Spike protein colle...
 
Notifications
Clear all

Spike protein collects in ovaries and bone marrow according to Pfizer data from Japan.

21 Posts
9 Users
0 Reactions
5,804 Views
Posts: 36
(@freeman-exiled)
Joined: 4 years ago

Here are some links to the report referenced.

Orginal study in Japanese
https://www.pmda.go.jp/drugs/2021/P20210212001/672212000_30300AMX00231_I100_1.pdf

English translation
https://www.naturalnews.com/files/Pfizer-bio-distribution-confidential-document-translated-to-english.pdf

This is part of the video that was banned by youtube,
https://www.bitchute.com/video/7hGYudt01MNm/
Short outake similar segment
https://www.youtube.com/watch?app=desktop&v=aMB1dRJNHe8&feature=youtu.be

(One of many, not msm, sites carrying this article)
https://www.globalresearch.ca/inventor-mrna-technology-vaccine-causes-lipid-nanoparticles-accumulate-high-concentrations-ovaries/5748020
"Prior to the study’s disclosure, the public was led to believe by regulators and vaccine developers that the spike protein produced by mRNA COVID vaccines stayed in the shoulder where it was injected and was not biologically active"

"The mRNA — or messenger RNA — is what tells the body to manufacture the spike protein. The lipid nanoparticles are like the “boxes” the mRNA is shipped in, according to Malone. “If you find lipid nanoparticles in an organ or tissue, that tells you the drug got to that location,” Malone explained."

"According to the data in the Japanese study, lipid nanoparticles were found in the whole blood circulating throughout the body within four hours, and then settled in large concentrations in the ovaries, bone marrow and lymph nodes."

So far nobody has explained what is happening once the lipids nanoparticles get to the other organs.
Speculation that it could cause leukemia, infertility , organ damage other long term unknown effects becuase hey they're still experimental.

"30–99% of administered nanoparticles will accumulate and sequester in the liver after administration into the body. This results in reduced delivery to the targeted diseased tissue and potentially leads to increased toxicity at the hepatic cellular level."

"The use of nanoparticles as drug carriers may reduce the toxicity of the incorporated drug but it is sometimes difficult to distinguish the toxicity of the drug from that of the nanoparticle. "
https://ec.europa.eu/health/scientific_committees/opinions_layman/en/nanotechnologies/index.htm#6

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0168365916300190

Reply
Posts: 1539
(@miahoneybee)
Joined: 4 years ago

Very informative posts freeman exiled.. jmc...and Mike thank you...
Doobeedoobeedo 😆 😆 😆 😆 😆
That made me laugh out loud... 😆 😆

Reply
Posts: 615
 jmc
(@jmc)
Joined: 4 years ago

So far nobody has explained what is happening once the lipids nanoparticles get to the other organs.
Speculation that it could cause leukemia, infertility , organ damage other long term unknown effects becuase hey they're still experimental.

The WTF moment for me while reading through the mRNA Vaccine literature was when they started discussing the self adjuvant properties of the LNP package for the mRNA vaccines. The way the nano particles trigger the immune system. Or rather the effect happened but they had no real idea of the actual mechanisms involved.

From reading the rest of the vaccine literature it became obvious that only very few adjuvants are approved for mass use vaccines precisely because only a few have a large body of field and clinical data going back over decades that indicate the way the interact with the immune system and long term effects. Even so the preferred vaccines from a product safety point are those that dont need adjuvants.

The overwhelming impression I got from the current research of how mRNA-LNP interacts with the immune system short term let alone long term is that it could be useful for very specific low use / high risk scenarios (like an ebola) but for mass vaccination for a low health risk endemic infectious disease it was utterly irresponsible to use when so little is known about the interactions with the immune system quite separate from the delivery of any vaccine package.

This is one very serious problem that the adenovirus and attenuated virus vaccines dont have.

Reply
Posts: 125
(@halfhearted)
Joined: 3 years ago

Brett Weinstein (biologist) with Dr. Robert Malone (the inventor of mRNA Vaccine technology) analyse data obtained via FOI.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Tb_7E12VDE4
That YouTube video has been removed. Weinstein was punished by YT for daring to mention Ivermectin in a stream. Him and his partner have now moved their podcast "Dark Horse" to Odysee.com and who can blame them. Greater openness has been shown by the FDA who have just admitted that there is a slightly elevated risk of myocarditis/pericarditis resulting from the Pfizer & Moderna mRNA vaccines. https://www.fda.gov/news-events/press-announcements/coronavirus-covid-19-update-june-25-2021

Reply
Posts: 586
(@speedstick)
Joined: 4 years ago

Fon your mistruths are collapsing like the government's.
Josef Goebbels really had nothing on you did he Fon.
Does Fon stand for Full Of Nonsense?????

Reply
Page 2 / 5
Share:
May 2024
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031  
Free Speech Union

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Create New Account!

Please note: To be able to comment on our articles you'll need to be a registered donor

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.