What difference has...
 
Notifications
Clear all

What difference has vaccine made?

63 Posts
19 Users
1 Reactions
11.8 K Views
Posts: 1356
 fon
Topic starter
(@fon)
Joined: 3 years ago

I'll try to show what difference vaccine has made.

John Campbell
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uJrfPFTk3pU
claims it has lessened the link between cases and severe illness. To back his belief, he had shown this graph:

The first row show the number of "cases" observed in a week in september 2020, while the third row shows the number of people admitted to hospital a week later. The figures are 2838 cases versus 243 admissions,i.e. equal to 9% of cases detected the week before.

To make the contrast Campbell, on the second row he gives the number of "cases" observed in recent a week in May 2021, while the last row shows the number of people admitted to hospital a week later. The figures are 2744 cases and 108 admissions. i.e. equal to 3.9% of cases detected the week before.

Hence, in the period after vaccination the number of cases is down a few percent while the number admitted (compared to cases detected) is down to only to 44.4% of what might have been expected before vaccination.

Thus it looks like vaccination greatly reduces pressure on the health service. And that is the difference vaccine has made.

62 Replies
Posts: 1356
 fon
Topic starter
(@fon)
Joined: 3 years ago

The difference is even more stark with the newest data.
The protection against servere covid19/hospitalisation even against the indian/delta varient ois between 85% and 88%, as this plot shows:

My advice, get jabbed, FFS!

Reply
MikeAustin
Posts: 1191
(@mikeaustin)
Joined: 4 years ago

The difference is even more stark with the newest data.
The protection against servere covid19/hospitalisation even against the indian/delta varient ois between 85% and 88%, as this plot shows:

Screenshot 2021-06-14 at 21.34.21.png

My advice, get jabbed, FFS!

There are, of course, the 1,296 jab-related deaths (1 in 31,000) plus unknown long-term effects, but I will put that to one side for the moment.

We would need the figures for hospitalisations due to some of the 922,596 adverse reactions from the jabs in the Yellow Card Reports to come to any conclusion on net hospitalisation. Boris said today that admissions had gone up but did not qualify them as covid. I smelled a rat there (well, two in total actually).

Then also, Dr Peter McCullough in an interview with Reiner Fuellmich estimates that 85% of the covid deaths in the USA could have been avoided if there had been nearly stage treatment with a variety of safe and cheap medicines such as hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin. And one need only look at what happened in India since ivermectin was approved. Deaths and cases reduced drastically. Another advantage was that it kept the BBC away!

It is quite clear that big pharma is using its influence to block these treatments. There is money in the jabs - and possibly a lot more in terms of a power grab. So, whether one is pro or anti these jabs, there are cheaper, proven alternatives.

Reply
Posts: 1539
(@miahoneybee)
Joined: 4 years ago

Any figures from the grubbyment are not to be trusted...
Lower the cycle of the pcr test = less cases= experimental vaccines success for doris wanksock and co = bullshit.

Reply
Posts: 1356
 fon
Topic starter
(@fon)
Joined: 3 years ago

The difference is even more stark with the newest data.
The protection against servere covid19/hospitalisation even against the indian/delta varient ois between 85% and 88%, as this plot shows:

Screenshot 2021-06-14 at 21.34.21.png

My advice, get jabbed, FFS!

There is money in the jabs - and possibly a lot more in terms of a power grab.

Not much monry since the astra zeneca vaccine is made and distributed on a not-for- profir basis, there would be more profit in ivermectin than nothing!

In any case no proper trial has ever indictated ivermectin is usrful, it is another of your many exaggerations and myths. You know I am very grateful the government continues to respond to the moderate voices, such as mine, and continues to totally ignore the voices of alarmists, such as yourself. You are old enough to know better and you should be deeply ashamed of yourself for the trouble you try (but singularly fail ) to cause to the health of our nation. Deep shame on you and all your ilk.

Reply
Page 1 / 12
Share:
May 2024
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031  
Free Speech Union

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Create New Account!

Please note: To be able to comment on our articles you'll need to be a registered donor

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.