going to be a Climate Apocalypse

15

Aberdeen’s Ditching of ESG Proves the Green Finance Revolution is Dead

4 July 2025
by Tilak Doshi

The UK’s Crisis Point is Fast Approaching

3 July 2025
by Dr David McGrogan

Does Mass Immigration Cause Homelessness?

3 July 2025
by Noah Carl

Manchester Art Gallery’s New Hyper-Woke Exhibition Shows it Has Lost its Way

3 July 2025
by Dr Roger Watson

The Emergence of the National Dealth Service

3 July 2025
by James Alexander

SOCIAL LINKS

Free Speech Union
  • Home
  • About us
  • Donate
  • Privacy Policy

Facebook

  • X

Instagram

RSS

Subscribe to our newsletter

© Skeptics Ltd.

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password? Sign Up

Create New Account!

Fill the forms below to register

All fields are required. Log In

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
No Result
View All Result
  • Articles
  • About
  • Archive
    • ARCHIVE
    • NEWS ROUND-UPS
  • Podcasts
  • Newsletter
  • Premium
  • Donate
  • Log In

© Skeptics Ltd.

wpDiscuz
You are going to send email to

Move Comment